Why are the local extrema of a log-transformed function equal to local extrema of the original function?












0












$begingroup$


I am studying maximum likelihood and to simplify taking the derivative of the likelihood function, it is often transformed by the natural log before taking the derivative.



I have read in other posts that this is because the logarithm is a monotonic function, so its extrema will be the same as the original function. However, I do not understand why this is the case. Can someone explain intuitively why the transformation does not affect the local extrema?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$

















    0












    $begingroup$


    I am studying maximum likelihood and to simplify taking the derivative of the likelihood function, it is often transformed by the natural log before taking the derivative.



    I have read in other posts that this is because the logarithm is a monotonic function, so its extrema will be the same as the original function. However, I do not understand why this is the case. Can someone explain intuitively why the transformation does not affect the local extrema?










    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$















      0












      0








      0





      $begingroup$


      I am studying maximum likelihood and to simplify taking the derivative of the likelihood function, it is often transformed by the natural log before taking the derivative.



      I have read in other posts that this is because the logarithm is a monotonic function, so its extrema will be the same as the original function. However, I do not understand why this is the case. Can someone explain intuitively why the transformation does not affect the local extrema?










      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      I am studying maximum likelihood and to simplify taking the derivative of the likelihood function, it is often transformed by the natural log before taking the derivative.



      I have read in other posts that this is because the logarithm is a monotonic function, so its extrema will be the same as the original function. However, I do not understand why this is the case. Can someone explain intuitively why the transformation does not affect the local extrema?







      derivatives logarithms maximum-likelihood monotone-functions






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Dec 26 '18 at 17:53









      Bernard

      122k741116




      122k741116










      asked Dec 26 '18 at 17:29









      hlineehlinee

      755




      755






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          3












          $begingroup$

          Let $f(x)$ be a positive function and suppose that $x_0$ is the local maximum of $f(x)$ in the interval $[a,b]$. This means that for any $yin[a,b]$, $f(y)le f(x_0)$.



          Logarithms is a monotonically increasing function: if $zle w$, then $log zle log w$. So for any $yin[a,b]$, since $f(y)le f(x_0)$, we have $log f(y) le log f(x_0)$. Hence, $x_0$ is also the local maximum for $log f(x)$.



          The other direction can be proven by noting that the inverse of log is also monotonically increasing.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            });
            });
            }, "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3053131%2fwhy-are-the-local-extrema-of-a-log-transformed-function-equal-to-local-extrema-o%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            3












            $begingroup$

            Let $f(x)$ be a positive function and suppose that $x_0$ is the local maximum of $f(x)$ in the interval $[a,b]$. This means that for any $yin[a,b]$, $f(y)le f(x_0)$.



            Logarithms is a monotonically increasing function: if $zle w$, then $log zle log w$. So for any $yin[a,b]$, since $f(y)le f(x_0)$, we have $log f(y) le log f(x_0)$. Hence, $x_0$ is also the local maximum for $log f(x)$.



            The other direction can be proven by noting that the inverse of log is also monotonically increasing.






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$


















              3












              $begingroup$

              Let $f(x)$ be a positive function and suppose that $x_0$ is the local maximum of $f(x)$ in the interval $[a,b]$. This means that for any $yin[a,b]$, $f(y)le f(x_0)$.



              Logarithms is a monotonically increasing function: if $zle w$, then $log zle log w$. So for any $yin[a,b]$, since $f(y)le f(x_0)$, we have $log f(y) le log f(x_0)$. Hence, $x_0$ is also the local maximum for $log f(x)$.



              The other direction can be proven by noting that the inverse of log is also monotonically increasing.






              share|cite|improve this answer











              $endgroup$
















                3












                3








                3





                $begingroup$

                Let $f(x)$ be a positive function and suppose that $x_0$ is the local maximum of $f(x)$ in the interval $[a,b]$. This means that for any $yin[a,b]$, $f(y)le f(x_0)$.



                Logarithms is a monotonically increasing function: if $zle w$, then $log zle log w$. So for any $yin[a,b]$, since $f(y)le f(x_0)$, we have $log f(y) le log f(x_0)$. Hence, $x_0$ is also the local maximum for $log f(x)$.



                The other direction can be proven by noting that the inverse of log is also monotonically increasing.






                share|cite|improve this answer











                $endgroup$



                Let $f(x)$ be a positive function and suppose that $x_0$ is the local maximum of $f(x)$ in the interval $[a,b]$. This means that for any $yin[a,b]$, $f(y)le f(x_0)$.



                Logarithms is a monotonically increasing function: if $zle w$, then $log zle log w$. So for any $yin[a,b]$, since $f(y)le f(x_0)$, we have $log f(y) le log f(x_0)$. Hence, $x_0$ is also the local maximum for $log f(x)$.



                The other direction can be proven by noting that the inverse of log is also monotonically increasing.







                share|cite|improve this answer














                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer








                edited Dec 26 '18 at 21:32

























                answered Dec 26 '18 at 17:38









                DirkGentlyDirkGently

                1,49858




                1,49858






























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3053131%2fwhy-are-the-local-extrema-of-a-log-transformed-function-equal-to-local-extrema-o%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Tonle Sap (See)

                    I get strange results when I access the Sqlitedatabase with Unity C# via XAMPP

                    Guatemaltekische Davis-Cup-Mannschaft