How to prove that the set-theoretic difference operation $setminus$ cannot be defined through $cap$ and $cup$
$begingroup$
How does one go about proving that the set-theoretic difference operation $setminus$ cannot be defined through the operations $cap$ and $cup$?
My thoughts: I first assumed $A$ and $B$ are two non-disjoint non-empty sets since if they are disjoint and non-empty, then we have that $Asetminus B= A =Acap A=(Acap B) cup A$. Therefore we have defined, in this case, $setminus$ in terms of $cap$ and $cup$.
Next, I drew three Venn diagrams for $Acap B $, $Acup B $ and $Asetminus B $ and made the observation that $A setminus B$ involves an exclusion of a part of $A$. When I looked at the definitions, I could see this clearer:
$$Acap B = {xmid (xin A) land (xin B)}$$
$$Acup B = {xmid (xin A) lor (xin B)}$$
$$Asetminus B = {xmid (xin A) land mathbf{(xnotin B)}}$$
From this, I decided to conclude that since the intersection and union operations have the condition that $(xin B)$ whereas the set difference operation requires $(xnotin B)$, we cannot define set difference through the operations union and intersection only.
This is as far as I could go. How can I prove this formally?
discrete-mathematics elementary-set-theory
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
How does one go about proving that the set-theoretic difference operation $setminus$ cannot be defined through the operations $cap$ and $cup$?
My thoughts: I first assumed $A$ and $B$ are two non-disjoint non-empty sets since if they are disjoint and non-empty, then we have that $Asetminus B= A =Acap A=(Acap B) cup A$. Therefore we have defined, in this case, $setminus$ in terms of $cap$ and $cup$.
Next, I drew three Venn diagrams for $Acap B $, $Acup B $ and $Asetminus B $ and made the observation that $A setminus B$ involves an exclusion of a part of $A$. When I looked at the definitions, I could see this clearer:
$$Acap B = {xmid (xin A) land (xin B)}$$
$$Acup B = {xmid (xin A) lor (xin B)}$$
$$Asetminus B = {xmid (xin A) land mathbf{(xnotin B)}}$$
From this, I decided to conclude that since the intersection and union operations have the condition that $(xin B)$ whereas the set difference operation requires $(xnotin B)$, we cannot define set difference through the operations union and intersection only.
This is as far as I could go. How can I prove this formally?
discrete-mathematics elementary-set-theory
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
How does one go about proving that the set-theoretic difference operation $setminus$ cannot be defined through the operations $cap$ and $cup$?
My thoughts: I first assumed $A$ and $B$ are two non-disjoint non-empty sets since if they are disjoint and non-empty, then we have that $Asetminus B= A =Acap A=(Acap B) cup A$. Therefore we have defined, in this case, $setminus$ in terms of $cap$ and $cup$.
Next, I drew three Venn diagrams for $Acap B $, $Acup B $ and $Asetminus B $ and made the observation that $A setminus B$ involves an exclusion of a part of $A$. When I looked at the definitions, I could see this clearer:
$$Acap B = {xmid (xin A) land (xin B)}$$
$$Acup B = {xmid (xin A) lor (xin B)}$$
$$Asetminus B = {xmid (xin A) land mathbf{(xnotin B)}}$$
From this, I decided to conclude that since the intersection and union operations have the condition that $(xin B)$ whereas the set difference operation requires $(xnotin B)$, we cannot define set difference through the operations union and intersection only.
This is as far as I could go. How can I prove this formally?
discrete-mathematics elementary-set-theory
$endgroup$
How does one go about proving that the set-theoretic difference operation $setminus$ cannot be defined through the operations $cap$ and $cup$?
My thoughts: I first assumed $A$ and $B$ are two non-disjoint non-empty sets since if they are disjoint and non-empty, then we have that $Asetminus B= A =Acap A=(Acap B) cup A$. Therefore we have defined, in this case, $setminus$ in terms of $cap$ and $cup$.
Next, I drew three Venn diagrams for $Acap B $, $Acup B $ and $Asetminus B $ and made the observation that $A setminus B$ involves an exclusion of a part of $A$. When I looked at the definitions, I could see this clearer:
$$Acap B = {xmid (xin A) land (xin B)}$$
$$Acup B = {xmid (xin A) lor (xin B)}$$
$$Asetminus B = {xmid (xin A) land mathbf{(xnotin B)}}$$
From this, I decided to conclude that since the intersection and union operations have the condition that $(xin B)$ whereas the set difference operation requires $(xnotin B)$, we cannot define set difference through the operations union and intersection only.
This is as far as I could go. How can I prove this formally?
discrete-mathematics elementary-set-theory
discrete-mathematics elementary-set-theory
asked Dec 8 '18 at 13:04
E.NoleE.Nole
141114
141114
add a comment |
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
All you need is a counterexample.
Let $A = B = { 0 }$. Then all of the sets
$$A,~ B,~ A cup A,~ A cap A,~ A cup B,~ A cap B,~ B cup A,~ B cap A,~ B cup B,~ B cup B$$
are equal to ${ 0 }$, and so any set built out of $A$, $B$ and the operations $cup$ and $cap$ is equal to ${ 0 }$.
But $B setminus A = varnothing ne { 0 }$, and so the set difference operator $setminus$ can't be expressed in terms of $cup$ and $cap$ alone.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The union and intersection operators are monotone. If $Asubseteq A'$
and $Bsubseteq B'$ then $Acup Bsubseteq A'cup B'$ and $Acap Bsubseteq A'cap B'$. If $f(A,B)$ is a formal combination of $A$s and $B$s with unions and intersections, then it is monotone: $f(A,B)subseteq f(A',B')$ under the above
assumptions. But $Asetminus B$ is not a monotone operation.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3031087%2fhow-to-prove-that-the-set-theoretic-difference-operation-setminus-cannot-be-d%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
All you need is a counterexample.
Let $A = B = { 0 }$. Then all of the sets
$$A,~ B,~ A cup A,~ A cap A,~ A cup B,~ A cap B,~ B cup A,~ B cap A,~ B cup B,~ B cup B$$
are equal to ${ 0 }$, and so any set built out of $A$, $B$ and the operations $cup$ and $cap$ is equal to ${ 0 }$.
But $B setminus A = varnothing ne { 0 }$, and so the set difference operator $setminus$ can't be expressed in terms of $cup$ and $cap$ alone.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
All you need is a counterexample.
Let $A = B = { 0 }$. Then all of the sets
$$A,~ B,~ A cup A,~ A cap A,~ A cup B,~ A cap B,~ B cup A,~ B cap A,~ B cup B,~ B cup B$$
are equal to ${ 0 }$, and so any set built out of $A$, $B$ and the operations $cup$ and $cap$ is equal to ${ 0 }$.
But $B setminus A = varnothing ne { 0 }$, and so the set difference operator $setminus$ can't be expressed in terms of $cup$ and $cap$ alone.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
All you need is a counterexample.
Let $A = B = { 0 }$. Then all of the sets
$$A,~ B,~ A cup A,~ A cap A,~ A cup B,~ A cap B,~ B cup A,~ B cap A,~ B cup B,~ B cup B$$
are equal to ${ 0 }$, and so any set built out of $A$, $B$ and the operations $cup$ and $cap$ is equal to ${ 0 }$.
But $B setminus A = varnothing ne { 0 }$, and so the set difference operator $setminus$ can't be expressed in terms of $cup$ and $cap$ alone.
$endgroup$
All you need is a counterexample.
Let $A = B = { 0 }$. Then all of the sets
$$A,~ B,~ A cup A,~ A cap A,~ A cup B,~ A cap B,~ B cup A,~ B cap A,~ B cup B,~ B cup B$$
are equal to ${ 0 }$, and so any set built out of $A$, $B$ and the operations $cup$ and $cap$ is equal to ${ 0 }$.
But $B setminus A = varnothing ne { 0 }$, and so the set difference operator $setminus$ can't be expressed in terms of $cup$ and $cap$ alone.
answered Dec 8 '18 at 14:48
Clive NewsteadClive Newstead
51.2k474135
51.2k474135
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The union and intersection operators are monotone. If $Asubseteq A'$
and $Bsubseteq B'$ then $Acup Bsubseteq A'cup B'$ and $Acap Bsubseteq A'cap B'$. If $f(A,B)$ is a formal combination of $A$s and $B$s with unions and intersections, then it is monotone: $f(A,B)subseteq f(A',B')$ under the above
assumptions. But $Asetminus B$ is not a monotone operation.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The union and intersection operators are monotone. If $Asubseteq A'$
and $Bsubseteq B'$ then $Acup Bsubseteq A'cup B'$ and $Acap Bsubseteq A'cap B'$. If $f(A,B)$ is a formal combination of $A$s and $B$s with unions and intersections, then it is monotone: $f(A,B)subseteq f(A',B')$ under the above
assumptions. But $Asetminus B$ is not a monotone operation.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
The union and intersection operators are monotone. If $Asubseteq A'$
and $Bsubseteq B'$ then $Acup Bsubseteq A'cup B'$ and $Acap Bsubseteq A'cap B'$. If $f(A,B)$ is a formal combination of $A$s and $B$s with unions and intersections, then it is monotone: $f(A,B)subseteq f(A',B')$ under the above
assumptions. But $Asetminus B$ is not a monotone operation.
$endgroup$
The union and intersection operators are monotone. If $Asubseteq A'$
and $Bsubseteq B'$ then $Acup Bsubseteq A'cup B'$ and $Acap Bsubseteq A'cap B'$. If $f(A,B)$ is a formal combination of $A$s and $B$s with unions and intersections, then it is monotone: $f(A,B)subseteq f(A',B')$ under the above
assumptions. But $Asetminus B$ is not a monotone operation.
answered Dec 8 '18 at 13:14
Lord Shark the UnknownLord Shark the Unknown
103k1160132
103k1160132
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3031087%2fhow-to-prove-that-the-set-theoretic-difference-operation-setminus-cannot-be-d%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown