SonarQube Violation Java 8 Bifunction Requirement
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
I defined a functional interface with one method declaration, and the implementation of the method in a class of another project. SonarQube violation is that I am redefining a standard functional interface that is already provided in Java 8.
@FunctionalInterface
/*access modifier*/ interface XYZService {
XYZProfile makeRESTServiceGetCall(String str, Integer id);
}
"Drop this interface in favor of "java.util.function.BiFunction<String,Integer,XYZProfile>"Drop this interface in favor of "java.util.function.BiFunction<String,Integer,XYZProfile>"
The REST service GET call simply takes the inputs and returns XYZProfile. Generally, the project structure requires the using interfaces, but to solve the Sonar violations shall I remove the 'interface', and change the makeRESTServiceGetCall method call to the bifunction syntax?
java spring-boot java-8 sonarqube functional-interface
edited Nov 20 at 14:47
nullpointer
38.9k1074148
asked Nov 20 at 13:57
Parth Patel
133
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
I defined a functional interface with one method declaration, and the implementation of the method in a class of another project. SonarQube violation is that I am redefining a standard functional interface that is already provided in Java 8.
@FunctionalInterface
/*access modifier*/ interface XYZService {
XYZProfile makeRESTServiceGetCall(String str, Integer id);
}
"Drop this interface in favor of "java.util.function.BiFunction<String,Integer,XYZProfile>"Drop this interface in favor of "java.util.function.BiFunction<String,Integer,XYZProfile>"
The REST service GET call simply takes the inputs and returns XYZProfile. Generally, the project structure requires the using interfaces, but to solve the Sonar violations shall I remove the 'interface', and change the makeRESTServiceGetCall method call to the bifunction syntax?
java spring-boot java-8 sonarqube functional-interface
edited Nov 20 at 14:47
nullpointer
38.9k1074148
asked Nov 20 at 13:57
Parth Patel
133
3
You didn’t ask a question. You just appended a question mark to a statement.
– Holger
Nov 20 at 14:02
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
I defined a functional interface with one method declaration, and the implementation of the method in a class of another project. SonarQube violation is that I am redefining a standard functional interface that is already provided in Java 8.
@FunctionalInterface
/*access modifier*/ interface XYZService {
XYZProfile makeRESTServiceGetCall(String str, Integer id);
}
"Drop this interface in favor of "java.util.function.BiFunction<String,Integer,XYZProfile>"Drop this interface in favor of "java.util.function.BiFunction<String,Integer,XYZProfile>"
The REST service GET call simply takes the inputs and returns XYZProfile. Generally, the project structure requires the using interfaces, but to solve the Sonar violations shall I remove the 'interface', and change the makeRESTServiceGetCall method call to the bifunction syntax?
java spring-boot java-8 sonarqube functional-interface
edited Nov 20 at 14:47
nullpointer
38.9k1074148
asked Nov 20 at 13:57
Parth Patel
133
I defined a functional interface with one method declaration, and the implementation of the method in a class of another project. SonarQube violation is that I am redefining a standard functional interface that is already provided in Java 8.
@FunctionalInterface
/*access modifier*/ interface XYZService {
XYZProfile makeRESTServiceGetCall(String str, Integer id);
}
"Drop this interface in favor of "java.util.function.BiFunction<String,Integer,XYZProfile>"Drop this interface in favor of "java.util.function.BiFunction<String,Integer,XYZProfile>"
The REST service GET call simply takes the inputs and returns XYZProfile. Generally, the project structure requires the using interfaces, but to solve the Sonar violations shall I remove the 'interface', and change the makeRESTServiceGetCall method call to the bifunction syntax?
java spring-boot java-8 sonarqube functional-interface
java spring-boot java-8 sonarqube functional-interface
edited Nov 20 at 14:47
nullpointer
38.9k1074148
asked Nov 20 at 13:57
Parth Patel
133
edited Nov 20 at 14:47
nullpointer
38.9k1074148
asked Nov 20 at 13:57
Parth Patel
133
edited Nov 20 at 14:47
nullpointer
38.9k1074148
edited Nov 20 at 14:47
nullpointer
38.9k1074148
edited Nov 20 at 14:47
nullpointer
38.9k1074148
38.9k1074148
asked Nov 20 at 13:57
Parth Patel
133
asked Nov 20 at 13:57
Parth Patel
133
asked Nov 20 at 13:57
Parth Patel
133
133
3
You didn’t ask a question. You just appended a question mark to a statement.
– Holger
Nov 20 at 14:02
add a comment |
3
You didn’t ask a question. You just appended a question mark to a statement.
– Holger
Nov 20 at 14:02
3
3
You didn’t ask a question. You just appended a question mark to a statement.
– Holger
Nov 20 at 14:02
You didn’t ask a question. You just appended a question mark to a statement.
– Holger
Nov 20 at 14:02
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
The violation suggests that there is already a Functional Interface that can solve the purpose of what you're trying to implement using your custom interface i.e. BiFunction<T,U,R>.
So at places where you're defining the method makeRESTServiceGetCall of your XYZService, you can instead simply create a BiFunction in your code as:
BiFunction<String, Integer, XYZProfile> xyzProfileBiFunction = (string, integer) -> {
return xyzProfile; // the GET call implementation using 'string' &'integer'
};
and then at places where you were calling the method makeRESTServiceGetCall, you can simply apply the above implementation as :
XYZProfile xyzProfileNullPointer = xyzProfileBiFunction.apply("nullpointer", 0);
XYZProfile xyzProfileParth = xyzProfileBiFunction.apply("Parth", 1);
answered Nov 20 at 14:37
nullpointer
38.9k1074148
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53394623%2fsonarqube-violation-java-8-bifunction-requirement%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
The violation suggests that there is already a Functional Interface that can solve the purpose of what you're trying to implement using your custom interface i.e. BiFunction<T,U,R>.
So at places where you're defining the method makeRESTServiceGetCall of your XYZService, you can instead simply create a BiFunction in your code as:
BiFunction<String, Integer, XYZProfile> xyzProfileBiFunction = (string, integer) -> {
return xyzProfile; // the GET call implementation using 'string' &'integer'
};
and then at places where you were calling the method makeRESTServiceGetCall, you can simply apply the above implementation as :
XYZProfile xyzProfileNullPointer = xyzProfileBiFunction.apply("nullpointer", 0);
XYZProfile xyzProfileParth = xyzProfileBiFunction.apply("Parth", 1);
answered Nov 20 at 14:37
nullpointer
38.9k1074148
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
The violation suggests that there is already a Functional Interface that can solve the purpose of what you're trying to implement using your custom interface i.e. BiFunction<T,U,R>.
So at places where you're defining the method makeRESTServiceGetCall of your XYZService, you can instead simply create a BiFunction in your code as:
BiFunction<String, Integer, XYZProfile> xyzProfileBiFunction = (string, integer) -> {
return xyzProfile; // the GET call implementation using 'string' &'integer'
};
and then at places where you were calling the method makeRESTServiceGetCall, you can simply apply the above implementation as :
XYZProfile xyzProfileNullPointer = xyzProfileBiFunction.apply("nullpointer", 0);
XYZProfile xyzProfileParth = xyzProfileBiFunction.apply("Parth", 1);
answered Nov 20 at 14:37
nullpointer
38.9k1074148
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
up vote
1
down vote
The violation suggests that there is already a Functional Interface that can solve the purpose of what you're trying to implement using your custom interface i.e. BiFunction<T,U,R>.
So at places where you're defining the method makeRESTServiceGetCall of your XYZService, you can instead simply create a BiFunction in your code as:
BiFunction<String, Integer, XYZProfile> xyzProfileBiFunction = (string, integer) -> {
return xyzProfile; // the GET call implementation using 'string' &'integer'
};
and then at places where you were calling the method makeRESTServiceGetCall, you can simply apply the above implementation as :
XYZProfile xyzProfileNullPointer = xyzProfileBiFunction.apply("nullpointer", 0);
XYZProfile xyzProfileParth = xyzProfileBiFunction.apply("Parth", 1);
answered Nov 20 at 14:37
nullpointer
38.9k1074148
The violation suggests that there is already a Functional Interface that can solve the purpose of what you're trying to implement using your custom interface i.e. BiFunction<T,U,R>.
So at places where you're defining the method makeRESTServiceGetCall of your XYZService, you can instead simply create a BiFunction in your code as:
BiFunction<String, Integer, XYZProfile> xyzProfileBiFunction = (string, integer) -> {
return xyzProfile; // the GET call implementation using 'string' &'integer'
};
and then at places where you were calling the method makeRESTServiceGetCall, you can simply apply the above implementation as :
XYZProfile xyzProfileNullPointer = xyzProfileBiFunction.apply("nullpointer", 0);
XYZProfile xyzProfileParth = xyzProfileBiFunction.apply("Parth", 1);
answered Nov 20 at 14:37
nullpointer
38.9k1074148
answered Nov 20 at 14:37
nullpointer
38.9k1074148
answered Nov 20 at 14:37
nullpointer
38.9k1074148
answered Nov 20 at 14:37
nullpointer
38.9k1074148
38.9k1074148
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53394623%2fsonarqube-violation-java-8-bifunction-requirement%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
3
You didn’t ask a question. You just appended a question mark to a statement.
– Holger
Nov 20 at 14:02