How would you draw the graphs of the interactions between these functions?
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I was wondering how I would draw the interactions between these functions if I were not given the equations for them (and am not allowed to make an equation). Please ignore my current drawings.
Thanks.
graphing-functions
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I was wondering how I would draw the interactions between these functions if I were not given the equations for them (and am not allowed to make an equation). Please ignore my current drawings.
Thanks.
graphing-functions
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I was wondering how I would draw the interactions between these functions if I were not given the equations for them (and am not allowed to make an equation). Please ignore my current drawings.
Thanks.
graphing-functions
I was wondering how I would draw the interactions between these functions if I were not given the equations for them (and am not allowed to make an equation). Please ignore my current drawings.
Thanks.
graphing-functions
graphing-functions
asked Oct 12 at 0:11
BLoby Blob
3616
3616
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
Even if we don't have specific equations for either $f(x)$ or $g(x)$, we can still deduce a decent amount about what $f(x)+g(x)$, $f(x)cdot g(x)$, and $f(x)/g(x)$ will look like.
$f(x)+g(x)$ is probably the easiest. We know that $g(x)$ must have a negative leading coefficient, because it opens downward, and adding $f(x)$ to it wouldn't change the leading coefficient, because $f(x)$ doesn't have a quadratic term. Therefore, $f(x)+g(x)$ must be a parabola that opens downward. We can also tell that the $y$-intercept of $f(x)+g(x)$ must be less than $0$, since the $y$-intercept of $g(x)$ is more negative than the $y$-intercept of $f(x)$ is positive. Furthermore, we can see that $f(x)+g(x)$ must be greater than $0$ wherever $|f(x)|>|g(x)|$, less than $0$ wherever $|f(x)|<|g(x)|$, and equal to $0$ wherever $|f(x)|=|g(x)|$.
Now we can move on to $f(x)cdot g(x)$. If the leading coefficient of $f(x)$ is some real number $a>0$ and the leading coefficient of $g(x)$ is some real number $b<0$, then the leading coefficient of $f(x)cdot g(x)$ must be $ab$ and must be less than $0$, so we know that $f(x)cdot g(x)$ must be some cubic polynomial that goes to $infty$ as $x$ goes to $-infty$ and that goes to $-infty$ as $x$ goes to $infty$. We can also tell that the $y$-intercept of $f(x)cdot g(x)$ must be negative, because the $y$-intercepts of $f(x)$ and $g(x)$ have opposite signs.
$f(x)/g(x)$ is potentially the trickiest, but we can still draw some general conclusions about what it will look like. We know that it will have two vertical asymptotes, one at each value of $x$ such that $g(x)=0$. We also know it will have a horizontal asymptote at $y=0$, because for any large values of $x$, $frac{1}{g(x)}$ will be extremely close to $0$. In fact, at the one value of $x$ where $f(x)=0$, $f(x)/g(x)$ will be $0$ as well (if both $f(x)$ and $g(x)$ were $0$ at the same place, this wouldn't be the case, but fortunately, we don't have to worry about that). The last piece of information we can determine about $f(x)/g(x)$ is where it is positive and where it is negative: wherever $f(x)$ and $g(x)$ have the same sign, $f(x)/g(x)$ will be positive, and wherever $f(x)$ and $g(x)$ have opposite signs, $f(x)/g(x)$ will be negative. In between those regions of positivity and negativity, $f(x)/g(x)$ must either cross the $x$-axis or have a vertical asymptote.
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
Even if we don't have specific equations for either $f(x)$ or $g(x)$, we can still deduce a decent amount about what $f(x)+g(x)$, $f(x)cdot g(x)$, and $f(x)/g(x)$ will look like.
$f(x)+g(x)$ is probably the easiest. We know that $g(x)$ must have a negative leading coefficient, because it opens downward, and adding $f(x)$ to it wouldn't change the leading coefficient, because $f(x)$ doesn't have a quadratic term. Therefore, $f(x)+g(x)$ must be a parabola that opens downward. We can also tell that the $y$-intercept of $f(x)+g(x)$ must be less than $0$, since the $y$-intercept of $g(x)$ is more negative than the $y$-intercept of $f(x)$ is positive. Furthermore, we can see that $f(x)+g(x)$ must be greater than $0$ wherever $|f(x)|>|g(x)|$, less than $0$ wherever $|f(x)|<|g(x)|$, and equal to $0$ wherever $|f(x)|=|g(x)|$.
Now we can move on to $f(x)cdot g(x)$. If the leading coefficient of $f(x)$ is some real number $a>0$ and the leading coefficient of $g(x)$ is some real number $b<0$, then the leading coefficient of $f(x)cdot g(x)$ must be $ab$ and must be less than $0$, so we know that $f(x)cdot g(x)$ must be some cubic polynomial that goes to $infty$ as $x$ goes to $-infty$ and that goes to $-infty$ as $x$ goes to $infty$. We can also tell that the $y$-intercept of $f(x)cdot g(x)$ must be negative, because the $y$-intercepts of $f(x)$ and $g(x)$ have opposite signs.
$f(x)/g(x)$ is potentially the trickiest, but we can still draw some general conclusions about what it will look like. We know that it will have two vertical asymptotes, one at each value of $x$ such that $g(x)=0$. We also know it will have a horizontal asymptote at $y=0$, because for any large values of $x$, $frac{1}{g(x)}$ will be extremely close to $0$. In fact, at the one value of $x$ where $f(x)=0$, $f(x)/g(x)$ will be $0$ as well (if both $f(x)$ and $g(x)$ were $0$ at the same place, this wouldn't be the case, but fortunately, we don't have to worry about that). The last piece of information we can determine about $f(x)/g(x)$ is where it is positive and where it is negative: wherever $f(x)$ and $g(x)$ have the same sign, $f(x)/g(x)$ will be positive, and wherever $f(x)$ and $g(x)$ have opposite signs, $f(x)/g(x)$ will be negative. In between those regions of positivity and negativity, $f(x)/g(x)$ must either cross the $x$-axis or have a vertical asymptote.
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
Even if we don't have specific equations for either $f(x)$ or $g(x)$, we can still deduce a decent amount about what $f(x)+g(x)$, $f(x)cdot g(x)$, and $f(x)/g(x)$ will look like.
$f(x)+g(x)$ is probably the easiest. We know that $g(x)$ must have a negative leading coefficient, because it opens downward, and adding $f(x)$ to it wouldn't change the leading coefficient, because $f(x)$ doesn't have a quadratic term. Therefore, $f(x)+g(x)$ must be a parabola that opens downward. We can also tell that the $y$-intercept of $f(x)+g(x)$ must be less than $0$, since the $y$-intercept of $g(x)$ is more negative than the $y$-intercept of $f(x)$ is positive. Furthermore, we can see that $f(x)+g(x)$ must be greater than $0$ wherever $|f(x)|>|g(x)|$, less than $0$ wherever $|f(x)|<|g(x)|$, and equal to $0$ wherever $|f(x)|=|g(x)|$.
Now we can move on to $f(x)cdot g(x)$. If the leading coefficient of $f(x)$ is some real number $a>0$ and the leading coefficient of $g(x)$ is some real number $b<0$, then the leading coefficient of $f(x)cdot g(x)$ must be $ab$ and must be less than $0$, so we know that $f(x)cdot g(x)$ must be some cubic polynomial that goes to $infty$ as $x$ goes to $-infty$ and that goes to $-infty$ as $x$ goes to $infty$. We can also tell that the $y$-intercept of $f(x)cdot g(x)$ must be negative, because the $y$-intercepts of $f(x)$ and $g(x)$ have opposite signs.
$f(x)/g(x)$ is potentially the trickiest, but we can still draw some general conclusions about what it will look like. We know that it will have two vertical asymptotes, one at each value of $x$ such that $g(x)=0$. We also know it will have a horizontal asymptote at $y=0$, because for any large values of $x$, $frac{1}{g(x)}$ will be extremely close to $0$. In fact, at the one value of $x$ where $f(x)=0$, $f(x)/g(x)$ will be $0$ as well (if both $f(x)$ and $g(x)$ were $0$ at the same place, this wouldn't be the case, but fortunately, we don't have to worry about that). The last piece of information we can determine about $f(x)/g(x)$ is where it is positive and where it is negative: wherever $f(x)$ and $g(x)$ have the same sign, $f(x)/g(x)$ will be positive, and wherever $f(x)$ and $g(x)$ have opposite signs, $f(x)/g(x)$ will be negative. In between those regions of positivity and negativity, $f(x)/g(x)$ must either cross the $x$-axis or have a vertical asymptote.
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
Even if we don't have specific equations for either $f(x)$ or $g(x)$, we can still deduce a decent amount about what $f(x)+g(x)$, $f(x)cdot g(x)$, and $f(x)/g(x)$ will look like.
$f(x)+g(x)$ is probably the easiest. We know that $g(x)$ must have a negative leading coefficient, because it opens downward, and adding $f(x)$ to it wouldn't change the leading coefficient, because $f(x)$ doesn't have a quadratic term. Therefore, $f(x)+g(x)$ must be a parabola that opens downward. We can also tell that the $y$-intercept of $f(x)+g(x)$ must be less than $0$, since the $y$-intercept of $g(x)$ is more negative than the $y$-intercept of $f(x)$ is positive. Furthermore, we can see that $f(x)+g(x)$ must be greater than $0$ wherever $|f(x)|>|g(x)|$, less than $0$ wherever $|f(x)|<|g(x)|$, and equal to $0$ wherever $|f(x)|=|g(x)|$.
Now we can move on to $f(x)cdot g(x)$. If the leading coefficient of $f(x)$ is some real number $a>0$ and the leading coefficient of $g(x)$ is some real number $b<0$, then the leading coefficient of $f(x)cdot g(x)$ must be $ab$ and must be less than $0$, so we know that $f(x)cdot g(x)$ must be some cubic polynomial that goes to $infty$ as $x$ goes to $-infty$ and that goes to $-infty$ as $x$ goes to $infty$. We can also tell that the $y$-intercept of $f(x)cdot g(x)$ must be negative, because the $y$-intercepts of $f(x)$ and $g(x)$ have opposite signs.
$f(x)/g(x)$ is potentially the trickiest, but we can still draw some general conclusions about what it will look like. We know that it will have two vertical asymptotes, one at each value of $x$ such that $g(x)=0$. We also know it will have a horizontal asymptote at $y=0$, because for any large values of $x$, $frac{1}{g(x)}$ will be extremely close to $0$. In fact, at the one value of $x$ where $f(x)=0$, $f(x)/g(x)$ will be $0$ as well (if both $f(x)$ and $g(x)$ were $0$ at the same place, this wouldn't be the case, but fortunately, we don't have to worry about that). The last piece of information we can determine about $f(x)/g(x)$ is where it is positive and where it is negative: wherever $f(x)$ and $g(x)$ have the same sign, $f(x)/g(x)$ will be positive, and wherever $f(x)$ and $g(x)$ have opposite signs, $f(x)/g(x)$ will be negative. In between those regions of positivity and negativity, $f(x)/g(x)$ must either cross the $x$-axis or have a vertical asymptote.
Even if we don't have specific equations for either $f(x)$ or $g(x)$, we can still deduce a decent amount about what $f(x)+g(x)$, $f(x)cdot g(x)$, and $f(x)/g(x)$ will look like.
$f(x)+g(x)$ is probably the easiest. We know that $g(x)$ must have a negative leading coefficient, because it opens downward, and adding $f(x)$ to it wouldn't change the leading coefficient, because $f(x)$ doesn't have a quadratic term. Therefore, $f(x)+g(x)$ must be a parabola that opens downward. We can also tell that the $y$-intercept of $f(x)+g(x)$ must be less than $0$, since the $y$-intercept of $g(x)$ is more negative than the $y$-intercept of $f(x)$ is positive. Furthermore, we can see that $f(x)+g(x)$ must be greater than $0$ wherever $|f(x)|>|g(x)|$, less than $0$ wherever $|f(x)|<|g(x)|$, and equal to $0$ wherever $|f(x)|=|g(x)|$.
Now we can move on to $f(x)cdot g(x)$. If the leading coefficient of $f(x)$ is some real number $a>0$ and the leading coefficient of $g(x)$ is some real number $b<0$, then the leading coefficient of $f(x)cdot g(x)$ must be $ab$ and must be less than $0$, so we know that $f(x)cdot g(x)$ must be some cubic polynomial that goes to $infty$ as $x$ goes to $-infty$ and that goes to $-infty$ as $x$ goes to $infty$. We can also tell that the $y$-intercept of $f(x)cdot g(x)$ must be negative, because the $y$-intercepts of $f(x)$ and $g(x)$ have opposite signs.
$f(x)/g(x)$ is potentially the trickiest, but we can still draw some general conclusions about what it will look like. We know that it will have two vertical asymptotes, one at each value of $x$ such that $g(x)=0$. We also know it will have a horizontal asymptote at $y=0$, because for any large values of $x$, $frac{1}{g(x)}$ will be extremely close to $0$. In fact, at the one value of $x$ where $f(x)=0$, $f(x)/g(x)$ will be $0$ as well (if both $f(x)$ and $g(x)$ were $0$ at the same place, this wouldn't be the case, but fortunately, we don't have to worry about that). The last piece of information we can determine about $f(x)/g(x)$ is where it is positive and where it is negative: wherever $f(x)$ and $g(x)$ have the same sign, $f(x)/g(x)$ will be positive, and wherever $f(x)$ and $g(x)$ have opposite signs, $f(x)/g(x)$ will be negative. In between those regions of positivity and negativity, $f(x)/g(x)$ must either cross the $x$-axis or have a vertical asymptote.
answered Nov 24 at 0:27
Robert Howard
1,9101822
1,9101822
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2952072%2fhow-would-you-draw-the-graphs-of-the-interactions-between-these-functions%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown