Condition for pullback to split












2














This is probably an elementary question, but I'm new to this machinery.



Let $G$ be a group and $N$ be a normal subgroup of $G$. Let $Gamma$ be another group. Suppose we have a homomorphism $phi:Gamma to G/N$.
Now we have the homomorphism $phi:Gamma to G/N$ and the canonical quotient homomorphism $psi:G to G/N$.



Denote by $H$ the pullback of the two homomorphisms to $G/N$. That is, $H subseteq G times Gamma$ comprising elements $(g,gamma)$ such that $phi(gamma)=psi(g) in G/N$.



So we have the following two diagrams:
$$1 rightarrow N rightarrow Gstackrel{psi}{rightarrow} G/Nrightarrow 1$$
which is a short exact sequence, and another diagram
$$begin{array}
GG & stackrel{psi}{longrightarrow} & G/N\
uparrow & & uparrow{phi} \
H & longrightarrow & Gamma
end{array}
$$

Is the following also a commutative diagram?
$$begin{array}
11 & longrightarrow & N & longrightarrow & G & stackrel{psi}{longrightarrow} & G/N & longrightarrow & 1\
& & uparrow & & uparrow & & uparrow{phi} & & \
1 & longrightarrow & N & longrightarrow & H & longrightarrow & Gamma & longrightarrow & 1\
end{array}
$$

That is, can $N$ be embedded in the pullback $H$?



Secondly, suppose the map $phi:Gamma to G/N$ can be lifted to a map $phi':Gamma to G$ so that we have a commuting diagram bypassing $H$. In this case, is $H$ a semidirect product of $N$ and $Gamma$?



In other words, is the bottom exact sequence split when $phi$ can be lifted diagonally to $G$, and is the converse true too?



Thanks!










share|cite|improve this question



























    2














    This is probably an elementary question, but I'm new to this machinery.



    Let $G$ be a group and $N$ be a normal subgroup of $G$. Let $Gamma$ be another group. Suppose we have a homomorphism $phi:Gamma to G/N$.
    Now we have the homomorphism $phi:Gamma to G/N$ and the canonical quotient homomorphism $psi:G to G/N$.



    Denote by $H$ the pullback of the two homomorphisms to $G/N$. That is, $H subseteq G times Gamma$ comprising elements $(g,gamma)$ such that $phi(gamma)=psi(g) in G/N$.



    So we have the following two diagrams:
    $$1 rightarrow N rightarrow Gstackrel{psi}{rightarrow} G/Nrightarrow 1$$
    which is a short exact sequence, and another diagram
    $$begin{array}
    GG & stackrel{psi}{longrightarrow} & G/N\
    uparrow & & uparrow{phi} \
    H & longrightarrow & Gamma
    end{array}
    $$

    Is the following also a commutative diagram?
    $$begin{array}
    11 & longrightarrow & N & longrightarrow & G & stackrel{psi}{longrightarrow} & G/N & longrightarrow & 1\
    & & uparrow & & uparrow & & uparrow{phi} & & \
    1 & longrightarrow & N & longrightarrow & H & longrightarrow & Gamma & longrightarrow & 1\
    end{array}
    $$

    That is, can $N$ be embedded in the pullback $H$?



    Secondly, suppose the map $phi:Gamma to G/N$ can be lifted to a map $phi':Gamma to G$ so that we have a commuting diagram bypassing $H$. In this case, is $H$ a semidirect product of $N$ and $Gamma$?



    In other words, is the bottom exact sequence split when $phi$ can be lifted diagonally to $G$, and is the converse true too?



    Thanks!










    share|cite|improve this question

























      2












      2








      2


      1





      This is probably an elementary question, but I'm new to this machinery.



      Let $G$ be a group and $N$ be a normal subgroup of $G$. Let $Gamma$ be another group. Suppose we have a homomorphism $phi:Gamma to G/N$.
      Now we have the homomorphism $phi:Gamma to G/N$ and the canonical quotient homomorphism $psi:G to G/N$.



      Denote by $H$ the pullback of the two homomorphisms to $G/N$. That is, $H subseteq G times Gamma$ comprising elements $(g,gamma)$ such that $phi(gamma)=psi(g) in G/N$.



      So we have the following two diagrams:
      $$1 rightarrow N rightarrow Gstackrel{psi}{rightarrow} G/Nrightarrow 1$$
      which is a short exact sequence, and another diagram
      $$begin{array}
      GG & stackrel{psi}{longrightarrow} & G/N\
      uparrow & & uparrow{phi} \
      H & longrightarrow & Gamma
      end{array}
      $$

      Is the following also a commutative diagram?
      $$begin{array}
      11 & longrightarrow & N & longrightarrow & G & stackrel{psi}{longrightarrow} & G/N & longrightarrow & 1\
      & & uparrow & & uparrow & & uparrow{phi} & & \
      1 & longrightarrow & N & longrightarrow & H & longrightarrow & Gamma & longrightarrow & 1\
      end{array}
      $$

      That is, can $N$ be embedded in the pullback $H$?



      Secondly, suppose the map $phi:Gamma to G/N$ can be lifted to a map $phi':Gamma to G$ so that we have a commuting diagram bypassing $H$. In this case, is $H$ a semidirect product of $N$ and $Gamma$?



      In other words, is the bottom exact sequence split when $phi$ can be lifted diagonally to $G$, and is the converse true too?



      Thanks!










      share|cite|improve this question













      This is probably an elementary question, but I'm new to this machinery.



      Let $G$ be a group and $N$ be a normal subgroup of $G$. Let $Gamma$ be another group. Suppose we have a homomorphism $phi:Gamma to G/N$.
      Now we have the homomorphism $phi:Gamma to G/N$ and the canonical quotient homomorphism $psi:G to G/N$.



      Denote by $H$ the pullback of the two homomorphisms to $G/N$. That is, $H subseteq G times Gamma$ comprising elements $(g,gamma)$ such that $phi(gamma)=psi(g) in G/N$.



      So we have the following two diagrams:
      $$1 rightarrow N rightarrow Gstackrel{psi}{rightarrow} G/Nrightarrow 1$$
      which is a short exact sequence, and another diagram
      $$begin{array}
      GG & stackrel{psi}{longrightarrow} & G/N\
      uparrow & & uparrow{phi} \
      H & longrightarrow & Gamma
      end{array}
      $$

      Is the following also a commutative diagram?
      $$begin{array}
      11 & longrightarrow & N & longrightarrow & G & stackrel{psi}{longrightarrow} & G/N & longrightarrow & 1\
      & & uparrow & & uparrow & & uparrow{phi} & & \
      1 & longrightarrow & N & longrightarrow & H & longrightarrow & Gamma & longrightarrow & 1\
      end{array}
      $$

      That is, can $N$ be embedded in the pullback $H$?



      Secondly, suppose the map $phi:Gamma to G/N$ can be lifted to a map $phi':Gamma to G$ so that we have a commuting diagram bypassing $H$. In this case, is $H$ a semidirect product of $N$ and $Gamma$?



      In other words, is the bottom exact sequence split when $phi$ can be lifted diagonally to $G$, and is the converse true too?



      Thanks!







      abstract-algebra group-theory category-theory exact-sequence diagram-chasing






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Nov 30 at 14:33









      BharatRam

      903618




      903618






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          2














          Yes and Yes. The subgroup $N$ of $H$ that you are looking for is ${(n,1) : n in N }$, and the complement you are looking for is ${(phi'(gamma),gamma) : gamma in Gamma}$.






          share|cite|improve this answer





















          • Hello, thanks for the answer. But if you have time, could you please elaborate more? I still can't see why the existence of the lift in the diagram forces $H$ to be a semi-direct product. What is the action of $Gamma$ on $N$ for instance? Thanks!
            – BharatRam
            Nov 30 at 17:15










          • I am not sure what there is to elaborate. I have given a definition of a specific complement of $N$ in $Gamma$. The existence of a complement is equivalent to the extension being a semidirect product.
            – Derek Holt
            Nov 30 at 17:34











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3020158%2fcondition-for-pullback-to-split%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          2














          Yes and Yes. The subgroup $N$ of $H$ that you are looking for is ${(n,1) : n in N }$, and the complement you are looking for is ${(phi'(gamma),gamma) : gamma in Gamma}$.






          share|cite|improve this answer





















          • Hello, thanks for the answer. But if you have time, could you please elaborate more? I still can't see why the existence of the lift in the diagram forces $H$ to be a semi-direct product. What is the action of $Gamma$ on $N$ for instance? Thanks!
            – BharatRam
            Nov 30 at 17:15










          • I am not sure what there is to elaborate. I have given a definition of a specific complement of $N$ in $Gamma$. The existence of a complement is equivalent to the extension being a semidirect product.
            – Derek Holt
            Nov 30 at 17:34
















          2














          Yes and Yes. The subgroup $N$ of $H$ that you are looking for is ${(n,1) : n in N }$, and the complement you are looking for is ${(phi'(gamma),gamma) : gamma in Gamma}$.






          share|cite|improve this answer





















          • Hello, thanks for the answer. But if you have time, could you please elaborate more? I still can't see why the existence of the lift in the diagram forces $H$ to be a semi-direct product. What is the action of $Gamma$ on $N$ for instance? Thanks!
            – BharatRam
            Nov 30 at 17:15










          • I am not sure what there is to elaborate. I have given a definition of a specific complement of $N$ in $Gamma$. The existence of a complement is equivalent to the extension being a semidirect product.
            – Derek Holt
            Nov 30 at 17:34














          2












          2








          2






          Yes and Yes. The subgroup $N$ of $H$ that you are looking for is ${(n,1) : n in N }$, and the complement you are looking for is ${(phi'(gamma),gamma) : gamma in Gamma}$.






          share|cite|improve this answer












          Yes and Yes. The subgroup $N$ of $H$ that you are looking for is ${(n,1) : n in N }$, and the complement you are looking for is ${(phi'(gamma),gamma) : gamma in Gamma}$.







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered Nov 30 at 15:44









          Derek Holt

          52.6k53570




          52.6k53570












          • Hello, thanks for the answer. But if you have time, could you please elaborate more? I still can't see why the existence of the lift in the diagram forces $H$ to be a semi-direct product. What is the action of $Gamma$ on $N$ for instance? Thanks!
            – BharatRam
            Nov 30 at 17:15










          • I am not sure what there is to elaborate. I have given a definition of a specific complement of $N$ in $Gamma$. The existence of a complement is equivalent to the extension being a semidirect product.
            – Derek Holt
            Nov 30 at 17:34


















          • Hello, thanks for the answer. But if you have time, could you please elaborate more? I still can't see why the existence of the lift in the diagram forces $H$ to be a semi-direct product. What is the action of $Gamma$ on $N$ for instance? Thanks!
            – BharatRam
            Nov 30 at 17:15










          • I am not sure what there is to elaborate. I have given a definition of a specific complement of $N$ in $Gamma$. The existence of a complement is equivalent to the extension being a semidirect product.
            – Derek Holt
            Nov 30 at 17:34
















          Hello, thanks for the answer. But if you have time, could you please elaborate more? I still can't see why the existence of the lift in the diagram forces $H$ to be a semi-direct product. What is the action of $Gamma$ on $N$ for instance? Thanks!
          – BharatRam
          Nov 30 at 17:15




          Hello, thanks for the answer. But if you have time, could you please elaborate more? I still can't see why the existence of the lift in the diagram forces $H$ to be a semi-direct product. What is the action of $Gamma$ on $N$ for instance? Thanks!
          – BharatRam
          Nov 30 at 17:15












          I am not sure what there is to elaborate. I have given a definition of a specific complement of $N$ in $Gamma$. The existence of a complement is equivalent to the extension being a semidirect product.
          – Derek Holt
          Nov 30 at 17:34




          I am not sure what there is to elaborate. I have given a definition of a specific complement of $N$ in $Gamma$. The existence of a complement is equivalent to the extension being a semidirect product.
          – Derek Holt
          Nov 30 at 17:34


















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





          Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


          Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3020158%2fcondition-for-pullback-to-split%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Wiesbaden

          Marschland

          Dieringhausen