How would you draw the graphs of the interactions between these functions?











up vote
0
down vote

favorite












I was wondering how I would draw the interactions between these functions if I were not given the equations for them (and am not allowed to make an equation). Please ignore my current drawings.
Equations
Thanks.










share|cite|improve this question


























    up vote
    0
    down vote

    favorite












    I was wondering how I would draw the interactions between these functions if I were not given the equations for them (and am not allowed to make an equation). Please ignore my current drawings.
    Equations
    Thanks.










    share|cite|improve this question
























      up vote
      0
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      0
      down vote

      favorite











      I was wondering how I would draw the interactions between these functions if I were not given the equations for them (and am not allowed to make an equation). Please ignore my current drawings.
      Equations
      Thanks.










      share|cite|improve this question













      I was wondering how I would draw the interactions between these functions if I were not given the equations for them (and am not allowed to make an equation). Please ignore my current drawings.
      Equations
      Thanks.







      graphing-functions






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Oct 12 at 0:11









      BLoby Blob

      3616




      3616






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          1
          down vote



          accepted










          Even if we don't have specific equations for either $f(x)$ or $g(x)$, we can still deduce a decent amount about what $f(x)+g(x)$, $f(x)cdot g(x)$, and $f(x)/g(x)$ will look like.



          $f(x)+g(x)$ is probably the easiest. We know that $g(x)$ must have a negative leading coefficient, because it opens downward, and adding $f(x)$ to it wouldn't change the leading coefficient, because $f(x)$ doesn't have a quadratic term. Therefore, $f(x)+g(x)$ must be a parabola that opens downward. We can also tell that the $y$-intercept of $f(x)+g(x)$ must be less than $0$, since the $y$-intercept of $g(x)$ is more negative than the $y$-intercept of $f(x)$ is positive. Furthermore, we can see that $f(x)+g(x)$ must be greater than $0$ wherever $|f(x)|>|g(x)|$, less than $0$ wherever $|f(x)|<|g(x)|$, and equal to $0$ wherever $|f(x)|=|g(x)|$.



          Now we can move on to $f(x)cdot g(x)$. If the leading coefficient of $f(x)$ is some real number $a>0$ and the leading coefficient of $g(x)$ is some real number $b<0$, then the leading coefficient of $f(x)cdot g(x)$ must be $ab$ and must be less than $0$, so we know that $f(x)cdot g(x)$ must be some cubic polynomial that goes to $infty$ as $x$ goes to $-infty$ and that goes to $-infty$ as $x$ goes to $infty$. We can also tell that the $y$-intercept of $f(x)cdot g(x)$ must be negative, because the $y$-intercepts of $f(x)$ and $g(x)$ have opposite signs.



          $f(x)/g(x)$ is potentially the trickiest, but we can still draw some general conclusions about what it will look like. We know that it will have two vertical asymptotes, one at each value of $x$ such that $g(x)=0$. We also know it will have a horizontal asymptote at $y=0$, because for any large values of $x$, $frac{1}{g(x)}$ will be extremely close to $0$. In fact, at the one value of $x$ where $f(x)=0$, $f(x)/g(x)$ will be $0$ as well (if both $f(x)$ and $g(x)$ were $0$ at the same place, this wouldn't be the case, but fortunately, we don't have to worry about that). The last piece of information we can determine about $f(x)/g(x)$ is where it is positive and where it is negative: wherever $f(x)$ and $g(x)$ have the same sign, $f(x)/g(x)$ will be positive, and wherever $f(x)$ and $g(x)$ have opposite signs, $f(x)/g(x)$ will be negative. In between those regions of positivity and negativity, $f(x)/g(x)$ must either cross the $x$-axis or have a vertical asymptote.






          share|cite|improve this answer





















            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            });
            });
            }, "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2952072%2fhow-would-you-draw-the-graphs-of-the-interactions-between-these-functions%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes








            up vote
            1
            down vote



            accepted










            Even if we don't have specific equations for either $f(x)$ or $g(x)$, we can still deduce a decent amount about what $f(x)+g(x)$, $f(x)cdot g(x)$, and $f(x)/g(x)$ will look like.



            $f(x)+g(x)$ is probably the easiest. We know that $g(x)$ must have a negative leading coefficient, because it opens downward, and adding $f(x)$ to it wouldn't change the leading coefficient, because $f(x)$ doesn't have a quadratic term. Therefore, $f(x)+g(x)$ must be a parabola that opens downward. We can also tell that the $y$-intercept of $f(x)+g(x)$ must be less than $0$, since the $y$-intercept of $g(x)$ is more negative than the $y$-intercept of $f(x)$ is positive. Furthermore, we can see that $f(x)+g(x)$ must be greater than $0$ wherever $|f(x)|>|g(x)|$, less than $0$ wherever $|f(x)|<|g(x)|$, and equal to $0$ wherever $|f(x)|=|g(x)|$.



            Now we can move on to $f(x)cdot g(x)$. If the leading coefficient of $f(x)$ is some real number $a>0$ and the leading coefficient of $g(x)$ is some real number $b<0$, then the leading coefficient of $f(x)cdot g(x)$ must be $ab$ and must be less than $0$, so we know that $f(x)cdot g(x)$ must be some cubic polynomial that goes to $infty$ as $x$ goes to $-infty$ and that goes to $-infty$ as $x$ goes to $infty$. We can also tell that the $y$-intercept of $f(x)cdot g(x)$ must be negative, because the $y$-intercepts of $f(x)$ and $g(x)$ have opposite signs.



            $f(x)/g(x)$ is potentially the trickiest, but we can still draw some general conclusions about what it will look like. We know that it will have two vertical asymptotes, one at each value of $x$ such that $g(x)=0$. We also know it will have a horizontal asymptote at $y=0$, because for any large values of $x$, $frac{1}{g(x)}$ will be extremely close to $0$. In fact, at the one value of $x$ where $f(x)=0$, $f(x)/g(x)$ will be $0$ as well (if both $f(x)$ and $g(x)$ were $0$ at the same place, this wouldn't be the case, but fortunately, we don't have to worry about that). The last piece of information we can determine about $f(x)/g(x)$ is where it is positive and where it is negative: wherever $f(x)$ and $g(x)$ have the same sign, $f(x)/g(x)$ will be positive, and wherever $f(x)$ and $g(x)$ have opposite signs, $f(x)/g(x)$ will be negative. In between those regions of positivity and negativity, $f(x)/g(x)$ must either cross the $x$-axis or have a vertical asymptote.






            share|cite|improve this answer

























              up vote
              1
              down vote



              accepted










              Even if we don't have specific equations for either $f(x)$ or $g(x)$, we can still deduce a decent amount about what $f(x)+g(x)$, $f(x)cdot g(x)$, and $f(x)/g(x)$ will look like.



              $f(x)+g(x)$ is probably the easiest. We know that $g(x)$ must have a negative leading coefficient, because it opens downward, and adding $f(x)$ to it wouldn't change the leading coefficient, because $f(x)$ doesn't have a quadratic term. Therefore, $f(x)+g(x)$ must be a parabola that opens downward. We can also tell that the $y$-intercept of $f(x)+g(x)$ must be less than $0$, since the $y$-intercept of $g(x)$ is more negative than the $y$-intercept of $f(x)$ is positive. Furthermore, we can see that $f(x)+g(x)$ must be greater than $0$ wherever $|f(x)|>|g(x)|$, less than $0$ wherever $|f(x)|<|g(x)|$, and equal to $0$ wherever $|f(x)|=|g(x)|$.



              Now we can move on to $f(x)cdot g(x)$. If the leading coefficient of $f(x)$ is some real number $a>0$ and the leading coefficient of $g(x)$ is some real number $b<0$, then the leading coefficient of $f(x)cdot g(x)$ must be $ab$ and must be less than $0$, so we know that $f(x)cdot g(x)$ must be some cubic polynomial that goes to $infty$ as $x$ goes to $-infty$ and that goes to $-infty$ as $x$ goes to $infty$. We can also tell that the $y$-intercept of $f(x)cdot g(x)$ must be negative, because the $y$-intercepts of $f(x)$ and $g(x)$ have opposite signs.



              $f(x)/g(x)$ is potentially the trickiest, but we can still draw some general conclusions about what it will look like. We know that it will have two vertical asymptotes, one at each value of $x$ such that $g(x)=0$. We also know it will have a horizontal asymptote at $y=0$, because for any large values of $x$, $frac{1}{g(x)}$ will be extremely close to $0$. In fact, at the one value of $x$ where $f(x)=0$, $f(x)/g(x)$ will be $0$ as well (if both $f(x)$ and $g(x)$ were $0$ at the same place, this wouldn't be the case, but fortunately, we don't have to worry about that). The last piece of information we can determine about $f(x)/g(x)$ is where it is positive and where it is negative: wherever $f(x)$ and $g(x)$ have the same sign, $f(x)/g(x)$ will be positive, and wherever $f(x)$ and $g(x)$ have opposite signs, $f(x)/g(x)$ will be negative. In between those regions of positivity and negativity, $f(x)/g(x)$ must either cross the $x$-axis or have a vertical asymptote.






              share|cite|improve this answer























                up vote
                1
                down vote



                accepted







                up vote
                1
                down vote



                accepted






                Even if we don't have specific equations for either $f(x)$ or $g(x)$, we can still deduce a decent amount about what $f(x)+g(x)$, $f(x)cdot g(x)$, and $f(x)/g(x)$ will look like.



                $f(x)+g(x)$ is probably the easiest. We know that $g(x)$ must have a negative leading coefficient, because it opens downward, and adding $f(x)$ to it wouldn't change the leading coefficient, because $f(x)$ doesn't have a quadratic term. Therefore, $f(x)+g(x)$ must be a parabola that opens downward. We can also tell that the $y$-intercept of $f(x)+g(x)$ must be less than $0$, since the $y$-intercept of $g(x)$ is more negative than the $y$-intercept of $f(x)$ is positive. Furthermore, we can see that $f(x)+g(x)$ must be greater than $0$ wherever $|f(x)|>|g(x)|$, less than $0$ wherever $|f(x)|<|g(x)|$, and equal to $0$ wherever $|f(x)|=|g(x)|$.



                Now we can move on to $f(x)cdot g(x)$. If the leading coefficient of $f(x)$ is some real number $a>0$ and the leading coefficient of $g(x)$ is some real number $b<0$, then the leading coefficient of $f(x)cdot g(x)$ must be $ab$ and must be less than $0$, so we know that $f(x)cdot g(x)$ must be some cubic polynomial that goes to $infty$ as $x$ goes to $-infty$ and that goes to $-infty$ as $x$ goes to $infty$. We can also tell that the $y$-intercept of $f(x)cdot g(x)$ must be negative, because the $y$-intercepts of $f(x)$ and $g(x)$ have opposite signs.



                $f(x)/g(x)$ is potentially the trickiest, but we can still draw some general conclusions about what it will look like. We know that it will have two vertical asymptotes, one at each value of $x$ such that $g(x)=0$. We also know it will have a horizontal asymptote at $y=0$, because for any large values of $x$, $frac{1}{g(x)}$ will be extremely close to $0$. In fact, at the one value of $x$ where $f(x)=0$, $f(x)/g(x)$ will be $0$ as well (if both $f(x)$ and $g(x)$ were $0$ at the same place, this wouldn't be the case, but fortunately, we don't have to worry about that). The last piece of information we can determine about $f(x)/g(x)$ is where it is positive and where it is negative: wherever $f(x)$ and $g(x)$ have the same sign, $f(x)/g(x)$ will be positive, and wherever $f(x)$ and $g(x)$ have opposite signs, $f(x)/g(x)$ will be negative. In between those regions of positivity and negativity, $f(x)/g(x)$ must either cross the $x$-axis or have a vertical asymptote.






                share|cite|improve this answer












                Even if we don't have specific equations for either $f(x)$ or $g(x)$, we can still deduce a decent amount about what $f(x)+g(x)$, $f(x)cdot g(x)$, and $f(x)/g(x)$ will look like.



                $f(x)+g(x)$ is probably the easiest. We know that $g(x)$ must have a negative leading coefficient, because it opens downward, and adding $f(x)$ to it wouldn't change the leading coefficient, because $f(x)$ doesn't have a quadratic term. Therefore, $f(x)+g(x)$ must be a parabola that opens downward. We can also tell that the $y$-intercept of $f(x)+g(x)$ must be less than $0$, since the $y$-intercept of $g(x)$ is more negative than the $y$-intercept of $f(x)$ is positive. Furthermore, we can see that $f(x)+g(x)$ must be greater than $0$ wherever $|f(x)|>|g(x)|$, less than $0$ wherever $|f(x)|<|g(x)|$, and equal to $0$ wherever $|f(x)|=|g(x)|$.



                Now we can move on to $f(x)cdot g(x)$. If the leading coefficient of $f(x)$ is some real number $a>0$ and the leading coefficient of $g(x)$ is some real number $b<0$, then the leading coefficient of $f(x)cdot g(x)$ must be $ab$ and must be less than $0$, so we know that $f(x)cdot g(x)$ must be some cubic polynomial that goes to $infty$ as $x$ goes to $-infty$ and that goes to $-infty$ as $x$ goes to $infty$. We can also tell that the $y$-intercept of $f(x)cdot g(x)$ must be negative, because the $y$-intercepts of $f(x)$ and $g(x)$ have opposite signs.



                $f(x)/g(x)$ is potentially the trickiest, but we can still draw some general conclusions about what it will look like. We know that it will have two vertical asymptotes, one at each value of $x$ such that $g(x)=0$. We also know it will have a horizontal asymptote at $y=0$, because for any large values of $x$, $frac{1}{g(x)}$ will be extremely close to $0$. In fact, at the one value of $x$ where $f(x)=0$, $f(x)/g(x)$ will be $0$ as well (if both $f(x)$ and $g(x)$ were $0$ at the same place, this wouldn't be the case, but fortunately, we don't have to worry about that). The last piece of information we can determine about $f(x)/g(x)$ is where it is positive and where it is negative: wherever $f(x)$ and $g(x)$ have the same sign, $f(x)/g(x)$ will be positive, and wherever $f(x)$ and $g(x)$ have opposite signs, $f(x)/g(x)$ will be negative. In between those regions of positivity and negativity, $f(x)/g(x)$ must either cross the $x$-axis or have a vertical asymptote.







                share|cite|improve this answer












                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer










                answered Nov 24 at 0:27









                Robert Howard

                1,9101822




                1,9101822






























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





                    Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


                    Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2952072%2fhow-would-you-draw-the-graphs-of-the-interactions-between-these-functions%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Wiesbaden

                    Marschland

                    Dieringhausen