Finite element method for nonlinear differential equation












0












$begingroup$


I encounter this problem $$frac{df(u(x))}{dx} = g(x)$$ with $$u(0) = u(1) = 0$$ I first convert it to weak form $f(u(x))v(x)]^1_0 - int^{1}_0 frac{dv(x)}{dx}f(u(x))dx =- int^{1}_0 frac{dv(x)}{dx}f(u(x))dx = int^{1}_0v(x)g(x)dx $ by multiplying a test function $v(x)$. Then how should I write it in matrix form? The right hand side does not depend on $u$ explicit.



Thanks in advance.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Set $G(x)=f(0)+int_0^xg(s),ds$, then you just have to solve the inverse function problem $f(u(x))=G(x)$ using Newton and some version of path-following. There is no reason why a first order ODE should satisfy two boundary conditions.
    $endgroup$
    – LutzL
    Jan 6 at 11:15










  • $begingroup$
    @LutzL variable is x! Sorry about that.
    $endgroup$
    – metricspace
    Jan 6 at 19:43
















0












$begingroup$


I encounter this problem $$frac{df(u(x))}{dx} = g(x)$$ with $$u(0) = u(1) = 0$$ I first convert it to weak form $f(u(x))v(x)]^1_0 - int^{1}_0 frac{dv(x)}{dx}f(u(x))dx =- int^{1}_0 frac{dv(x)}{dx}f(u(x))dx = int^{1}_0v(x)g(x)dx $ by multiplying a test function $v(x)$. Then how should I write it in matrix form? The right hand side does not depend on $u$ explicit.



Thanks in advance.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Set $G(x)=f(0)+int_0^xg(s),ds$, then you just have to solve the inverse function problem $f(u(x))=G(x)$ using Newton and some version of path-following. There is no reason why a first order ODE should satisfy two boundary conditions.
    $endgroup$
    – LutzL
    Jan 6 at 11:15










  • $begingroup$
    @LutzL variable is x! Sorry about that.
    $endgroup$
    – metricspace
    Jan 6 at 19:43














0












0








0





$begingroup$


I encounter this problem $$frac{df(u(x))}{dx} = g(x)$$ with $$u(0) = u(1) = 0$$ I first convert it to weak form $f(u(x))v(x)]^1_0 - int^{1}_0 frac{dv(x)}{dx}f(u(x))dx =- int^{1}_0 frac{dv(x)}{dx}f(u(x))dx = int^{1}_0v(x)g(x)dx $ by multiplying a test function $v(x)$. Then how should I write it in matrix form? The right hand side does not depend on $u$ explicit.



Thanks in advance.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




I encounter this problem $$frac{df(u(x))}{dx} = g(x)$$ with $$u(0) = u(1) = 0$$ I first convert it to weak form $f(u(x))v(x)]^1_0 - int^{1}_0 frac{dv(x)}{dx}f(u(x))dx =- int^{1}_0 frac{dv(x)}{dx}f(u(x))dx = int^{1}_0v(x)g(x)dx $ by multiplying a test function $v(x)$. Then how should I write it in matrix form? The right hand side does not depend on $u$ explicit.



Thanks in advance.







ordinary-differential-equations numerical-methods finite-element-method galerkin-methods






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Jan 6 at 19:42







metricspace

















asked Jan 6 at 10:59









metricspacemetricspace

408210




408210












  • $begingroup$
    Set $G(x)=f(0)+int_0^xg(s),ds$, then you just have to solve the inverse function problem $f(u(x))=G(x)$ using Newton and some version of path-following. There is no reason why a first order ODE should satisfy two boundary conditions.
    $endgroup$
    – LutzL
    Jan 6 at 11:15










  • $begingroup$
    @LutzL variable is x! Sorry about that.
    $endgroup$
    – metricspace
    Jan 6 at 19:43


















  • $begingroup$
    Set $G(x)=f(0)+int_0^xg(s),ds$, then you just have to solve the inverse function problem $f(u(x))=G(x)$ using Newton and some version of path-following. There is no reason why a first order ODE should satisfy two boundary conditions.
    $endgroup$
    – LutzL
    Jan 6 at 11:15










  • $begingroup$
    @LutzL variable is x! Sorry about that.
    $endgroup$
    – metricspace
    Jan 6 at 19:43
















$begingroup$
Set $G(x)=f(0)+int_0^xg(s),ds$, then you just have to solve the inverse function problem $f(u(x))=G(x)$ using Newton and some version of path-following. There is no reason why a first order ODE should satisfy two boundary conditions.
$endgroup$
– LutzL
Jan 6 at 11:15




$begingroup$
Set $G(x)=f(0)+int_0^xg(s),ds$, then you just have to solve the inverse function problem $f(u(x))=G(x)$ using Newton and some version of path-following. There is no reason why a first order ODE should satisfy two boundary conditions.
$endgroup$
– LutzL
Jan 6 at 11:15












$begingroup$
@LutzL variable is x! Sorry about that.
$endgroup$
– metricspace
Jan 6 at 19:43




$begingroup$
@LutzL variable is x! Sorry about that.
$endgroup$
– metricspace
Jan 6 at 19:43










0






active

oldest

votes












Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3063715%2ffinite-element-method-for-nonlinear-differential-equation%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























0






active

oldest

votes








0






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes
















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3063715%2ffinite-element-method-for-nonlinear-differential-equation%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Wiesbaden

Marschland

Dieringhausen