Why is the integral of $1/x$ not $ln|ax|$?











up vote
1
down vote

favorite












Wouldn't any non-zero constant $a$ cause the derivative of $ln|ax|$ to simply be $1/x$? So shouldn't the integral of $1/x$ include the constant $a$? I am probably missing something basic here, thanks!



(EDIT: I just realized as I posted that with logarithm rules this $a$ value just goes to the $+C$ constant from integrating, so got!)










share|cite|improve this question
























  • The a's cancel out. Try chain rule.
    – Dude156
    Nov 26 at 3:42















up vote
1
down vote

favorite












Wouldn't any non-zero constant $a$ cause the derivative of $ln|ax|$ to simply be $1/x$? So shouldn't the integral of $1/x$ include the constant $a$? I am probably missing something basic here, thanks!



(EDIT: I just realized as I posted that with logarithm rules this $a$ value just goes to the $+C$ constant from integrating, so got!)










share|cite|improve this question
























  • The a's cancel out. Try chain rule.
    – Dude156
    Nov 26 at 3:42













up vote
1
down vote

favorite









up vote
1
down vote

favorite











Wouldn't any non-zero constant $a$ cause the derivative of $ln|ax|$ to simply be $1/x$? So shouldn't the integral of $1/x$ include the constant $a$? I am probably missing something basic here, thanks!



(EDIT: I just realized as I posted that with logarithm rules this $a$ value just goes to the $+C$ constant from integrating, so got!)










share|cite|improve this question















Wouldn't any non-zero constant $a$ cause the derivative of $ln|ax|$ to simply be $1/x$? So shouldn't the integral of $1/x$ include the constant $a$? I am probably missing something basic here, thanks!



(EDIT: I just realized as I posted that with logarithm rules this $a$ value just goes to the $+C$ constant from integrating, so got!)







integration






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Nov 26 at 6:02









Robert Howard

1,9181822




1,9181822










asked Nov 26 at 3:36









Zach

12716




12716












  • The a's cancel out. Try chain rule.
    – Dude156
    Nov 26 at 3:42


















  • The a's cancel out. Try chain rule.
    – Dude156
    Nov 26 at 3:42
















The a's cancel out. Try chain rule.
– Dude156
Nov 26 at 3:42




The a's cancel out. Try chain rule.
– Dude156
Nov 26 at 3:42










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
2
down vote













because of:



$$ dfrac{ d log ax }{dx} = frac{ (ax)' }{ax} = frac{a}{ax} = frac{1}{x } $$






share|cite|improve this answer

















  • 2




    Yeah, I knew that. My question was why the anti-derivative didn't include an a, BECAUSE they cancel out. But I figured it it's part of the plus C.
    – Zach
    Nov 26 at 3:51






  • 2




    The constant of integration $C$ eats it out because remember $log(ax) = log a + log x $ and $log a $ is a constant
    – Jimmy Sabater
    Nov 26 at 4:13











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3013790%2fwhy-is-the-integral-of-1-x-not-lnax%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes








up vote
2
down vote













because of:



$$ dfrac{ d log ax }{dx} = frac{ (ax)' }{ax} = frac{a}{ax} = frac{1}{x } $$






share|cite|improve this answer

















  • 2




    Yeah, I knew that. My question was why the anti-derivative didn't include an a, BECAUSE they cancel out. But I figured it it's part of the plus C.
    – Zach
    Nov 26 at 3:51






  • 2




    The constant of integration $C$ eats it out because remember $log(ax) = log a + log x $ and $log a $ is a constant
    – Jimmy Sabater
    Nov 26 at 4:13















up vote
2
down vote













because of:



$$ dfrac{ d log ax }{dx} = frac{ (ax)' }{ax} = frac{a}{ax} = frac{1}{x } $$






share|cite|improve this answer

















  • 2




    Yeah, I knew that. My question was why the anti-derivative didn't include an a, BECAUSE they cancel out. But I figured it it's part of the plus C.
    – Zach
    Nov 26 at 3:51






  • 2




    The constant of integration $C$ eats it out because remember $log(ax) = log a + log x $ and $log a $ is a constant
    – Jimmy Sabater
    Nov 26 at 4:13













up vote
2
down vote










up vote
2
down vote









because of:



$$ dfrac{ d log ax }{dx} = frac{ (ax)' }{ax} = frac{a}{ax} = frac{1}{x } $$






share|cite|improve this answer












because of:



$$ dfrac{ d log ax }{dx} = frac{ (ax)' }{ax} = frac{a}{ax} = frac{1}{x } $$







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered Nov 26 at 3:41









Jimmy Sabater

1,827218




1,827218








  • 2




    Yeah, I knew that. My question was why the anti-derivative didn't include an a, BECAUSE they cancel out. But I figured it it's part of the plus C.
    – Zach
    Nov 26 at 3:51






  • 2




    The constant of integration $C$ eats it out because remember $log(ax) = log a + log x $ and $log a $ is a constant
    – Jimmy Sabater
    Nov 26 at 4:13














  • 2




    Yeah, I knew that. My question was why the anti-derivative didn't include an a, BECAUSE they cancel out. But I figured it it's part of the plus C.
    – Zach
    Nov 26 at 3:51






  • 2




    The constant of integration $C$ eats it out because remember $log(ax) = log a + log x $ and $log a $ is a constant
    – Jimmy Sabater
    Nov 26 at 4:13








2




2




Yeah, I knew that. My question was why the anti-derivative didn't include an a, BECAUSE they cancel out. But I figured it it's part of the plus C.
– Zach
Nov 26 at 3:51




Yeah, I knew that. My question was why the anti-derivative didn't include an a, BECAUSE they cancel out. But I figured it it's part of the plus C.
– Zach
Nov 26 at 3:51




2




2




The constant of integration $C$ eats it out because remember $log(ax) = log a + log x $ and $log a $ is a constant
– Jimmy Sabater
Nov 26 at 4:13




The constant of integration $C$ eats it out because remember $log(ax) = log a + log x $ and $log a $ is a constant
– Jimmy Sabater
Nov 26 at 4:13


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3013790%2fwhy-is-the-integral-of-1-x-not-lnax%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Wiesbaden

Marschland

Dieringhausen