challenging power series expansion
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I encountered in a text the unsupported assertion that the series expansion of
$$(1-w)^{y_1/y_2+1} + left(frac{x}{y_2z_2}right)(1-w)^{y_1/y_2} = 1$$
is
$$w = left(frac{1}{y}right)left(frac{1}{z_2}right)x
- left(frac{1}{2y^2z}right)x^2 - left(frac{1}{3y^3z^2}right)left(z_1-z_2right)x^3 - left(frac{1}{8y^4z^3}right)left(2z_1^2 - 5z_1z_2 + 2z_2^2right)x^4 + ldots
$$
for $0 le frac{x}{y_2z_2} le 1$ and given that ${ y_1, y_2, z_1, z_2 } in mathbb{N}$, $y=y_1+y_2$, $z=z_1cdot{}z_2$, $y_1z_1=y_2z_2$, and $1-w ge 0$.
The series appears to have the basic form
$$w = -sum_{i=1}^infty left(frac{x^i}{i!! cdot{} y^i z^{i-1}}right) left(??right)$$
where the term indicated by question marks lacks a recognizable pattern (${-1/z_2, 1, z_1-z_2, (2z_1-z_2)(z_1-2z_2), ldots }$).
By what approach can this series expansion be derived?
power-series
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I encountered in a text the unsupported assertion that the series expansion of
$$(1-w)^{y_1/y_2+1} + left(frac{x}{y_2z_2}right)(1-w)^{y_1/y_2} = 1$$
is
$$w = left(frac{1}{y}right)left(frac{1}{z_2}right)x
- left(frac{1}{2y^2z}right)x^2 - left(frac{1}{3y^3z^2}right)left(z_1-z_2right)x^3 - left(frac{1}{8y^4z^3}right)left(2z_1^2 - 5z_1z_2 + 2z_2^2right)x^4 + ldots
$$
for $0 le frac{x}{y_2z_2} le 1$ and given that ${ y_1, y_2, z_1, z_2 } in mathbb{N}$, $y=y_1+y_2$, $z=z_1cdot{}z_2$, $y_1z_1=y_2z_2$, and $1-w ge 0$.
The series appears to have the basic form
$$w = -sum_{i=1}^infty left(frac{x^i}{i!! cdot{} y^i z^{i-1}}right) left(??right)$$
where the term indicated by question marks lacks a recognizable pattern (${-1/z_2, 1, z_1-z_2, (2z_1-z_2)(z_1-2z_2), ldots }$).
By what approach can this series expansion be derived?
power-series
In my second answer, notice that $frac k{a+1}=frac 1{z_2(y_1+y_2)}$
– Claude Leibovici
Nov 24 at 16:55
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I encountered in a text the unsupported assertion that the series expansion of
$$(1-w)^{y_1/y_2+1} + left(frac{x}{y_2z_2}right)(1-w)^{y_1/y_2} = 1$$
is
$$w = left(frac{1}{y}right)left(frac{1}{z_2}right)x
- left(frac{1}{2y^2z}right)x^2 - left(frac{1}{3y^3z^2}right)left(z_1-z_2right)x^3 - left(frac{1}{8y^4z^3}right)left(2z_1^2 - 5z_1z_2 + 2z_2^2right)x^4 + ldots
$$
for $0 le frac{x}{y_2z_2} le 1$ and given that ${ y_1, y_2, z_1, z_2 } in mathbb{N}$, $y=y_1+y_2$, $z=z_1cdot{}z_2$, $y_1z_1=y_2z_2$, and $1-w ge 0$.
The series appears to have the basic form
$$w = -sum_{i=1}^infty left(frac{x^i}{i!! cdot{} y^i z^{i-1}}right) left(??right)$$
where the term indicated by question marks lacks a recognizable pattern (${-1/z_2, 1, z_1-z_2, (2z_1-z_2)(z_1-2z_2), ldots }$).
By what approach can this series expansion be derived?
power-series
I encountered in a text the unsupported assertion that the series expansion of
$$(1-w)^{y_1/y_2+1} + left(frac{x}{y_2z_2}right)(1-w)^{y_1/y_2} = 1$$
is
$$w = left(frac{1}{y}right)left(frac{1}{z_2}right)x
- left(frac{1}{2y^2z}right)x^2 - left(frac{1}{3y^3z^2}right)left(z_1-z_2right)x^3 - left(frac{1}{8y^4z^3}right)left(2z_1^2 - 5z_1z_2 + 2z_2^2right)x^4 + ldots
$$
for $0 le frac{x}{y_2z_2} le 1$ and given that ${ y_1, y_2, z_1, z_2 } in mathbb{N}$, $y=y_1+y_2$, $z=z_1cdot{}z_2$, $y_1z_1=y_2z_2$, and $1-w ge 0$.
The series appears to have the basic form
$$w = -sum_{i=1}^infty left(frac{x^i}{i!! cdot{} y^i z^{i-1}}right) left(??right)$$
where the term indicated by question marks lacks a recognizable pattern (${-1/z_2, 1, z_1-z_2, (2z_1-z_2)(z_1-2z_2), ldots }$).
By what approach can this series expansion be derived?
power-series
power-series
edited Nov 24 at 4:06
asked Nov 23 at 23:13
user001
25829
25829
In my second answer, notice that $frac k{a+1}=frac 1{z_2(y_1+y_2)}$
– Claude Leibovici
Nov 24 at 16:55
add a comment |
In my second answer, notice that $frac k{a+1}=frac 1{z_2(y_1+y_2)}$
– Claude Leibovici
Nov 24 at 16:55
In my second answer, notice that $frac k{a+1}=frac 1{z_2(y_1+y_2)}$
– Claude Leibovici
Nov 24 at 16:55
In my second answer, notice that $frac k{a+1}=frac 1{z_2(y_1+y_2)}$
– Claude Leibovici
Nov 24 at 16:55
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
up vote
3
down vote
accepted
The idea seems to be to write (I changed notations to make my life easier)
$$w=sum_{k=1}^n c_k,x^k$$ and to expand
$$(1-w)^{a/b+1} + left(frac{x}{bz}right)(1-w)^{a/b} -1$$ as a Taylor series around $x=0$. Cancelling the coefficients leads to the expressions dor the $c_k$'s.
Doing it, we get
$$ 0=left(-frac{a c_1}{b}-c_1+frac{1}{b z}right)x+frac{ left((a+b) left(a
c_1^2-2 c_2 bright)-frac{2 a c_1}{z}right)}{2 b^2}x^2-frac{ left(6 c_3
b^2 z (a+b)-6 a c_2 b (c_1 z (a+b)-1)+a c_1^2 (a-b) (c_1 z
(a+b)-3)right)}{6 b^3 z}x^3+Oleft(x^4right)$$ from which, using more terms, gives the following
$$left(
begin{array}{cc}
k & c_k \
1 & frac{1}{(a+b) z} \
2 & -frac{a}{2 b (a+b)^2 z^2} \
3 & frac{a (a-b)}{3 b^2 (a+b)^3 z^3} \
4 & -frac{a (a-2 b) (2 a-b)}{8 b^3 (a+b)^4 z^4} \
5 & frac{a (a-3 b) (a-b) (3 a-b)}{15 b^4 (a+b)^5 z^5} \
6 & -frac{a (a-4 b) (2 a-3 b) (3 a-2 b) (4 a-b)}{144 b^5 (a+b)^6 z^6} \
7 & frac{a (a-5 b) (a-2 b) (a-b) (2 a-b) (5 a-b)}{70 b^6 (a+b)^7 z^7} \
8 & -frac{a (a-6 b) (2 a-5 b) (3 a-4 b) (4 a-3 b) (5 a-2 b) (6 a-b)}{5760 b^7
(a+b)^8 z^8} \
9 & frac{a (a-7 b) (3 a-5 b) (a-3 b) (5 a-3 b) (a-b) (3 a-b) (7 a-b)}{2835 b^8
(a+b)^9 z^9} \
10 & -frac{a (a-8 b) (2 a-7 b) (4 a-5 b) (5 a-4 b) (a-2 b) (7 a-2 b) (2 a-b) (8
a-b)}{44800 b^9 (a+b)^{10} z^{10}}
end{array}
right)$$
Impressive. I'm not sure that I completely follow your logic, so I proceeded by considering the $1-w$ equation as an implicit function of $x$ such that $w=f(x)$. I then began to construct a Taylor series by implicit differentiation about the point $x=0$. Doing so gave for the $k=1$ term $frac{f^{(1)}(0)}{1!}x = 1/(z(a+b))$, which matches your $c_1$ term; $f^{(1)}(x)=df/dx$ was found to be $frac{1}{bz*(a/b + 1 + ax/(b^2z(1-w)))}$. I was not able to relate this directly to your expression $-ac_1/b - c_1 +1/(bz)$. Would you care to elaborate on how you obtained that intermediate? Many thanks.
– user001
Nov 24 at 8:24
@user001. Just replace $w$ by the series and use the binomial expansion. By the way, you are very welcome ! Cheers.
– Claude Leibovici
Nov 24 at 8:29
When you say to replace $w$ by the series and then to use the binomial expansion, do you mean to apply the generalized binomial expansion ($(1+x)^{alpha} = sum_{k=0}^infty {alpha choose k} x^k$) to $(1 - sum_{k=1}^n c_k x^k)^{a/b+1} + frac{x}{bz}(1-sum_{k=1}^n c_k x^k)^{a/b} - 1 = 0$? Merci beaucoup!
– user001
Nov 24 at 9:20
@user001. This is the way !
– Claude Leibovici
Nov 24 at 9:22
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
I prefer to add another answer since changing quite many things.
Let first $$a=frac {y_1}{y_2}qquad k=frac 1 {y_2,z_2}qquad text{and define} qquad
w=asum_{i=1}^n (-1)^{i-1}, c_i, left(frac{k}{a+1}right)^i x^i $$ Now, much clearer (I think) that in my previous answer, the coefficients are
$$left(
begin{array}{cc}
i & text{coefficient } c_i \
1 & frac{1}{a} \
2 & frac{1}{2} \
3 & frac{1}{3}(a-1) \
4 & frac{1}{8} (a-2) (2 a-1) \
5 & frac{1}{15} (a-3) (a-1) (3 a-1) \
6 & frac{1}{144} (a-4) (2 a-3) (3 a-2) (4 a-1) \
7 & frac{1}{70} (a-5) (a-2) (a-1) (2 a-1) (5 a-1) \
8 & frac{1}{5760} (a-6) (2 a-5) (3 a-4) (4 a-3) (5 a-2) (6 a-1)\
9 & frac{1}{2835}(a-7) (a-3) (a-1) (3 a-5) (3 a-1) (5 a-3) (7 a-1) \
10 & frac{1}{44800}(a-8) (a-2) (2 a-7) (2 a-1) (4 a-5) (5 a-4) (7 a-2) (8 a-1) \
11 &frac{1}{49896}(a-9) (a-4) (a-1) (2 a-3) (3 a-7) (3 a-2) (4 a-1) (7 a-3) (9 a-1)
end{array}
right)$$
Unfortunately, the sequence ${2,3,8,15,144,70,5760,2835,44800,49896}$ or its subsequences do not appear in $OEIS$.
You can notice two different patterns depending on the parity of $i$.
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
3
down vote
accepted
The idea seems to be to write (I changed notations to make my life easier)
$$w=sum_{k=1}^n c_k,x^k$$ and to expand
$$(1-w)^{a/b+1} + left(frac{x}{bz}right)(1-w)^{a/b} -1$$ as a Taylor series around $x=0$. Cancelling the coefficients leads to the expressions dor the $c_k$'s.
Doing it, we get
$$ 0=left(-frac{a c_1}{b}-c_1+frac{1}{b z}right)x+frac{ left((a+b) left(a
c_1^2-2 c_2 bright)-frac{2 a c_1}{z}right)}{2 b^2}x^2-frac{ left(6 c_3
b^2 z (a+b)-6 a c_2 b (c_1 z (a+b)-1)+a c_1^2 (a-b) (c_1 z
(a+b)-3)right)}{6 b^3 z}x^3+Oleft(x^4right)$$ from which, using more terms, gives the following
$$left(
begin{array}{cc}
k & c_k \
1 & frac{1}{(a+b) z} \
2 & -frac{a}{2 b (a+b)^2 z^2} \
3 & frac{a (a-b)}{3 b^2 (a+b)^3 z^3} \
4 & -frac{a (a-2 b) (2 a-b)}{8 b^3 (a+b)^4 z^4} \
5 & frac{a (a-3 b) (a-b) (3 a-b)}{15 b^4 (a+b)^5 z^5} \
6 & -frac{a (a-4 b) (2 a-3 b) (3 a-2 b) (4 a-b)}{144 b^5 (a+b)^6 z^6} \
7 & frac{a (a-5 b) (a-2 b) (a-b) (2 a-b) (5 a-b)}{70 b^6 (a+b)^7 z^7} \
8 & -frac{a (a-6 b) (2 a-5 b) (3 a-4 b) (4 a-3 b) (5 a-2 b) (6 a-b)}{5760 b^7
(a+b)^8 z^8} \
9 & frac{a (a-7 b) (3 a-5 b) (a-3 b) (5 a-3 b) (a-b) (3 a-b) (7 a-b)}{2835 b^8
(a+b)^9 z^9} \
10 & -frac{a (a-8 b) (2 a-7 b) (4 a-5 b) (5 a-4 b) (a-2 b) (7 a-2 b) (2 a-b) (8
a-b)}{44800 b^9 (a+b)^{10} z^{10}}
end{array}
right)$$
Impressive. I'm not sure that I completely follow your logic, so I proceeded by considering the $1-w$ equation as an implicit function of $x$ such that $w=f(x)$. I then began to construct a Taylor series by implicit differentiation about the point $x=0$. Doing so gave for the $k=1$ term $frac{f^{(1)}(0)}{1!}x = 1/(z(a+b))$, which matches your $c_1$ term; $f^{(1)}(x)=df/dx$ was found to be $frac{1}{bz*(a/b + 1 + ax/(b^2z(1-w)))}$. I was not able to relate this directly to your expression $-ac_1/b - c_1 +1/(bz)$. Would you care to elaborate on how you obtained that intermediate? Many thanks.
– user001
Nov 24 at 8:24
@user001. Just replace $w$ by the series and use the binomial expansion. By the way, you are very welcome ! Cheers.
– Claude Leibovici
Nov 24 at 8:29
When you say to replace $w$ by the series and then to use the binomial expansion, do you mean to apply the generalized binomial expansion ($(1+x)^{alpha} = sum_{k=0}^infty {alpha choose k} x^k$) to $(1 - sum_{k=1}^n c_k x^k)^{a/b+1} + frac{x}{bz}(1-sum_{k=1}^n c_k x^k)^{a/b} - 1 = 0$? Merci beaucoup!
– user001
Nov 24 at 9:20
@user001. This is the way !
– Claude Leibovici
Nov 24 at 9:22
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
accepted
The idea seems to be to write (I changed notations to make my life easier)
$$w=sum_{k=1}^n c_k,x^k$$ and to expand
$$(1-w)^{a/b+1} + left(frac{x}{bz}right)(1-w)^{a/b} -1$$ as a Taylor series around $x=0$. Cancelling the coefficients leads to the expressions dor the $c_k$'s.
Doing it, we get
$$ 0=left(-frac{a c_1}{b}-c_1+frac{1}{b z}right)x+frac{ left((a+b) left(a
c_1^2-2 c_2 bright)-frac{2 a c_1}{z}right)}{2 b^2}x^2-frac{ left(6 c_3
b^2 z (a+b)-6 a c_2 b (c_1 z (a+b)-1)+a c_1^2 (a-b) (c_1 z
(a+b)-3)right)}{6 b^3 z}x^3+Oleft(x^4right)$$ from which, using more terms, gives the following
$$left(
begin{array}{cc}
k & c_k \
1 & frac{1}{(a+b) z} \
2 & -frac{a}{2 b (a+b)^2 z^2} \
3 & frac{a (a-b)}{3 b^2 (a+b)^3 z^3} \
4 & -frac{a (a-2 b) (2 a-b)}{8 b^3 (a+b)^4 z^4} \
5 & frac{a (a-3 b) (a-b) (3 a-b)}{15 b^4 (a+b)^5 z^5} \
6 & -frac{a (a-4 b) (2 a-3 b) (3 a-2 b) (4 a-b)}{144 b^5 (a+b)^6 z^6} \
7 & frac{a (a-5 b) (a-2 b) (a-b) (2 a-b) (5 a-b)}{70 b^6 (a+b)^7 z^7} \
8 & -frac{a (a-6 b) (2 a-5 b) (3 a-4 b) (4 a-3 b) (5 a-2 b) (6 a-b)}{5760 b^7
(a+b)^8 z^8} \
9 & frac{a (a-7 b) (3 a-5 b) (a-3 b) (5 a-3 b) (a-b) (3 a-b) (7 a-b)}{2835 b^8
(a+b)^9 z^9} \
10 & -frac{a (a-8 b) (2 a-7 b) (4 a-5 b) (5 a-4 b) (a-2 b) (7 a-2 b) (2 a-b) (8
a-b)}{44800 b^9 (a+b)^{10} z^{10}}
end{array}
right)$$
Impressive. I'm not sure that I completely follow your logic, so I proceeded by considering the $1-w$ equation as an implicit function of $x$ such that $w=f(x)$. I then began to construct a Taylor series by implicit differentiation about the point $x=0$. Doing so gave for the $k=1$ term $frac{f^{(1)}(0)}{1!}x = 1/(z(a+b))$, which matches your $c_1$ term; $f^{(1)}(x)=df/dx$ was found to be $frac{1}{bz*(a/b + 1 + ax/(b^2z(1-w)))}$. I was not able to relate this directly to your expression $-ac_1/b - c_1 +1/(bz)$. Would you care to elaborate on how you obtained that intermediate? Many thanks.
– user001
Nov 24 at 8:24
@user001. Just replace $w$ by the series and use the binomial expansion. By the way, you are very welcome ! Cheers.
– Claude Leibovici
Nov 24 at 8:29
When you say to replace $w$ by the series and then to use the binomial expansion, do you mean to apply the generalized binomial expansion ($(1+x)^{alpha} = sum_{k=0}^infty {alpha choose k} x^k$) to $(1 - sum_{k=1}^n c_k x^k)^{a/b+1} + frac{x}{bz}(1-sum_{k=1}^n c_k x^k)^{a/b} - 1 = 0$? Merci beaucoup!
– user001
Nov 24 at 9:20
@user001. This is the way !
– Claude Leibovici
Nov 24 at 9:22
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
accepted
up vote
3
down vote
accepted
The idea seems to be to write (I changed notations to make my life easier)
$$w=sum_{k=1}^n c_k,x^k$$ and to expand
$$(1-w)^{a/b+1} + left(frac{x}{bz}right)(1-w)^{a/b} -1$$ as a Taylor series around $x=0$. Cancelling the coefficients leads to the expressions dor the $c_k$'s.
Doing it, we get
$$ 0=left(-frac{a c_1}{b}-c_1+frac{1}{b z}right)x+frac{ left((a+b) left(a
c_1^2-2 c_2 bright)-frac{2 a c_1}{z}right)}{2 b^2}x^2-frac{ left(6 c_3
b^2 z (a+b)-6 a c_2 b (c_1 z (a+b)-1)+a c_1^2 (a-b) (c_1 z
(a+b)-3)right)}{6 b^3 z}x^3+Oleft(x^4right)$$ from which, using more terms, gives the following
$$left(
begin{array}{cc}
k & c_k \
1 & frac{1}{(a+b) z} \
2 & -frac{a}{2 b (a+b)^2 z^2} \
3 & frac{a (a-b)}{3 b^2 (a+b)^3 z^3} \
4 & -frac{a (a-2 b) (2 a-b)}{8 b^3 (a+b)^4 z^4} \
5 & frac{a (a-3 b) (a-b) (3 a-b)}{15 b^4 (a+b)^5 z^5} \
6 & -frac{a (a-4 b) (2 a-3 b) (3 a-2 b) (4 a-b)}{144 b^5 (a+b)^6 z^6} \
7 & frac{a (a-5 b) (a-2 b) (a-b) (2 a-b) (5 a-b)}{70 b^6 (a+b)^7 z^7} \
8 & -frac{a (a-6 b) (2 a-5 b) (3 a-4 b) (4 a-3 b) (5 a-2 b) (6 a-b)}{5760 b^7
(a+b)^8 z^8} \
9 & frac{a (a-7 b) (3 a-5 b) (a-3 b) (5 a-3 b) (a-b) (3 a-b) (7 a-b)}{2835 b^8
(a+b)^9 z^9} \
10 & -frac{a (a-8 b) (2 a-7 b) (4 a-5 b) (5 a-4 b) (a-2 b) (7 a-2 b) (2 a-b) (8
a-b)}{44800 b^9 (a+b)^{10} z^{10}}
end{array}
right)$$
The idea seems to be to write (I changed notations to make my life easier)
$$w=sum_{k=1}^n c_k,x^k$$ and to expand
$$(1-w)^{a/b+1} + left(frac{x}{bz}right)(1-w)^{a/b} -1$$ as a Taylor series around $x=0$. Cancelling the coefficients leads to the expressions dor the $c_k$'s.
Doing it, we get
$$ 0=left(-frac{a c_1}{b}-c_1+frac{1}{b z}right)x+frac{ left((a+b) left(a
c_1^2-2 c_2 bright)-frac{2 a c_1}{z}right)}{2 b^2}x^2-frac{ left(6 c_3
b^2 z (a+b)-6 a c_2 b (c_1 z (a+b)-1)+a c_1^2 (a-b) (c_1 z
(a+b)-3)right)}{6 b^3 z}x^3+Oleft(x^4right)$$ from which, using more terms, gives the following
$$left(
begin{array}{cc}
k & c_k \
1 & frac{1}{(a+b) z} \
2 & -frac{a}{2 b (a+b)^2 z^2} \
3 & frac{a (a-b)}{3 b^2 (a+b)^3 z^3} \
4 & -frac{a (a-2 b) (2 a-b)}{8 b^3 (a+b)^4 z^4} \
5 & frac{a (a-3 b) (a-b) (3 a-b)}{15 b^4 (a+b)^5 z^5} \
6 & -frac{a (a-4 b) (2 a-3 b) (3 a-2 b) (4 a-b)}{144 b^5 (a+b)^6 z^6} \
7 & frac{a (a-5 b) (a-2 b) (a-b) (2 a-b) (5 a-b)}{70 b^6 (a+b)^7 z^7} \
8 & -frac{a (a-6 b) (2 a-5 b) (3 a-4 b) (4 a-3 b) (5 a-2 b) (6 a-b)}{5760 b^7
(a+b)^8 z^8} \
9 & frac{a (a-7 b) (3 a-5 b) (a-3 b) (5 a-3 b) (a-b) (3 a-b) (7 a-b)}{2835 b^8
(a+b)^9 z^9} \
10 & -frac{a (a-8 b) (2 a-7 b) (4 a-5 b) (5 a-4 b) (a-2 b) (7 a-2 b) (2 a-b) (8
a-b)}{44800 b^9 (a+b)^{10} z^{10}}
end{array}
right)$$
edited Nov 24 at 8:50
answered Nov 24 at 6:52
Claude Leibovici
117k1156131
117k1156131
Impressive. I'm not sure that I completely follow your logic, so I proceeded by considering the $1-w$ equation as an implicit function of $x$ such that $w=f(x)$. I then began to construct a Taylor series by implicit differentiation about the point $x=0$. Doing so gave for the $k=1$ term $frac{f^{(1)}(0)}{1!}x = 1/(z(a+b))$, which matches your $c_1$ term; $f^{(1)}(x)=df/dx$ was found to be $frac{1}{bz*(a/b + 1 + ax/(b^2z(1-w)))}$. I was not able to relate this directly to your expression $-ac_1/b - c_1 +1/(bz)$. Would you care to elaborate on how you obtained that intermediate? Many thanks.
– user001
Nov 24 at 8:24
@user001. Just replace $w$ by the series and use the binomial expansion. By the way, you are very welcome ! Cheers.
– Claude Leibovici
Nov 24 at 8:29
When you say to replace $w$ by the series and then to use the binomial expansion, do you mean to apply the generalized binomial expansion ($(1+x)^{alpha} = sum_{k=0}^infty {alpha choose k} x^k$) to $(1 - sum_{k=1}^n c_k x^k)^{a/b+1} + frac{x}{bz}(1-sum_{k=1}^n c_k x^k)^{a/b} - 1 = 0$? Merci beaucoup!
– user001
Nov 24 at 9:20
@user001. This is the way !
– Claude Leibovici
Nov 24 at 9:22
add a comment |
Impressive. I'm not sure that I completely follow your logic, so I proceeded by considering the $1-w$ equation as an implicit function of $x$ such that $w=f(x)$. I then began to construct a Taylor series by implicit differentiation about the point $x=0$. Doing so gave for the $k=1$ term $frac{f^{(1)}(0)}{1!}x = 1/(z(a+b))$, which matches your $c_1$ term; $f^{(1)}(x)=df/dx$ was found to be $frac{1}{bz*(a/b + 1 + ax/(b^2z(1-w)))}$. I was not able to relate this directly to your expression $-ac_1/b - c_1 +1/(bz)$. Would you care to elaborate on how you obtained that intermediate? Many thanks.
– user001
Nov 24 at 8:24
@user001. Just replace $w$ by the series and use the binomial expansion. By the way, you are very welcome ! Cheers.
– Claude Leibovici
Nov 24 at 8:29
When you say to replace $w$ by the series and then to use the binomial expansion, do you mean to apply the generalized binomial expansion ($(1+x)^{alpha} = sum_{k=0}^infty {alpha choose k} x^k$) to $(1 - sum_{k=1}^n c_k x^k)^{a/b+1} + frac{x}{bz}(1-sum_{k=1}^n c_k x^k)^{a/b} - 1 = 0$? Merci beaucoup!
– user001
Nov 24 at 9:20
@user001. This is the way !
– Claude Leibovici
Nov 24 at 9:22
Impressive. I'm not sure that I completely follow your logic, so I proceeded by considering the $1-w$ equation as an implicit function of $x$ such that $w=f(x)$. I then began to construct a Taylor series by implicit differentiation about the point $x=0$. Doing so gave for the $k=1$ term $frac{f^{(1)}(0)}{1!}x = 1/(z(a+b))$, which matches your $c_1$ term; $f^{(1)}(x)=df/dx$ was found to be $frac{1}{bz*(a/b + 1 + ax/(b^2z(1-w)))}$. I was not able to relate this directly to your expression $-ac_1/b - c_1 +1/(bz)$. Would you care to elaborate on how you obtained that intermediate? Many thanks.
– user001
Nov 24 at 8:24
Impressive. I'm not sure that I completely follow your logic, so I proceeded by considering the $1-w$ equation as an implicit function of $x$ such that $w=f(x)$. I then began to construct a Taylor series by implicit differentiation about the point $x=0$. Doing so gave for the $k=1$ term $frac{f^{(1)}(0)}{1!}x = 1/(z(a+b))$, which matches your $c_1$ term; $f^{(1)}(x)=df/dx$ was found to be $frac{1}{bz*(a/b + 1 + ax/(b^2z(1-w)))}$. I was not able to relate this directly to your expression $-ac_1/b - c_1 +1/(bz)$. Would you care to elaborate on how you obtained that intermediate? Many thanks.
– user001
Nov 24 at 8:24
@user001. Just replace $w$ by the series and use the binomial expansion. By the way, you are very welcome ! Cheers.
– Claude Leibovici
Nov 24 at 8:29
@user001. Just replace $w$ by the series and use the binomial expansion. By the way, you are very welcome ! Cheers.
– Claude Leibovici
Nov 24 at 8:29
When you say to replace $w$ by the series and then to use the binomial expansion, do you mean to apply the generalized binomial expansion ($(1+x)^{alpha} = sum_{k=0}^infty {alpha choose k} x^k$) to $(1 - sum_{k=1}^n c_k x^k)^{a/b+1} + frac{x}{bz}(1-sum_{k=1}^n c_k x^k)^{a/b} - 1 = 0$? Merci beaucoup!
– user001
Nov 24 at 9:20
When you say to replace $w$ by the series and then to use the binomial expansion, do you mean to apply the generalized binomial expansion ($(1+x)^{alpha} = sum_{k=0}^infty {alpha choose k} x^k$) to $(1 - sum_{k=1}^n c_k x^k)^{a/b+1} + frac{x}{bz}(1-sum_{k=1}^n c_k x^k)^{a/b} - 1 = 0$? Merci beaucoup!
– user001
Nov 24 at 9:20
@user001. This is the way !
– Claude Leibovici
Nov 24 at 9:22
@user001. This is the way !
– Claude Leibovici
Nov 24 at 9:22
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
I prefer to add another answer since changing quite many things.
Let first $$a=frac {y_1}{y_2}qquad k=frac 1 {y_2,z_2}qquad text{and define} qquad
w=asum_{i=1}^n (-1)^{i-1}, c_i, left(frac{k}{a+1}right)^i x^i $$ Now, much clearer (I think) that in my previous answer, the coefficients are
$$left(
begin{array}{cc}
i & text{coefficient } c_i \
1 & frac{1}{a} \
2 & frac{1}{2} \
3 & frac{1}{3}(a-1) \
4 & frac{1}{8} (a-2) (2 a-1) \
5 & frac{1}{15} (a-3) (a-1) (3 a-1) \
6 & frac{1}{144} (a-4) (2 a-3) (3 a-2) (4 a-1) \
7 & frac{1}{70} (a-5) (a-2) (a-1) (2 a-1) (5 a-1) \
8 & frac{1}{5760} (a-6) (2 a-5) (3 a-4) (4 a-3) (5 a-2) (6 a-1)\
9 & frac{1}{2835}(a-7) (a-3) (a-1) (3 a-5) (3 a-1) (5 a-3) (7 a-1) \
10 & frac{1}{44800}(a-8) (a-2) (2 a-7) (2 a-1) (4 a-5) (5 a-4) (7 a-2) (8 a-1) \
11 &frac{1}{49896}(a-9) (a-4) (a-1) (2 a-3) (3 a-7) (3 a-2) (4 a-1) (7 a-3) (9 a-1)
end{array}
right)$$
Unfortunately, the sequence ${2,3,8,15,144,70,5760,2835,44800,49896}$ or its subsequences do not appear in $OEIS$.
You can notice two different patterns depending on the parity of $i$.
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
I prefer to add another answer since changing quite many things.
Let first $$a=frac {y_1}{y_2}qquad k=frac 1 {y_2,z_2}qquad text{and define} qquad
w=asum_{i=1}^n (-1)^{i-1}, c_i, left(frac{k}{a+1}right)^i x^i $$ Now, much clearer (I think) that in my previous answer, the coefficients are
$$left(
begin{array}{cc}
i & text{coefficient } c_i \
1 & frac{1}{a} \
2 & frac{1}{2} \
3 & frac{1}{3}(a-1) \
4 & frac{1}{8} (a-2) (2 a-1) \
5 & frac{1}{15} (a-3) (a-1) (3 a-1) \
6 & frac{1}{144} (a-4) (2 a-3) (3 a-2) (4 a-1) \
7 & frac{1}{70} (a-5) (a-2) (a-1) (2 a-1) (5 a-1) \
8 & frac{1}{5760} (a-6) (2 a-5) (3 a-4) (4 a-3) (5 a-2) (6 a-1)\
9 & frac{1}{2835}(a-7) (a-3) (a-1) (3 a-5) (3 a-1) (5 a-3) (7 a-1) \
10 & frac{1}{44800}(a-8) (a-2) (2 a-7) (2 a-1) (4 a-5) (5 a-4) (7 a-2) (8 a-1) \
11 &frac{1}{49896}(a-9) (a-4) (a-1) (2 a-3) (3 a-7) (3 a-2) (4 a-1) (7 a-3) (9 a-1)
end{array}
right)$$
Unfortunately, the sequence ${2,3,8,15,144,70,5760,2835,44800,49896}$ or its subsequences do not appear in $OEIS$.
You can notice two different patterns depending on the parity of $i$.
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
I prefer to add another answer since changing quite many things.
Let first $$a=frac {y_1}{y_2}qquad k=frac 1 {y_2,z_2}qquad text{and define} qquad
w=asum_{i=1}^n (-1)^{i-1}, c_i, left(frac{k}{a+1}right)^i x^i $$ Now, much clearer (I think) that in my previous answer, the coefficients are
$$left(
begin{array}{cc}
i & text{coefficient } c_i \
1 & frac{1}{a} \
2 & frac{1}{2} \
3 & frac{1}{3}(a-1) \
4 & frac{1}{8} (a-2) (2 a-1) \
5 & frac{1}{15} (a-3) (a-1) (3 a-1) \
6 & frac{1}{144} (a-4) (2 a-3) (3 a-2) (4 a-1) \
7 & frac{1}{70} (a-5) (a-2) (a-1) (2 a-1) (5 a-1) \
8 & frac{1}{5760} (a-6) (2 a-5) (3 a-4) (4 a-3) (5 a-2) (6 a-1)\
9 & frac{1}{2835}(a-7) (a-3) (a-1) (3 a-5) (3 a-1) (5 a-3) (7 a-1) \
10 & frac{1}{44800}(a-8) (a-2) (2 a-7) (2 a-1) (4 a-5) (5 a-4) (7 a-2) (8 a-1) \
11 &frac{1}{49896}(a-9) (a-4) (a-1) (2 a-3) (3 a-7) (3 a-2) (4 a-1) (7 a-3) (9 a-1)
end{array}
right)$$
Unfortunately, the sequence ${2,3,8,15,144,70,5760,2835,44800,49896}$ or its subsequences do not appear in $OEIS$.
You can notice two different patterns depending on the parity of $i$.
I prefer to add another answer since changing quite many things.
Let first $$a=frac {y_1}{y_2}qquad k=frac 1 {y_2,z_2}qquad text{and define} qquad
w=asum_{i=1}^n (-1)^{i-1}, c_i, left(frac{k}{a+1}right)^i x^i $$ Now, much clearer (I think) that in my previous answer, the coefficients are
$$left(
begin{array}{cc}
i & text{coefficient } c_i \
1 & frac{1}{a} \
2 & frac{1}{2} \
3 & frac{1}{3}(a-1) \
4 & frac{1}{8} (a-2) (2 a-1) \
5 & frac{1}{15} (a-3) (a-1) (3 a-1) \
6 & frac{1}{144} (a-4) (2 a-3) (3 a-2) (4 a-1) \
7 & frac{1}{70} (a-5) (a-2) (a-1) (2 a-1) (5 a-1) \
8 & frac{1}{5760} (a-6) (2 a-5) (3 a-4) (4 a-3) (5 a-2) (6 a-1)\
9 & frac{1}{2835}(a-7) (a-3) (a-1) (3 a-5) (3 a-1) (5 a-3) (7 a-1) \
10 & frac{1}{44800}(a-8) (a-2) (2 a-7) (2 a-1) (4 a-5) (5 a-4) (7 a-2) (8 a-1) \
11 &frac{1}{49896}(a-9) (a-4) (a-1) (2 a-3) (3 a-7) (3 a-2) (4 a-1) (7 a-3) (9 a-1)
end{array}
right)$$
Unfortunately, the sequence ${2,3,8,15,144,70,5760,2835,44800,49896}$ or its subsequences do not appear in $OEIS$.
You can notice two different patterns depending on the parity of $i$.
edited Nov 24 at 16:06
answered Nov 24 at 15:12
Claude Leibovici
117k1156131
117k1156131
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3010955%2fchallenging-power-series-expansion%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
In my second answer, notice that $frac k{a+1}=frac 1{z_2(y_1+y_2)}$
– Claude Leibovici
Nov 24 at 16:55