Condition for pullback to split
This is probably an elementary question, but I'm new to this machinery.
Let $G$ be a group and $N$ be a normal subgroup of $G$. Let $Gamma$ be another group. Suppose we have a homomorphism $phi:Gamma to G/N$.
Now we have the homomorphism $phi:Gamma to G/N$ and the canonical quotient homomorphism $psi:G to G/N$.
Denote by $H$ the pullback of the two homomorphisms to $G/N$. That is, $H subseteq G times Gamma$ comprising elements $(g,gamma)$ such that $phi(gamma)=psi(g) in G/N$.
So we have the following two diagrams:
$$1 rightarrow N rightarrow Gstackrel{psi}{rightarrow} G/Nrightarrow 1$$
which is a short exact sequence, and another diagram
$$begin{array}
GG & stackrel{psi}{longrightarrow} & G/N\
uparrow & & uparrow{phi} \
H & longrightarrow & Gamma
end{array}
$$
Is the following also a commutative diagram?
$$begin{array}
11 & longrightarrow & N & longrightarrow & G & stackrel{psi}{longrightarrow} & G/N & longrightarrow & 1\
& & uparrow & & uparrow & & uparrow{phi} & & \
1 & longrightarrow & N & longrightarrow & H & longrightarrow & Gamma & longrightarrow & 1\
end{array}
$$
That is, can $N$ be embedded in the pullback $H$?
Secondly, suppose the map $phi:Gamma to G/N$ can be lifted to a map $phi':Gamma to G$ so that we have a commuting diagram bypassing $H$. In this case, is $H$ a semidirect product of $N$ and $Gamma$?
In other words, is the bottom exact sequence split when $phi$ can be lifted diagonally to $G$, and is the converse true too?
Thanks!
abstract-algebra group-theory category-theory exact-sequence diagram-chasing
add a comment |
This is probably an elementary question, but I'm new to this machinery.
Let $G$ be a group and $N$ be a normal subgroup of $G$. Let $Gamma$ be another group. Suppose we have a homomorphism $phi:Gamma to G/N$.
Now we have the homomorphism $phi:Gamma to G/N$ and the canonical quotient homomorphism $psi:G to G/N$.
Denote by $H$ the pullback of the two homomorphisms to $G/N$. That is, $H subseteq G times Gamma$ comprising elements $(g,gamma)$ such that $phi(gamma)=psi(g) in G/N$.
So we have the following two diagrams:
$$1 rightarrow N rightarrow Gstackrel{psi}{rightarrow} G/Nrightarrow 1$$
which is a short exact sequence, and another diagram
$$begin{array}
GG & stackrel{psi}{longrightarrow} & G/N\
uparrow & & uparrow{phi} \
H & longrightarrow & Gamma
end{array}
$$
Is the following also a commutative diagram?
$$begin{array}
11 & longrightarrow & N & longrightarrow & G & stackrel{psi}{longrightarrow} & G/N & longrightarrow & 1\
& & uparrow & & uparrow & & uparrow{phi} & & \
1 & longrightarrow & N & longrightarrow & H & longrightarrow & Gamma & longrightarrow & 1\
end{array}
$$
That is, can $N$ be embedded in the pullback $H$?
Secondly, suppose the map $phi:Gamma to G/N$ can be lifted to a map $phi':Gamma to G$ so that we have a commuting diagram bypassing $H$. In this case, is $H$ a semidirect product of $N$ and $Gamma$?
In other words, is the bottom exact sequence split when $phi$ can be lifted diagonally to $G$, and is the converse true too?
Thanks!
abstract-algebra group-theory category-theory exact-sequence diagram-chasing
add a comment |
This is probably an elementary question, but I'm new to this machinery.
Let $G$ be a group and $N$ be a normal subgroup of $G$. Let $Gamma$ be another group. Suppose we have a homomorphism $phi:Gamma to G/N$.
Now we have the homomorphism $phi:Gamma to G/N$ and the canonical quotient homomorphism $psi:G to G/N$.
Denote by $H$ the pullback of the two homomorphisms to $G/N$. That is, $H subseteq G times Gamma$ comprising elements $(g,gamma)$ such that $phi(gamma)=psi(g) in G/N$.
So we have the following two diagrams:
$$1 rightarrow N rightarrow Gstackrel{psi}{rightarrow} G/Nrightarrow 1$$
which is a short exact sequence, and another diagram
$$begin{array}
GG & stackrel{psi}{longrightarrow} & G/N\
uparrow & & uparrow{phi} \
H & longrightarrow & Gamma
end{array}
$$
Is the following also a commutative diagram?
$$begin{array}
11 & longrightarrow & N & longrightarrow & G & stackrel{psi}{longrightarrow} & G/N & longrightarrow & 1\
& & uparrow & & uparrow & & uparrow{phi} & & \
1 & longrightarrow & N & longrightarrow & H & longrightarrow & Gamma & longrightarrow & 1\
end{array}
$$
That is, can $N$ be embedded in the pullback $H$?
Secondly, suppose the map $phi:Gamma to G/N$ can be lifted to a map $phi':Gamma to G$ so that we have a commuting diagram bypassing $H$. In this case, is $H$ a semidirect product of $N$ and $Gamma$?
In other words, is the bottom exact sequence split when $phi$ can be lifted diagonally to $G$, and is the converse true too?
Thanks!
abstract-algebra group-theory category-theory exact-sequence diagram-chasing
This is probably an elementary question, but I'm new to this machinery.
Let $G$ be a group and $N$ be a normal subgroup of $G$. Let $Gamma$ be another group. Suppose we have a homomorphism $phi:Gamma to G/N$.
Now we have the homomorphism $phi:Gamma to G/N$ and the canonical quotient homomorphism $psi:G to G/N$.
Denote by $H$ the pullback of the two homomorphisms to $G/N$. That is, $H subseteq G times Gamma$ comprising elements $(g,gamma)$ such that $phi(gamma)=psi(g) in G/N$.
So we have the following two diagrams:
$$1 rightarrow N rightarrow Gstackrel{psi}{rightarrow} G/Nrightarrow 1$$
which is a short exact sequence, and another diagram
$$begin{array}
GG & stackrel{psi}{longrightarrow} & G/N\
uparrow & & uparrow{phi} \
H & longrightarrow & Gamma
end{array}
$$
Is the following also a commutative diagram?
$$begin{array}
11 & longrightarrow & N & longrightarrow & G & stackrel{psi}{longrightarrow} & G/N & longrightarrow & 1\
& & uparrow & & uparrow & & uparrow{phi} & & \
1 & longrightarrow & N & longrightarrow & H & longrightarrow & Gamma & longrightarrow & 1\
end{array}
$$
That is, can $N$ be embedded in the pullback $H$?
Secondly, suppose the map $phi:Gamma to G/N$ can be lifted to a map $phi':Gamma to G$ so that we have a commuting diagram bypassing $H$. In this case, is $H$ a semidirect product of $N$ and $Gamma$?
In other words, is the bottom exact sequence split when $phi$ can be lifted diagonally to $G$, and is the converse true too?
Thanks!
abstract-algebra group-theory category-theory exact-sequence diagram-chasing
abstract-algebra group-theory category-theory exact-sequence diagram-chasing
asked Nov 30 at 14:33
BharatRam
903618
903618
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
Yes and Yes. The subgroup $N$ of $H$ that you are looking for is ${(n,1) : n in N }$, and the complement you are looking for is ${(phi'(gamma),gamma) : gamma in Gamma}$.
Hello, thanks for the answer. But if you have time, could you please elaborate more? I still can't see why the existence of the lift in the diagram forces $H$ to be a semi-direct product. What is the action of $Gamma$ on $N$ for instance? Thanks!
– BharatRam
Nov 30 at 17:15
I am not sure what there is to elaborate. I have given a definition of a specific complement of $N$ in $Gamma$. The existence of a complement is equivalent to the extension being a semidirect product.
– Derek Holt
Nov 30 at 17:34
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3020158%2fcondition-for-pullback-to-split%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Yes and Yes. The subgroup $N$ of $H$ that you are looking for is ${(n,1) : n in N }$, and the complement you are looking for is ${(phi'(gamma),gamma) : gamma in Gamma}$.
Hello, thanks for the answer. But if you have time, could you please elaborate more? I still can't see why the existence of the lift in the diagram forces $H$ to be a semi-direct product. What is the action of $Gamma$ on $N$ for instance? Thanks!
– BharatRam
Nov 30 at 17:15
I am not sure what there is to elaborate. I have given a definition of a specific complement of $N$ in $Gamma$. The existence of a complement is equivalent to the extension being a semidirect product.
– Derek Holt
Nov 30 at 17:34
add a comment |
Yes and Yes. The subgroup $N$ of $H$ that you are looking for is ${(n,1) : n in N }$, and the complement you are looking for is ${(phi'(gamma),gamma) : gamma in Gamma}$.
Hello, thanks for the answer. But if you have time, could you please elaborate more? I still can't see why the existence of the lift in the diagram forces $H$ to be a semi-direct product. What is the action of $Gamma$ on $N$ for instance? Thanks!
– BharatRam
Nov 30 at 17:15
I am not sure what there is to elaborate. I have given a definition of a specific complement of $N$ in $Gamma$. The existence of a complement is equivalent to the extension being a semidirect product.
– Derek Holt
Nov 30 at 17:34
add a comment |
Yes and Yes. The subgroup $N$ of $H$ that you are looking for is ${(n,1) : n in N }$, and the complement you are looking for is ${(phi'(gamma),gamma) : gamma in Gamma}$.
Yes and Yes. The subgroup $N$ of $H$ that you are looking for is ${(n,1) : n in N }$, and the complement you are looking for is ${(phi'(gamma),gamma) : gamma in Gamma}$.
answered Nov 30 at 15:44
Derek Holt
52.6k53570
52.6k53570
Hello, thanks for the answer. But if you have time, could you please elaborate more? I still can't see why the existence of the lift in the diagram forces $H$ to be a semi-direct product. What is the action of $Gamma$ on $N$ for instance? Thanks!
– BharatRam
Nov 30 at 17:15
I am not sure what there is to elaborate. I have given a definition of a specific complement of $N$ in $Gamma$. The existence of a complement is equivalent to the extension being a semidirect product.
– Derek Holt
Nov 30 at 17:34
add a comment |
Hello, thanks for the answer. But if you have time, could you please elaborate more? I still can't see why the existence of the lift in the diagram forces $H$ to be a semi-direct product. What is the action of $Gamma$ on $N$ for instance? Thanks!
– BharatRam
Nov 30 at 17:15
I am not sure what there is to elaborate. I have given a definition of a specific complement of $N$ in $Gamma$. The existence of a complement is equivalent to the extension being a semidirect product.
– Derek Holt
Nov 30 at 17:34
Hello, thanks for the answer. But if you have time, could you please elaborate more? I still can't see why the existence of the lift in the diagram forces $H$ to be a semi-direct product. What is the action of $Gamma$ on $N$ for instance? Thanks!
– BharatRam
Nov 30 at 17:15
Hello, thanks for the answer. But if you have time, could you please elaborate more? I still can't see why the existence of the lift in the diagram forces $H$ to be a semi-direct product. What is the action of $Gamma$ on $N$ for instance? Thanks!
– BharatRam
Nov 30 at 17:15
I am not sure what there is to elaborate. I have given a definition of a specific complement of $N$ in $Gamma$. The existence of a complement is equivalent to the extension being a semidirect product.
– Derek Holt
Nov 30 at 17:34
I am not sure what there is to elaborate. I have given a definition of a specific complement of $N$ in $Gamma$. The existence of a complement is equivalent to the extension being a semidirect product.
– Derek Holt
Nov 30 at 17:34
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3020158%2fcondition-for-pullback-to-split%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown