Kendall's Tau of bivariate normal
$begingroup$
Prove Kendall's tau of a bivariate normal is given by
$$rho_tau (X_1,X_2)=frac{2}{pi}arcsinrho$$
I can derive the bivariate normal as
$$F(x_1,x_2)=frac{1}{2pisqrt{1-rho^2}}e^{-frac{1}{2}x_1Sigma^{-1}x_2}$$
where, for simplicity, I am assuming $X_1$ and $X_2$ have mean $0$. I also am aware that the formula for Kendall's tau involves an integral over some domain involving $X_1$, $X_2$, and $rho$, multiplied by $4$.
So it seems like all the pieces are there; the integral should result in the answer, if only the integral over the exponential term w.r.t. $X_1$ and $X_2$ were $1$. But this is not the case, so I am stuck.
probability integration statistics correlation
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Prove Kendall's tau of a bivariate normal is given by
$$rho_tau (X_1,X_2)=frac{2}{pi}arcsinrho$$
I can derive the bivariate normal as
$$F(x_1,x_2)=frac{1}{2pisqrt{1-rho^2}}e^{-frac{1}{2}x_1Sigma^{-1}x_2}$$
where, for simplicity, I am assuming $X_1$ and $X_2$ have mean $0$. I also am aware that the formula for Kendall's tau involves an integral over some domain involving $X_1$, $X_2$, and $rho$, multiplied by $4$.
So it seems like all the pieces are there; the integral should result in the answer, if only the integral over the exponential term w.r.t. $X_1$ and $X_2$ were $1$. But this is not the case, so I am stuck.
probability integration statistics correlation
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
See here
$endgroup$
– mrtaurho
Jan 1 at 21:16
$begingroup$
I saw this but, as @Avraham writes, access is not given to the necessary papers for a rigorous proof.
$endgroup$
– E Werner
Jan 1 at 21:29
1
$begingroup$
Anyway just stating a task is not appropriate for MSE. Therefore please include some more details with an edit.
$endgroup$
– mrtaurho
Jan 1 at 21:41
$begingroup$
At least write down the expression for Kendall's tau and indicate where you are stuck.
$endgroup$
– StubbornAtom
Jan 2 at 14:35
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Prove Kendall's tau of a bivariate normal is given by
$$rho_tau (X_1,X_2)=frac{2}{pi}arcsinrho$$
I can derive the bivariate normal as
$$F(x_1,x_2)=frac{1}{2pisqrt{1-rho^2}}e^{-frac{1}{2}x_1Sigma^{-1}x_2}$$
where, for simplicity, I am assuming $X_1$ and $X_2$ have mean $0$. I also am aware that the formula for Kendall's tau involves an integral over some domain involving $X_1$, $X_2$, and $rho$, multiplied by $4$.
So it seems like all the pieces are there; the integral should result in the answer, if only the integral over the exponential term w.r.t. $X_1$ and $X_2$ were $1$. But this is not the case, so I am stuck.
probability integration statistics correlation
$endgroup$
Prove Kendall's tau of a bivariate normal is given by
$$rho_tau (X_1,X_2)=frac{2}{pi}arcsinrho$$
I can derive the bivariate normal as
$$F(x_1,x_2)=frac{1}{2pisqrt{1-rho^2}}e^{-frac{1}{2}x_1Sigma^{-1}x_2}$$
where, for simplicity, I am assuming $X_1$ and $X_2$ have mean $0$. I also am aware that the formula for Kendall's tau involves an integral over some domain involving $X_1$, $X_2$, and $rho$, multiplied by $4$.
So it seems like all the pieces are there; the integral should result in the answer, if only the integral over the exponential term w.r.t. $X_1$ and $X_2$ were $1$. But this is not the case, so I am stuck.
probability integration statistics correlation
probability integration statistics correlation
edited Jan 1 at 23:04
mrtaurho
6,09271641
6,09271641
asked Jan 1 at 21:13
E WernerE Werner
605
605
$begingroup$
See here
$endgroup$
– mrtaurho
Jan 1 at 21:16
$begingroup$
I saw this but, as @Avraham writes, access is not given to the necessary papers for a rigorous proof.
$endgroup$
– E Werner
Jan 1 at 21:29
1
$begingroup$
Anyway just stating a task is not appropriate for MSE. Therefore please include some more details with an edit.
$endgroup$
– mrtaurho
Jan 1 at 21:41
$begingroup$
At least write down the expression for Kendall's tau and indicate where you are stuck.
$endgroup$
– StubbornAtom
Jan 2 at 14:35
add a comment |
$begingroup$
See here
$endgroup$
– mrtaurho
Jan 1 at 21:16
$begingroup$
I saw this but, as @Avraham writes, access is not given to the necessary papers for a rigorous proof.
$endgroup$
– E Werner
Jan 1 at 21:29
1
$begingroup$
Anyway just stating a task is not appropriate for MSE. Therefore please include some more details with an edit.
$endgroup$
– mrtaurho
Jan 1 at 21:41
$begingroup$
At least write down the expression for Kendall's tau and indicate where you are stuck.
$endgroup$
– StubbornAtom
Jan 2 at 14:35
$begingroup$
See here
$endgroup$
– mrtaurho
Jan 1 at 21:16
$begingroup$
See here
$endgroup$
– mrtaurho
Jan 1 at 21:16
$begingroup$
I saw this but, as @Avraham writes, access is not given to the necessary papers for a rigorous proof.
$endgroup$
– E Werner
Jan 1 at 21:29
$begingroup$
I saw this but, as @Avraham writes, access is not given to the necessary papers for a rigorous proof.
$endgroup$
– E Werner
Jan 1 at 21:29
1
1
$begingroup$
Anyway just stating a task is not appropriate for MSE. Therefore please include some more details with an edit.
$endgroup$
– mrtaurho
Jan 1 at 21:41
$begingroup$
Anyway just stating a task is not appropriate for MSE. Therefore please include some more details with an edit.
$endgroup$
– mrtaurho
Jan 1 at 21:41
$begingroup$
At least write down the expression for Kendall's tau and indicate where you are stuck.
$endgroup$
– StubbornAtom
Jan 2 at 14:35
$begingroup$
At least write down the expression for Kendall's tau and indicate where you are stuck.
$endgroup$
– StubbornAtom
Jan 2 at 14:35
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Kendall's $tau$ is defined as
$$
tau(X_1,X_2)=mathsf{P}((X_1-Y_1)(X_2-Y_2)>0)-mathsf{P}((X_1-Y_1)(X_2-Y_2)<0),
$$
where $Yequiv(Y_1,Y_2)$ is an independent copy of $Xequiv(X_1,X_2)$.
Let $Z:=X-Y$ and note that $Zsim N(0,2Sigma)$, where $Sigma=operatorname {Var}(X)$. In addition,
$$
Zoverset{d}{sim}sqrt{2}(Sigma_{11}(V_1cos(varphi)+V_2sin(varphi)),Sigma_{22}V_2),
$$
where $varphiequiv arcsinrho$ and $Vequiv(V_1,V_2)sim N(0,I_2)$. Then, by symmetry,
begin{align}
tau(X_1,X_2)&=2mathsf{P}(Z_1Z_2>0)-1=4mathsf{P}(Z_1>0,Z_2>0)-1 \
&=4mathsf{P}(V_1cos(varphi)+V_2sin(varphi)>0,V_2>0)-1.
end{align}
It is known that $Voverset{d}{=}R(cos(Phi),sin(Phi))$, where $Phisim U[-pi,pi]$ independent of $R=|V|_2$. Therefore,
begin{align}
tau(X_1,X_2)&=4mathsf{P}(cos(Phi)cos(varphi)+sin(Phi)sin(varphi)>0,sin(Phi)>0)-1 \
&=4mathsf{P}(Phiin (varphi-pi/2,varphi+pi/2)cap[0,pi])-1 \
&=frac{2}{pi}(varphi+pi/2)-1=frac{2}{pi}arcsin rho.
end{align}
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3058888%2fkendalls-tau-of-bivariate-normal%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Kendall's $tau$ is defined as
$$
tau(X_1,X_2)=mathsf{P}((X_1-Y_1)(X_2-Y_2)>0)-mathsf{P}((X_1-Y_1)(X_2-Y_2)<0),
$$
where $Yequiv(Y_1,Y_2)$ is an independent copy of $Xequiv(X_1,X_2)$.
Let $Z:=X-Y$ and note that $Zsim N(0,2Sigma)$, where $Sigma=operatorname {Var}(X)$. In addition,
$$
Zoverset{d}{sim}sqrt{2}(Sigma_{11}(V_1cos(varphi)+V_2sin(varphi)),Sigma_{22}V_2),
$$
where $varphiequiv arcsinrho$ and $Vequiv(V_1,V_2)sim N(0,I_2)$. Then, by symmetry,
begin{align}
tau(X_1,X_2)&=2mathsf{P}(Z_1Z_2>0)-1=4mathsf{P}(Z_1>0,Z_2>0)-1 \
&=4mathsf{P}(V_1cos(varphi)+V_2sin(varphi)>0,V_2>0)-1.
end{align}
It is known that $Voverset{d}{=}R(cos(Phi),sin(Phi))$, where $Phisim U[-pi,pi]$ independent of $R=|V|_2$. Therefore,
begin{align}
tau(X_1,X_2)&=4mathsf{P}(cos(Phi)cos(varphi)+sin(Phi)sin(varphi)>0,sin(Phi)>0)-1 \
&=4mathsf{P}(Phiin (varphi-pi/2,varphi+pi/2)cap[0,pi])-1 \
&=frac{2}{pi}(varphi+pi/2)-1=frac{2}{pi}arcsin rho.
end{align}
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Kendall's $tau$ is defined as
$$
tau(X_1,X_2)=mathsf{P}((X_1-Y_1)(X_2-Y_2)>0)-mathsf{P}((X_1-Y_1)(X_2-Y_2)<0),
$$
where $Yequiv(Y_1,Y_2)$ is an independent copy of $Xequiv(X_1,X_2)$.
Let $Z:=X-Y$ and note that $Zsim N(0,2Sigma)$, where $Sigma=operatorname {Var}(X)$. In addition,
$$
Zoverset{d}{sim}sqrt{2}(Sigma_{11}(V_1cos(varphi)+V_2sin(varphi)),Sigma_{22}V_2),
$$
where $varphiequiv arcsinrho$ and $Vequiv(V_1,V_2)sim N(0,I_2)$. Then, by symmetry,
begin{align}
tau(X_1,X_2)&=2mathsf{P}(Z_1Z_2>0)-1=4mathsf{P}(Z_1>0,Z_2>0)-1 \
&=4mathsf{P}(V_1cos(varphi)+V_2sin(varphi)>0,V_2>0)-1.
end{align}
It is known that $Voverset{d}{=}R(cos(Phi),sin(Phi))$, where $Phisim U[-pi,pi]$ independent of $R=|V|_2$. Therefore,
begin{align}
tau(X_1,X_2)&=4mathsf{P}(cos(Phi)cos(varphi)+sin(Phi)sin(varphi)>0,sin(Phi)>0)-1 \
&=4mathsf{P}(Phiin (varphi-pi/2,varphi+pi/2)cap[0,pi])-1 \
&=frac{2}{pi}(varphi+pi/2)-1=frac{2}{pi}arcsin rho.
end{align}
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Kendall's $tau$ is defined as
$$
tau(X_1,X_2)=mathsf{P}((X_1-Y_1)(X_2-Y_2)>0)-mathsf{P}((X_1-Y_1)(X_2-Y_2)<0),
$$
where $Yequiv(Y_1,Y_2)$ is an independent copy of $Xequiv(X_1,X_2)$.
Let $Z:=X-Y$ and note that $Zsim N(0,2Sigma)$, where $Sigma=operatorname {Var}(X)$. In addition,
$$
Zoverset{d}{sim}sqrt{2}(Sigma_{11}(V_1cos(varphi)+V_2sin(varphi)),Sigma_{22}V_2),
$$
where $varphiequiv arcsinrho$ and $Vequiv(V_1,V_2)sim N(0,I_2)$. Then, by symmetry,
begin{align}
tau(X_1,X_2)&=2mathsf{P}(Z_1Z_2>0)-1=4mathsf{P}(Z_1>0,Z_2>0)-1 \
&=4mathsf{P}(V_1cos(varphi)+V_2sin(varphi)>0,V_2>0)-1.
end{align}
It is known that $Voverset{d}{=}R(cos(Phi),sin(Phi))$, where $Phisim U[-pi,pi]$ independent of $R=|V|_2$. Therefore,
begin{align}
tau(X_1,X_2)&=4mathsf{P}(cos(Phi)cos(varphi)+sin(Phi)sin(varphi)>0,sin(Phi)>0)-1 \
&=4mathsf{P}(Phiin (varphi-pi/2,varphi+pi/2)cap[0,pi])-1 \
&=frac{2}{pi}(varphi+pi/2)-1=frac{2}{pi}arcsin rho.
end{align}
$endgroup$
Kendall's $tau$ is defined as
$$
tau(X_1,X_2)=mathsf{P}((X_1-Y_1)(X_2-Y_2)>0)-mathsf{P}((X_1-Y_1)(X_2-Y_2)<0),
$$
where $Yequiv(Y_1,Y_2)$ is an independent copy of $Xequiv(X_1,X_2)$.
Let $Z:=X-Y$ and note that $Zsim N(0,2Sigma)$, where $Sigma=operatorname {Var}(X)$. In addition,
$$
Zoverset{d}{sim}sqrt{2}(Sigma_{11}(V_1cos(varphi)+V_2sin(varphi)),Sigma_{22}V_2),
$$
where $varphiequiv arcsinrho$ and $Vequiv(V_1,V_2)sim N(0,I_2)$. Then, by symmetry,
begin{align}
tau(X_1,X_2)&=2mathsf{P}(Z_1Z_2>0)-1=4mathsf{P}(Z_1>0,Z_2>0)-1 \
&=4mathsf{P}(V_1cos(varphi)+V_2sin(varphi)>0,V_2>0)-1.
end{align}
It is known that $Voverset{d}{=}R(cos(Phi),sin(Phi))$, where $Phisim U[-pi,pi]$ independent of $R=|V|_2$. Therefore,
begin{align}
tau(X_1,X_2)&=4mathsf{P}(cos(Phi)cos(varphi)+sin(Phi)sin(varphi)>0,sin(Phi)>0)-1 \
&=4mathsf{P}(Phiin (varphi-pi/2,varphi+pi/2)cap[0,pi])-1 \
&=frac{2}{pi}(varphi+pi/2)-1=frac{2}{pi}arcsin rho.
end{align}
answered Jan 2 at 2:02
d.k.o.d.k.o.
10.5k630
10.5k630
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3058888%2fkendalls-tau-of-bivariate-normal%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
See here
$endgroup$
– mrtaurho
Jan 1 at 21:16
$begingroup$
I saw this but, as @Avraham writes, access is not given to the necessary papers for a rigorous proof.
$endgroup$
– E Werner
Jan 1 at 21:29
1
$begingroup$
Anyway just stating a task is not appropriate for MSE. Therefore please include some more details with an edit.
$endgroup$
– mrtaurho
Jan 1 at 21:41
$begingroup$
At least write down the expression for Kendall's tau and indicate where you are stuck.
$endgroup$
– StubbornAtom
Jan 2 at 14:35