Bind data to java object
1
I am trying to integrate a service in my system. which send the data in
below format
id=c100610414&amount=4681&card_currency_code=INR&transaction_ref_no=c1006f9bc12d411
I wish to bind it in java bean object in a performance effective manner.
Below is the code I have done so far
String splitval = val.split("&");
JSONObject json = new JSONObject();
for (int i = 0; i < splitval.length; i++) {
String _split = splitval[i].split("=");
if (_split.length > 1)
json.put(_split[0].trim(), _split[1].trim());
}
prePaidCardTxnBean = new Gson().fromJson(json.toString(), CardBean.class);
java json performance bind
asked Nov 26 '18 at 0:21
abhi314abhi314
68521240
add a comment |
1
I am trying to integrate a service in my system. which send the data in
below format
id=c100610414&amount=4681&card_currency_code=INR&transaction_ref_no=c1006f9bc12d411
I wish to bind it in java bean object in a performance effective manner.
Below is the code I have done so far
String splitval = val.split("&");
JSONObject json = new JSONObject();
for (int i = 0; i < splitval.length; i++) {
String _split = splitval[i].split("=");
if (_split.length > 1)
json.put(_split[0].trim(), _split[1].trim());
}
prePaidCardTxnBean = new Gson().fromJson(json.toString(), CardBean.class);
java json performance bind
asked Nov 26 '18 at 0:21
abhi314abhi314
68521240
and...? any problems?
– Scary Wombat
Nov 26 '18 at 0:23
2
belongs to codereview.stackexchange.com
– Kartik
Nov 26 '18 at 0:28
The code works fine, however I wish to know if it can be improved further as its important for my use case
– abhi314
Nov 26 '18 at 0:30
Premature optimization is bad. Just make whatever you are making work and see if its within SLAs or performant for the use case its meeting. Given you are working with other services your I/O will be your biggest performance sink in general. Not splitting a string.
– Darren Forsythe
Nov 26 '18 at 0:42
Of course, converting some trivial strings into JSON, just to parse them afterwards, is everything but efficient. You are already looping over all properties and splitting them into name and value, so all you have to do, is to check the names and set the particular property on the target object.
– Holger
Nov 28 '18 at 8:18
add a comment |
1
1
1
I am trying to integrate a service in my system. which send the data in
below format
id=c100610414&amount=4681&card_currency_code=INR&transaction_ref_no=c1006f9bc12d411
I wish to bind it in java bean object in a performance effective manner.
Below is the code I have done so far
String splitval = val.split("&");
JSONObject json = new JSONObject();
for (int i = 0; i < splitval.length; i++) {
String _split = splitval[i].split("=");
if (_split.length > 1)
json.put(_split[0].trim(), _split[1].trim());
}
prePaidCardTxnBean = new Gson().fromJson(json.toString(), CardBean.class);
java json performance bind
asked Nov 26 '18 at 0:21
abhi314abhi314
68521240
I am trying to integrate a service in my system. which send the data in
below format
id=c100610414&amount=4681&card_currency_code=INR&transaction_ref_no=c1006f9bc12d411
I wish to bind it in java bean object in a performance effective manner.
Below is the code I have done so far
String splitval = val.split("&");
JSONObject json = new JSONObject();
for (int i = 0; i < splitval.length; i++) {
String _split = splitval[i].split("=");
if (_split.length > 1)
json.put(_split[0].trim(), _split[1].trim());
}
prePaidCardTxnBean = new Gson().fromJson(json.toString(), CardBean.class);
java json performance bind
java json performance bind
asked Nov 26 '18 at 0:21
abhi314abhi314
68521240
asked Nov 26 '18 at 0:21
abhi314abhi314
68521240
asked Nov 26 '18 at 0:21
abhi314abhi314
68521240
asked Nov 26 '18 at 0:21
abhi314abhi314
68521240
asked Nov 26 '18 at 0:21
abhi314abhi314
68521240
68521240
and...? any problems?
– Scary Wombat
Nov 26 '18 at 0:23
2
belongs to codereview.stackexchange.com
– Kartik
Nov 26 '18 at 0:28
The code works fine, however I wish to know if it can be improved further as its important for my use case
– abhi314
Nov 26 '18 at 0:30
Premature optimization is bad. Just make whatever you are making work and see if its within SLAs or performant for the use case its meeting. Given you are working with other services your I/O will be your biggest performance sink in general. Not splitting a string.
– Darren Forsythe
Nov 26 '18 at 0:42
Of course, converting some trivial strings into JSON, just to parse them afterwards, is everything but efficient. You are already looping over all properties and splitting them into name and value, so all you have to do, is to check the names and set the particular property on the target object.
– Holger
Nov 28 '18 at 8:18
add a comment |
and...? any problems?
– Scary Wombat
Nov 26 '18 at 0:23
2
belongs to codereview.stackexchange.com
– Kartik
Nov 26 '18 at 0:28
The code works fine, however I wish to know if it can be improved further as its important for my use case
– abhi314
Nov 26 '18 at 0:30
Premature optimization is bad. Just make whatever you are making work and see if its within SLAs or performant for the use case its meeting. Given you are working with other services your I/O will be your biggest performance sink in general. Not splitting a string.
– Darren Forsythe
Nov 26 '18 at 0:42
Of course, converting some trivial strings into JSON, just to parse them afterwards, is everything but efficient. You are already looping over all properties and splitting them into name and value, so all you have to do, is to check the names and set the particular property on the target object.
– Holger
Nov 28 '18 at 8:18
and...? any problems?
– Scary Wombat
Nov 26 '18 at 0:23
and...? any problems?
– Scary Wombat
Nov 26 '18 at 0:23
2
2
belongs to codereview.stackexchange.com
– Kartik
Nov 26 '18 at 0:28
belongs to codereview.stackexchange.com
– Kartik
Nov 26 '18 at 0:28
The code works fine, however I wish to know if it can be improved further as its important for my use case
– abhi314
Nov 26 '18 at 0:30
The code works fine, however I wish to know if it can be improved further as its important for my use case
– abhi314
Nov 26 '18 at 0:30
Premature optimization is bad. Just make whatever you are making work and see if its within SLAs or performant for the use case its meeting. Given you are working with other services your I/O will be your biggest performance sink in general. Not splitting a string.
– Darren Forsythe
Nov 26 '18 at 0:42
Premature optimization is bad. Just make whatever you are making work and see if its within SLAs or performant for the use case its meeting. Given you are working with other services your I/O will be your biggest performance sink in general. Not splitting a string.
– Darren Forsythe
Nov 26 '18 at 0:42
Of course, converting some trivial strings into JSON, just to parse them afterwards, is everything but efficient. You are already looping over all properties and splitting them into name and value, so all you have to do, is to check the names and set the particular property on the target object.
– Holger
Nov 28 '18 at 8:18
Of course, converting some trivial strings into JSON, just to parse them afterwards, is everything but efficient. You are already looping over all properties and splitting them into name and value, so all you have to do, is to check the names and set the particular property on the target object.
– Holger
Nov 28 '18 at 8:18
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
draft saved
draft discarded
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53473355%2fbind-data-to-java-object%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
draft saved
draft discarded
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
draft saved
draft discarded
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53473355%2fbind-data-to-java-object%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
and...? any problems?
– Scary Wombat
Nov 26 '18 at 0:23
2
belongs to codereview.stackexchange.com
– Kartik
Nov 26 '18 at 0:28
The code works fine, however I wish to know if it can be improved further as its important for my use case
– abhi314
Nov 26 '18 at 0:30
Premature optimization is bad. Just make whatever you are making work and see if its within SLAs or performant for the use case its meeting. Given you are working with other services your I/O will be your biggest performance sink in general. Not splitting a string.
– Darren Forsythe
Nov 26 '18 at 0:42
Of course, converting some trivial strings into JSON, just to parse them afterwards, is everything but efficient. You are already looping over all properties and splitting them into name and value, so all you have to do, is to check the names and set the particular property on the target object.
– Holger
Nov 28 '18 at 8:18