Can I make a line with both a slant asymptote and a horizontal.
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
Why can’t you create an equation of a line that gets closer to a line as it heads to $infty,$ such as $y=x$ or $y=2x+4$ and a horizontal asymptote that approaches something like $-2$ as it goes towards $-infty.$ Can somebody please help me build an equation for this line. (https://i.stack.imgur.com/kYaVS.jpg)
calculus limits asymptotics
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
Why can’t you create an equation of a line that gets closer to a line as it heads to $infty,$ such as $y=x$ or $y=2x+4$ and a horizontal asymptote that approaches something like $-2$ as it goes towards $-infty.$ Can somebody please help me build an equation for this line. (https://i.stack.imgur.com/kYaVS.jpg)
calculus limits asymptotics
Of course one can do that with a complicated enough function. The question is which functions are allowed. E.g. a rational function could not fulfill this, because if it has a horizontal asymptote towards $-infty$ it must have the same h.a. towards $+infty$.
– Torsten Schoeneberg
Nov 27 at 20:44
But maybe you want to take a look at the graph of $xcdot(arctan(x)+frac{pi}{2})$, and adjust by stretching and shifting.
– Torsten Schoeneberg
Nov 27 at 20:52
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
Why can’t you create an equation of a line that gets closer to a line as it heads to $infty,$ such as $y=x$ or $y=2x+4$ and a horizontal asymptote that approaches something like $-2$ as it goes towards $-infty.$ Can somebody please help me build an equation for this line. (https://i.stack.imgur.com/kYaVS.jpg)
calculus limits asymptotics
Why can’t you create an equation of a line that gets closer to a line as it heads to $infty,$ such as $y=x$ or $y=2x+4$ and a horizontal asymptote that approaches something like $-2$ as it goes towards $-infty.$ Can somebody please help me build an equation for this line. (https://i.stack.imgur.com/kYaVS.jpg)
calculus limits asymptotics
calculus limits asymptotics
edited Nov 27 at 20:59
user376343
2,7782822
2,7782822
asked Nov 27 at 20:33
Kody Bates
61
61
Of course one can do that with a complicated enough function. The question is which functions are allowed. E.g. a rational function could not fulfill this, because if it has a horizontal asymptote towards $-infty$ it must have the same h.a. towards $+infty$.
– Torsten Schoeneberg
Nov 27 at 20:44
But maybe you want to take a look at the graph of $xcdot(arctan(x)+frac{pi}{2})$, and adjust by stretching and shifting.
– Torsten Schoeneberg
Nov 27 at 20:52
add a comment |
Of course one can do that with a complicated enough function. The question is which functions are allowed. E.g. a rational function could not fulfill this, because if it has a horizontal asymptote towards $-infty$ it must have the same h.a. towards $+infty$.
– Torsten Schoeneberg
Nov 27 at 20:44
But maybe you want to take a look at the graph of $xcdot(arctan(x)+frac{pi}{2})$, and adjust by stretching and shifting.
– Torsten Schoeneberg
Nov 27 at 20:52
Of course one can do that with a complicated enough function. The question is which functions are allowed. E.g. a rational function could not fulfill this, because if it has a horizontal asymptote towards $-infty$ it must have the same h.a. towards $+infty$.
– Torsten Schoeneberg
Nov 27 at 20:44
Of course one can do that with a complicated enough function. The question is which functions are allowed. E.g. a rational function could not fulfill this, because if it has a horizontal asymptote towards $-infty$ it must have the same h.a. towards $+infty$.
– Torsten Schoeneberg
Nov 27 at 20:44
But maybe you want to take a look at the graph of $xcdot(arctan(x)+frac{pi}{2})$, and adjust by stretching and shifting.
– Torsten Schoeneberg
Nov 27 at 20:52
But maybe you want to take a look at the graph of $xcdot(arctan(x)+frac{pi}{2})$, and adjust by stretching and shifting.
– Torsten Schoeneberg
Nov 27 at 20:52
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
up vote
4
down vote
As said by @Torsten Schoeneberg there are many ways to obtain such curves. However, (branches of) hyperbolas rank among the most natural ones.
Thus I propose the following general solution among the hyperbola family : for any real parameter $a>0$
$$y=dfrac12left(x-2+sqrt{(x+2)^2+4a}right)$$
Fig. Different branches for $a=0.5, 1, 1.5, ...4$.
How did I find this general equation ?
I have first considered the curve reduced to its asymptotes, i.e., with equation
$$(y+2)(y-x)=0 tag{1}$$
(the product of equations $y+2=0$ and $y-x=0$). Then I pertubated a little this equation by taking instead of it :
$$(y+2)(y-x)-a=0 tag{2}$$
Now expand it as a quadratic in variable $y$ :
$$y^2+y(2-x)-(2x+a)=0 tag{3}$$
and use the classical formula for the roots of a quadratic considering $x$ as a parameter.
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
An example of a function with asymptotes $;y=-2;$ as $;xto -infty;$ and $;y=x-2;$ as $xto infty;$ is $$f(x)=frac{sqrt{x^2+1}+x}{2}-2$$
The slant asymptote of this is $y = x-2$.
– Torsten Schoeneberg
Nov 27 at 21:15
Right, thanks. Going to fix it.
– user376343
Nov 27 at 21:16
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
To amend my second comment, for what it's worth, here is my thought process how to get a function as demanded, and what I experienced when doing that "shifting and stretching".
So to start, I looked for a function with two different horizontal asymptotes for $x to -infty$ versus $x to infty$. Well, the $arctan$ came to my mind. Now first I wanted to turn that in the general shape "0 on the left, but positive (so I can make it increasing) on the right". So I moved it up by $pi/2$, whence it would go from $0$ at $-infty$ to $pi$ (or whatever positive value) at $infty$.
$arctan(x)+frac{pi}{2}$:
This, multiplied with $frac{x}{pi}$, will give something that will behave like $0$ to the left, but like $x$ on the right (so I thought):
$displaystyle frac{x}{pi} cdot left(arctan(x) + frac{pi}{2}right)$:
Now shift it down by $2$. That will make $lim_{xto -infty} =-2$, I thought. It also moves the slant asymptote down to $y=x-2$. To make good for that, I thought I move the graph to the left by $2$, which transforms the slant asymptote back to $y=x$ and does not change the horizontal one.
$displaystyle frac{x+2}{pi} cdot left(arctan(x) + frac{pi}{2}right) -2$:
But now I noticed that ever since the second step I was off by a vertical shift of $1/pi$. See, both asymptotes are a bit too low. Where does that come from? Well I realised that even though arctan goes to $pmpi/2$ (and my shifted version in the first step to $0$ resp. $pi$), I multiply it with a linear term; which means that I have to find out how well the $arctan$ approaches its limit up to a term of order $frac1x$. And indeed, an expansion of $arctan$ "around $pm infty$" is given by
$$displaystyle arctan(x) = frac{pi}{2} - frac{1}{x} + frac{1}{3x^{3}} - frac{1}{5x^{5}} + ...$$ (for $x >1$) resp.
$$displaystyle arctan(x) = -frac{pi}{2} - frac{1}{x} + frac{1}{3x^{3}} - frac{1}{5x^{5}} + ...$$ (for $x < -1$).
whose $-1/x$-term, by multiplication with $x/pi$, indeed explained that constant $-1/pi$ term. But then that's that, one just removes it by hand, giving:
$$f(x) = displaystyle frac{x+2}{pi} cdot left(arctan(x) + frac{pi}{2}right) -2 +frac{1}{pi}$$
Voilà:
Fun fact I learned on the way when deriving the "expansion around $infty$": the derivative of $arctan(1/x)$ is $(-1)cdot$ the derivative of $arctan(x)$; which abstractly implies that $arctan(x)= C - arctan(1/x)$ for some constant depending on the connected component of the graph we are on. And indeed e.g. for $x>0$, we have $arctan(x) = pi/2 - arctan(1/x)$.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3016269%2fcan-i-make-a-line-with-both-a-slant-asymptote-and-a-horizontal%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
4
down vote
As said by @Torsten Schoeneberg there are many ways to obtain such curves. However, (branches of) hyperbolas rank among the most natural ones.
Thus I propose the following general solution among the hyperbola family : for any real parameter $a>0$
$$y=dfrac12left(x-2+sqrt{(x+2)^2+4a}right)$$
Fig. Different branches for $a=0.5, 1, 1.5, ...4$.
How did I find this general equation ?
I have first considered the curve reduced to its asymptotes, i.e., with equation
$$(y+2)(y-x)=0 tag{1}$$
(the product of equations $y+2=0$ and $y-x=0$). Then I pertubated a little this equation by taking instead of it :
$$(y+2)(y-x)-a=0 tag{2}$$
Now expand it as a quadratic in variable $y$ :
$$y^2+y(2-x)-(2x+a)=0 tag{3}$$
and use the classical formula for the roots of a quadratic considering $x$ as a parameter.
add a comment |
up vote
4
down vote
As said by @Torsten Schoeneberg there are many ways to obtain such curves. However, (branches of) hyperbolas rank among the most natural ones.
Thus I propose the following general solution among the hyperbola family : for any real parameter $a>0$
$$y=dfrac12left(x-2+sqrt{(x+2)^2+4a}right)$$
Fig. Different branches for $a=0.5, 1, 1.5, ...4$.
How did I find this general equation ?
I have first considered the curve reduced to its asymptotes, i.e., with equation
$$(y+2)(y-x)=0 tag{1}$$
(the product of equations $y+2=0$ and $y-x=0$). Then I pertubated a little this equation by taking instead of it :
$$(y+2)(y-x)-a=0 tag{2}$$
Now expand it as a quadratic in variable $y$ :
$$y^2+y(2-x)-(2x+a)=0 tag{3}$$
and use the classical formula for the roots of a quadratic considering $x$ as a parameter.
add a comment |
up vote
4
down vote
up vote
4
down vote
As said by @Torsten Schoeneberg there are many ways to obtain such curves. However, (branches of) hyperbolas rank among the most natural ones.
Thus I propose the following general solution among the hyperbola family : for any real parameter $a>0$
$$y=dfrac12left(x-2+sqrt{(x+2)^2+4a}right)$$
Fig. Different branches for $a=0.5, 1, 1.5, ...4$.
How did I find this general equation ?
I have first considered the curve reduced to its asymptotes, i.e., with equation
$$(y+2)(y-x)=0 tag{1}$$
(the product of equations $y+2=0$ and $y-x=0$). Then I pertubated a little this equation by taking instead of it :
$$(y+2)(y-x)-a=0 tag{2}$$
Now expand it as a quadratic in variable $y$ :
$$y^2+y(2-x)-(2x+a)=0 tag{3}$$
and use the classical formula for the roots of a quadratic considering $x$ as a parameter.
As said by @Torsten Schoeneberg there are many ways to obtain such curves. However, (branches of) hyperbolas rank among the most natural ones.
Thus I propose the following general solution among the hyperbola family : for any real parameter $a>0$
$$y=dfrac12left(x-2+sqrt{(x+2)^2+4a}right)$$
Fig. Different branches for $a=0.5, 1, 1.5, ...4$.
How did I find this general equation ?
I have first considered the curve reduced to its asymptotes, i.e., with equation
$$(y+2)(y-x)=0 tag{1}$$
(the product of equations $y+2=0$ and $y-x=0$). Then I pertubated a little this equation by taking instead of it :
$$(y+2)(y-x)-a=0 tag{2}$$
Now expand it as a quadratic in variable $y$ :
$$y^2+y(2-x)-(2x+a)=0 tag{3}$$
and use the classical formula for the roots of a quadratic considering $x$ as a parameter.
edited Nov 27 at 21:40
answered Nov 27 at 21:19
Jean Marie
28.7k41849
28.7k41849
add a comment |
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
An example of a function with asymptotes $;y=-2;$ as $;xto -infty;$ and $;y=x-2;$ as $xto infty;$ is $$f(x)=frac{sqrt{x^2+1}+x}{2}-2$$
The slant asymptote of this is $y = x-2$.
– Torsten Schoeneberg
Nov 27 at 21:15
Right, thanks. Going to fix it.
– user376343
Nov 27 at 21:16
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
An example of a function with asymptotes $;y=-2;$ as $;xto -infty;$ and $;y=x-2;$ as $xto infty;$ is $$f(x)=frac{sqrt{x^2+1}+x}{2}-2$$
The slant asymptote of this is $y = x-2$.
– Torsten Schoeneberg
Nov 27 at 21:15
Right, thanks. Going to fix it.
– user376343
Nov 27 at 21:16
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
An example of a function with asymptotes $;y=-2;$ as $;xto -infty;$ and $;y=x-2;$ as $xto infty;$ is $$f(x)=frac{sqrt{x^2+1}+x}{2}-2$$
An example of a function with asymptotes $;y=-2;$ as $;xto -infty;$ and $;y=x-2;$ as $xto infty;$ is $$f(x)=frac{sqrt{x^2+1}+x}{2}-2$$
edited Nov 27 at 21:17
answered Nov 27 at 20:58
user376343
2,7782822
2,7782822
The slant asymptote of this is $y = x-2$.
– Torsten Schoeneberg
Nov 27 at 21:15
Right, thanks. Going to fix it.
– user376343
Nov 27 at 21:16
add a comment |
The slant asymptote of this is $y = x-2$.
– Torsten Schoeneberg
Nov 27 at 21:15
Right, thanks. Going to fix it.
– user376343
Nov 27 at 21:16
The slant asymptote of this is $y = x-2$.
– Torsten Schoeneberg
Nov 27 at 21:15
The slant asymptote of this is $y = x-2$.
– Torsten Schoeneberg
Nov 27 at 21:15
Right, thanks. Going to fix it.
– user376343
Nov 27 at 21:16
Right, thanks. Going to fix it.
– user376343
Nov 27 at 21:16
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
To amend my second comment, for what it's worth, here is my thought process how to get a function as demanded, and what I experienced when doing that "shifting and stretching".
So to start, I looked for a function with two different horizontal asymptotes for $x to -infty$ versus $x to infty$. Well, the $arctan$ came to my mind. Now first I wanted to turn that in the general shape "0 on the left, but positive (so I can make it increasing) on the right". So I moved it up by $pi/2$, whence it would go from $0$ at $-infty$ to $pi$ (or whatever positive value) at $infty$.
$arctan(x)+frac{pi}{2}$:
This, multiplied with $frac{x}{pi}$, will give something that will behave like $0$ to the left, but like $x$ on the right (so I thought):
$displaystyle frac{x}{pi} cdot left(arctan(x) + frac{pi}{2}right)$:
Now shift it down by $2$. That will make $lim_{xto -infty} =-2$, I thought. It also moves the slant asymptote down to $y=x-2$. To make good for that, I thought I move the graph to the left by $2$, which transforms the slant asymptote back to $y=x$ and does not change the horizontal one.
$displaystyle frac{x+2}{pi} cdot left(arctan(x) + frac{pi}{2}right) -2$:
But now I noticed that ever since the second step I was off by a vertical shift of $1/pi$. See, both asymptotes are a bit too low. Where does that come from? Well I realised that even though arctan goes to $pmpi/2$ (and my shifted version in the first step to $0$ resp. $pi$), I multiply it with a linear term; which means that I have to find out how well the $arctan$ approaches its limit up to a term of order $frac1x$. And indeed, an expansion of $arctan$ "around $pm infty$" is given by
$$displaystyle arctan(x) = frac{pi}{2} - frac{1}{x} + frac{1}{3x^{3}} - frac{1}{5x^{5}} + ...$$ (for $x >1$) resp.
$$displaystyle arctan(x) = -frac{pi}{2} - frac{1}{x} + frac{1}{3x^{3}} - frac{1}{5x^{5}} + ...$$ (for $x < -1$).
whose $-1/x$-term, by multiplication with $x/pi$, indeed explained that constant $-1/pi$ term. But then that's that, one just removes it by hand, giving:
$$f(x) = displaystyle frac{x+2}{pi} cdot left(arctan(x) + frac{pi}{2}right) -2 +frac{1}{pi}$$
Voilà:
Fun fact I learned on the way when deriving the "expansion around $infty$": the derivative of $arctan(1/x)$ is $(-1)cdot$ the derivative of $arctan(x)$; which abstractly implies that $arctan(x)= C - arctan(1/x)$ for some constant depending on the connected component of the graph we are on. And indeed e.g. for $x>0$, we have $arctan(x) = pi/2 - arctan(1/x)$.
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
To amend my second comment, for what it's worth, here is my thought process how to get a function as demanded, and what I experienced when doing that "shifting and stretching".
So to start, I looked for a function with two different horizontal asymptotes for $x to -infty$ versus $x to infty$. Well, the $arctan$ came to my mind. Now first I wanted to turn that in the general shape "0 on the left, but positive (so I can make it increasing) on the right". So I moved it up by $pi/2$, whence it would go from $0$ at $-infty$ to $pi$ (or whatever positive value) at $infty$.
$arctan(x)+frac{pi}{2}$:
This, multiplied with $frac{x}{pi}$, will give something that will behave like $0$ to the left, but like $x$ on the right (so I thought):
$displaystyle frac{x}{pi} cdot left(arctan(x) + frac{pi}{2}right)$:
Now shift it down by $2$. That will make $lim_{xto -infty} =-2$, I thought. It also moves the slant asymptote down to $y=x-2$. To make good for that, I thought I move the graph to the left by $2$, which transforms the slant asymptote back to $y=x$ and does not change the horizontal one.
$displaystyle frac{x+2}{pi} cdot left(arctan(x) + frac{pi}{2}right) -2$:
But now I noticed that ever since the second step I was off by a vertical shift of $1/pi$. See, both asymptotes are a bit too low. Where does that come from? Well I realised that even though arctan goes to $pmpi/2$ (and my shifted version in the first step to $0$ resp. $pi$), I multiply it with a linear term; which means that I have to find out how well the $arctan$ approaches its limit up to a term of order $frac1x$. And indeed, an expansion of $arctan$ "around $pm infty$" is given by
$$displaystyle arctan(x) = frac{pi}{2} - frac{1}{x} + frac{1}{3x^{3}} - frac{1}{5x^{5}} + ...$$ (for $x >1$) resp.
$$displaystyle arctan(x) = -frac{pi}{2} - frac{1}{x} + frac{1}{3x^{3}} - frac{1}{5x^{5}} + ...$$ (for $x < -1$).
whose $-1/x$-term, by multiplication with $x/pi$, indeed explained that constant $-1/pi$ term. But then that's that, one just removes it by hand, giving:
$$f(x) = displaystyle frac{x+2}{pi} cdot left(arctan(x) + frac{pi}{2}right) -2 +frac{1}{pi}$$
Voilà:
Fun fact I learned on the way when deriving the "expansion around $infty$": the derivative of $arctan(1/x)$ is $(-1)cdot$ the derivative of $arctan(x)$; which abstractly implies that $arctan(x)= C - arctan(1/x)$ for some constant depending on the connected component of the graph we are on. And indeed e.g. for $x>0$, we have $arctan(x) = pi/2 - arctan(1/x)$.
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
To amend my second comment, for what it's worth, here is my thought process how to get a function as demanded, and what I experienced when doing that "shifting and stretching".
So to start, I looked for a function with two different horizontal asymptotes for $x to -infty$ versus $x to infty$. Well, the $arctan$ came to my mind. Now first I wanted to turn that in the general shape "0 on the left, but positive (so I can make it increasing) on the right". So I moved it up by $pi/2$, whence it would go from $0$ at $-infty$ to $pi$ (or whatever positive value) at $infty$.
$arctan(x)+frac{pi}{2}$:
This, multiplied with $frac{x}{pi}$, will give something that will behave like $0$ to the left, but like $x$ on the right (so I thought):
$displaystyle frac{x}{pi} cdot left(arctan(x) + frac{pi}{2}right)$:
Now shift it down by $2$. That will make $lim_{xto -infty} =-2$, I thought. It also moves the slant asymptote down to $y=x-2$. To make good for that, I thought I move the graph to the left by $2$, which transforms the slant asymptote back to $y=x$ and does not change the horizontal one.
$displaystyle frac{x+2}{pi} cdot left(arctan(x) + frac{pi}{2}right) -2$:
But now I noticed that ever since the second step I was off by a vertical shift of $1/pi$. See, both asymptotes are a bit too low. Where does that come from? Well I realised that even though arctan goes to $pmpi/2$ (and my shifted version in the first step to $0$ resp. $pi$), I multiply it with a linear term; which means that I have to find out how well the $arctan$ approaches its limit up to a term of order $frac1x$. And indeed, an expansion of $arctan$ "around $pm infty$" is given by
$$displaystyle arctan(x) = frac{pi}{2} - frac{1}{x} + frac{1}{3x^{3}} - frac{1}{5x^{5}} + ...$$ (for $x >1$) resp.
$$displaystyle arctan(x) = -frac{pi}{2} - frac{1}{x} + frac{1}{3x^{3}} - frac{1}{5x^{5}} + ...$$ (for $x < -1$).
whose $-1/x$-term, by multiplication with $x/pi$, indeed explained that constant $-1/pi$ term. But then that's that, one just removes it by hand, giving:
$$f(x) = displaystyle frac{x+2}{pi} cdot left(arctan(x) + frac{pi}{2}right) -2 +frac{1}{pi}$$
Voilà:
Fun fact I learned on the way when deriving the "expansion around $infty$": the derivative of $arctan(1/x)$ is $(-1)cdot$ the derivative of $arctan(x)$; which abstractly implies that $arctan(x)= C - arctan(1/x)$ for some constant depending on the connected component of the graph we are on. And indeed e.g. for $x>0$, we have $arctan(x) = pi/2 - arctan(1/x)$.
To amend my second comment, for what it's worth, here is my thought process how to get a function as demanded, and what I experienced when doing that "shifting and stretching".
So to start, I looked for a function with two different horizontal asymptotes for $x to -infty$ versus $x to infty$. Well, the $arctan$ came to my mind. Now first I wanted to turn that in the general shape "0 on the left, but positive (so I can make it increasing) on the right". So I moved it up by $pi/2$, whence it would go from $0$ at $-infty$ to $pi$ (or whatever positive value) at $infty$.
$arctan(x)+frac{pi}{2}$:
This, multiplied with $frac{x}{pi}$, will give something that will behave like $0$ to the left, but like $x$ on the right (so I thought):
$displaystyle frac{x}{pi} cdot left(arctan(x) + frac{pi}{2}right)$:
Now shift it down by $2$. That will make $lim_{xto -infty} =-2$, I thought. It also moves the slant asymptote down to $y=x-2$. To make good for that, I thought I move the graph to the left by $2$, which transforms the slant asymptote back to $y=x$ and does not change the horizontal one.
$displaystyle frac{x+2}{pi} cdot left(arctan(x) + frac{pi}{2}right) -2$:
But now I noticed that ever since the second step I was off by a vertical shift of $1/pi$. See, both asymptotes are a bit too low. Where does that come from? Well I realised that even though arctan goes to $pmpi/2$ (and my shifted version in the first step to $0$ resp. $pi$), I multiply it with a linear term; which means that I have to find out how well the $arctan$ approaches its limit up to a term of order $frac1x$. And indeed, an expansion of $arctan$ "around $pm infty$" is given by
$$displaystyle arctan(x) = frac{pi}{2} - frac{1}{x} + frac{1}{3x^{3}} - frac{1}{5x^{5}} + ...$$ (for $x >1$) resp.
$$displaystyle arctan(x) = -frac{pi}{2} - frac{1}{x} + frac{1}{3x^{3}} - frac{1}{5x^{5}} + ...$$ (for $x < -1$).
whose $-1/x$-term, by multiplication with $x/pi$, indeed explained that constant $-1/pi$ term. But then that's that, one just removes it by hand, giving:
$$f(x) = displaystyle frac{x+2}{pi} cdot left(arctan(x) + frac{pi}{2}right) -2 +frac{1}{pi}$$
Voilà:
Fun fact I learned on the way when deriving the "expansion around $infty$": the derivative of $arctan(1/x)$ is $(-1)cdot$ the derivative of $arctan(x)$; which abstractly implies that $arctan(x)= C - arctan(1/x)$ for some constant depending on the connected component of the graph we are on. And indeed e.g. for $x>0$, we have $arctan(x) = pi/2 - arctan(1/x)$.
edited Nov 28 at 21:10
answered Nov 28 at 4:11
Torsten Schoeneberg
3,6562832
3,6562832
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3016269%2fcan-i-make-a-line-with-both-a-slant-asymptote-and-a-horizontal%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Of course one can do that with a complicated enough function. The question is which functions are allowed. E.g. a rational function could not fulfill this, because if it has a horizontal asymptote towards $-infty$ it must have the same h.a. towards $+infty$.
– Torsten Schoeneberg
Nov 27 at 20:44
But maybe you want to take a look at the graph of $xcdot(arctan(x)+frac{pi}{2})$, and adjust by stretching and shifting.
– Torsten Schoeneberg
Nov 27 at 20:52