why can we use this $x^theta y^{1-theta} le theta x+(1-theta)y$ to prove the $prod limits_{i=1}^{n}x_i ge 1$...
Show that ${x in R^n_+|prod limits_{i=1}^{n}x_i ge 1}$ is convex set
Hint : if $x ,y ge 0$ and $0le theta le 1$,then $x^theta y^{1-theta} le theta x+(1-theta)y$
I don't understand the relation between the problem and the hint,the question wants me to prove the $prod limits_{i=1}^{n}x_i ge 1$ is a convex,why shouldn't we use the definition of convex: $f(theta x+(1-theta )y) le theta f(x)+(1-theta)f(y)$,but use this $x^theta y^{1-theta} le theta x+(1-theta)y$ to prove the $prod limits_{i=1}^{n}x_i ge 1$ is convex set?
convex-analysis convex-optimization
add a comment |
Show that ${x in R^n_+|prod limits_{i=1}^{n}x_i ge 1}$ is convex set
Hint : if $x ,y ge 0$ and $0le theta le 1$,then $x^theta y^{1-theta} le theta x+(1-theta)y$
I don't understand the relation between the problem and the hint,the question wants me to prove the $prod limits_{i=1}^{n}x_i ge 1$ is a convex,why shouldn't we use the definition of convex: $f(theta x+(1-theta )y) le theta f(x)+(1-theta)f(y)$,but use this $x^theta y^{1-theta} le theta x+(1-theta)y$ to prove the $prod limits_{i=1}^{n}x_i ge 1$ is convex set?
convex-analysis convex-optimization
2
Start with the definition of a convex set (not function) and carry out the rest of your plan. Then you will see when to use the hint.
– Michal Adamaszek
Nov 30 at 13:54
I think that carrying on the usual definition is pretty straightforward. I also can't see what that hint is useful for...not even if it simplifies something the proof...
– DonAntonio
Nov 30 at 14:03
add a comment |
Show that ${x in R^n_+|prod limits_{i=1}^{n}x_i ge 1}$ is convex set
Hint : if $x ,y ge 0$ and $0le theta le 1$,then $x^theta y^{1-theta} le theta x+(1-theta)y$
I don't understand the relation between the problem and the hint,the question wants me to prove the $prod limits_{i=1}^{n}x_i ge 1$ is a convex,why shouldn't we use the definition of convex: $f(theta x+(1-theta )y) le theta f(x)+(1-theta)f(y)$,but use this $x^theta y^{1-theta} le theta x+(1-theta)y$ to prove the $prod limits_{i=1}^{n}x_i ge 1$ is convex set?
convex-analysis convex-optimization
Show that ${x in R^n_+|prod limits_{i=1}^{n}x_i ge 1}$ is convex set
Hint : if $x ,y ge 0$ and $0le theta le 1$,then $x^theta y^{1-theta} le theta x+(1-theta)y$
I don't understand the relation between the problem and the hint,the question wants me to prove the $prod limits_{i=1}^{n}x_i ge 1$ is a convex,why shouldn't we use the definition of convex: $f(theta x+(1-theta )y) le theta f(x)+(1-theta)f(y)$,but use this $x^theta y^{1-theta} le theta x+(1-theta)y$ to prove the $prod limits_{i=1}^{n}x_i ge 1$ is convex set?
convex-analysis convex-optimization
convex-analysis convex-optimization
asked Nov 30 at 13:50
shineele
377
377
2
Start with the definition of a convex set (not function) and carry out the rest of your plan. Then you will see when to use the hint.
– Michal Adamaszek
Nov 30 at 13:54
I think that carrying on the usual definition is pretty straightforward. I also can't see what that hint is useful for...not even if it simplifies something the proof...
– DonAntonio
Nov 30 at 14:03
add a comment |
2
Start with the definition of a convex set (not function) and carry out the rest of your plan. Then you will see when to use the hint.
– Michal Adamaszek
Nov 30 at 13:54
I think that carrying on the usual definition is pretty straightforward. I also can't see what that hint is useful for...not even if it simplifies something the proof...
– DonAntonio
Nov 30 at 14:03
2
2
Start with the definition of a convex set (not function) and carry out the rest of your plan. Then you will see when to use the hint.
– Michal Adamaszek
Nov 30 at 13:54
Start with the definition of a convex set (not function) and carry out the rest of your plan. Then you will see when to use the hint.
– Michal Adamaszek
Nov 30 at 13:54
I think that carrying on the usual definition is pretty straightforward. I also can't see what that hint is useful for...not even if it simplifies something the proof...
– DonAntonio
Nov 30 at 14:03
I think that carrying on the usual definition is pretty straightforward. I also can't see what that hint is useful for...not even if it simplifies something the proof...
– DonAntonio
Nov 30 at 14:03
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
you may want to use this hint the other way: from right to left...
let's call $mathbb{A}$ your ensemble, let's take $(x,y) in mathbb{A}^2$. to prove that $mathbb{A}$ is convex, we need to prove that $forall t in [0,1], z = tx+(1-t)y ;$ is in $mathbb{A}$
$Pi_{i=1}^n z_i = Pi_{i=1}^n (tx_i+(1-t)y_i)$
now you use the inequality from the right side to the left.
$Pi_{i=1}^n (tx_i+(1-t)y_i) > Pi_{i=1}^n x_i^ty_i^{1-t}$
you are now one line away from the result
how does $Pi_{i=1}^n x_i^ty_i^{1-t}$ come ?
– shineele
Nov 30 at 14:22
how i came to this formula
– shineele
Nov 30 at 14:26
it's explained in the answer...
– Alexis
Nov 30 at 14:27
i mean why isn't $Pi_{i=1}^n (tx_i+(1-t)y_i) > 0 $ or the other formula or number,why must we $> Pi_{i=1}^n x_i^ty_i^{1-t}$?
– shineele
Nov 30 at 14:29
for two reasons: - one it's the hint, you were looking for a way to use the hint. here it is. if you change this you don't use the hint. - it brings you very very close to the results and it's after that straight forward to prove that z is in $mathbb{A}$
– Alexis
Nov 30 at 14:31
|
show 2 more comments
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3020110%2fwhy-can-we-use-this-x-theta-y1-theta-le-theta-x1-thetay-to-prove-th%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
you may want to use this hint the other way: from right to left...
let's call $mathbb{A}$ your ensemble, let's take $(x,y) in mathbb{A}^2$. to prove that $mathbb{A}$ is convex, we need to prove that $forall t in [0,1], z = tx+(1-t)y ;$ is in $mathbb{A}$
$Pi_{i=1}^n z_i = Pi_{i=1}^n (tx_i+(1-t)y_i)$
now you use the inequality from the right side to the left.
$Pi_{i=1}^n (tx_i+(1-t)y_i) > Pi_{i=1}^n x_i^ty_i^{1-t}$
you are now one line away from the result
how does $Pi_{i=1}^n x_i^ty_i^{1-t}$ come ?
– shineele
Nov 30 at 14:22
how i came to this formula
– shineele
Nov 30 at 14:26
it's explained in the answer...
– Alexis
Nov 30 at 14:27
i mean why isn't $Pi_{i=1}^n (tx_i+(1-t)y_i) > 0 $ or the other formula or number,why must we $> Pi_{i=1}^n x_i^ty_i^{1-t}$?
– shineele
Nov 30 at 14:29
for two reasons: - one it's the hint, you were looking for a way to use the hint. here it is. if you change this you don't use the hint. - it brings you very very close to the results and it's after that straight forward to prove that z is in $mathbb{A}$
– Alexis
Nov 30 at 14:31
|
show 2 more comments
you may want to use this hint the other way: from right to left...
let's call $mathbb{A}$ your ensemble, let's take $(x,y) in mathbb{A}^2$. to prove that $mathbb{A}$ is convex, we need to prove that $forall t in [0,1], z = tx+(1-t)y ;$ is in $mathbb{A}$
$Pi_{i=1}^n z_i = Pi_{i=1}^n (tx_i+(1-t)y_i)$
now you use the inequality from the right side to the left.
$Pi_{i=1}^n (tx_i+(1-t)y_i) > Pi_{i=1}^n x_i^ty_i^{1-t}$
you are now one line away from the result
how does $Pi_{i=1}^n x_i^ty_i^{1-t}$ come ?
– shineele
Nov 30 at 14:22
how i came to this formula
– shineele
Nov 30 at 14:26
it's explained in the answer...
– Alexis
Nov 30 at 14:27
i mean why isn't $Pi_{i=1}^n (tx_i+(1-t)y_i) > 0 $ or the other formula or number,why must we $> Pi_{i=1}^n x_i^ty_i^{1-t}$?
– shineele
Nov 30 at 14:29
for two reasons: - one it's the hint, you were looking for a way to use the hint. here it is. if you change this you don't use the hint. - it brings you very very close to the results and it's after that straight forward to prove that z is in $mathbb{A}$
– Alexis
Nov 30 at 14:31
|
show 2 more comments
you may want to use this hint the other way: from right to left...
let's call $mathbb{A}$ your ensemble, let's take $(x,y) in mathbb{A}^2$. to prove that $mathbb{A}$ is convex, we need to prove that $forall t in [0,1], z = tx+(1-t)y ;$ is in $mathbb{A}$
$Pi_{i=1}^n z_i = Pi_{i=1}^n (tx_i+(1-t)y_i)$
now you use the inequality from the right side to the left.
$Pi_{i=1}^n (tx_i+(1-t)y_i) > Pi_{i=1}^n x_i^ty_i^{1-t}$
you are now one line away from the result
you may want to use this hint the other way: from right to left...
let's call $mathbb{A}$ your ensemble, let's take $(x,y) in mathbb{A}^2$. to prove that $mathbb{A}$ is convex, we need to prove that $forall t in [0,1], z = tx+(1-t)y ;$ is in $mathbb{A}$
$Pi_{i=1}^n z_i = Pi_{i=1}^n (tx_i+(1-t)y_i)$
now you use the inequality from the right side to the left.
$Pi_{i=1}^n (tx_i+(1-t)y_i) > Pi_{i=1}^n x_i^ty_i^{1-t}$
you are now one line away from the result
answered Nov 30 at 14:05
Alexis
2199
2199
how does $Pi_{i=1}^n x_i^ty_i^{1-t}$ come ?
– shineele
Nov 30 at 14:22
how i came to this formula
– shineele
Nov 30 at 14:26
it's explained in the answer...
– Alexis
Nov 30 at 14:27
i mean why isn't $Pi_{i=1}^n (tx_i+(1-t)y_i) > 0 $ or the other formula or number,why must we $> Pi_{i=1}^n x_i^ty_i^{1-t}$?
– shineele
Nov 30 at 14:29
for two reasons: - one it's the hint, you were looking for a way to use the hint. here it is. if you change this you don't use the hint. - it brings you very very close to the results and it's after that straight forward to prove that z is in $mathbb{A}$
– Alexis
Nov 30 at 14:31
|
show 2 more comments
how does $Pi_{i=1}^n x_i^ty_i^{1-t}$ come ?
– shineele
Nov 30 at 14:22
how i came to this formula
– shineele
Nov 30 at 14:26
it's explained in the answer...
– Alexis
Nov 30 at 14:27
i mean why isn't $Pi_{i=1}^n (tx_i+(1-t)y_i) > 0 $ or the other formula or number,why must we $> Pi_{i=1}^n x_i^ty_i^{1-t}$?
– shineele
Nov 30 at 14:29
for two reasons: - one it's the hint, you were looking for a way to use the hint. here it is. if you change this you don't use the hint. - it brings you very very close to the results and it's after that straight forward to prove that z is in $mathbb{A}$
– Alexis
Nov 30 at 14:31
how does $Pi_{i=1}^n x_i^ty_i^{1-t}$ come ?
– shineele
Nov 30 at 14:22
how does $Pi_{i=1}^n x_i^ty_i^{1-t}$ come ?
– shineele
Nov 30 at 14:22
how i came to this formula
– shineele
Nov 30 at 14:26
how i came to this formula
– shineele
Nov 30 at 14:26
it's explained in the answer...
– Alexis
Nov 30 at 14:27
it's explained in the answer...
– Alexis
Nov 30 at 14:27
i mean why isn't $Pi_{i=1}^n (tx_i+(1-t)y_i) > 0 $ or the other formula or number,why must we $> Pi_{i=1}^n x_i^ty_i^{1-t}$?
– shineele
Nov 30 at 14:29
i mean why isn't $Pi_{i=1}^n (tx_i+(1-t)y_i) > 0 $ or the other formula or number,why must we $> Pi_{i=1}^n x_i^ty_i^{1-t}$?
– shineele
Nov 30 at 14:29
for two reasons: - one it's the hint, you were looking for a way to use the hint. here it is. if you change this you don't use the hint. - it brings you very very close to the results and it's after that straight forward to prove that z is in $mathbb{A}$
– Alexis
Nov 30 at 14:31
for two reasons: - one it's the hint, you were looking for a way to use the hint. here it is. if you change this you don't use the hint. - it brings you very very close to the results and it's after that straight forward to prove that z is in $mathbb{A}$
– Alexis
Nov 30 at 14:31
|
show 2 more comments
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3020110%2fwhy-can-we-use-this-x-theta-y1-theta-le-theta-x1-thetay-to-prove-th%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
2
Start with the definition of a convex set (not function) and carry out the rest of your plan. Then you will see when to use the hint.
– Michal Adamaszek
Nov 30 at 13:54
I think that carrying on the usual definition is pretty straightforward. I also can't see what that hint is useful for...not even if it simplifies something the proof...
– DonAntonio
Nov 30 at 14:03