Connection between definitions in function fields and on curves











up vote
2
down vote

favorite












(Sorry for the weird title, I really don't know how to describe this question in a line)



I am reading the book "Number Theory in Function Fields" by Rosen and it has an algebraic perspective on all the subject, and I was trying to get some sketchy introduction to the geometrical perspective. I got the book "Codes and Curves" by Judy Walker and I am trying to make the translation between definitions and objects in each book.



Rosen define divisors on a function field $F$ over a base field $k=mathbb{F}_q$ to be the free abelian group over the set of all primes, and Walker's definition for a divisor on a projective, non-singular algebraic curve $f(x,y)=0$ is similar but not exactly the same, she defines it as the free abelian group over the set of "points with multiplicity"- if we have a point $P$ on the curve we're looking at its orbit under the froubenius map $xmapsto x^q$, and this set is the "point with multiplicity".



Also, the principal divisor of an element $ain F$ is defined (in Rosen's book) by $sum_P v_P (x)P$ where $P$ are the primes of the function field, and $v_P$ are the valuations of these primes. Walker's definition is of divisors of rational functions $h/g$ of the curve, and it is done by taking the intersection divisors of $C_f cap C_g, C_fcap C_h$ and substracting them (where $C_f,C_g,C_h$ are the curves obtained by the zero locus of the equations of $f,g,h$). Finally, the definitions for the degree of a prime / point are different - the degree of $P$ is $[O_P/PO_P:k(x)]$ (where $O_P$ is the place of $P$) and the degree of the point $P$ on the curve is the size of its orbit under the Frobenius map $xmapsto x^q$.



How each pair of definitions is connected to each other? (Thanks for taking the time to reading this!)










share|cite|improve this question




























    up vote
    2
    down vote

    favorite












    (Sorry for the weird title, I really don't know how to describe this question in a line)



    I am reading the book "Number Theory in Function Fields" by Rosen and it has an algebraic perspective on all the subject, and I was trying to get some sketchy introduction to the geometrical perspective. I got the book "Codes and Curves" by Judy Walker and I am trying to make the translation between definitions and objects in each book.



    Rosen define divisors on a function field $F$ over a base field $k=mathbb{F}_q$ to be the free abelian group over the set of all primes, and Walker's definition for a divisor on a projective, non-singular algebraic curve $f(x,y)=0$ is similar but not exactly the same, she defines it as the free abelian group over the set of "points with multiplicity"- if we have a point $P$ on the curve we're looking at its orbit under the froubenius map $xmapsto x^q$, and this set is the "point with multiplicity".



    Also, the principal divisor of an element $ain F$ is defined (in Rosen's book) by $sum_P v_P (x)P$ where $P$ are the primes of the function field, and $v_P$ are the valuations of these primes. Walker's definition is of divisors of rational functions $h/g$ of the curve, and it is done by taking the intersection divisors of $C_f cap C_g, C_fcap C_h$ and substracting them (where $C_f,C_g,C_h$ are the curves obtained by the zero locus of the equations of $f,g,h$). Finally, the definitions for the degree of a prime / point are different - the degree of $P$ is $[O_P/PO_P:k(x)]$ (where $O_P$ is the place of $P$) and the degree of the point $P$ on the curve is the size of its orbit under the Frobenius map $xmapsto x^q$.



    How each pair of definitions is connected to each other? (Thanks for taking the time to reading this!)










    share|cite|improve this question


























      up vote
      2
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      2
      down vote

      favorite











      (Sorry for the weird title, I really don't know how to describe this question in a line)



      I am reading the book "Number Theory in Function Fields" by Rosen and it has an algebraic perspective on all the subject, and I was trying to get some sketchy introduction to the geometrical perspective. I got the book "Codes and Curves" by Judy Walker and I am trying to make the translation between definitions and objects in each book.



      Rosen define divisors on a function field $F$ over a base field $k=mathbb{F}_q$ to be the free abelian group over the set of all primes, and Walker's definition for a divisor on a projective, non-singular algebraic curve $f(x,y)=0$ is similar but not exactly the same, she defines it as the free abelian group over the set of "points with multiplicity"- if we have a point $P$ on the curve we're looking at its orbit under the froubenius map $xmapsto x^q$, and this set is the "point with multiplicity".



      Also, the principal divisor of an element $ain F$ is defined (in Rosen's book) by $sum_P v_P (x)P$ where $P$ are the primes of the function field, and $v_P$ are the valuations of these primes. Walker's definition is of divisors of rational functions $h/g$ of the curve, and it is done by taking the intersection divisors of $C_f cap C_g, C_fcap C_h$ and substracting them (where $C_f,C_g,C_h$ are the curves obtained by the zero locus of the equations of $f,g,h$). Finally, the definitions for the degree of a prime / point are different - the degree of $P$ is $[O_P/PO_P:k(x)]$ (where $O_P$ is the place of $P$) and the degree of the point $P$ on the curve is the size of its orbit under the Frobenius map $xmapsto x^q$.



      How each pair of definitions is connected to each other? (Thanks for taking the time to reading this!)










      share|cite|improve this question















      (Sorry for the weird title, I really don't know how to describe this question in a line)



      I am reading the book "Number Theory in Function Fields" by Rosen and it has an algebraic perspective on all the subject, and I was trying to get some sketchy introduction to the geometrical perspective. I got the book "Codes and Curves" by Judy Walker and I am trying to make the translation between definitions and objects in each book.



      Rosen define divisors on a function field $F$ over a base field $k=mathbb{F}_q$ to be the free abelian group over the set of all primes, and Walker's definition for a divisor on a projective, non-singular algebraic curve $f(x,y)=0$ is similar but not exactly the same, she defines it as the free abelian group over the set of "points with multiplicity"- if we have a point $P$ on the curve we're looking at its orbit under the froubenius map $xmapsto x^q$, and this set is the "point with multiplicity".



      Also, the principal divisor of an element $ain F$ is defined (in Rosen's book) by $sum_P v_P (x)P$ where $P$ are the primes of the function field, and $v_P$ are the valuations of these primes. Walker's definition is of divisors of rational functions $h/g$ of the curve, and it is done by taking the intersection divisors of $C_f cap C_g, C_fcap C_h$ and substracting them (where $C_f,C_g,C_h$ are the curves obtained by the zero locus of the equations of $f,g,h$). Finally, the definitions for the degree of a prime / point are different - the degree of $P$ is $[O_P/PO_P:k(x)]$ (where $O_P$ is the place of $P$) and the degree of the point $P$ on the curve is the size of its orbit under the Frobenius map $xmapsto x^q$.



      How each pair of definitions is connected to each other? (Thanks for taking the time to reading this!)







      algebraic-number-theory algebraic-curves function-fields






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Nov 27 at 21:13

























      asked Nov 27 at 21:07









      Madarb

      187111




      187111



























          active

          oldest

          votes











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3016298%2fconnection-between-definitions-in-function-fields-and-on-curves%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown






























          active

          oldest

          votes













          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes
















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





          Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


          Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3016298%2fconnection-between-definitions-in-function-fields-and-on-curves%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Wiesbaden

          Marschland

          Dieringhausen