Fubini's theorem for series with dependent indices












2












$begingroup$


As a part of a proposition about power series that I am trying to prove I have to show that
$$ sum_{m=0}^{infty} left(sum_{n=m}^{infty} frac{n!}{m!(n-m)!}(b-a)^{n-m}c_nright)(x-b)^m = sum_{n=0}^{infty}c_n(x-a)^n$$



Proof: What I have done so far is to show that
$$sum_{m=0}^{n} frac{n!}{m!(n-m)!}(b-a)^{n-m}(x-b)^m = (x-a)^n $$



So the next idea is to use Fubini's rearrangement theorem for infinite series (I have also shown that the series are absolutely convergent). However, the theorem does not accomodate for dependent indices. Intuitively (using triangular summation), I think that the proper way to interchange series would be
begin{equation*}
%begin{array}{ll}
sum_{m=0}^{infty} sum_{n=m}^{infty} frac{n!}{m!(n-m)!}(b-a)^{n-m}c_n(x-b)^m = sum_{n=0}^{infty} sum_{m=0}^{n}frac{n!}{m!(n-m)!}(b-a)^{n-m}c_n(x-b)^m
%end{array}
end{equation*}

and thus
$$=sum_{n=0}^{infty} c_n(x-a)^n$$
However, I do not know how to perform this step rigorously in case of infinite summation.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$

















    2












    $begingroup$


    As a part of a proposition about power series that I am trying to prove I have to show that
    $$ sum_{m=0}^{infty} left(sum_{n=m}^{infty} frac{n!}{m!(n-m)!}(b-a)^{n-m}c_nright)(x-b)^m = sum_{n=0}^{infty}c_n(x-a)^n$$



    Proof: What I have done so far is to show that
    $$sum_{m=0}^{n} frac{n!}{m!(n-m)!}(b-a)^{n-m}(x-b)^m = (x-a)^n $$



    So the next idea is to use Fubini's rearrangement theorem for infinite series (I have also shown that the series are absolutely convergent). However, the theorem does not accomodate for dependent indices. Intuitively (using triangular summation), I think that the proper way to interchange series would be
    begin{equation*}
    %begin{array}{ll}
    sum_{m=0}^{infty} sum_{n=m}^{infty} frac{n!}{m!(n-m)!}(b-a)^{n-m}c_n(x-b)^m = sum_{n=0}^{infty} sum_{m=0}^{n}frac{n!}{m!(n-m)!}(b-a)^{n-m}c_n(x-b)^m
    %end{array}
    end{equation*}

    and thus
    $$=sum_{n=0}^{infty} c_n(x-a)^n$$
    However, I do not know how to perform this step rigorously in case of infinite summation.










    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$















      2












      2








      2


      0



      $begingroup$


      As a part of a proposition about power series that I am trying to prove I have to show that
      $$ sum_{m=0}^{infty} left(sum_{n=m}^{infty} frac{n!}{m!(n-m)!}(b-a)^{n-m}c_nright)(x-b)^m = sum_{n=0}^{infty}c_n(x-a)^n$$



      Proof: What I have done so far is to show that
      $$sum_{m=0}^{n} frac{n!}{m!(n-m)!}(b-a)^{n-m}(x-b)^m = (x-a)^n $$



      So the next idea is to use Fubini's rearrangement theorem for infinite series (I have also shown that the series are absolutely convergent). However, the theorem does not accomodate for dependent indices. Intuitively (using triangular summation), I think that the proper way to interchange series would be
      begin{equation*}
      %begin{array}{ll}
      sum_{m=0}^{infty} sum_{n=m}^{infty} frac{n!}{m!(n-m)!}(b-a)^{n-m}c_n(x-b)^m = sum_{n=0}^{infty} sum_{m=0}^{n}frac{n!}{m!(n-m)!}(b-a)^{n-m}c_n(x-b)^m
      %end{array}
      end{equation*}

      and thus
      $$=sum_{n=0}^{infty} c_n(x-a)^n$$
      However, I do not know how to perform this step rigorously in case of infinite summation.










      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      As a part of a proposition about power series that I am trying to prove I have to show that
      $$ sum_{m=0}^{infty} left(sum_{n=m}^{infty} frac{n!}{m!(n-m)!}(b-a)^{n-m}c_nright)(x-b)^m = sum_{n=0}^{infty}c_n(x-a)^n$$



      Proof: What I have done so far is to show that
      $$sum_{m=0}^{n} frac{n!}{m!(n-m)!}(b-a)^{n-m}(x-b)^m = (x-a)^n $$



      So the next idea is to use Fubini's rearrangement theorem for infinite series (I have also shown that the series are absolutely convergent). However, the theorem does not accomodate for dependent indices. Intuitively (using triangular summation), I think that the proper way to interchange series would be
      begin{equation*}
      %begin{array}{ll}
      sum_{m=0}^{infty} sum_{n=m}^{infty} frac{n!}{m!(n-m)!}(b-a)^{n-m}c_n(x-b)^m = sum_{n=0}^{infty} sum_{m=0}^{n}frac{n!}{m!(n-m)!}(b-a)^{n-m}c_n(x-b)^m
      %end{array}
      end{equation*}

      and thus
      $$=sum_{n=0}^{infty} c_n(x-a)^n$$
      However, I do not know how to perform this step rigorously in case of infinite summation.







      real-analysis sequences-and-series power-series






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Jan 6 at 11:38







      Cebiş Mellim

















      asked Jan 6 at 10:41









      Cebiş MellimCebiş Mellim

      18113




      18113






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          2












          $begingroup$

          Using the indicator function



          $$mathbf{1}_{{m leqslant n}}=mathbf{1}_{{n geqslant m}} = begin{cases}1 , & ngeqslant m \ 0, & n < mend{cases}$$



          we have



          $$sum_{m=0}^inftysum_{n=m}^infty f(m,n) = sum_{m=0}^inftysum_{n=0}^infty f(m,n)mathbf{1}_{{n geqslant m}}= sum_{m=0}^inftysum_{n=0}^infty f(m,n)mathbf{1}_{{m leqslant n}} $$



          With absolute convergence we can apply Fubini's theorem to interchange summations and obtain



          $$sum_{m=0}^inftysum_{n=m}^infty f(m,n) =underbrace{sum_{n=0}^inftysum_{m=0}^infty f(m,n)mathbf{1}_{{m leqslant n}}}_{text{after switching summation order}} = sum_{n=0}^inftysum_{m=0}^n f(m,n)$$






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            When will I finally start to do the magic like this on my own ...
            $endgroup$
            – Cebiş Mellim
            Jan 7 at 8:35






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            @CebişMellim: Well, your intuition and observation about triangular summation was a good start and it allowed you to reach the correct conclusion.
            $endgroup$
            – RRL
            Jan 7 at 17:41












          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3063704%2ffubinis-theorem-for-series-with-dependent-indices%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          2












          $begingroup$

          Using the indicator function



          $$mathbf{1}_{{m leqslant n}}=mathbf{1}_{{n geqslant m}} = begin{cases}1 , & ngeqslant m \ 0, & n < mend{cases}$$



          we have



          $$sum_{m=0}^inftysum_{n=m}^infty f(m,n) = sum_{m=0}^inftysum_{n=0}^infty f(m,n)mathbf{1}_{{n geqslant m}}= sum_{m=0}^inftysum_{n=0}^infty f(m,n)mathbf{1}_{{m leqslant n}} $$



          With absolute convergence we can apply Fubini's theorem to interchange summations and obtain



          $$sum_{m=0}^inftysum_{n=m}^infty f(m,n) =underbrace{sum_{n=0}^inftysum_{m=0}^infty f(m,n)mathbf{1}_{{m leqslant n}}}_{text{after switching summation order}} = sum_{n=0}^inftysum_{m=0}^n f(m,n)$$






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            When will I finally start to do the magic like this on my own ...
            $endgroup$
            – Cebiş Mellim
            Jan 7 at 8:35






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            @CebişMellim: Well, your intuition and observation about triangular summation was a good start and it allowed you to reach the correct conclusion.
            $endgroup$
            – RRL
            Jan 7 at 17:41
















          2












          $begingroup$

          Using the indicator function



          $$mathbf{1}_{{m leqslant n}}=mathbf{1}_{{n geqslant m}} = begin{cases}1 , & ngeqslant m \ 0, & n < mend{cases}$$



          we have



          $$sum_{m=0}^inftysum_{n=m}^infty f(m,n) = sum_{m=0}^inftysum_{n=0}^infty f(m,n)mathbf{1}_{{n geqslant m}}= sum_{m=0}^inftysum_{n=0}^infty f(m,n)mathbf{1}_{{m leqslant n}} $$



          With absolute convergence we can apply Fubini's theorem to interchange summations and obtain



          $$sum_{m=0}^inftysum_{n=m}^infty f(m,n) =underbrace{sum_{n=0}^inftysum_{m=0}^infty f(m,n)mathbf{1}_{{m leqslant n}}}_{text{after switching summation order}} = sum_{n=0}^inftysum_{m=0}^n f(m,n)$$






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            When will I finally start to do the magic like this on my own ...
            $endgroup$
            – Cebiş Mellim
            Jan 7 at 8:35






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            @CebişMellim: Well, your intuition and observation about triangular summation was a good start and it allowed you to reach the correct conclusion.
            $endgroup$
            – RRL
            Jan 7 at 17:41














          2












          2








          2





          $begingroup$

          Using the indicator function



          $$mathbf{1}_{{m leqslant n}}=mathbf{1}_{{n geqslant m}} = begin{cases}1 , & ngeqslant m \ 0, & n < mend{cases}$$



          we have



          $$sum_{m=0}^inftysum_{n=m}^infty f(m,n) = sum_{m=0}^inftysum_{n=0}^infty f(m,n)mathbf{1}_{{n geqslant m}}= sum_{m=0}^inftysum_{n=0}^infty f(m,n)mathbf{1}_{{m leqslant n}} $$



          With absolute convergence we can apply Fubini's theorem to interchange summations and obtain



          $$sum_{m=0}^inftysum_{n=m}^infty f(m,n) =underbrace{sum_{n=0}^inftysum_{m=0}^infty f(m,n)mathbf{1}_{{m leqslant n}}}_{text{after switching summation order}} = sum_{n=0}^inftysum_{m=0}^n f(m,n)$$






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          Using the indicator function



          $$mathbf{1}_{{m leqslant n}}=mathbf{1}_{{n geqslant m}} = begin{cases}1 , & ngeqslant m \ 0, & n < mend{cases}$$



          we have



          $$sum_{m=0}^inftysum_{n=m}^infty f(m,n) = sum_{m=0}^inftysum_{n=0}^infty f(m,n)mathbf{1}_{{n geqslant m}}= sum_{m=0}^inftysum_{n=0}^infty f(m,n)mathbf{1}_{{m leqslant n}} $$



          With absolute convergence we can apply Fubini's theorem to interchange summations and obtain



          $$sum_{m=0}^inftysum_{n=m}^infty f(m,n) =underbrace{sum_{n=0}^inftysum_{m=0}^infty f(m,n)mathbf{1}_{{m leqslant n}}}_{text{after switching summation order}} = sum_{n=0}^inftysum_{m=0}^n f(m,n)$$







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered Jan 6 at 19:06









          RRLRRL

          53.5k52574




          53.5k52574












          • $begingroup$
            When will I finally start to do the magic like this on my own ...
            $endgroup$
            – Cebiş Mellim
            Jan 7 at 8:35






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            @CebişMellim: Well, your intuition and observation about triangular summation was a good start and it allowed you to reach the correct conclusion.
            $endgroup$
            – RRL
            Jan 7 at 17:41


















          • $begingroup$
            When will I finally start to do the magic like this on my own ...
            $endgroup$
            – Cebiş Mellim
            Jan 7 at 8:35






          • 1




            $begingroup$
            @CebişMellim: Well, your intuition and observation about triangular summation was a good start and it allowed you to reach the correct conclusion.
            $endgroup$
            – RRL
            Jan 7 at 17:41
















          $begingroup$
          When will I finally start to do the magic like this on my own ...
          $endgroup$
          – Cebiş Mellim
          Jan 7 at 8:35




          $begingroup$
          When will I finally start to do the magic like this on my own ...
          $endgroup$
          – Cebiş Mellim
          Jan 7 at 8:35




          1




          1




          $begingroup$
          @CebişMellim: Well, your intuition and observation about triangular summation was a good start and it allowed you to reach the correct conclusion.
          $endgroup$
          – RRL
          Jan 7 at 17:41




          $begingroup$
          @CebişMellim: Well, your intuition and observation about triangular summation was a good start and it allowed you to reach the correct conclusion.
          $endgroup$
          – RRL
          Jan 7 at 17:41


















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3063704%2ffubinis-theorem-for-series-with-dependent-indices%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Wiesbaden

          Marschland

          Dieringhausen