Getting rid on internal boundaries
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
Suppose I have a volume, $V$ split up into two regions $V=V_{1}cup V_{2}$ say with and interface $Sigma$ between them and I am considering the heat equation in each region:
$$frac{partial T_{1,2}}{partial t}=nablacdotleft(k_{1,2}(x)nabla T_{1,2}right),$$
Is there a way of defining a "global" $T$, such that:
$$T=leftlbrace
begin{array}{cc}
T_{1} & xin V_{1} \
T_{2} & xin V_{2}
end{array}right.$$
Which eliminates the use the usual interfacial conditions:
$$T_{1}(t,mathbf{x})=T_{2}(t,mathbf{x})quad xinSigma$$
$$frac{partial T_{1}}{partial n}(t,mathbf{x})=frac{partial T_{2}}{partial n}(t,mathbf{x})quad xinSigma$$
So basically, can I derive an equation for $T$ which just uses the boundary conditions on $V$ rather than $Sigma$?
pde boundary-value-problem heat-equation
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
Suppose I have a volume, $V$ split up into two regions $V=V_{1}cup V_{2}$ say with and interface $Sigma$ between them and I am considering the heat equation in each region:
$$frac{partial T_{1,2}}{partial t}=nablacdotleft(k_{1,2}(x)nabla T_{1,2}right),$$
Is there a way of defining a "global" $T$, such that:
$$T=leftlbrace
begin{array}{cc}
T_{1} & xin V_{1} \
T_{2} & xin V_{2}
end{array}right.$$
Which eliminates the use the usual interfacial conditions:
$$T_{1}(t,mathbf{x})=T_{2}(t,mathbf{x})quad xinSigma$$
$$frac{partial T_{1}}{partial n}(t,mathbf{x})=frac{partial T_{2}}{partial n}(t,mathbf{x})quad xinSigma$$
So basically, can I derive an equation for $T$ which just uses the boundary conditions on $V$ rather than $Sigma$?
pde boundary-value-problem heat-equation
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
Suppose I have a volume, $V$ split up into two regions $V=V_{1}cup V_{2}$ say with and interface $Sigma$ between them and I am considering the heat equation in each region:
$$frac{partial T_{1,2}}{partial t}=nablacdotleft(k_{1,2}(x)nabla T_{1,2}right),$$
Is there a way of defining a "global" $T$, such that:
$$T=leftlbrace
begin{array}{cc}
T_{1} & xin V_{1} \
T_{2} & xin V_{2}
end{array}right.$$
Which eliminates the use the usual interfacial conditions:
$$T_{1}(t,mathbf{x})=T_{2}(t,mathbf{x})quad xinSigma$$
$$frac{partial T_{1}}{partial n}(t,mathbf{x})=frac{partial T_{2}}{partial n}(t,mathbf{x})quad xinSigma$$
So basically, can I derive an equation for $T$ which just uses the boundary conditions on $V$ rather than $Sigma$?
pde boundary-value-problem heat-equation
Suppose I have a volume, $V$ split up into two regions $V=V_{1}cup V_{2}$ say with and interface $Sigma$ between them and I am considering the heat equation in each region:
$$frac{partial T_{1,2}}{partial t}=nablacdotleft(k_{1,2}(x)nabla T_{1,2}right),$$
Is there a way of defining a "global" $T$, such that:
$$T=leftlbrace
begin{array}{cc}
T_{1} & xin V_{1} \
T_{2} & xin V_{2}
end{array}right.$$
Which eliminates the use the usual interfacial conditions:
$$T_{1}(t,mathbf{x})=T_{2}(t,mathbf{x})quad xinSigma$$
$$frac{partial T_{1}}{partial n}(t,mathbf{x})=frac{partial T_{2}}{partial n}(t,mathbf{x})quad xinSigma$$
So basically, can I derive an equation for $T$ which just uses the boundary conditions on $V$ rather than $Sigma$?
pde boundary-value-problem heat-equation
pde boundary-value-problem heat-equation
edited Nov 27 at 20:10
Dylan
12.1k31026
12.1k31026
asked Nov 12 at 19:35
Matthew Hunt
36916
36916
add a comment |
add a comment |
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2995758%2fgetting-rid-on-internal-boundaries%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2995758%2fgetting-rid-on-internal-boundaries%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown