What does an integral with only one integration limit mean?











up vote
3
down vote

favorite












I am supervising an end of degree project related to Sturm-Liouville problems. In the paper Singular Sturm comparison theorems I saw the next strange integrals in Theorem 1:




Let $P(x)$, $p(x)$ be continuous functions on the open, finite or infinite interval $(a,b)$ (but not necessarily at its endpoints), and $P(x)geq p(x)$, $P (x)notequiv p(x)$ on $(a, b)$.
(i) Suppose that the differential equation
$$u′′+p(x)u=0,quad a<x<b,$$
has a solution $u$ which satisfies the boundary conditions
$$int_afrac{dx}{u^2(x)}=infty, int^bfrac{dx}{u^2(x)}=infty.$$




In the paper, there is no explanation about how they are defined.
There is one reference in the paper to the book Ordinary Differential Equations by Philip Hartman. In this book, the notation is used extensively but I could neither found their definition.



My thoughts: they don't seem to be primitives; they neither seem to be improper integrals in an infinite interval.



Can someone help me, please?










share|cite|improve this question
























  • This is a just a guess, but the notation suggests the following interpretation to me $$int_a f(x)dx=lim_{cto a+}int_c^d f(x)dx,$$ and similarly for the other. Does this make sense in context?
    – saulspatz
    Nov 27 at 8:13






  • 2




    IMO, "near $x=a$" and "near $x=b$". As the integral diverges at $a$ and $b$, the other bound is unimportant.
    – Yves Daoust
    Nov 27 at 10:06










  • @YvesDaoust, thank you very much for your answer. I think that this make sense.
    – Math wind
    Nov 28 at 7:54















up vote
3
down vote

favorite












I am supervising an end of degree project related to Sturm-Liouville problems. In the paper Singular Sturm comparison theorems I saw the next strange integrals in Theorem 1:




Let $P(x)$, $p(x)$ be continuous functions on the open, finite or infinite interval $(a,b)$ (but not necessarily at its endpoints), and $P(x)geq p(x)$, $P (x)notequiv p(x)$ on $(a, b)$.
(i) Suppose that the differential equation
$$u′′+p(x)u=0,quad a<x<b,$$
has a solution $u$ which satisfies the boundary conditions
$$int_afrac{dx}{u^2(x)}=infty, int^bfrac{dx}{u^2(x)}=infty.$$




In the paper, there is no explanation about how they are defined.
There is one reference in the paper to the book Ordinary Differential Equations by Philip Hartman. In this book, the notation is used extensively but I could neither found their definition.



My thoughts: they don't seem to be primitives; they neither seem to be improper integrals in an infinite interval.



Can someone help me, please?










share|cite|improve this question
























  • This is a just a guess, but the notation suggests the following interpretation to me $$int_a f(x)dx=lim_{cto a+}int_c^d f(x)dx,$$ and similarly for the other. Does this make sense in context?
    – saulspatz
    Nov 27 at 8:13






  • 2




    IMO, "near $x=a$" and "near $x=b$". As the integral diverges at $a$ and $b$, the other bound is unimportant.
    – Yves Daoust
    Nov 27 at 10:06










  • @YvesDaoust, thank you very much for your answer. I think that this make sense.
    – Math wind
    Nov 28 at 7:54













up vote
3
down vote

favorite









up vote
3
down vote

favorite











I am supervising an end of degree project related to Sturm-Liouville problems. In the paper Singular Sturm comparison theorems I saw the next strange integrals in Theorem 1:




Let $P(x)$, $p(x)$ be continuous functions on the open, finite or infinite interval $(a,b)$ (but not necessarily at its endpoints), and $P(x)geq p(x)$, $P (x)notequiv p(x)$ on $(a, b)$.
(i) Suppose that the differential equation
$$u′′+p(x)u=0,quad a<x<b,$$
has a solution $u$ which satisfies the boundary conditions
$$int_afrac{dx}{u^2(x)}=infty, int^bfrac{dx}{u^2(x)}=infty.$$




In the paper, there is no explanation about how they are defined.
There is one reference in the paper to the book Ordinary Differential Equations by Philip Hartman. In this book, the notation is used extensively but I could neither found their definition.



My thoughts: they don't seem to be primitives; they neither seem to be improper integrals in an infinite interval.



Can someone help me, please?










share|cite|improve this question















I am supervising an end of degree project related to Sturm-Liouville problems. In the paper Singular Sturm comparison theorems I saw the next strange integrals in Theorem 1:




Let $P(x)$, $p(x)$ be continuous functions on the open, finite or infinite interval $(a,b)$ (but not necessarily at its endpoints), and $P(x)geq p(x)$, $P (x)notequiv p(x)$ on $(a, b)$.
(i) Suppose that the differential equation
$$u′′+p(x)u=0,quad a<x<b,$$
has a solution $u$ which satisfies the boundary conditions
$$int_afrac{dx}{u^2(x)}=infty, int^bfrac{dx}{u^2(x)}=infty.$$




In the paper, there is no explanation about how they are defined.
There is one reference in the paper to the book Ordinary Differential Equations by Philip Hartman. In this book, the notation is used extensively but I could neither found their definition.



My thoughts: they don't seem to be primitives; they neither seem to be improper integrals in an infinite interval.



Can someone help me, please?







notation






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Nov 27 at 12:40

























asked Nov 27 at 7:56









Math wind

164




164












  • This is a just a guess, but the notation suggests the following interpretation to me $$int_a f(x)dx=lim_{cto a+}int_c^d f(x)dx,$$ and similarly for the other. Does this make sense in context?
    – saulspatz
    Nov 27 at 8:13






  • 2




    IMO, "near $x=a$" and "near $x=b$". As the integral diverges at $a$ and $b$, the other bound is unimportant.
    – Yves Daoust
    Nov 27 at 10:06










  • @YvesDaoust, thank you very much for your answer. I think that this make sense.
    – Math wind
    Nov 28 at 7:54


















  • This is a just a guess, but the notation suggests the following interpretation to me $$int_a f(x)dx=lim_{cto a+}int_c^d f(x)dx,$$ and similarly for the other. Does this make sense in context?
    – saulspatz
    Nov 27 at 8:13






  • 2




    IMO, "near $x=a$" and "near $x=b$". As the integral diverges at $a$ and $b$, the other bound is unimportant.
    – Yves Daoust
    Nov 27 at 10:06










  • @YvesDaoust, thank you very much for your answer. I think that this make sense.
    – Math wind
    Nov 28 at 7:54
















This is a just a guess, but the notation suggests the following interpretation to me $$int_a f(x)dx=lim_{cto a+}int_c^d f(x)dx,$$ and similarly for the other. Does this make sense in context?
– saulspatz
Nov 27 at 8:13




This is a just a guess, but the notation suggests the following interpretation to me $$int_a f(x)dx=lim_{cto a+}int_c^d f(x)dx,$$ and similarly for the other. Does this make sense in context?
– saulspatz
Nov 27 at 8:13




2




2




IMO, "near $x=a$" and "near $x=b$". As the integral diverges at $a$ and $b$, the other bound is unimportant.
– Yves Daoust
Nov 27 at 10:06




IMO, "near $x=a$" and "near $x=b$". As the integral diverges at $a$ and $b$, the other bound is unimportant.
– Yves Daoust
Nov 27 at 10:06












@YvesDaoust, thank you very much for your answer. I think that this make sense.
– Math wind
Nov 28 at 7:54




@YvesDaoust, thank you very much for your answer. I think that this make sense.
– Math wind
Nov 28 at 7:54















active

oldest

votes











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3015474%2fwhat-does-an-integral-with-only-one-integration-limit-mean%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown






























active

oldest

votes













active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes
















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3015474%2fwhat-does-an-integral-with-only-one-integration-limit-mean%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Wiesbaden

Marschland

Dieringhausen