Finding eigenvalues from a matrix that has constant a.
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
Given the matrix $$A= left[
begin{array}{ccc}
2&0&1\
1&1&a\
0&0&1
end{array}
right] $$
Find all the eigenvalues of A.
My approach:
$det( λI-A) = 0 =$
$$
begin{vmatrix}
λ-2&0&-1\
-1&λ-1&-a\
0&-a&λ-1
end{vmatrix}
$$
However, after solving it, $ λ^3 -4 λ^2+(5-a^2) λ+(2a^2-2-a)=0$. How do I proceed to solve it further to obtain my eigenvalues?
linear-algebra matrices eigenvalues-eigenvectors
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
Given the matrix $$A= left[
begin{array}{ccc}
2&0&1\
1&1&a\
0&0&1
end{array}
right] $$
Find all the eigenvalues of A.
My approach:
$det( λI-A) = 0 =$
$$
begin{vmatrix}
λ-2&0&-1\
-1&λ-1&-a\
0&-a&λ-1
end{vmatrix}
$$
However, after solving it, $ λ^3 -4 λ^2+(5-a^2) λ+(2a^2-2-a)=0$. How do I proceed to solve it further to obtain my eigenvalues?
linear-algebra matrices eigenvalues-eigenvectors
3
You have a misprint in the matrix $A$ or in the determinant
– Tito Eliatron
Nov 27 at 8:22
The error should be in the determinant, since then the eigenvalues are independent of $a$.
– Gnampfissimo
Nov 27 at 8:26
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
Given the matrix $$A= left[
begin{array}{ccc}
2&0&1\
1&1&a\
0&0&1
end{array}
right] $$
Find all the eigenvalues of A.
My approach:
$det( λI-A) = 0 =$
$$
begin{vmatrix}
λ-2&0&-1\
-1&λ-1&-a\
0&-a&λ-1
end{vmatrix}
$$
However, after solving it, $ λ^3 -4 λ^2+(5-a^2) λ+(2a^2-2-a)=0$. How do I proceed to solve it further to obtain my eigenvalues?
linear-algebra matrices eigenvalues-eigenvectors
Given the matrix $$A= left[
begin{array}{ccc}
2&0&1\
1&1&a\
0&0&1
end{array}
right] $$
Find all the eigenvalues of A.
My approach:
$det( λI-A) = 0 =$
$$
begin{vmatrix}
λ-2&0&-1\
-1&λ-1&-a\
0&-a&λ-1
end{vmatrix}
$$
However, after solving it, $ λ^3 -4 λ^2+(5-a^2) λ+(2a^2-2-a)=0$. How do I proceed to solve it further to obtain my eigenvalues?
linear-algebra matrices eigenvalues-eigenvectors
linear-algebra matrices eigenvalues-eigenvectors
edited Nov 27 at 10:10
Bernard
117k637109
117k637109
asked Nov 27 at 8:20
Cheryl
755
755
3
You have a misprint in the matrix $A$ or in the determinant
– Tito Eliatron
Nov 27 at 8:22
The error should be in the determinant, since then the eigenvalues are independent of $a$.
– Gnampfissimo
Nov 27 at 8:26
add a comment |
3
You have a misprint in the matrix $A$ or in the determinant
– Tito Eliatron
Nov 27 at 8:22
The error should be in the determinant, since then the eigenvalues are independent of $a$.
– Gnampfissimo
Nov 27 at 8:26
3
3
You have a misprint in the matrix $A$ or in the determinant
– Tito Eliatron
Nov 27 at 8:22
You have a misprint in the matrix $A$ or in the determinant
– Tito Eliatron
Nov 27 at 8:22
The error should be in the determinant, since then the eigenvalues are independent of $a$.
– Gnampfissimo
Nov 27 at 8:26
The error should be in the determinant, since then the eigenvalues are independent of $a$.
– Gnampfissimo
Nov 27 at 8:26
add a comment |
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
up vote
0
down vote
Assuming the matrix is correct,
$$det(lambda I-A)=
begin{vmatrix}
λ-2&0&-1\
-1&λ-1&-a\
0&0&λ-1
end{vmatrix} =(lambda-1)begin{vmatrix} λ-2&0\
-1&λ-1end{vmatrix} =(lambda-1)^2(lambda-2)
$$ and so, eigenvalues are $lambda=2$ double, and $lambda=1$ simple.
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
A matrix is singular amongst other things if it has a zero row or column, or if two rows or columns are linearly dependent. Subtracting $lambda$ from diagonal elements just changed the diagonal.
I can see that I can change the $1$ in the bottom row to a zero by a suitable choice of $lambda$ and if the top left entry were $0$ the bottom row would be a multiple of the top one. So I can read two eigenvalues off straight away. Then the trace - the sum of the diagonal entries - is the sum of the eigenvalues.
Now either that solves the problem without doing the computations, or - if the computation is expected - it acts as a robust check on your arithmetic.
I have assumed that the matrix first given is right. One of the zeros in the bottom row will appear in any sub-product of the determinant which involves $a$ so you can tell that the determinant will be independent of $a$.
This is to encourage you to look at the matrix for clues (columns will do as well as rows) which will either act as a check on your computations or give you short-cuts.
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
You’ve made an error in computing the determinant: it should be $lambda^3-4lambda^2+5lambda-2$. However, it’s not necessary to go through all of that for this particular matrix.
A matrix and its transpose have the same eigenvalues, so we can examine the rows of the matrix. From the last row, we have the left eigenvector $(0,0,1)$ with eigenvalue $1$. If you add the first and third rows, you get $(2,0,2)$, but left-multiplying a matrix by $(1,0,1)$ performs this addition, so we have another eigenvector/eigenvalue pair: $(1,0,1)$ and $2$. The trace of a matrix is equal to the sum of its eigenvalues, so we can find the last eigenvalue “for free:” it’s $4-2-1=1$. With a bit of practice, you’ll be able to spot things like this.
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
Hint:
$$
left[
begin{array}{ccc}
2&0&1\
1&1&a\
0&0&1
end{array}
right]
=
Pleft[
begin{array}{ccc}
2&1&1\
0&1&a\
0&0&1
end{array}
right] P^{-1}
$$
Where $P$ is a permutation matrix.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3015489%2ffinding-eigenvalues-from-a-matrix-that-has-constant-a%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
0
down vote
Assuming the matrix is correct,
$$det(lambda I-A)=
begin{vmatrix}
λ-2&0&-1\
-1&λ-1&-a\
0&0&λ-1
end{vmatrix} =(lambda-1)begin{vmatrix} λ-2&0\
-1&λ-1end{vmatrix} =(lambda-1)^2(lambda-2)
$$ and so, eigenvalues are $lambda=2$ double, and $lambda=1$ simple.
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
Assuming the matrix is correct,
$$det(lambda I-A)=
begin{vmatrix}
λ-2&0&-1\
-1&λ-1&-a\
0&0&λ-1
end{vmatrix} =(lambda-1)begin{vmatrix} λ-2&0\
-1&λ-1end{vmatrix} =(lambda-1)^2(lambda-2)
$$ and so, eigenvalues are $lambda=2$ double, and $lambda=1$ simple.
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
Assuming the matrix is correct,
$$det(lambda I-A)=
begin{vmatrix}
λ-2&0&-1\
-1&λ-1&-a\
0&0&λ-1
end{vmatrix} =(lambda-1)begin{vmatrix} λ-2&0\
-1&λ-1end{vmatrix} =(lambda-1)^2(lambda-2)
$$ and so, eigenvalues are $lambda=2$ double, and $lambda=1$ simple.
Assuming the matrix is correct,
$$det(lambda I-A)=
begin{vmatrix}
λ-2&0&-1\
-1&λ-1&-a\
0&0&λ-1
end{vmatrix} =(lambda-1)begin{vmatrix} λ-2&0\
-1&λ-1end{vmatrix} =(lambda-1)^2(lambda-2)
$$ and so, eigenvalues are $lambda=2$ double, and $lambda=1$ simple.
answered Nov 27 at 8:25
Tito Eliatron
1,307622
1,307622
add a comment |
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
A matrix is singular amongst other things if it has a zero row or column, or if two rows or columns are linearly dependent. Subtracting $lambda$ from diagonal elements just changed the diagonal.
I can see that I can change the $1$ in the bottom row to a zero by a suitable choice of $lambda$ and if the top left entry were $0$ the bottom row would be a multiple of the top one. So I can read two eigenvalues off straight away. Then the trace - the sum of the diagonal entries - is the sum of the eigenvalues.
Now either that solves the problem without doing the computations, or - if the computation is expected - it acts as a robust check on your arithmetic.
I have assumed that the matrix first given is right. One of the zeros in the bottom row will appear in any sub-product of the determinant which involves $a$ so you can tell that the determinant will be independent of $a$.
This is to encourage you to look at the matrix for clues (columns will do as well as rows) which will either act as a check on your computations or give you short-cuts.
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
A matrix is singular amongst other things if it has a zero row or column, or if two rows or columns are linearly dependent. Subtracting $lambda$ from diagonal elements just changed the diagonal.
I can see that I can change the $1$ in the bottom row to a zero by a suitable choice of $lambda$ and if the top left entry were $0$ the bottom row would be a multiple of the top one. So I can read two eigenvalues off straight away. Then the trace - the sum of the diagonal entries - is the sum of the eigenvalues.
Now either that solves the problem without doing the computations, or - if the computation is expected - it acts as a robust check on your arithmetic.
I have assumed that the matrix first given is right. One of the zeros in the bottom row will appear in any sub-product of the determinant which involves $a$ so you can tell that the determinant will be independent of $a$.
This is to encourage you to look at the matrix for clues (columns will do as well as rows) which will either act as a check on your computations or give you short-cuts.
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
A matrix is singular amongst other things if it has a zero row or column, or if two rows or columns are linearly dependent. Subtracting $lambda$ from diagonal elements just changed the diagonal.
I can see that I can change the $1$ in the bottom row to a zero by a suitable choice of $lambda$ and if the top left entry were $0$ the bottom row would be a multiple of the top one. So I can read two eigenvalues off straight away. Then the trace - the sum of the diagonal entries - is the sum of the eigenvalues.
Now either that solves the problem without doing the computations, or - if the computation is expected - it acts as a robust check on your arithmetic.
I have assumed that the matrix first given is right. One of the zeros in the bottom row will appear in any sub-product of the determinant which involves $a$ so you can tell that the determinant will be independent of $a$.
This is to encourage you to look at the matrix for clues (columns will do as well as rows) which will either act as a check on your computations or give you short-cuts.
A matrix is singular amongst other things if it has a zero row or column, or if two rows or columns are linearly dependent. Subtracting $lambda$ from diagonal elements just changed the diagonal.
I can see that I can change the $1$ in the bottom row to a zero by a suitable choice of $lambda$ and if the top left entry were $0$ the bottom row would be a multiple of the top one. So I can read two eigenvalues off straight away. Then the trace - the sum of the diagonal entries - is the sum of the eigenvalues.
Now either that solves the problem without doing the computations, or - if the computation is expected - it acts as a robust check on your arithmetic.
I have assumed that the matrix first given is right. One of the zeros in the bottom row will appear in any sub-product of the determinant which involves $a$ so you can tell that the determinant will be independent of $a$.
This is to encourage you to look at the matrix for clues (columns will do as well as rows) which will either act as a check on your computations or give you short-cuts.
answered Nov 27 at 8:33
Mark Bennet
80.1k981179
80.1k981179
add a comment |
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
You’ve made an error in computing the determinant: it should be $lambda^3-4lambda^2+5lambda-2$. However, it’s not necessary to go through all of that for this particular matrix.
A matrix and its transpose have the same eigenvalues, so we can examine the rows of the matrix. From the last row, we have the left eigenvector $(0,0,1)$ with eigenvalue $1$. If you add the first and third rows, you get $(2,0,2)$, but left-multiplying a matrix by $(1,0,1)$ performs this addition, so we have another eigenvector/eigenvalue pair: $(1,0,1)$ and $2$. The trace of a matrix is equal to the sum of its eigenvalues, so we can find the last eigenvalue “for free:” it’s $4-2-1=1$. With a bit of practice, you’ll be able to spot things like this.
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
You’ve made an error in computing the determinant: it should be $lambda^3-4lambda^2+5lambda-2$. However, it’s not necessary to go through all of that for this particular matrix.
A matrix and its transpose have the same eigenvalues, so we can examine the rows of the matrix. From the last row, we have the left eigenvector $(0,0,1)$ with eigenvalue $1$. If you add the first and third rows, you get $(2,0,2)$, but left-multiplying a matrix by $(1,0,1)$ performs this addition, so we have another eigenvector/eigenvalue pair: $(1,0,1)$ and $2$. The trace of a matrix is equal to the sum of its eigenvalues, so we can find the last eigenvalue “for free:” it’s $4-2-1=1$. With a bit of practice, you’ll be able to spot things like this.
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
You’ve made an error in computing the determinant: it should be $lambda^3-4lambda^2+5lambda-2$. However, it’s not necessary to go through all of that for this particular matrix.
A matrix and its transpose have the same eigenvalues, so we can examine the rows of the matrix. From the last row, we have the left eigenvector $(0,0,1)$ with eigenvalue $1$. If you add the first and third rows, you get $(2,0,2)$, but left-multiplying a matrix by $(1,0,1)$ performs this addition, so we have another eigenvector/eigenvalue pair: $(1,0,1)$ and $2$. The trace of a matrix is equal to the sum of its eigenvalues, so we can find the last eigenvalue “for free:” it’s $4-2-1=1$. With a bit of practice, you’ll be able to spot things like this.
You’ve made an error in computing the determinant: it should be $lambda^3-4lambda^2+5lambda-2$. However, it’s not necessary to go through all of that for this particular matrix.
A matrix and its transpose have the same eigenvalues, so we can examine the rows of the matrix. From the last row, we have the left eigenvector $(0,0,1)$ with eigenvalue $1$. If you add the first and third rows, you get $(2,0,2)$, but left-multiplying a matrix by $(1,0,1)$ performs this addition, so we have another eigenvector/eigenvalue pair: $(1,0,1)$ and $2$. The trace of a matrix is equal to the sum of its eigenvalues, so we can find the last eigenvalue “for free:” it’s $4-2-1=1$. With a bit of practice, you’ll be able to spot things like this.
answered Nov 27 at 10:05
amd
29k21050
29k21050
add a comment |
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
Hint:
$$
left[
begin{array}{ccc}
2&0&1\
1&1&a\
0&0&1
end{array}
right]
=
Pleft[
begin{array}{ccc}
2&1&1\
0&1&a\
0&0&1
end{array}
right] P^{-1}
$$
Where $P$ is a permutation matrix.
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
Hint:
$$
left[
begin{array}{ccc}
2&0&1\
1&1&a\
0&0&1
end{array}
right]
=
Pleft[
begin{array}{ccc}
2&1&1\
0&1&a\
0&0&1
end{array}
right] P^{-1}
$$
Where $P$ is a permutation matrix.
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
Hint:
$$
left[
begin{array}{ccc}
2&0&1\
1&1&a\
0&0&1
end{array}
right]
=
Pleft[
begin{array}{ccc}
2&1&1\
0&1&a\
0&0&1
end{array}
right] P^{-1}
$$
Where $P$ is a permutation matrix.
Hint:
$$
left[
begin{array}{ccc}
2&0&1\
1&1&a\
0&0&1
end{array}
right]
=
Pleft[
begin{array}{ccc}
2&1&1\
0&1&a\
0&0&1
end{array}
right] P^{-1}
$$
Where $P$ is a permutation matrix.
answered Nov 27 at 15:16
zimbra314
456212
456212
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3015489%2ffinding-eigenvalues-from-a-matrix-that-has-constant-a%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
3
You have a misprint in the matrix $A$ or in the determinant
– Tito Eliatron
Nov 27 at 8:22
The error should be in the determinant, since then the eigenvalues are independent of $a$.
– Gnampfissimo
Nov 27 at 8:26