why can we use this $x^theta y^{1-theta} le theta x+(1-theta)y$ to prove the $prod limits_{i=1}^{n}x_i ge 1$...












0














Show that ${x in R^n_+|prod limits_{i=1}^{n}x_i ge 1}$ is convex set



Hint : if $x ,y ge 0$ and $0le theta le 1$,then $x^theta y^{1-theta} le theta x+(1-theta)y$



I don't understand the relation between the problem and the hint,the question wants me to prove the $prod limits_{i=1}^{n}x_i ge 1$ is a convex,why shouldn't we use the definition of convex: $f(theta x+(1-theta )y) le theta f(x)+(1-theta)f(y)$,but use this $x^theta y^{1-theta} le theta x+(1-theta)y$ to prove the $prod limits_{i=1}^{n}x_i ge 1$ is convex set?










share|cite|improve this question


















  • 2




    Start with the definition of a convex set (not function) and carry out the rest of your plan. Then you will see when to use the hint.
    – Michal Adamaszek
    Nov 30 at 13:54










  • I think that carrying on the usual definition is pretty straightforward. I also can't see what that hint is useful for...not even if it simplifies something the proof...
    – DonAntonio
    Nov 30 at 14:03
















0














Show that ${x in R^n_+|prod limits_{i=1}^{n}x_i ge 1}$ is convex set



Hint : if $x ,y ge 0$ and $0le theta le 1$,then $x^theta y^{1-theta} le theta x+(1-theta)y$



I don't understand the relation between the problem and the hint,the question wants me to prove the $prod limits_{i=1}^{n}x_i ge 1$ is a convex,why shouldn't we use the definition of convex: $f(theta x+(1-theta )y) le theta f(x)+(1-theta)f(y)$,but use this $x^theta y^{1-theta} le theta x+(1-theta)y$ to prove the $prod limits_{i=1}^{n}x_i ge 1$ is convex set?










share|cite|improve this question


















  • 2




    Start with the definition of a convex set (not function) and carry out the rest of your plan. Then you will see when to use the hint.
    – Michal Adamaszek
    Nov 30 at 13:54










  • I think that carrying on the usual definition is pretty straightforward. I also can't see what that hint is useful for...not even if it simplifies something the proof...
    – DonAntonio
    Nov 30 at 14:03














0












0








0







Show that ${x in R^n_+|prod limits_{i=1}^{n}x_i ge 1}$ is convex set



Hint : if $x ,y ge 0$ and $0le theta le 1$,then $x^theta y^{1-theta} le theta x+(1-theta)y$



I don't understand the relation between the problem and the hint,the question wants me to prove the $prod limits_{i=1}^{n}x_i ge 1$ is a convex,why shouldn't we use the definition of convex: $f(theta x+(1-theta )y) le theta f(x)+(1-theta)f(y)$,but use this $x^theta y^{1-theta} le theta x+(1-theta)y$ to prove the $prod limits_{i=1}^{n}x_i ge 1$ is convex set?










share|cite|improve this question













Show that ${x in R^n_+|prod limits_{i=1}^{n}x_i ge 1}$ is convex set



Hint : if $x ,y ge 0$ and $0le theta le 1$,then $x^theta y^{1-theta} le theta x+(1-theta)y$



I don't understand the relation between the problem and the hint,the question wants me to prove the $prod limits_{i=1}^{n}x_i ge 1$ is a convex,why shouldn't we use the definition of convex: $f(theta x+(1-theta )y) le theta f(x)+(1-theta)f(y)$,but use this $x^theta y^{1-theta} le theta x+(1-theta)y$ to prove the $prod limits_{i=1}^{n}x_i ge 1$ is convex set?







convex-analysis convex-optimization






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Nov 30 at 13:50









shineele

377




377








  • 2




    Start with the definition of a convex set (not function) and carry out the rest of your plan. Then you will see when to use the hint.
    – Michal Adamaszek
    Nov 30 at 13:54










  • I think that carrying on the usual definition is pretty straightforward. I also can't see what that hint is useful for...not even if it simplifies something the proof...
    – DonAntonio
    Nov 30 at 14:03














  • 2




    Start with the definition of a convex set (not function) and carry out the rest of your plan. Then you will see when to use the hint.
    – Michal Adamaszek
    Nov 30 at 13:54










  • I think that carrying on the usual definition is pretty straightforward. I also can't see what that hint is useful for...not even if it simplifies something the proof...
    – DonAntonio
    Nov 30 at 14:03








2




2




Start with the definition of a convex set (not function) and carry out the rest of your plan. Then you will see when to use the hint.
– Michal Adamaszek
Nov 30 at 13:54




Start with the definition of a convex set (not function) and carry out the rest of your plan. Then you will see when to use the hint.
– Michal Adamaszek
Nov 30 at 13:54












I think that carrying on the usual definition is pretty straightforward. I also can't see what that hint is useful for...not even if it simplifies something the proof...
– DonAntonio
Nov 30 at 14:03




I think that carrying on the usual definition is pretty straightforward. I also can't see what that hint is useful for...not even if it simplifies something the proof...
– DonAntonio
Nov 30 at 14:03










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















2














you may want to use this hint the other way: from right to left...



let's call $mathbb{A}$ your ensemble, let's take $(x,y) in mathbb{A}^2$. to prove that $mathbb{A}$ is convex, we need to prove that $forall t in [0,1], z = tx+(1-t)y ;$ is in $mathbb{A}$



$Pi_{i=1}^n z_i = Pi_{i=1}^n (tx_i+(1-t)y_i)$



now you use the inequality from the right side to the left.



$Pi_{i=1}^n (tx_i+(1-t)y_i) > Pi_{i=1}^n x_i^ty_i^{1-t}$



you are now one line away from the result






share|cite|improve this answer





















  • how does $Pi_{i=1}^n x_i^ty_i^{1-t}$ come ?
    – shineele
    Nov 30 at 14:22










  • how i came to this formula
    – shineele
    Nov 30 at 14:26












  • it's explained in the answer...
    – Alexis
    Nov 30 at 14:27










  • i mean why isn't $Pi_{i=1}^n (tx_i+(1-t)y_i) > 0 $ or the other formula or number,why must we $> Pi_{i=1}^n x_i^ty_i^{1-t}$?
    – shineele
    Nov 30 at 14:29












  • for two reasons: - one it's the hint, you were looking for a way to use the hint. here it is. if you change this you don't use the hint. - it brings you very very close to the results and it's after that straight forward to prove that z is in $mathbb{A}$
    – Alexis
    Nov 30 at 14:31











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3020110%2fwhy-can-we-use-this-x-theta-y1-theta-le-theta-x1-thetay-to-prove-th%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









2














you may want to use this hint the other way: from right to left...



let's call $mathbb{A}$ your ensemble, let's take $(x,y) in mathbb{A}^2$. to prove that $mathbb{A}$ is convex, we need to prove that $forall t in [0,1], z = tx+(1-t)y ;$ is in $mathbb{A}$



$Pi_{i=1}^n z_i = Pi_{i=1}^n (tx_i+(1-t)y_i)$



now you use the inequality from the right side to the left.



$Pi_{i=1}^n (tx_i+(1-t)y_i) > Pi_{i=1}^n x_i^ty_i^{1-t}$



you are now one line away from the result






share|cite|improve this answer





















  • how does $Pi_{i=1}^n x_i^ty_i^{1-t}$ come ?
    – shineele
    Nov 30 at 14:22










  • how i came to this formula
    – shineele
    Nov 30 at 14:26












  • it's explained in the answer...
    – Alexis
    Nov 30 at 14:27










  • i mean why isn't $Pi_{i=1}^n (tx_i+(1-t)y_i) > 0 $ or the other formula or number,why must we $> Pi_{i=1}^n x_i^ty_i^{1-t}$?
    – shineele
    Nov 30 at 14:29












  • for two reasons: - one it's the hint, you were looking for a way to use the hint. here it is. if you change this you don't use the hint. - it brings you very very close to the results and it's after that straight forward to prove that z is in $mathbb{A}$
    – Alexis
    Nov 30 at 14:31
















2














you may want to use this hint the other way: from right to left...



let's call $mathbb{A}$ your ensemble, let's take $(x,y) in mathbb{A}^2$. to prove that $mathbb{A}$ is convex, we need to prove that $forall t in [0,1], z = tx+(1-t)y ;$ is in $mathbb{A}$



$Pi_{i=1}^n z_i = Pi_{i=1}^n (tx_i+(1-t)y_i)$



now you use the inequality from the right side to the left.



$Pi_{i=1}^n (tx_i+(1-t)y_i) > Pi_{i=1}^n x_i^ty_i^{1-t}$



you are now one line away from the result






share|cite|improve this answer





















  • how does $Pi_{i=1}^n x_i^ty_i^{1-t}$ come ?
    – shineele
    Nov 30 at 14:22










  • how i came to this formula
    – shineele
    Nov 30 at 14:26












  • it's explained in the answer...
    – Alexis
    Nov 30 at 14:27










  • i mean why isn't $Pi_{i=1}^n (tx_i+(1-t)y_i) > 0 $ or the other formula or number,why must we $> Pi_{i=1}^n x_i^ty_i^{1-t}$?
    – shineele
    Nov 30 at 14:29












  • for two reasons: - one it's the hint, you were looking for a way to use the hint. here it is. if you change this you don't use the hint. - it brings you very very close to the results and it's after that straight forward to prove that z is in $mathbb{A}$
    – Alexis
    Nov 30 at 14:31














2












2








2






you may want to use this hint the other way: from right to left...



let's call $mathbb{A}$ your ensemble, let's take $(x,y) in mathbb{A}^2$. to prove that $mathbb{A}$ is convex, we need to prove that $forall t in [0,1], z = tx+(1-t)y ;$ is in $mathbb{A}$



$Pi_{i=1}^n z_i = Pi_{i=1}^n (tx_i+(1-t)y_i)$



now you use the inequality from the right side to the left.



$Pi_{i=1}^n (tx_i+(1-t)y_i) > Pi_{i=1}^n x_i^ty_i^{1-t}$



you are now one line away from the result






share|cite|improve this answer












you may want to use this hint the other way: from right to left...



let's call $mathbb{A}$ your ensemble, let's take $(x,y) in mathbb{A}^2$. to prove that $mathbb{A}$ is convex, we need to prove that $forall t in [0,1], z = tx+(1-t)y ;$ is in $mathbb{A}$



$Pi_{i=1}^n z_i = Pi_{i=1}^n (tx_i+(1-t)y_i)$



now you use the inequality from the right side to the left.



$Pi_{i=1}^n (tx_i+(1-t)y_i) > Pi_{i=1}^n x_i^ty_i^{1-t}$



you are now one line away from the result







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered Nov 30 at 14:05









Alexis

2199




2199












  • how does $Pi_{i=1}^n x_i^ty_i^{1-t}$ come ?
    – shineele
    Nov 30 at 14:22










  • how i came to this formula
    – shineele
    Nov 30 at 14:26












  • it's explained in the answer...
    – Alexis
    Nov 30 at 14:27










  • i mean why isn't $Pi_{i=1}^n (tx_i+(1-t)y_i) > 0 $ or the other formula or number,why must we $> Pi_{i=1}^n x_i^ty_i^{1-t}$?
    – shineele
    Nov 30 at 14:29












  • for two reasons: - one it's the hint, you were looking for a way to use the hint. here it is. if you change this you don't use the hint. - it brings you very very close to the results and it's after that straight forward to prove that z is in $mathbb{A}$
    – Alexis
    Nov 30 at 14:31


















  • how does $Pi_{i=1}^n x_i^ty_i^{1-t}$ come ?
    – shineele
    Nov 30 at 14:22










  • how i came to this formula
    – shineele
    Nov 30 at 14:26












  • it's explained in the answer...
    – Alexis
    Nov 30 at 14:27










  • i mean why isn't $Pi_{i=1}^n (tx_i+(1-t)y_i) > 0 $ or the other formula or number,why must we $> Pi_{i=1}^n x_i^ty_i^{1-t}$?
    – shineele
    Nov 30 at 14:29












  • for two reasons: - one it's the hint, you were looking for a way to use the hint. here it is. if you change this you don't use the hint. - it brings you very very close to the results and it's after that straight forward to prove that z is in $mathbb{A}$
    – Alexis
    Nov 30 at 14:31
















how does $Pi_{i=1}^n x_i^ty_i^{1-t}$ come ?
– shineele
Nov 30 at 14:22




how does $Pi_{i=1}^n x_i^ty_i^{1-t}$ come ?
– shineele
Nov 30 at 14:22












how i came to this formula
– shineele
Nov 30 at 14:26






how i came to this formula
– shineele
Nov 30 at 14:26














it's explained in the answer...
– Alexis
Nov 30 at 14:27




it's explained in the answer...
– Alexis
Nov 30 at 14:27












i mean why isn't $Pi_{i=1}^n (tx_i+(1-t)y_i) > 0 $ or the other formula or number,why must we $> Pi_{i=1}^n x_i^ty_i^{1-t}$?
– shineele
Nov 30 at 14:29






i mean why isn't $Pi_{i=1}^n (tx_i+(1-t)y_i) > 0 $ or the other formula or number,why must we $> Pi_{i=1}^n x_i^ty_i^{1-t}$?
– shineele
Nov 30 at 14:29














for two reasons: - one it's the hint, you were looking for a way to use the hint. here it is. if you change this you don't use the hint. - it brings you very very close to the results and it's after that straight forward to prove that z is in $mathbb{A}$
– Alexis
Nov 30 at 14:31




for two reasons: - one it's the hint, you were looking for a way to use the hint. here it is. if you change this you don't use the hint. - it brings you very very close to the results and it's after that straight forward to prove that z is in $mathbb{A}$
– Alexis
Nov 30 at 14:31


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3020110%2fwhy-can-we-use-this-x-theta-y1-theta-le-theta-x1-thetay-to-prove-th%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Wiesbaden

Marschland

Dieringhausen