Parse error on input ‘module’ when importing a module












0















This is the source code of the file Solitaire.hs:



import MergeSort

module Solitaire where

a :: Int

a = 2


MergeSort.hs and Solitaire.hs are in the same directory.



I'm using WinGhci.



The error I'm getting when trying to load Solitaire.hs after changing to its directory and using the command :load Solitaire.hs is:



Solitaire.hs:3:1: error: parse error on input ‘module’
|
3 | module Solitaire where | ^^^^^^
Failed, one module loaded.
*MergeSort>


What's curious is, that just removing the import statement: import MergeSort removes any error.










share|improve this question





























    0















    This is the source code of the file Solitaire.hs:



    import MergeSort

    module Solitaire where

    a :: Int

    a = 2


    MergeSort.hs and Solitaire.hs are in the same directory.



    I'm using WinGhci.



    The error I'm getting when trying to load Solitaire.hs after changing to its directory and using the command :load Solitaire.hs is:



    Solitaire.hs:3:1: error: parse error on input ‘module’
    |
    3 | module Solitaire where | ^^^^^^
    Failed, one module loaded.
    *MergeSort>


    What's curious is, that just removing the import statement: import MergeSort removes any error.










    share|improve this question



























      0












      0








      0








      This is the source code of the file Solitaire.hs:



      import MergeSort

      module Solitaire where

      a :: Int

      a = 2


      MergeSort.hs and Solitaire.hs are in the same directory.



      I'm using WinGhci.



      The error I'm getting when trying to load Solitaire.hs after changing to its directory and using the command :load Solitaire.hs is:



      Solitaire.hs:3:1: error: parse error on input ‘module’
      |
      3 | module Solitaire where | ^^^^^^
      Failed, one module loaded.
      *MergeSort>


      What's curious is, that just removing the import statement: import MergeSort removes any error.










      share|improve this question
















      This is the source code of the file Solitaire.hs:



      import MergeSort

      module Solitaire where

      a :: Int

      a = 2


      MergeSort.hs and Solitaire.hs are in the same directory.



      I'm using WinGhci.



      The error I'm getting when trying to load Solitaire.hs after changing to its directory and using the command :load Solitaire.hs is:



      Solitaire.hs:3:1: error: parse error on input ‘module’
      |
      3 | module Solitaire where | ^^^^^^
      Failed, one module loaded.
      *MergeSort>


      What's curious is, that just removing the import statement: import MergeSort removes any error.







      haskell compiler-errors






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited Nov 25 '18 at 19:08









      dfeuer

      33.2k349132




      33.2k349132










      asked Nov 25 '18 at 18:44









      Andrei TihoanAndrei Tihoan

      51




      51
























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          1














          Take a look at the grammar (5.1):



          module  →   module modid [exports] where body
          | body
          body → { impdecls ; topdecls }
          | { impdecls }
          | { topdecls }

          impdecls → impdecl1 ; … ; impdecln (n ≥ 1)
          topdecls → topdecl1 ; … ; topdecln (n ≥ 1)


          Also, in Section 5.3:




          The entities exported by a module may be brought into scope in another module with an import declaration at the beginning of the module.




          As you can see, imports must be inside the module, so your code should be:



          module Solitaire where
          import MergeSort

          a :: Int
          a = 2





          share|improve this answer



















          • 1





            Oh, that worked. I was almost certain I tried that. I must've tried it without indenting it properly or something. Thank you for the very much for the detailed response.

            – Andrei Tihoan
            Nov 25 '18 at 19:07











          • @AndreiTihoan, it's completely optional to indent module contents like that, and in my experience it's rare. The vast majority of Haskell programmers start their imports and top-level definitions in column 0 so they can make the best use of limited horizontal space. But whatever column you start the module contents in is the one you have to put the rest in.

            – dfeuer
            Nov 25 '18 at 19:11











          • Thanks again @ForceBru. It does actually look better when not indented. Also, thank you for cleaning up my question. It was my first post, and I made it in a bit of a hurry, not realizing my code wasn't properly written under code.

            – Andrei Tihoan
            Nov 25 '18 at 19:20











          • @AndreiTihoan, you should thank defer for the idea about indentation, not me :D As for question formatting, you can find more information about how and what to post in the Help Centre. Welcome to Stack Overflow!

            – ForceBru
            Nov 25 '18 at 19:24











          Your Answer






          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
          StackExchange.snippets.init();
          });
          });
          }, "code-snippets");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "1"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53470725%2fparse-error-on-input-module-when-importing-a-module%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          1














          Take a look at the grammar (5.1):



          module  →   module modid [exports] where body
          | body
          body → { impdecls ; topdecls }
          | { impdecls }
          | { topdecls }

          impdecls → impdecl1 ; … ; impdecln (n ≥ 1)
          topdecls → topdecl1 ; … ; topdecln (n ≥ 1)


          Also, in Section 5.3:




          The entities exported by a module may be brought into scope in another module with an import declaration at the beginning of the module.




          As you can see, imports must be inside the module, so your code should be:



          module Solitaire where
          import MergeSort

          a :: Int
          a = 2





          share|improve this answer



















          • 1





            Oh, that worked. I was almost certain I tried that. I must've tried it without indenting it properly or something. Thank you for the very much for the detailed response.

            – Andrei Tihoan
            Nov 25 '18 at 19:07











          • @AndreiTihoan, it's completely optional to indent module contents like that, and in my experience it's rare. The vast majority of Haskell programmers start their imports and top-level definitions in column 0 so they can make the best use of limited horizontal space. But whatever column you start the module contents in is the one you have to put the rest in.

            – dfeuer
            Nov 25 '18 at 19:11











          • Thanks again @ForceBru. It does actually look better when not indented. Also, thank you for cleaning up my question. It was my first post, and I made it in a bit of a hurry, not realizing my code wasn't properly written under code.

            – Andrei Tihoan
            Nov 25 '18 at 19:20











          • @AndreiTihoan, you should thank defer for the idea about indentation, not me :D As for question formatting, you can find more information about how and what to post in the Help Centre. Welcome to Stack Overflow!

            – ForceBru
            Nov 25 '18 at 19:24
















          1














          Take a look at the grammar (5.1):



          module  →   module modid [exports] where body
          | body
          body → { impdecls ; topdecls }
          | { impdecls }
          | { topdecls }

          impdecls → impdecl1 ; … ; impdecln (n ≥ 1)
          topdecls → topdecl1 ; … ; topdecln (n ≥ 1)


          Also, in Section 5.3:




          The entities exported by a module may be brought into scope in another module with an import declaration at the beginning of the module.




          As you can see, imports must be inside the module, so your code should be:



          module Solitaire where
          import MergeSort

          a :: Int
          a = 2





          share|improve this answer



















          • 1





            Oh, that worked. I was almost certain I tried that. I must've tried it without indenting it properly or something. Thank you for the very much for the detailed response.

            – Andrei Tihoan
            Nov 25 '18 at 19:07











          • @AndreiTihoan, it's completely optional to indent module contents like that, and in my experience it's rare. The vast majority of Haskell programmers start their imports and top-level definitions in column 0 so they can make the best use of limited horizontal space. But whatever column you start the module contents in is the one you have to put the rest in.

            – dfeuer
            Nov 25 '18 at 19:11











          • Thanks again @ForceBru. It does actually look better when not indented. Also, thank you for cleaning up my question. It was my first post, and I made it in a bit of a hurry, not realizing my code wasn't properly written under code.

            – Andrei Tihoan
            Nov 25 '18 at 19:20











          • @AndreiTihoan, you should thank defer for the idea about indentation, not me :D As for question formatting, you can find more information about how and what to post in the Help Centre. Welcome to Stack Overflow!

            – ForceBru
            Nov 25 '18 at 19:24














          1












          1








          1







          Take a look at the grammar (5.1):



          module  →   module modid [exports] where body
          | body
          body → { impdecls ; topdecls }
          | { impdecls }
          | { topdecls }

          impdecls → impdecl1 ; … ; impdecln (n ≥ 1)
          topdecls → topdecl1 ; … ; topdecln (n ≥ 1)


          Also, in Section 5.3:




          The entities exported by a module may be brought into scope in another module with an import declaration at the beginning of the module.




          As you can see, imports must be inside the module, so your code should be:



          module Solitaire where
          import MergeSort

          a :: Int
          a = 2





          share|improve this answer













          Take a look at the grammar (5.1):



          module  →   module modid [exports] where body
          | body
          body → { impdecls ; topdecls }
          | { impdecls }
          | { topdecls }

          impdecls → impdecl1 ; … ; impdecln (n ≥ 1)
          topdecls → topdecl1 ; … ; topdecln (n ≥ 1)


          Also, in Section 5.3:




          The entities exported by a module may be brought into scope in another module with an import declaration at the beginning of the module.




          As you can see, imports must be inside the module, so your code should be:



          module Solitaire where
          import MergeSort

          a :: Int
          a = 2






          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered Nov 25 '18 at 18:56









          ForceBruForceBru

          20.5k83354




          20.5k83354








          • 1





            Oh, that worked. I was almost certain I tried that. I must've tried it without indenting it properly or something. Thank you for the very much for the detailed response.

            – Andrei Tihoan
            Nov 25 '18 at 19:07











          • @AndreiTihoan, it's completely optional to indent module contents like that, and in my experience it's rare. The vast majority of Haskell programmers start their imports and top-level definitions in column 0 so they can make the best use of limited horizontal space. But whatever column you start the module contents in is the one you have to put the rest in.

            – dfeuer
            Nov 25 '18 at 19:11











          • Thanks again @ForceBru. It does actually look better when not indented. Also, thank you for cleaning up my question. It was my first post, and I made it in a bit of a hurry, not realizing my code wasn't properly written under code.

            – Andrei Tihoan
            Nov 25 '18 at 19:20











          • @AndreiTihoan, you should thank defer for the idea about indentation, not me :D As for question formatting, you can find more information about how and what to post in the Help Centre. Welcome to Stack Overflow!

            – ForceBru
            Nov 25 '18 at 19:24














          • 1





            Oh, that worked. I was almost certain I tried that. I must've tried it without indenting it properly or something. Thank you for the very much for the detailed response.

            – Andrei Tihoan
            Nov 25 '18 at 19:07











          • @AndreiTihoan, it's completely optional to indent module contents like that, and in my experience it's rare. The vast majority of Haskell programmers start their imports and top-level definitions in column 0 so they can make the best use of limited horizontal space. But whatever column you start the module contents in is the one you have to put the rest in.

            – dfeuer
            Nov 25 '18 at 19:11











          • Thanks again @ForceBru. It does actually look better when not indented. Also, thank you for cleaning up my question. It was my first post, and I made it in a bit of a hurry, not realizing my code wasn't properly written under code.

            – Andrei Tihoan
            Nov 25 '18 at 19:20











          • @AndreiTihoan, you should thank defer for the idea about indentation, not me :D As for question formatting, you can find more information about how and what to post in the Help Centre. Welcome to Stack Overflow!

            – ForceBru
            Nov 25 '18 at 19:24








          1




          1





          Oh, that worked. I was almost certain I tried that. I must've tried it without indenting it properly or something. Thank you for the very much for the detailed response.

          – Andrei Tihoan
          Nov 25 '18 at 19:07





          Oh, that worked. I was almost certain I tried that. I must've tried it without indenting it properly or something. Thank you for the very much for the detailed response.

          – Andrei Tihoan
          Nov 25 '18 at 19:07













          @AndreiTihoan, it's completely optional to indent module contents like that, and in my experience it's rare. The vast majority of Haskell programmers start their imports and top-level definitions in column 0 so they can make the best use of limited horizontal space. But whatever column you start the module contents in is the one you have to put the rest in.

          – dfeuer
          Nov 25 '18 at 19:11





          @AndreiTihoan, it's completely optional to indent module contents like that, and in my experience it's rare. The vast majority of Haskell programmers start their imports and top-level definitions in column 0 so they can make the best use of limited horizontal space. But whatever column you start the module contents in is the one you have to put the rest in.

          – dfeuer
          Nov 25 '18 at 19:11













          Thanks again @ForceBru. It does actually look better when not indented. Also, thank you for cleaning up my question. It was my first post, and I made it in a bit of a hurry, not realizing my code wasn't properly written under code.

          – Andrei Tihoan
          Nov 25 '18 at 19:20





          Thanks again @ForceBru. It does actually look better when not indented. Also, thank you for cleaning up my question. It was my first post, and I made it in a bit of a hurry, not realizing my code wasn't properly written under code.

          – Andrei Tihoan
          Nov 25 '18 at 19:20













          @AndreiTihoan, you should thank defer for the idea about indentation, not me :D As for question formatting, you can find more information about how and what to post in the Help Centre. Welcome to Stack Overflow!

          – ForceBru
          Nov 25 '18 at 19:24





          @AndreiTihoan, you should thank defer for the idea about indentation, not me :D As for question formatting, you can find more information about how and what to post in the Help Centre. Welcome to Stack Overflow!

          – ForceBru
          Nov 25 '18 at 19:24




















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53470725%2fparse-error-on-input-module-when-importing-a-module%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Wiesbaden

          Marschland

          Dieringhausen