Adding Timecodes in Excel
I have about 140 cells (they are in a vertical column) containing Timecodes in the Format hh:mm:ss:ff.
There are 24 Frames per second.
I would like to add them, so I have a total duration of all extracts.
Can anyone tell me how I could do that in Micosoft Excel?
Any help is greatly appreciated, since I am literally clueless...Thanks so much in advance!!
excel duration timecodes
edited Nov 23 '18 at 19:51
Ron Rosenfeld
23.4k41636
asked Nov 23 '18 at 19:11
Anna SolteszAnna Soltesz
1
add a comment |
I have about 140 cells (they are in a vertical column) containing Timecodes in the Format hh:mm:ss:ff.
There are 24 Frames per second.
I would like to add them, so I have a total duration of all extracts.
Can anyone tell me how I could do that in Micosoft Excel?
Any help is greatly appreciated, since I am literally clueless...Thanks so much in advance!!
excel duration timecodes
edited Nov 23 '18 at 19:51
Ron Rosenfeld
23.4k41636
asked Nov 23 '18 at 19:11
Anna SolteszAnna Soltesz
1
What would a duration look like between, say,00:01:07:07and00:01:07:09. Would it be measured as 2 frames or 1/12 second or what?
– JNevill
Nov 23 '18 at 19:57
My lists consists of durations already, so it would be 00:00:00:2
– Anna Soltesz
Nov 26 '18 at 11:55
add a comment |
I have about 140 cells (they are in a vertical column) containing Timecodes in the Format hh:mm:ss:ff.
There are 24 Frames per second.
I would like to add them, so I have a total duration of all extracts.
Can anyone tell me how I could do that in Micosoft Excel?
Any help is greatly appreciated, since I am literally clueless...Thanks so much in advance!!
excel duration timecodes
edited Nov 23 '18 at 19:51
Ron Rosenfeld
23.4k41636
asked Nov 23 '18 at 19:11
Anna SolteszAnna Soltesz
1
I have about 140 cells (they are in a vertical column) containing Timecodes in the Format hh:mm:ss:ff.
There are 24 Frames per second.
I would like to add them, so I have a total duration of all extracts.
Can anyone tell me how I could do that in Micosoft Excel?
Any help is greatly appreciated, since I am literally clueless...Thanks so much in advance!!
excel duration timecodes
excel duration timecodes
edited Nov 23 '18 at 19:51
Ron Rosenfeld
23.4k41636
asked Nov 23 '18 at 19:11
Anna SolteszAnna Soltesz
1
edited Nov 23 '18 at 19:51
Ron Rosenfeld
23.4k41636
asked Nov 23 '18 at 19:11
Anna SolteszAnna Soltesz
1
edited Nov 23 '18 at 19:51
Ron Rosenfeld
23.4k41636
edited Nov 23 '18 at 19:51
Ron Rosenfeld
23.4k41636
edited Nov 23 '18 at 19:51
Ron Rosenfeld
23.4k41636
23.4k41636
asked Nov 23 '18 at 19:11
Anna SolteszAnna Soltesz
1
asked Nov 23 '18 at 19:11
Anna SolteszAnna Soltesz
1
asked Nov 23 '18 at 19:11
Anna SolteszAnna Soltesz
1
1
What would a duration look like between, say,00:01:07:07and00:01:07:09. Would it be measured as 2 frames or 1/12 second or what?
– JNevill
Nov 23 '18 at 19:57
My lists consists of durations already, so it would be 00:00:00:2
– Anna Soltesz
Nov 26 '18 at 11:55
add a comment |
What would a duration look like between, say,00:01:07:07and00:01:07:09. Would it be measured as 2 frames or 1/12 second or what?
– JNevill
Nov 23 '18 at 19:57
My lists consists of durations already, so it would be 00:00:00:2
– Anna Soltesz
Nov 26 '18 at 11:55
What would a duration look like between, say,
00:01:07:07 and 00:01:07:09. Would it be measured as 2 frames or 1/12 second or what?– JNevill
Nov 23 '18 at 19:57
What would a duration look like between, say,
00:01:07:07 and 00:01:07:09. Would it be measured as 2 frames or 1/12 second or what?– JNevill
Nov 23 '18 at 19:57
My lists consists of durations already, so it would be 00:00:00:2
– Anna Soltesz
Nov 26 '18 at 11:55
My lists consists of durations already, so it would be 00:00:00:2
– Anna Soltesz
Nov 26 '18 at 11:55
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
You can get the duration in frames by doing some math. First you have to pick out each portion of the timestamp (Hours, Minutes, Seconds, and Frames), then just math that up to get the number of frames since some prior point in time (00:00:00:00). From that you can derive the duration each frame is from it's predecessor and sum the results for the total:
answered Nov 23 '18 at 20:04
JNevillJNevill
31.8k31544
Thanks so much! Since I have to do it several times (sometimes only for three cells, sometimes for 40) that is a bit too much of a hustle. But thank you anyway :-)
– Anna Soltesz
Nov 26 '18 at 11:57
add a comment |
This might not be the best way (or maybe it is?), but it works.
- Separate hh:mm:ss from ff.
- Sum hh:mm:ss and ff respectively.
- Add frames to hh:mm:ss.
answered Nov 23 '18 at 20:23
Erik BlomgrenErik Blomgren
52226
1
Thanks so much! I ended up just calculating without the frames with a very approximate number, but in a later phase of this project I will probably use this! Thank you :-)
– Anna Soltesz
Nov 26 '18 at 11:58
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53451898%2fadding-timecodes-in-excel%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
You can get the duration in frames by doing some math. First you have to pick out each portion of the timestamp (Hours, Minutes, Seconds, and Frames), then just math that up to get the number of frames since some prior point in time (00:00:00:00). From that you can derive the duration each frame is from it's predecessor and sum the results for the total:
answered Nov 23 '18 at 20:04
JNevillJNevill
31.8k31544
Thanks so much! Since I have to do it several times (sometimes only for three cells, sometimes for 40) that is a bit too much of a hustle. But thank you anyway :-)
– Anna Soltesz
Nov 26 '18 at 11:57
add a comment |
You can get the duration in frames by doing some math. First you have to pick out each portion of the timestamp (Hours, Minutes, Seconds, and Frames), then just math that up to get the number of frames since some prior point in time (00:00:00:00). From that you can derive the duration each frame is from it's predecessor and sum the results for the total:
answered Nov 23 '18 at 20:04
JNevillJNevill
31.8k31544
Thanks so much! Since I have to do it several times (sometimes only for three cells, sometimes for 40) that is a bit too much of a hustle. But thank you anyway :-)
– Anna Soltesz
Nov 26 '18 at 11:57
add a comment |
You can get the duration in frames by doing some math. First you have to pick out each portion of the timestamp (Hours, Minutes, Seconds, and Frames), then just math that up to get the number of frames since some prior point in time (00:00:00:00). From that you can derive the duration each frame is from it's predecessor and sum the results for the total:
answered Nov 23 '18 at 20:04
JNevillJNevill
31.8k31544
You can get the duration in frames by doing some math. First you have to pick out each portion of the timestamp (Hours, Minutes, Seconds, and Frames), then just math that up to get the number of frames since some prior point in time (00:00:00:00). From that you can derive the duration each frame is from it's predecessor and sum the results for the total:
answered Nov 23 '18 at 20:04
JNevillJNevill
31.8k31544
answered Nov 23 '18 at 20:04
JNevillJNevill
31.8k31544
answered Nov 23 '18 at 20:04
JNevillJNevill
31.8k31544
answered Nov 23 '18 at 20:04
JNevillJNevill
31.8k31544
31.8k31544
Thanks so much! Since I have to do it several times (sometimes only for three cells, sometimes for 40) that is a bit too much of a hustle. But thank you anyway :-)
– Anna Soltesz
Nov 26 '18 at 11:57
add a comment |
Thanks so much! Since I have to do it several times (sometimes only for three cells, sometimes for 40) that is a bit too much of a hustle. But thank you anyway :-)
– Anna Soltesz
Nov 26 '18 at 11:57
Thanks so much! Since I have to do it several times (sometimes only for three cells, sometimes for 40) that is a bit too much of a hustle. But thank you anyway :-)
– Anna Soltesz
Nov 26 '18 at 11:57
Thanks so much! Since I have to do it several times (sometimes only for three cells, sometimes for 40) that is a bit too much of a hustle. But thank you anyway :-)
– Anna Soltesz
Nov 26 '18 at 11:57
add a comment |
This might not be the best way (or maybe it is?), but it works.
- Separate hh:mm:ss from ff.
- Sum hh:mm:ss and ff respectively.
- Add frames to hh:mm:ss.
answered Nov 23 '18 at 20:23
Erik BlomgrenErik Blomgren
52226
1
Thanks so much! I ended up just calculating without the frames with a very approximate number, but in a later phase of this project I will probably use this! Thank you :-)
– Anna Soltesz
Nov 26 '18 at 11:58
add a comment |
This might not be the best way (or maybe it is?), but it works.
- Separate hh:mm:ss from ff.
- Sum hh:mm:ss and ff respectively.
- Add frames to hh:mm:ss.
answered Nov 23 '18 at 20:23
Erik BlomgrenErik Blomgren
52226
1
Thanks so much! I ended up just calculating without the frames with a very approximate number, but in a later phase of this project I will probably use this! Thank you :-)
– Anna Soltesz
Nov 26 '18 at 11:58
add a comment |
This might not be the best way (or maybe it is?), but it works.
- Separate hh:mm:ss from ff.
- Sum hh:mm:ss and ff respectively.
- Add frames to hh:mm:ss.
answered Nov 23 '18 at 20:23
Erik BlomgrenErik Blomgren
52226
This might not be the best way (or maybe it is?), but it works.
- Separate hh:mm:ss from ff.
- Sum hh:mm:ss and ff respectively.
- Add frames to hh:mm:ss.
answered Nov 23 '18 at 20:23
Erik BlomgrenErik Blomgren
52226
answered Nov 23 '18 at 20:23
Erik BlomgrenErik Blomgren
52226
answered Nov 23 '18 at 20:23
Erik BlomgrenErik Blomgren
52226
answered Nov 23 '18 at 20:23
Erik BlomgrenErik Blomgren
52226
52226
1
Thanks so much! I ended up just calculating without the frames with a very approximate number, but in a later phase of this project I will probably use this! Thank you :-)
– Anna Soltesz
Nov 26 '18 at 11:58
add a comment |
1
Thanks so much! I ended up just calculating without the frames with a very approximate number, but in a later phase of this project I will probably use this! Thank you :-)
– Anna Soltesz
Nov 26 '18 at 11:58
1
1
Thanks so much! I ended up just calculating without the frames with a very approximate number, but in a later phase of this project I will probably use this! Thank you :-)
– Anna Soltesz
Nov 26 '18 at 11:58
Thanks so much! I ended up just calculating without the frames with a very approximate number, but in a later phase of this project I will probably use this! Thank you :-)
– Anna Soltesz
Nov 26 '18 at 11:58
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53451898%2fadding-timecodes-in-excel%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
What would a duration look like between, say,
00:01:07:07and00:01:07:09. Would it be measured as 2 frames or 1/12 second or what?– JNevill
Nov 23 '18 at 19:57
My lists consists of durations already, so it would be 00:00:00:2
– Anna Soltesz
Nov 26 '18 at 11:55