Analog of finite set in valued complete division ring












1












$begingroup$


Let $K$ be a complete valued division ring and $S$ be a compact subset of $D$. It is easy to see that if $K$ is commuative, the $K$-algebra $mathscr C(S,K)$ of continuous functions on $S$ in $K$ is $K[x]$ if and only if $S$ is finite.
Does one have such a characterization on $S$ when $K$ is not commutative?



Thanks in advance.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    What do you mean by "is $K[x]$"? Maybe you mean that every continuous function is given by a polynomial? Note that this does not mean that $mathscr{C}(S,K)$ is isomorphic to $K[x]$ though since the map from $K[x]$ may not be injective.
    $endgroup$
    – Eric Wofsey
    Dec 29 '18 at 1:18










  • $begingroup$
    Yes, I meant that every continuous function is given by a polynomial.
    $endgroup$
    – joaopa
    Dec 29 '18 at 1:26












  • $begingroup$
    Interesting question (when fixed as suggested above). Indeed, for either implication, I run into the problems discussed here: math.stackexchange.com/q/122898/96384.
    $endgroup$
    – Torsten Schoeneberg
    Jan 1 at 18:13










  • $begingroup$
    May I ask what is the motivation for this? Precisely because of the problems discussed in the link above, standard polynomials (where the variable commutes with coefficients) are an unnatural object and a not very helpful tool over non-commutative rings, even division rings. Instead, something like skew polynomials might make a good replacement.
    $endgroup$
    – Torsten Schoeneberg
    Jan 2 at 21:20










  • $begingroup$
    standard polynomials are not skew polynomials (for the identity endomorphism and the null derivation)?
    $endgroup$
    – joaopa
    Jan 3 at 18:00
















1












$begingroup$


Let $K$ be a complete valued division ring and $S$ be a compact subset of $D$. It is easy to see that if $K$ is commuative, the $K$-algebra $mathscr C(S,K)$ of continuous functions on $S$ in $K$ is $K[x]$ if and only if $S$ is finite.
Does one have such a characterization on $S$ when $K$ is not commutative?



Thanks in advance.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    What do you mean by "is $K[x]$"? Maybe you mean that every continuous function is given by a polynomial? Note that this does not mean that $mathscr{C}(S,K)$ is isomorphic to $K[x]$ though since the map from $K[x]$ may not be injective.
    $endgroup$
    – Eric Wofsey
    Dec 29 '18 at 1:18










  • $begingroup$
    Yes, I meant that every continuous function is given by a polynomial.
    $endgroup$
    – joaopa
    Dec 29 '18 at 1:26












  • $begingroup$
    Interesting question (when fixed as suggested above). Indeed, for either implication, I run into the problems discussed here: math.stackexchange.com/q/122898/96384.
    $endgroup$
    – Torsten Schoeneberg
    Jan 1 at 18:13










  • $begingroup$
    May I ask what is the motivation for this? Precisely because of the problems discussed in the link above, standard polynomials (where the variable commutes with coefficients) are an unnatural object and a not very helpful tool over non-commutative rings, even division rings. Instead, something like skew polynomials might make a good replacement.
    $endgroup$
    – Torsten Schoeneberg
    Jan 2 at 21:20










  • $begingroup$
    standard polynomials are not skew polynomials (for the identity endomorphism and the null derivation)?
    $endgroup$
    – joaopa
    Jan 3 at 18:00














1












1








1


1



$begingroup$


Let $K$ be a complete valued division ring and $S$ be a compact subset of $D$. It is easy to see that if $K$ is commuative, the $K$-algebra $mathscr C(S,K)$ of continuous functions on $S$ in $K$ is $K[x]$ if and only if $S$ is finite.
Does one have such a characterization on $S$ when $K$ is not commutative?



Thanks in advance.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




Let $K$ be a complete valued division ring and $S$ be a compact subset of $D$. It is easy to see that if $K$ is commuative, the $K$-algebra $mathscr C(S,K)$ of continuous functions on $S$ in $K$ is $K[x]$ if and only if $S$ is finite.
Does one have such a characterization on $S$ when $K$ is not commutative?



Thanks in advance.







analysis p-adic-number-theory noncommutative-geometry






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Dec 29 '18 at 1:11









joaopajoaopa

35618




35618








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    What do you mean by "is $K[x]$"? Maybe you mean that every continuous function is given by a polynomial? Note that this does not mean that $mathscr{C}(S,K)$ is isomorphic to $K[x]$ though since the map from $K[x]$ may not be injective.
    $endgroup$
    – Eric Wofsey
    Dec 29 '18 at 1:18










  • $begingroup$
    Yes, I meant that every continuous function is given by a polynomial.
    $endgroup$
    – joaopa
    Dec 29 '18 at 1:26












  • $begingroup$
    Interesting question (when fixed as suggested above). Indeed, for either implication, I run into the problems discussed here: math.stackexchange.com/q/122898/96384.
    $endgroup$
    – Torsten Schoeneberg
    Jan 1 at 18:13










  • $begingroup$
    May I ask what is the motivation for this? Precisely because of the problems discussed in the link above, standard polynomials (where the variable commutes with coefficients) are an unnatural object and a not very helpful tool over non-commutative rings, even division rings. Instead, something like skew polynomials might make a good replacement.
    $endgroup$
    – Torsten Schoeneberg
    Jan 2 at 21:20










  • $begingroup$
    standard polynomials are not skew polynomials (for the identity endomorphism and the null derivation)?
    $endgroup$
    – joaopa
    Jan 3 at 18:00














  • 1




    $begingroup$
    What do you mean by "is $K[x]$"? Maybe you mean that every continuous function is given by a polynomial? Note that this does not mean that $mathscr{C}(S,K)$ is isomorphic to $K[x]$ though since the map from $K[x]$ may not be injective.
    $endgroup$
    – Eric Wofsey
    Dec 29 '18 at 1:18










  • $begingroup$
    Yes, I meant that every continuous function is given by a polynomial.
    $endgroup$
    – joaopa
    Dec 29 '18 at 1:26












  • $begingroup$
    Interesting question (when fixed as suggested above). Indeed, for either implication, I run into the problems discussed here: math.stackexchange.com/q/122898/96384.
    $endgroup$
    – Torsten Schoeneberg
    Jan 1 at 18:13










  • $begingroup$
    May I ask what is the motivation for this? Precisely because of the problems discussed in the link above, standard polynomials (where the variable commutes with coefficients) are an unnatural object and a not very helpful tool over non-commutative rings, even division rings. Instead, something like skew polynomials might make a good replacement.
    $endgroup$
    – Torsten Schoeneberg
    Jan 2 at 21:20










  • $begingroup$
    standard polynomials are not skew polynomials (for the identity endomorphism and the null derivation)?
    $endgroup$
    – joaopa
    Jan 3 at 18:00








1




1




$begingroup$
What do you mean by "is $K[x]$"? Maybe you mean that every continuous function is given by a polynomial? Note that this does not mean that $mathscr{C}(S,K)$ is isomorphic to $K[x]$ though since the map from $K[x]$ may not be injective.
$endgroup$
– Eric Wofsey
Dec 29 '18 at 1:18




$begingroup$
What do you mean by "is $K[x]$"? Maybe you mean that every continuous function is given by a polynomial? Note that this does not mean that $mathscr{C}(S,K)$ is isomorphic to $K[x]$ though since the map from $K[x]$ may not be injective.
$endgroup$
– Eric Wofsey
Dec 29 '18 at 1:18












$begingroup$
Yes, I meant that every continuous function is given by a polynomial.
$endgroup$
– joaopa
Dec 29 '18 at 1:26






$begingroup$
Yes, I meant that every continuous function is given by a polynomial.
$endgroup$
– joaopa
Dec 29 '18 at 1:26














$begingroup$
Interesting question (when fixed as suggested above). Indeed, for either implication, I run into the problems discussed here: math.stackexchange.com/q/122898/96384.
$endgroup$
– Torsten Schoeneberg
Jan 1 at 18:13




$begingroup$
Interesting question (when fixed as suggested above). Indeed, for either implication, I run into the problems discussed here: math.stackexchange.com/q/122898/96384.
$endgroup$
– Torsten Schoeneberg
Jan 1 at 18:13












$begingroup$
May I ask what is the motivation for this? Precisely because of the problems discussed in the link above, standard polynomials (where the variable commutes with coefficients) are an unnatural object and a not very helpful tool over non-commutative rings, even division rings. Instead, something like skew polynomials might make a good replacement.
$endgroup$
– Torsten Schoeneberg
Jan 2 at 21:20




$begingroup$
May I ask what is the motivation for this? Precisely because of the problems discussed in the link above, standard polynomials (where the variable commutes with coefficients) are an unnatural object and a not very helpful tool over non-commutative rings, even division rings. Instead, something like skew polynomials might make a good replacement.
$endgroup$
– Torsten Schoeneberg
Jan 2 at 21:20












$begingroup$
standard polynomials are not skew polynomials (for the identity endomorphism and the null derivation)?
$endgroup$
– joaopa
Jan 3 at 18:00




$begingroup$
standard polynomials are not skew polynomials (for the identity endomorphism and the null derivation)?
$endgroup$
– joaopa
Jan 3 at 18:00










0






active

oldest

votes











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3055441%2fanalog-of-finite-set-in-valued-complete-division-ring%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























0






active

oldest

votes








0






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes
















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3055441%2fanalog-of-finite-set-in-valued-complete-division-ring%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Wiesbaden

Marschland

Dieringhausen