In crystal Why do I need to do matches.try &.[0]











up vote
0
down vote

favorite












Here's some code:



matches =  //([a-z]+)/(d+)/state/([a-z]+)/.match(address) # line 1
puts matches[0]? # line 2
puts matches.try &.[0] # line 3


matches datatype is (Regex::MatchData | Nil) according to typeof. Yet, line 2, referring to matches[0] fails with a compilation error. And I don't understand line 3 at all!



Could someone clarify?










share|improve this question




























    up vote
    0
    down vote

    favorite












    Here's some code:



    matches =  //([a-z]+)/(d+)/state/([a-z]+)/.match(address) # line 1
    puts matches[0]? # line 2
    puts matches.try &.[0] # line 3


    matches datatype is (Regex::MatchData | Nil) according to typeof. Yet, line 2, referring to matches[0] fails with a compilation error. And I don't understand line 3 at all!



    Could someone clarify?










    share|improve this question


























      up vote
      0
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      0
      down vote

      favorite











      Here's some code:



      matches =  //([a-z]+)/(d+)/state/([a-z]+)/.match(address) # line 1
      puts matches[0]? # line 2
      puts matches.try &.[0] # line 3


      matches datatype is (Regex::MatchData | Nil) according to typeof. Yet, line 2, referring to matches[0] fails with a compilation error. And I don't understand line 3 at all!



      Could someone clarify?










      share|improve this question















      Here's some code:



      matches =  //([a-z]+)/(d+)/state/([a-z]+)/.match(address) # line 1
      puts matches[0]? # line 2
      puts matches.try &.[0] # line 3


      matches datatype is (Regex::MatchData | Nil) according to typeof. Yet, line 2, referring to matches[0] fails with a compilation error. And I don't understand line 3 at all!



      Could someone clarify?







      crystal-lang






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited Nov 20 at 4:49









      Cœur

      17.2k9102141




      17.2k9102141










      asked Nov 20 at 1:37









      pitosalas

      3,13163363




      3,13163363
























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          4
          down vote



          accepted










          Line 2: As you say, the type of matches is (Regex::MatchData | Nil). In case it happens to be nil, it wouldn't have the #? method, which makes the type checker angry. You are supposed to check whether match succeeded first:



          matches =  //([a-z]+)/(d+)/state/([a-z]+)/.match(address)
          if matches
          puts matches[0]?
          end


          Inside if, the type of matches is just Regex::MatchData (as we eliminated the Nil possibility), and the type checker can rest peacefully.



          If you are sure your string will match, you can pacify the type checker with not_nil!, but that opens up a possibility of a runtime error, if your confidence in your data's conformance was unfounded:



          puts matches.not_nil![0]?


          Line 3: #try will perform the block, except when the caller is nil, when it returns nil. No guards are needed because #try is explicitly defined on Nil (as well as on Object).



          It uses the shortcut syntax for blocks, where &.[0] is kind of equivalent to { |x| x[0] }.






          share|improve this answer























            Your Answer






            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
            StackExchange.snippets.init();
            });
            });
            }, "code-snippets");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "1"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53385025%2fin-crystal-why-do-i-need-to-do-matches-try-0%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes








            up vote
            4
            down vote



            accepted










            Line 2: As you say, the type of matches is (Regex::MatchData | Nil). In case it happens to be nil, it wouldn't have the #? method, which makes the type checker angry. You are supposed to check whether match succeeded first:



            matches =  //([a-z]+)/(d+)/state/([a-z]+)/.match(address)
            if matches
            puts matches[0]?
            end


            Inside if, the type of matches is just Regex::MatchData (as we eliminated the Nil possibility), and the type checker can rest peacefully.



            If you are sure your string will match, you can pacify the type checker with not_nil!, but that opens up a possibility of a runtime error, if your confidence in your data's conformance was unfounded:



            puts matches.not_nil![0]?


            Line 3: #try will perform the block, except when the caller is nil, when it returns nil. No guards are needed because #try is explicitly defined on Nil (as well as on Object).



            It uses the shortcut syntax for blocks, where &.[0] is kind of equivalent to { |x| x[0] }.






            share|improve this answer



























              up vote
              4
              down vote



              accepted










              Line 2: As you say, the type of matches is (Regex::MatchData | Nil). In case it happens to be nil, it wouldn't have the #? method, which makes the type checker angry. You are supposed to check whether match succeeded first:



              matches =  //([a-z]+)/(d+)/state/([a-z]+)/.match(address)
              if matches
              puts matches[0]?
              end


              Inside if, the type of matches is just Regex::MatchData (as we eliminated the Nil possibility), and the type checker can rest peacefully.



              If you are sure your string will match, you can pacify the type checker with not_nil!, but that opens up a possibility of a runtime error, if your confidence in your data's conformance was unfounded:



              puts matches.not_nil![0]?


              Line 3: #try will perform the block, except when the caller is nil, when it returns nil. No guards are needed because #try is explicitly defined on Nil (as well as on Object).



              It uses the shortcut syntax for blocks, where &.[0] is kind of equivalent to { |x| x[0] }.






              share|improve this answer

























                up vote
                4
                down vote



                accepted







                up vote
                4
                down vote



                accepted






                Line 2: As you say, the type of matches is (Regex::MatchData | Nil). In case it happens to be nil, it wouldn't have the #? method, which makes the type checker angry. You are supposed to check whether match succeeded first:



                matches =  //([a-z]+)/(d+)/state/([a-z]+)/.match(address)
                if matches
                puts matches[0]?
                end


                Inside if, the type of matches is just Regex::MatchData (as we eliminated the Nil possibility), and the type checker can rest peacefully.



                If you are sure your string will match, you can pacify the type checker with not_nil!, but that opens up a possibility of a runtime error, if your confidence in your data's conformance was unfounded:



                puts matches.not_nil![0]?


                Line 3: #try will perform the block, except when the caller is nil, when it returns nil. No guards are needed because #try is explicitly defined on Nil (as well as on Object).



                It uses the shortcut syntax for blocks, where &.[0] is kind of equivalent to { |x| x[0] }.






                share|improve this answer














                Line 2: As you say, the type of matches is (Regex::MatchData | Nil). In case it happens to be nil, it wouldn't have the #? method, which makes the type checker angry. You are supposed to check whether match succeeded first:



                matches =  //([a-z]+)/(d+)/state/([a-z]+)/.match(address)
                if matches
                puts matches[0]?
                end


                Inside if, the type of matches is just Regex::MatchData (as we eliminated the Nil possibility), and the type checker can rest peacefully.



                If you are sure your string will match, you can pacify the type checker with not_nil!, but that opens up a possibility of a runtime error, if your confidence in your data's conformance was unfounded:



                puts matches.not_nil![0]?


                Line 3: #try will perform the block, except when the caller is nil, when it returns nil. No guards are needed because #try is explicitly defined on Nil (as well as on Object).



                It uses the shortcut syntax for blocks, where &.[0] is kind of equivalent to { |x| x[0] }.







                share|improve this answer














                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer








                edited Nov 20 at 9:06

























                answered Nov 20 at 8:47









                Amadan

                126k13137189




                126k13137189






























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





                    Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


                    Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53385025%2fin-crystal-why-do-i-need-to-do-matches-try-0%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Wiesbaden

                    Marschland

                    Dieringhausen