How to prove that the set-theoretic difference operation $setminus$ cannot be defined through $cap$ and $cup$












1












$begingroup$


How does one go about proving that the set-theoretic difference operation $setminus$ cannot be defined through the operations $cap$ and $cup$?



My thoughts: I first assumed $A$ and $B$ are two non-disjoint non-empty sets since if they are disjoint and non-empty, then we have that $Asetminus B= A =Acap A=(Acap B) cup A$. Therefore we have defined, in this case, $setminus$ in terms of $cap$ and $cup$.



Next, I drew three Venn diagrams for $Acap B $, $Acup B $ and $Asetminus B $ and made the observation that $A setminus B$ involves an exclusion of a part of $A$. When I looked at the definitions, I could see this clearer:



$$Acap B = {xmid (xin A) land (xin B)}$$
$$Acup B = {xmid (xin A) lor (xin B)}$$
$$Asetminus B = {xmid (xin A) land mathbf{(xnotin B)}}$$



From this, I decided to conclude that since the intersection and union operations have the condition that $(xin B)$ whereas the set difference operation requires $(xnotin B)$, we cannot define set difference through the operations union and intersection only.



This is as far as I could go. How can I prove this formally?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$

















    1












    $begingroup$


    How does one go about proving that the set-theoretic difference operation $setminus$ cannot be defined through the operations $cap$ and $cup$?



    My thoughts: I first assumed $A$ and $B$ are two non-disjoint non-empty sets since if they are disjoint and non-empty, then we have that $Asetminus B= A =Acap A=(Acap B) cup A$. Therefore we have defined, in this case, $setminus$ in terms of $cap$ and $cup$.



    Next, I drew three Venn diagrams for $Acap B $, $Acup B $ and $Asetminus B $ and made the observation that $A setminus B$ involves an exclusion of a part of $A$. When I looked at the definitions, I could see this clearer:



    $$Acap B = {xmid (xin A) land (xin B)}$$
    $$Acup B = {xmid (xin A) lor (xin B)}$$
    $$Asetminus B = {xmid (xin A) land mathbf{(xnotin B)}}$$



    From this, I decided to conclude that since the intersection and union operations have the condition that $(xin B)$ whereas the set difference operation requires $(xnotin B)$, we cannot define set difference through the operations union and intersection only.



    This is as far as I could go. How can I prove this formally?










    share|cite|improve this question









    $endgroup$















      1












      1








      1





      $begingroup$


      How does one go about proving that the set-theoretic difference operation $setminus$ cannot be defined through the operations $cap$ and $cup$?



      My thoughts: I first assumed $A$ and $B$ are two non-disjoint non-empty sets since if they are disjoint and non-empty, then we have that $Asetminus B= A =Acap A=(Acap B) cup A$. Therefore we have defined, in this case, $setminus$ in terms of $cap$ and $cup$.



      Next, I drew three Venn diagrams for $Acap B $, $Acup B $ and $Asetminus B $ and made the observation that $A setminus B$ involves an exclusion of a part of $A$. When I looked at the definitions, I could see this clearer:



      $$Acap B = {xmid (xin A) land (xin B)}$$
      $$Acup B = {xmid (xin A) lor (xin B)}$$
      $$Asetminus B = {xmid (xin A) land mathbf{(xnotin B)}}$$



      From this, I decided to conclude that since the intersection and union operations have the condition that $(xin B)$ whereas the set difference operation requires $(xnotin B)$, we cannot define set difference through the operations union and intersection only.



      This is as far as I could go. How can I prove this formally?










      share|cite|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      How does one go about proving that the set-theoretic difference operation $setminus$ cannot be defined through the operations $cap$ and $cup$?



      My thoughts: I first assumed $A$ and $B$ are two non-disjoint non-empty sets since if they are disjoint and non-empty, then we have that $Asetminus B= A =Acap A=(Acap B) cup A$. Therefore we have defined, in this case, $setminus$ in terms of $cap$ and $cup$.



      Next, I drew three Venn diagrams for $Acap B $, $Acup B $ and $Asetminus B $ and made the observation that $A setminus B$ involves an exclusion of a part of $A$. When I looked at the definitions, I could see this clearer:



      $$Acap B = {xmid (xin A) land (xin B)}$$
      $$Acup B = {xmid (xin A) lor (xin B)}$$
      $$Asetminus B = {xmid (xin A) land mathbf{(xnotin B)}}$$



      From this, I decided to conclude that since the intersection and union operations have the condition that $(xin B)$ whereas the set difference operation requires $(xnotin B)$, we cannot define set difference through the operations union and intersection only.



      This is as far as I could go. How can I prove this formally?







      discrete-mathematics elementary-set-theory






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Dec 8 '18 at 13:04









      E.NoleE.Nole

      141114




      141114






















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          2












          $begingroup$

          All you need is a counterexample.



          Let $A = B = { 0 }$. Then all of the sets
          $$A,~ B,~ A cup A,~ A cap A,~ A cup B,~ A cap B,~ B cup A,~ B cap A,~ B cup B,~ B cup B$$
          are equal to ${ 0 }$, and so any set built out of $A$, $B$ and the operations $cup$ and $cap$ is equal to ${ 0 }$.



          But $B setminus A = varnothing ne { 0 }$, and so the set difference operator $setminus$ can't be expressed in terms of $cup$ and $cap$ alone.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$





















            3












            $begingroup$

            The union and intersection operators are monotone. If $Asubseteq A'$
            and $Bsubseteq B'$ then $Acup Bsubseteq A'cup B'$ and $Acap Bsubseteq A'cap B'$. If $f(A,B)$ is a formal combination of $A$s and $B$s with unions and intersections, then it is monotone: $f(A,B)subseteq f(A',B')$ under the above
            assumptions. But $Asetminus B$ is not a monotone operation.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$













              Your Answer





              StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
              return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
              StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
              StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
              });
              });
              }, "mathjax-editing");

              StackExchange.ready(function() {
              var channelOptions = {
              tags: "".split(" "),
              id: "69"
              };
              initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

              StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
              // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
              if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
              StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
              createEditor();
              });
              }
              else {
              createEditor();
              }
              });

              function createEditor() {
              StackExchange.prepareEditor({
              heartbeatType: 'answer',
              autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
              convertImagesToLinks: true,
              noModals: true,
              showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
              reputationToPostImages: 10,
              bindNavPrevention: true,
              postfix: "",
              imageUploader: {
              brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
              contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
              allowUrls: true
              },
              noCode: true, onDemand: true,
              discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
              ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
              });


              }
              });














              draft saved

              draft discarded


















              StackExchange.ready(
              function () {
              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3031087%2fhow-to-prove-that-the-set-theoretic-difference-operation-setminus-cannot-be-d%23new-answer', 'question_page');
              }
              );

              Post as a guest















              Required, but never shown

























              2 Answers
              2






              active

              oldest

              votes








              2 Answers
              2






              active

              oldest

              votes









              active

              oldest

              votes






              active

              oldest

              votes









              2












              $begingroup$

              All you need is a counterexample.



              Let $A = B = { 0 }$. Then all of the sets
              $$A,~ B,~ A cup A,~ A cap A,~ A cup B,~ A cap B,~ B cup A,~ B cap A,~ B cup B,~ B cup B$$
              are equal to ${ 0 }$, and so any set built out of $A$, $B$ and the operations $cup$ and $cap$ is equal to ${ 0 }$.



              But $B setminus A = varnothing ne { 0 }$, and so the set difference operator $setminus$ can't be expressed in terms of $cup$ and $cap$ alone.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$


















                2












                $begingroup$

                All you need is a counterexample.



                Let $A = B = { 0 }$. Then all of the sets
                $$A,~ B,~ A cup A,~ A cap A,~ A cup B,~ A cap B,~ B cup A,~ B cap A,~ B cup B,~ B cup B$$
                are equal to ${ 0 }$, and so any set built out of $A$, $B$ and the operations $cup$ and $cap$ is equal to ${ 0 }$.



                But $B setminus A = varnothing ne { 0 }$, and so the set difference operator $setminus$ can't be expressed in terms of $cup$ and $cap$ alone.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$
















                  2












                  2








                  2





                  $begingroup$

                  All you need is a counterexample.



                  Let $A = B = { 0 }$. Then all of the sets
                  $$A,~ B,~ A cup A,~ A cap A,~ A cup B,~ A cap B,~ B cup A,~ B cap A,~ B cup B,~ B cup B$$
                  are equal to ${ 0 }$, and so any set built out of $A$, $B$ and the operations $cup$ and $cap$ is equal to ${ 0 }$.



                  But $B setminus A = varnothing ne { 0 }$, and so the set difference operator $setminus$ can't be expressed in terms of $cup$ and $cap$ alone.






                  share|cite|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$



                  All you need is a counterexample.



                  Let $A = B = { 0 }$. Then all of the sets
                  $$A,~ B,~ A cup A,~ A cap A,~ A cup B,~ A cap B,~ B cup A,~ B cap A,~ B cup B,~ B cup B$$
                  are equal to ${ 0 }$, and so any set built out of $A$, $B$ and the operations $cup$ and $cap$ is equal to ${ 0 }$.



                  But $B setminus A = varnothing ne { 0 }$, and so the set difference operator $setminus$ can't be expressed in terms of $cup$ and $cap$ alone.







                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer










                  answered Dec 8 '18 at 14:48









                  Clive NewsteadClive Newstead

                  51.2k474135




                  51.2k474135























                      3












                      $begingroup$

                      The union and intersection operators are monotone. If $Asubseteq A'$
                      and $Bsubseteq B'$ then $Acup Bsubseteq A'cup B'$ and $Acap Bsubseteq A'cap B'$. If $f(A,B)$ is a formal combination of $A$s and $B$s with unions and intersections, then it is monotone: $f(A,B)subseteq f(A',B')$ under the above
                      assumptions. But $Asetminus B$ is not a monotone operation.






                      share|cite|improve this answer









                      $endgroup$


















                        3












                        $begingroup$

                        The union and intersection operators are monotone. If $Asubseteq A'$
                        and $Bsubseteq B'$ then $Acup Bsubseteq A'cup B'$ and $Acap Bsubseteq A'cap B'$. If $f(A,B)$ is a formal combination of $A$s and $B$s with unions and intersections, then it is monotone: $f(A,B)subseteq f(A',B')$ under the above
                        assumptions. But $Asetminus B$ is not a monotone operation.






                        share|cite|improve this answer









                        $endgroup$
















                          3












                          3








                          3





                          $begingroup$

                          The union and intersection operators are monotone. If $Asubseteq A'$
                          and $Bsubseteq B'$ then $Acup Bsubseteq A'cup B'$ and $Acap Bsubseteq A'cap B'$. If $f(A,B)$ is a formal combination of $A$s and $B$s with unions and intersections, then it is monotone: $f(A,B)subseteq f(A',B')$ under the above
                          assumptions. But $Asetminus B$ is not a monotone operation.






                          share|cite|improve this answer









                          $endgroup$



                          The union and intersection operators are monotone. If $Asubseteq A'$
                          and $Bsubseteq B'$ then $Acup Bsubseteq A'cup B'$ and $Acap Bsubseteq A'cap B'$. If $f(A,B)$ is a formal combination of $A$s and $B$s with unions and intersections, then it is monotone: $f(A,B)subseteq f(A',B')$ under the above
                          assumptions. But $Asetminus B$ is not a monotone operation.







                          share|cite|improve this answer












                          share|cite|improve this answer



                          share|cite|improve this answer










                          answered Dec 8 '18 at 13:14









                          Lord Shark the UnknownLord Shark the Unknown

                          103k1160132




                          103k1160132






























                              draft saved

                              draft discarded




















































                              Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                              • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                              But avoid



                              • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                              • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                              Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                              To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                              draft saved


                              draft discarded














                              StackExchange.ready(
                              function () {
                              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3031087%2fhow-to-prove-that-the-set-theoretic-difference-operation-setminus-cannot-be-d%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                              }
                              );

                              Post as a guest















                              Required, but never shown





















































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown

































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown







                              Popular posts from this blog

                              Wiesbaden

                              Marschland

                              Dieringhausen