What does an integral with only one integration limit mean?
up vote
3
down vote
favorite
I am supervising an end of degree project related to Sturm-Liouville problems. In the paper Singular Sturm comparison theorems I saw the next strange integrals in Theorem 1:
Let $P(x)$, $p(x)$ be continuous functions on the open, finite or infinite interval $(a,b)$ (but not necessarily at its endpoints), and $P(x)geq p(x)$, $P (x)notequiv p(x)$ on $(a, b)$.
(i) Suppose that the differential equation
$$u′′+p(x)u=0,quad a<x<b,$$
has a solution $u$ which satisfies the boundary conditions
$$int_afrac{dx}{u^2(x)}=infty, int^bfrac{dx}{u^2(x)}=infty.$$
In the paper, there is no explanation about how they are defined.
There is one reference in the paper to the book Ordinary Differential Equations by Philip Hartman. In this book, the notation is used extensively but I could neither found their definition.
My thoughts: they don't seem to be primitives; they neither seem to be improper integrals in an infinite interval.
Can someone help me, please?
notation
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
favorite
I am supervising an end of degree project related to Sturm-Liouville problems. In the paper Singular Sturm comparison theorems I saw the next strange integrals in Theorem 1:
Let $P(x)$, $p(x)$ be continuous functions on the open, finite or infinite interval $(a,b)$ (but not necessarily at its endpoints), and $P(x)geq p(x)$, $P (x)notequiv p(x)$ on $(a, b)$.
(i) Suppose that the differential equation
$$u′′+p(x)u=0,quad a<x<b,$$
has a solution $u$ which satisfies the boundary conditions
$$int_afrac{dx}{u^2(x)}=infty, int^bfrac{dx}{u^2(x)}=infty.$$
In the paper, there is no explanation about how they are defined.
There is one reference in the paper to the book Ordinary Differential Equations by Philip Hartman. In this book, the notation is used extensively but I could neither found their definition.
My thoughts: they don't seem to be primitives; they neither seem to be improper integrals in an infinite interval.
Can someone help me, please?
notation
This is a just a guess, but the notation suggests the following interpretation to me $$int_a f(x)dx=lim_{cto a+}int_c^d f(x)dx,$$ and similarly for the other. Does this make sense in context?
– saulspatz
Nov 27 at 8:13
2
IMO, "near $x=a$" and "near $x=b$". As the integral diverges at $a$ and $b$, the other bound is unimportant.
– Yves Daoust
Nov 27 at 10:06
@YvesDaoust, thank you very much for your answer. I think that this make sense.
– Math wind
Nov 28 at 7:54
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
favorite
up vote
3
down vote
favorite
I am supervising an end of degree project related to Sturm-Liouville problems. In the paper Singular Sturm comparison theorems I saw the next strange integrals in Theorem 1:
Let $P(x)$, $p(x)$ be continuous functions on the open, finite or infinite interval $(a,b)$ (but not necessarily at its endpoints), and $P(x)geq p(x)$, $P (x)notequiv p(x)$ on $(a, b)$.
(i) Suppose that the differential equation
$$u′′+p(x)u=0,quad a<x<b,$$
has a solution $u$ which satisfies the boundary conditions
$$int_afrac{dx}{u^2(x)}=infty, int^bfrac{dx}{u^2(x)}=infty.$$
In the paper, there is no explanation about how they are defined.
There is one reference in the paper to the book Ordinary Differential Equations by Philip Hartman. In this book, the notation is used extensively but I could neither found their definition.
My thoughts: they don't seem to be primitives; they neither seem to be improper integrals in an infinite interval.
Can someone help me, please?
notation
I am supervising an end of degree project related to Sturm-Liouville problems. In the paper Singular Sturm comparison theorems I saw the next strange integrals in Theorem 1:
Let $P(x)$, $p(x)$ be continuous functions on the open, finite or infinite interval $(a,b)$ (but not necessarily at its endpoints), and $P(x)geq p(x)$, $P (x)notequiv p(x)$ on $(a, b)$.
(i) Suppose that the differential equation
$$u′′+p(x)u=0,quad a<x<b,$$
has a solution $u$ which satisfies the boundary conditions
$$int_afrac{dx}{u^2(x)}=infty, int^bfrac{dx}{u^2(x)}=infty.$$
In the paper, there is no explanation about how they are defined.
There is one reference in the paper to the book Ordinary Differential Equations by Philip Hartman. In this book, the notation is used extensively but I could neither found their definition.
My thoughts: they don't seem to be primitives; they neither seem to be improper integrals in an infinite interval.
Can someone help me, please?
notation
notation
edited Nov 27 at 12:40
asked Nov 27 at 7:56
Math wind
164
164
This is a just a guess, but the notation suggests the following interpretation to me $$int_a f(x)dx=lim_{cto a+}int_c^d f(x)dx,$$ and similarly for the other. Does this make sense in context?
– saulspatz
Nov 27 at 8:13
2
IMO, "near $x=a$" and "near $x=b$". As the integral diverges at $a$ and $b$, the other bound is unimportant.
– Yves Daoust
Nov 27 at 10:06
@YvesDaoust, thank you very much for your answer. I think that this make sense.
– Math wind
Nov 28 at 7:54
add a comment |
This is a just a guess, but the notation suggests the following interpretation to me $$int_a f(x)dx=lim_{cto a+}int_c^d f(x)dx,$$ and similarly for the other. Does this make sense in context?
– saulspatz
Nov 27 at 8:13
2
IMO, "near $x=a$" and "near $x=b$". As the integral diverges at $a$ and $b$, the other bound is unimportant.
– Yves Daoust
Nov 27 at 10:06
@YvesDaoust, thank you very much for your answer. I think that this make sense.
– Math wind
Nov 28 at 7:54
This is a just a guess, but the notation suggests the following interpretation to me $$int_a f(x)dx=lim_{cto a+}int_c^d f(x)dx,$$ and similarly for the other. Does this make sense in context?
– saulspatz
Nov 27 at 8:13
This is a just a guess, but the notation suggests the following interpretation to me $$int_a f(x)dx=lim_{cto a+}int_c^d f(x)dx,$$ and similarly for the other. Does this make sense in context?
– saulspatz
Nov 27 at 8:13
2
2
IMO, "near $x=a$" and "near $x=b$". As the integral diverges at $a$ and $b$, the other bound is unimportant.
– Yves Daoust
Nov 27 at 10:06
IMO, "near $x=a$" and "near $x=b$". As the integral diverges at $a$ and $b$, the other bound is unimportant.
– Yves Daoust
Nov 27 at 10:06
@YvesDaoust, thank you very much for your answer. I think that this make sense.
– Math wind
Nov 28 at 7:54
@YvesDaoust, thank you very much for your answer. I think that this make sense.
– Math wind
Nov 28 at 7:54
add a comment |
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3015474%2fwhat-does-an-integral-with-only-one-integration-limit-mean%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3015474%2fwhat-does-an-integral-with-only-one-integration-limit-mean%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
This is a just a guess, but the notation suggests the following interpretation to me $$int_a f(x)dx=lim_{cto a+}int_c^d f(x)dx,$$ and similarly for the other. Does this make sense in context?
– saulspatz
Nov 27 at 8:13
2
IMO, "near $x=a$" and "near $x=b$". As the integral diverges at $a$ and $b$, the other bound is unimportant.
– Yves Daoust
Nov 27 at 10:06
@YvesDaoust, thank you very much for your answer. I think that this make sense.
– Math wind
Nov 28 at 7:54