Convergence in probability of sum of bounded random variables implies finite expectation
$begingroup$
Let $(X_i)$ be sequence of independent random variables with $|X_i| < 1$ almost-surely and define $M_n :=sum_{i=1}^{n}X_i$. Suppose it is known that $M_n$ converges in probability to some random variable $M$, where $M < infty$ almost-surely. Does it follow that $sum_{i=1}^{infty}mathbb{E}[X_i] < infty$?
probability probability-theory convergence random-variables
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $(X_i)$ be sequence of independent random variables with $|X_i| < 1$ almost-surely and define $M_n :=sum_{i=1}^{n}X_i$. Suppose it is known that $M_n$ converges in probability to some random variable $M$, where $M < infty$ almost-surely. Does it follow that $sum_{i=1}^{infty}mathbb{E}[X_i] < infty$?
probability probability-theory convergence random-variables
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Yes, the series converges... the proof which i know is somewhat technical; it uses an symmetrization argument, i.e. $Y_i := X_i-tilde{X}_i$ where $tilde{X}_i$ is an independent copy of $X_i$
$endgroup$
– saz
Dec 12 '18 at 6:36
$begingroup$
@saz Any reference or further details would be appreciated.
$endgroup$
– jesterII
Dec 12 '18 at 13:30
1
$begingroup$
Do you know Kolmogorov's three series convergence theorem? You can deduce it immediately from this result.
$endgroup$
– saz
Dec 12 '18 at 13:54
$begingroup$
@saz I've come across the three series theorem, although that applies to convergence a.s. whereas in this case the series is assumed to converge in probability. Is there an immediate way to connect the two?
$endgroup$
– jesterII
Dec 12 '18 at 15:56
1
$begingroup$
A well-known result (by Lévy) states that for independent random variables $X_i$ the series $sum_i X_i$ converges almost surely iff it converges in probability; see e.g. this question
$endgroup$
– saz
Dec 12 '18 at 15:59
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $(X_i)$ be sequence of independent random variables with $|X_i| < 1$ almost-surely and define $M_n :=sum_{i=1}^{n}X_i$. Suppose it is known that $M_n$ converges in probability to some random variable $M$, where $M < infty$ almost-surely. Does it follow that $sum_{i=1}^{infty}mathbb{E}[X_i] < infty$?
probability probability-theory convergence random-variables
$endgroup$
Let $(X_i)$ be sequence of independent random variables with $|X_i| < 1$ almost-surely and define $M_n :=sum_{i=1}^{n}X_i$. Suppose it is known that $M_n$ converges in probability to some random variable $M$, where $M < infty$ almost-surely. Does it follow that $sum_{i=1}^{infty}mathbb{E}[X_i] < infty$?
probability probability-theory convergence random-variables
probability probability-theory convergence random-variables
edited Dec 12 '18 at 1:18
jesterII
asked Dec 11 '18 at 23:27
jesterIIjesterII
1,21321326
1,21321326
$begingroup$
Yes, the series converges... the proof which i know is somewhat technical; it uses an symmetrization argument, i.e. $Y_i := X_i-tilde{X}_i$ where $tilde{X}_i$ is an independent copy of $X_i$
$endgroup$
– saz
Dec 12 '18 at 6:36
$begingroup$
@saz Any reference or further details would be appreciated.
$endgroup$
– jesterII
Dec 12 '18 at 13:30
1
$begingroup$
Do you know Kolmogorov's three series convergence theorem? You can deduce it immediately from this result.
$endgroup$
– saz
Dec 12 '18 at 13:54
$begingroup$
@saz I've come across the three series theorem, although that applies to convergence a.s. whereas in this case the series is assumed to converge in probability. Is there an immediate way to connect the two?
$endgroup$
– jesterII
Dec 12 '18 at 15:56
1
$begingroup$
A well-known result (by Lévy) states that for independent random variables $X_i$ the series $sum_i X_i$ converges almost surely iff it converges in probability; see e.g. this question
$endgroup$
– saz
Dec 12 '18 at 15:59
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Yes, the series converges... the proof which i know is somewhat technical; it uses an symmetrization argument, i.e. $Y_i := X_i-tilde{X}_i$ where $tilde{X}_i$ is an independent copy of $X_i$
$endgroup$
– saz
Dec 12 '18 at 6:36
$begingroup$
@saz Any reference or further details would be appreciated.
$endgroup$
– jesterII
Dec 12 '18 at 13:30
1
$begingroup$
Do you know Kolmogorov's three series convergence theorem? You can deduce it immediately from this result.
$endgroup$
– saz
Dec 12 '18 at 13:54
$begingroup$
@saz I've come across the three series theorem, although that applies to convergence a.s. whereas in this case the series is assumed to converge in probability. Is there an immediate way to connect the two?
$endgroup$
– jesterII
Dec 12 '18 at 15:56
1
$begingroup$
A well-known result (by Lévy) states that for independent random variables $X_i$ the series $sum_i X_i$ converges almost surely iff it converges in probability; see e.g. this question
$endgroup$
– saz
Dec 12 '18 at 15:59
$begingroup$
Yes, the series converges... the proof which i know is somewhat technical; it uses an symmetrization argument, i.e. $Y_i := X_i-tilde{X}_i$ where $tilde{X}_i$ is an independent copy of $X_i$
$endgroup$
– saz
Dec 12 '18 at 6:36
$begingroup$
Yes, the series converges... the proof which i know is somewhat technical; it uses an symmetrization argument, i.e. $Y_i := X_i-tilde{X}_i$ where $tilde{X}_i$ is an independent copy of $X_i$
$endgroup$
– saz
Dec 12 '18 at 6:36
$begingroup$
@saz Any reference or further details would be appreciated.
$endgroup$
– jesterII
Dec 12 '18 at 13:30
$begingroup$
@saz Any reference or further details would be appreciated.
$endgroup$
– jesterII
Dec 12 '18 at 13:30
1
1
$begingroup$
Do you know Kolmogorov's three series convergence theorem? You can deduce it immediately from this result.
$endgroup$
– saz
Dec 12 '18 at 13:54
$begingroup$
Do you know Kolmogorov's three series convergence theorem? You can deduce it immediately from this result.
$endgroup$
– saz
Dec 12 '18 at 13:54
$begingroup$
@saz I've come across the three series theorem, although that applies to convergence a.s. whereas in this case the series is assumed to converge in probability. Is there an immediate way to connect the two?
$endgroup$
– jesterII
Dec 12 '18 at 15:56
$begingroup$
@saz I've come across the three series theorem, although that applies to convergence a.s. whereas in this case the series is assumed to converge in probability. Is there an immediate way to connect the two?
$endgroup$
– jesterII
Dec 12 '18 at 15:56
1
1
$begingroup$
A well-known result (by Lévy) states that for independent random variables $X_i$ the series $sum_i X_i$ converges almost surely iff it converges in probability; see e.g. this question
$endgroup$
– saz
Dec 12 '18 at 15:59
$begingroup$
A well-known result (by Lévy) states that for independent random variables $X_i$ the series $sum_i X_i$ converges almost surely iff it converges in probability; see e.g. this question
$endgroup$
– saz
Dec 12 '18 at 15:59
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3035996%2fconvergence-in-probability-of-sum-of-bounded-random-variables-implies-finite-exp%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3035996%2fconvergence-in-probability-of-sum-of-bounded-random-variables-implies-finite-exp%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
Yes, the series converges... the proof which i know is somewhat technical; it uses an symmetrization argument, i.e. $Y_i := X_i-tilde{X}_i$ where $tilde{X}_i$ is an independent copy of $X_i$
$endgroup$
– saz
Dec 12 '18 at 6:36
$begingroup$
@saz Any reference or further details would be appreciated.
$endgroup$
– jesterII
Dec 12 '18 at 13:30
1
$begingroup$
Do you know Kolmogorov's three series convergence theorem? You can deduce it immediately from this result.
$endgroup$
– saz
Dec 12 '18 at 13:54
$begingroup$
@saz I've come across the three series theorem, although that applies to convergence a.s. whereas in this case the series is assumed to converge in probability. Is there an immediate way to connect the two?
$endgroup$
– jesterII
Dec 12 '18 at 15:56
1
$begingroup$
A well-known result (by Lévy) states that for independent random variables $X_i$ the series $sum_i X_i$ converges almost surely iff it converges in probability; see e.g. this question
$endgroup$
– saz
Dec 12 '18 at 15:59