Skip DLL compilation if no changes
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
I'm attempting to optimize our build procedure for our applications we have here. I'd like to skip the compilation of our backend .dll file should the file timestamp not have change using Netbeans Ant scripts.
I've been using Incremental and fast build using Ant and Advanced Free-form project configuration as a reference point but it seems to require 2 build targets to create the .timestamp comparison in the first link.
Is there a way to circumvent the need for 2 targets and check the timestamp of the .dll file instead? or do I simply need to add another tag inside of my call to make the comparison, or is what I'm trying to do not feasible?
Any help would be greatly appreciated or if better methods of doing this are known I am open to listening to it.
We use Netbeans to compile our projects, and uses Ant by default. I've included a snippit of my build.xml Ant script so far.
Thanks in advance!
<target name="init-skip-dll" description="initializes the skip property for the Ada dll">
<uptodate srcfile="create-ada-dll.timestamp" targetfile="ada-dll.timestamp" property="ada-dll.skip" value="true" />
</target>
<target name="-build-dll" description="builds the Ada dll if needed" depends="init-skip-dll">
<exec executable="gprbuild.exe">
<arg value="-P"/>
<arg file="..DLLifccs_dll.gpr"/>
</exec>
<touch file="create-ada-dll.timestamp"/>
</target>
java optimization netbeans ant ada
asked Nov 20 at 16:15
FunkyMonkey
2318
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
I'm attempting to optimize our build procedure for our applications we have here. I'd like to skip the compilation of our backend .dll file should the file timestamp not have change using Netbeans Ant scripts.
I've been using Incremental and fast build using Ant and Advanced Free-form project configuration as a reference point but it seems to require 2 build targets to create the .timestamp comparison in the first link.
Is there a way to circumvent the need for 2 targets and check the timestamp of the .dll file instead? or do I simply need to add another tag inside of my call to make the comparison, or is what I'm trying to do not feasible?
Any help would be greatly appreciated or if better methods of doing this are known I am open to listening to it.
We use Netbeans to compile our projects, and uses Ant by default. I've included a snippit of my build.xml Ant script so far.
Thanks in advance!
<target name="init-skip-dll" description="initializes the skip property for the Ada dll">
<uptodate srcfile="create-ada-dll.timestamp" targetfile="ada-dll.timestamp" property="ada-dll.skip" value="true" />
</target>
<target name="-build-dll" description="builds the Ada dll if needed" depends="init-skip-dll">
<exec executable="gprbuild.exe">
<arg value="-P"/>
<arg file="..DLLifccs_dll.gpr"/>
</exec>
<touch file="create-ada-dll.timestamp"/>
</target>
java optimization netbeans ant ada
asked Nov 20 at 16:15
FunkyMonkey
2318
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
I'm attempting to optimize our build procedure for our applications we have here. I'd like to skip the compilation of our backend .dll file should the file timestamp not have change using Netbeans Ant scripts.
I've been using Incremental and fast build using Ant and Advanced Free-form project configuration as a reference point but it seems to require 2 build targets to create the .timestamp comparison in the first link.
Is there a way to circumvent the need for 2 targets and check the timestamp of the .dll file instead? or do I simply need to add another tag inside of my call to make the comparison, or is what I'm trying to do not feasible?
Any help would be greatly appreciated or if better methods of doing this are known I am open to listening to it.
We use Netbeans to compile our projects, and uses Ant by default. I've included a snippit of my build.xml Ant script so far.
Thanks in advance!
<target name="init-skip-dll" description="initializes the skip property for the Ada dll">
<uptodate srcfile="create-ada-dll.timestamp" targetfile="ada-dll.timestamp" property="ada-dll.skip" value="true" />
</target>
<target name="-build-dll" description="builds the Ada dll if needed" depends="init-skip-dll">
<exec executable="gprbuild.exe">
<arg value="-P"/>
<arg file="..DLLifccs_dll.gpr"/>
</exec>
<touch file="create-ada-dll.timestamp"/>
</target>
java optimization netbeans ant ada
asked Nov 20 at 16:15
FunkyMonkey
2318
I'm attempting to optimize our build procedure for our applications we have here. I'd like to skip the compilation of our backend .dll file should the file timestamp not have change using Netbeans Ant scripts.
I've been using Incremental and fast build using Ant and Advanced Free-form project configuration as a reference point but it seems to require 2 build targets to create the .timestamp comparison in the first link.
Is there a way to circumvent the need for 2 targets and check the timestamp of the .dll file instead? or do I simply need to add another tag inside of my call to make the comparison, or is what I'm trying to do not feasible?
Any help would be greatly appreciated or if better methods of doing this are known I am open to listening to it.
We use Netbeans to compile our projects, and uses Ant by default. I've included a snippit of my build.xml Ant script so far.
Thanks in advance!
<target name="init-skip-dll" description="initializes the skip property for the Ada dll">
<uptodate srcfile="create-ada-dll.timestamp" targetfile="ada-dll.timestamp" property="ada-dll.skip" value="true" />
</target>
<target name="-build-dll" description="builds the Ada dll if needed" depends="init-skip-dll">
<exec executable="gprbuild.exe">
<arg value="-P"/>
<arg file="..DLLifccs_dll.gpr"/>
</exec>
<touch file="create-ada-dll.timestamp"/>
</target>
java optimization netbeans ant ada
java optimization netbeans ant ada
asked Nov 20 at 16:15
FunkyMonkey
2318
asked Nov 20 at 16:15
FunkyMonkey
2318
asked Nov 20 at 16:15
FunkyMonkey
2318
asked Nov 20 at 16:15
FunkyMonkey
2318
asked Nov 20 at 16:15
FunkyMonkey
2318
2318
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
I don’t use Ant, but the same problem exists with Make; the Ada dependency rules are complex, and best handled by unconditionally letting gprbuild do whatever it needs to to bring the DLL up-to-date. Gprbuild will do nothing besides checking dependencies if the DLL is actually up-to-date.
In Make, this involves a phony target: e.g. for a real target testbed,
testbed: force
gprbuild -p -P testbed
.PHONY: force
or for an already-phony target
all:
gprbuild -p -P build_runtime.gpr
.PHONY: all
By the way, note the -p, which says to create needed directories, e.g. an object directory.
answered Nov 20 at 16:39
Simon Wright
16.4k21735
and best handled by unconditionally letting gprbuild do whatever it needs to to bring the DLL up-to-dat I agree. Trying to do anything else is overthinking (99% of the time).
– LoneWanderer
Nov 23 at 23:46
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53397157%2fskip-dll-compilation-if-no-changes%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
I don’t use Ant, but the same problem exists with Make; the Ada dependency rules are complex, and best handled by unconditionally letting gprbuild do whatever it needs to to bring the DLL up-to-date. Gprbuild will do nothing besides checking dependencies if the DLL is actually up-to-date.
In Make, this involves a phony target: e.g. for a real target testbed,
testbed: force
gprbuild -p -P testbed
.PHONY: force
or for an already-phony target
all:
gprbuild -p -P build_runtime.gpr
.PHONY: all
By the way, note the -p, which says to create needed directories, e.g. an object directory.
answered Nov 20 at 16:39
Simon Wright
16.4k21735
and best handled by unconditionally letting gprbuild do whatever it needs to to bring the DLL up-to-dat I agree. Trying to do anything else is overthinking (99% of the time).
– LoneWanderer
Nov 23 at 23:46
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
I don’t use Ant, but the same problem exists with Make; the Ada dependency rules are complex, and best handled by unconditionally letting gprbuild do whatever it needs to to bring the DLL up-to-date. Gprbuild will do nothing besides checking dependencies if the DLL is actually up-to-date.
In Make, this involves a phony target: e.g. for a real target testbed,
testbed: force
gprbuild -p -P testbed
.PHONY: force
or for an already-phony target
all:
gprbuild -p -P build_runtime.gpr
.PHONY: all
By the way, note the -p, which says to create needed directories, e.g. an object directory.
answered Nov 20 at 16:39
Simon Wright
16.4k21735
and best handled by unconditionally letting gprbuild do whatever it needs to to bring the DLL up-to-dat I agree. Trying to do anything else is overthinking (99% of the time).
– LoneWanderer
Nov 23 at 23:46
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
up vote
1
down vote
I don’t use Ant, but the same problem exists with Make; the Ada dependency rules are complex, and best handled by unconditionally letting gprbuild do whatever it needs to to bring the DLL up-to-date. Gprbuild will do nothing besides checking dependencies if the DLL is actually up-to-date.
In Make, this involves a phony target: e.g. for a real target testbed,
testbed: force
gprbuild -p -P testbed
.PHONY: force
or for an already-phony target
all:
gprbuild -p -P build_runtime.gpr
.PHONY: all
By the way, note the -p, which says to create needed directories, e.g. an object directory.
answered Nov 20 at 16:39
Simon Wright
16.4k21735
I don’t use Ant, but the same problem exists with Make; the Ada dependency rules are complex, and best handled by unconditionally letting gprbuild do whatever it needs to to bring the DLL up-to-date. Gprbuild will do nothing besides checking dependencies if the DLL is actually up-to-date.
In Make, this involves a phony target: e.g. for a real target testbed,
testbed: force
gprbuild -p -P testbed
.PHONY: force
or for an already-phony target
all:
gprbuild -p -P build_runtime.gpr
.PHONY: all
By the way, note the -p, which says to create needed directories, e.g. an object directory.
answered Nov 20 at 16:39
Simon Wright
16.4k21735
answered Nov 20 at 16:39
Simon Wright
16.4k21735
answered Nov 20 at 16:39
Simon Wright
16.4k21735
answered Nov 20 at 16:39
Simon Wright
16.4k21735
16.4k21735
and best handled by unconditionally letting gprbuild do whatever it needs to to bring the DLL up-to-dat I agree. Trying to do anything else is overthinking (99% of the time).
– LoneWanderer
Nov 23 at 23:46
add a comment |
and best handled by unconditionally letting gprbuild do whatever it needs to to bring the DLL up-to-dat I agree. Trying to do anything else is overthinking (99% of the time).
– LoneWanderer
Nov 23 at 23:46
and best handled by unconditionally letting gprbuild do whatever it needs to to bring the DLL up-to-dat I agree. Trying to do anything else is overthinking (99% of the time).
– LoneWanderer
Nov 23 at 23:46
and best handled by unconditionally letting gprbuild do whatever it needs to to bring the DLL up-to-dat I agree. Trying to do anything else is overthinking (99% of the time).
– LoneWanderer
Nov 23 at 23:46
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53397157%2fskip-dll-compilation-if-no-changes%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
