Kendall's Tau of bivariate normal












3












$begingroup$


Prove Kendall's tau of a bivariate normal is given by



$$rho_tau (X_1,X_2)=frac{2}{pi}arcsinrho$$



I can derive the bivariate normal as



$$F(x_1,x_2)=frac{1}{2pisqrt{1-rho^2}}e^{-frac{1}{2}x_1Sigma^{-1}x_2}$$



where, for simplicity, I am assuming $X_1$ and $X_2$ have mean $0$. I also am aware that the formula for Kendall's tau involves an integral over some domain involving $X_1$, $X_2$, and $rho$, multiplied by $4$.



So it seems like all the pieces are there; the integral should result in the answer, if only the integral over the exponential term w.r.t. $X_1$ and $X_2$ were $1$. But this is not the case, so I am stuck.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    See here
    $endgroup$
    – mrtaurho
    Jan 1 at 21:16










  • $begingroup$
    I saw this but, as @Avraham writes, access is not given to the necessary papers for a rigorous proof.
    $endgroup$
    – E Werner
    Jan 1 at 21:29






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Anyway just stating a task is not appropriate for MSE. Therefore please include some more details with an edit.
    $endgroup$
    – mrtaurho
    Jan 1 at 21:41










  • $begingroup$
    At least write down the expression for Kendall's tau and indicate where you are stuck.
    $endgroup$
    – StubbornAtom
    Jan 2 at 14:35
















3












$begingroup$


Prove Kendall's tau of a bivariate normal is given by



$$rho_tau (X_1,X_2)=frac{2}{pi}arcsinrho$$



I can derive the bivariate normal as



$$F(x_1,x_2)=frac{1}{2pisqrt{1-rho^2}}e^{-frac{1}{2}x_1Sigma^{-1}x_2}$$



where, for simplicity, I am assuming $X_1$ and $X_2$ have mean $0$. I also am aware that the formula for Kendall's tau involves an integral over some domain involving $X_1$, $X_2$, and $rho$, multiplied by $4$.



So it seems like all the pieces are there; the integral should result in the answer, if only the integral over the exponential term w.r.t. $X_1$ and $X_2$ were $1$. But this is not the case, so I am stuck.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    See here
    $endgroup$
    – mrtaurho
    Jan 1 at 21:16










  • $begingroup$
    I saw this but, as @Avraham writes, access is not given to the necessary papers for a rigorous proof.
    $endgroup$
    – E Werner
    Jan 1 at 21:29






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Anyway just stating a task is not appropriate for MSE. Therefore please include some more details with an edit.
    $endgroup$
    – mrtaurho
    Jan 1 at 21:41










  • $begingroup$
    At least write down the expression for Kendall's tau and indicate where you are stuck.
    $endgroup$
    – StubbornAtom
    Jan 2 at 14:35














3












3








3





$begingroup$


Prove Kendall's tau of a bivariate normal is given by



$$rho_tau (X_1,X_2)=frac{2}{pi}arcsinrho$$



I can derive the bivariate normal as



$$F(x_1,x_2)=frac{1}{2pisqrt{1-rho^2}}e^{-frac{1}{2}x_1Sigma^{-1}x_2}$$



where, for simplicity, I am assuming $X_1$ and $X_2$ have mean $0$. I also am aware that the formula for Kendall's tau involves an integral over some domain involving $X_1$, $X_2$, and $rho$, multiplied by $4$.



So it seems like all the pieces are there; the integral should result in the answer, if only the integral over the exponential term w.r.t. $X_1$ and $X_2$ were $1$. But this is not the case, so I am stuck.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




Prove Kendall's tau of a bivariate normal is given by



$$rho_tau (X_1,X_2)=frac{2}{pi}arcsinrho$$



I can derive the bivariate normal as



$$F(x_1,x_2)=frac{1}{2pisqrt{1-rho^2}}e^{-frac{1}{2}x_1Sigma^{-1}x_2}$$



where, for simplicity, I am assuming $X_1$ and $X_2$ have mean $0$. I also am aware that the formula for Kendall's tau involves an integral over some domain involving $X_1$, $X_2$, and $rho$, multiplied by $4$.



So it seems like all the pieces are there; the integral should result in the answer, if only the integral over the exponential term w.r.t. $X_1$ and $X_2$ were $1$. But this is not the case, so I am stuck.







probability integration statistics correlation






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Jan 1 at 23:04









mrtaurho

6,09271641




6,09271641










asked Jan 1 at 21:13









E WernerE Werner

605




605












  • $begingroup$
    See here
    $endgroup$
    – mrtaurho
    Jan 1 at 21:16










  • $begingroup$
    I saw this but, as @Avraham writes, access is not given to the necessary papers for a rigorous proof.
    $endgroup$
    – E Werner
    Jan 1 at 21:29






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Anyway just stating a task is not appropriate for MSE. Therefore please include some more details with an edit.
    $endgroup$
    – mrtaurho
    Jan 1 at 21:41










  • $begingroup$
    At least write down the expression for Kendall's tau and indicate where you are stuck.
    $endgroup$
    – StubbornAtom
    Jan 2 at 14:35


















  • $begingroup$
    See here
    $endgroup$
    – mrtaurho
    Jan 1 at 21:16










  • $begingroup$
    I saw this but, as @Avraham writes, access is not given to the necessary papers for a rigorous proof.
    $endgroup$
    – E Werner
    Jan 1 at 21:29






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Anyway just stating a task is not appropriate for MSE. Therefore please include some more details with an edit.
    $endgroup$
    – mrtaurho
    Jan 1 at 21:41










  • $begingroup$
    At least write down the expression for Kendall's tau and indicate where you are stuck.
    $endgroup$
    – StubbornAtom
    Jan 2 at 14:35
















$begingroup$
See here
$endgroup$
– mrtaurho
Jan 1 at 21:16




$begingroup$
See here
$endgroup$
– mrtaurho
Jan 1 at 21:16












$begingroup$
I saw this but, as @Avraham writes, access is not given to the necessary papers for a rigorous proof.
$endgroup$
– E Werner
Jan 1 at 21:29




$begingroup$
I saw this but, as @Avraham writes, access is not given to the necessary papers for a rigorous proof.
$endgroup$
– E Werner
Jan 1 at 21:29




1




1




$begingroup$
Anyway just stating a task is not appropriate for MSE. Therefore please include some more details with an edit.
$endgroup$
– mrtaurho
Jan 1 at 21:41




$begingroup$
Anyway just stating a task is not appropriate for MSE. Therefore please include some more details with an edit.
$endgroup$
– mrtaurho
Jan 1 at 21:41












$begingroup$
At least write down the expression for Kendall's tau and indicate where you are stuck.
$endgroup$
– StubbornAtom
Jan 2 at 14:35




$begingroup$
At least write down the expression for Kendall's tau and indicate where you are stuck.
$endgroup$
– StubbornAtom
Jan 2 at 14:35










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















1












$begingroup$

Kendall's $tau$ is defined as
$$
tau(X_1,X_2)=mathsf{P}((X_1-Y_1)(X_2-Y_2)>0)-mathsf{P}((X_1-Y_1)(X_2-Y_2)<0),
$$

where $Yequiv(Y_1,Y_2)$ is an independent copy of $Xequiv(X_1,X_2)$.





Let $Z:=X-Y$ and note that $Zsim N(0,2Sigma)$, where $Sigma=operatorname {Var}(X)$. In addition,
$$
Zoverset{d}{sim}sqrt{2}(Sigma_{11}(V_1cos(varphi)+V_2sin(varphi)),Sigma_{22}V_2),
$$

where $varphiequiv arcsinrho$ and $Vequiv(V_1,V_2)sim N(0,I_2)$. Then, by symmetry,
begin{align}
tau(X_1,X_2)&=2mathsf{P}(Z_1Z_2>0)-1=4mathsf{P}(Z_1>0,Z_2>0)-1 \
&=4mathsf{P}(V_1cos(varphi)+V_2sin(varphi)>0,V_2>0)-1.
end{align}



It is known that $Voverset{d}{=}R(cos(Phi),sin(Phi))$, where $Phisim U[-pi,pi]$ independent of $R=|V|_2$. Therefore,
begin{align}
tau(X_1,X_2)&=4mathsf{P}(cos(Phi)cos(varphi)+sin(Phi)sin(varphi)>0,sin(Phi)>0)-1 \
&=4mathsf{P}(Phiin (varphi-pi/2,varphi+pi/2)cap[0,pi])-1 \
&=frac{2}{pi}(varphi+pi/2)-1=frac{2}{pi}arcsin rho.
end{align}






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$














    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3058888%2fkendalls-tau-of-bivariate-normal%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    1












    $begingroup$

    Kendall's $tau$ is defined as
    $$
    tau(X_1,X_2)=mathsf{P}((X_1-Y_1)(X_2-Y_2)>0)-mathsf{P}((X_1-Y_1)(X_2-Y_2)<0),
    $$

    where $Yequiv(Y_1,Y_2)$ is an independent copy of $Xequiv(X_1,X_2)$.





    Let $Z:=X-Y$ and note that $Zsim N(0,2Sigma)$, where $Sigma=operatorname {Var}(X)$. In addition,
    $$
    Zoverset{d}{sim}sqrt{2}(Sigma_{11}(V_1cos(varphi)+V_2sin(varphi)),Sigma_{22}V_2),
    $$

    where $varphiequiv arcsinrho$ and $Vequiv(V_1,V_2)sim N(0,I_2)$. Then, by symmetry,
    begin{align}
    tau(X_1,X_2)&=2mathsf{P}(Z_1Z_2>0)-1=4mathsf{P}(Z_1>0,Z_2>0)-1 \
    &=4mathsf{P}(V_1cos(varphi)+V_2sin(varphi)>0,V_2>0)-1.
    end{align}



    It is known that $Voverset{d}{=}R(cos(Phi),sin(Phi))$, where $Phisim U[-pi,pi]$ independent of $R=|V|_2$. Therefore,
    begin{align}
    tau(X_1,X_2)&=4mathsf{P}(cos(Phi)cos(varphi)+sin(Phi)sin(varphi)>0,sin(Phi)>0)-1 \
    &=4mathsf{P}(Phiin (varphi-pi/2,varphi+pi/2)cap[0,pi])-1 \
    &=frac{2}{pi}(varphi+pi/2)-1=frac{2}{pi}arcsin rho.
    end{align}






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$


















      1












      $begingroup$

      Kendall's $tau$ is defined as
      $$
      tau(X_1,X_2)=mathsf{P}((X_1-Y_1)(X_2-Y_2)>0)-mathsf{P}((X_1-Y_1)(X_2-Y_2)<0),
      $$

      where $Yequiv(Y_1,Y_2)$ is an independent copy of $Xequiv(X_1,X_2)$.





      Let $Z:=X-Y$ and note that $Zsim N(0,2Sigma)$, where $Sigma=operatorname {Var}(X)$. In addition,
      $$
      Zoverset{d}{sim}sqrt{2}(Sigma_{11}(V_1cos(varphi)+V_2sin(varphi)),Sigma_{22}V_2),
      $$

      where $varphiequiv arcsinrho$ and $Vequiv(V_1,V_2)sim N(0,I_2)$. Then, by symmetry,
      begin{align}
      tau(X_1,X_2)&=2mathsf{P}(Z_1Z_2>0)-1=4mathsf{P}(Z_1>0,Z_2>0)-1 \
      &=4mathsf{P}(V_1cos(varphi)+V_2sin(varphi)>0,V_2>0)-1.
      end{align}



      It is known that $Voverset{d}{=}R(cos(Phi),sin(Phi))$, where $Phisim U[-pi,pi]$ independent of $R=|V|_2$. Therefore,
      begin{align}
      tau(X_1,X_2)&=4mathsf{P}(cos(Phi)cos(varphi)+sin(Phi)sin(varphi)>0,sin(Phi)>0)-1 \
      &=4mathsf{P}(Phiin (varphi-pi/2,varphi+pi/2)cap[0,pi])-1 \
      &=frac{2}{pi}(varphi+pi/2)-1=frac{2}{pi}arcsin rho.
      end{align}






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$
















        1












        1








        1





        $begingroup$

        Kendall's $tau$ is defined as
        $$
        tau(X_1,X_2)=mathsf{P}((X_1-Y_1)(X_2-Y_2)>0)-mathsf{P}((X_1-Y_1)(X_2-Y_2)<0),
        $$

        where $Yequiv(Y_1,Y_2)$ is an independent copy of $Xequiv(X_1,X_2)$.





        Let $Z:=X-Y$ and note that $Zsim N(0,2Sigma)$, where $Sigma=operatorname {Var}(X)$. In addition,
        $$
        Zoverset{d}{sim}sqrt{2}(Sigma_{11}(V_1cos(varphi)+V_2sin(varphi)),Sigma_{22}V_2),
        $$

        where $varphiequiv arcsinrho$ and $Vequiv(V_1,V_2)sim N(0,I_2)$. Then, by symmetry,
        begin{align}
        tau(X_1,X_2)&=2mathsf{P}(Z_1Z_2>0)-1=4mathsf{P}(Z_1>0,Z_2>0)-1 \
        &=4mathsf{P}(V_1cos(varphi)+V_2sin(varphi)>0,V_2>0)-1.
        end{align}



        It is known that $Voverset{d}{=}R(cos(Phi),sin(Phi))$, where $Phisim U[-pi,pi]$ independent of $R=|V|_2$. Therefore,
        begin{align}
        tau(X_1,X_2)&=4mathsf{P}(cos(Phi)cos(varphi)+sin(Phi)sin(varphi)>0,sin(Phi)>0)-1 \
        &=4mathsf{P}(Phiin (varphi-pi/2,varphi+pi/2)cap[0,pi])-1 \
        &=frac{2}{pi}(varphi+pi/2)-1=frac{2}{pi}arcsin rho.
        end{align}






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        Kendall's $tau$ is defined as
        $$
        tau(X_1,X_2)=mathsf{P}((X_1-Y_1)(X_2-Y_2)>0)-mathsf{P}((X_1-Y_1)(X_2-Y_2)<0),
        $$

        where $Yequiv(Y_1,Y_2)$ is an independent copy of $Xequiv(X_1,X_2)$.





        Let $Z:=X-Y$ and note that $Zsim N(0,2Sigma)$, where $Sigma=operatorname {Var}(X)$. In addition,
        $$
        Zoverset{d}{sim}sqrt{2}(Sigma_{11}(V_1cos(varphi)+V_2sin(varphi)),Sigma_{22}V_2),
        $$

        where $varphiequiv arcsinrho$ and $Vequiv(V_1,V_2)sim N(0,I_2)$. Then, by symmetry,
        begin{align}
        tau(X_1,X_2)&=2mathsf{P}(Z_1Z_2>0)-1=4mathsf{P}(Z_1>0,Z_2>0)-1 \
        &=4mathsf{P}(V_1cos(varphi)+V_2sin(varphi)>0,V_2>0)-1.
        end{align}



        It is known that $Voverset{d}{=}R(cos(Phi),sin(Phi))$, where $Phisim U[-pi,pi]$ independent of $R=|V|_2$. Therefore,
        begin{align}
        tau(X_1,X_2)&=4mathsf{P}(cos(Phi)cos(varphi)+sin(Phi)sin(varphi)>0,sin(Phi)>0)-1 \
        &=4mathsf{P}(Phiin (varphi-pi/2,varphi+pi/2)cap[0,pi])-1 \
        &=frac{2}{pi}(varphi+pi/2)-1=frac{2}{pi}arcsin rho.
        end{align}







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Jan 2 at 2:02









        d.k.o.d.k.o.

        10.5k630




        10.5k630






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3058888%2fkendalls-tau-of-bivariate-normal%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Wiesbaden

            Marschland

            Dieringhausen