Connection between definitions in function fields and on curves
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
(Sorry for the weird title, I really don't know how to describe this question in a line)
I am reading the book "Number Theory in Function Fields" by Rosen and it has an algebraic perspective on all the subject, and I was trying to get some sketchy introduction to the geometrical perspective. I got the book "Codes and Curves" by Judy Walker and I am trying to make the translation between definitions and objects in each book.
Rosen define divisors on a function field $F$ over a base field $k=mathbb{F}_q$ to be the free abelian group over the set of all primes, and Walker's definition for a divisor on a projective, non-singular algebraic curve $f(x,y)=0$ is similar but not exactly the same, she defines it as the free abelian group over the set of "points with multiplicity"- if we have a point $P$ on the curve we're looking at its orbit under the froubenius map $xmapsto x^q$, and this set is the "point with multiplicity".
Also, the principal divisor of an element $ain F$ is defined (in Rosen's book) by $sum_P v_P (x)P$ where $P$ are the primes of the function field, and $v_P$ are the valuations of these primes. Walker's definition is of divisors of rational functions $h/g$ of the curve, and it is done by taking the intersection divisors of $C_f cap C_g, C_fcap C_h$ and substracting them (where $C_f,C_g,C_h$ are the curves obtained by the zero locus of the equations of $f,g,h$). Finally, the definitions for the degree of a prime / point are different - the degree of $P$ is $[O_P/PO_P:k(x)]$ (where $O_P$ is the place of $P$) and the degree of the point $P$ on the curve is the size of its orbit under the Frobenius map $xmapsto x^q$.
How each pair of definitions is connected to each other? (Thanks for taking the time to reading this!)
algebraic-number-theory algebraic-curves function-fields
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
(Sorry for the weird title, I really don't know how to describe this question in a line)
I am reading the book "Number Theory in Function Fields" by Rosen and it has an algebraic perspective on all the subject, and I was trying to get some sketchy introduction to the geometrical perspective. I got the book "Codes and Curves" by Judy Walker and I am trying to make the translation between definitions and objects in each book.
Rosen define divisors on a function field $F$ over a base field $k=mathbb{F}_q$ to be the free abelian group over the set of all primes, and Walker's definition for a divisor on a projective, non-singular algebraic curve $f(x,y)=0$ is similar but not exactly the same, she defines it as the free abelian group over the set of "points with multiplicity"- if we have a point $P$ on the curve we're looking at its orbit under the froubenius map $xmapsto x^q$, and this set is the "point with multiplicity".
Also, the principal divisor of an element $ain F$ is defined (in Rosen's book) by $sum_P v_P (x)P$ where $P$ are the primes of the function field, and $v_P$ are the valuations of these primes. Walker's definition is of divisors of rational functions $h/g$ of the curve, and it is done by taking the intersection divisors of $C_f cap C_g, C_fcap C_h$ and substracting them (where $C_f,C_g,C_h$ are the curves obtained by the zero locus of the equations of $f,g,h$). Finally, the definitions for the degree of a prime / point are different - the degree of $P$ is $[O_P/PO_P:k(x)]$ (where $O_P$ is the place of $P$) and the degree of the point $P$ on the curve is the size of its orbit under the Frobenius map $xmapsto x^q$.
How each pair of definitions is connected to each other? (Thanks for taking the time to reading this!)
algebraic-number-theory algebraic-curves function-fields
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
(Sorry for the weird title, I really don't know how to describe this question in a line)
I am reading the book "Number Theory in Function Fields" by Rosen and it has an algebraic perspective on all the subject, and I was trying to get some sketchy introduction to the geometrical perspective. I got the book "Codes and Curves" by Judy Walker and I am trying to make the translation between definitions and objects in each book.
Rosen define divisors on a function field $F$ over a base field $k=mathbb{F}_q$ to be the free abelian group over the set of all primes, and Walker's definition for a divisor on a projective, non-singular algebraic curve $f(x,y)=0$ is similar but not exactly the same, she defines it as the free abelian group over the set of "points with multiplicity"- if we have a point $P$ on the curve we're looking at its orbit under the froubenius map $xmapsto x^q$, and this set is the "point with multiplicity".
Also, the principal divisor of an element $ain F$ is defined (in Rosen's book) by $sum_P v_P (x)P$ where $P$ are the primes of the function field, and $v_P$ are the valuations of these primes. Walker's definition is of divisors of rational functions $h/g$ of the curve, and it is done by taking the intersection divisors of $C_f cap C_g, C_fcap C_h$ and substracting them (where $C_f,C_g,C_h$ are the curves obtained by the zero locus of the equations of $f,g,h$). Finally, the definitions for the degree of a prime / point are different - the degree of $P$ is $[O_P/PO_P:k(x)]$ (where $O_P$ is the place of $P$) and the degree of the point $P$ on the curve is the size of its orbit under the Frobenius map $xmapsto x^q$.
How each pair of definitions is connected to each other? (Thanks for taking the time to reading this!)
algebraic-number-theory algebraic-curves function-fields
(Sorry for the weird title, I really don't know how to describe this question in a line)
I am reading the book "Number Theory in Function Fields" by Rosen and it has an algebraic perspective on all the subject, and I was trying to get some sketchy introduction to the geometrical perspective. I got the book "Codes and Curves" by Judy Walker and I am trying to make the translation between definitions and objects in each book.
Rosen define divisors on a function field $F$ over a base field $k=mathbb{F}_q$ to be the free abelian group over the set of all primes, and Walker's definition for a divisor on a projective, non-singular algebraic curve $f(x,y)=0$ is similar but not exactly the same, she defines it as the free abelian group over the set of "points with multiplicity"- if we have a point $P$ on the curve we're looking at its orbit under the froubenius map $xmapsto x^q$, and this set is the "point with multiplicity".
Also, the principal divisor of an element $ain F$ is defined (in Rosen's book) by $sum_P v_P (x)P$ where $P$ are the primes of the function field, and $v_P$ are the valuations of these primes. Walker's definition is of divisors of rational functions $h/g$ of the curve, and it is done by taking the intersection divisors of $C_f cap C_g, C_fcap C_h$ and substracting them (where $C_f,C_g,C_h$ are the curves obtained by the zero locus of the equations of $f,g,h$). Finally, the definitions for the degree of a prime / point are different - the degree of $P$ is $[O_P/PO_P:k(x)]$ (where $O_P$ is the place of $P$) and the degree of the point $P$ on the curve is the size of its orbit under the Frobenius map $xmapsto x^q$.
How each pair of definitions is connected to each other? (Thanks for taking the time to reading this!)
algebraic-number-theory algebraic-curves function-fields
algebraic-number-theory algebraic-curves function-fields
edited Nov 27 at 21:13
asked Nov 27 at 21:07
Madarb
187111
187111
add a comment |
add a comment |
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3016298%2fconnection-between-definitions-in-function-fields-and-on-curves%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3016298%2fconnection-between-definitions-in-function-fields-and-on-curves%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown