If $x in A$ why does it not follow that $x in A-B$?
I understand that if $x in A-B$ then $x in A$ because $x notin B$ but why doesn't the reverse hold true?
elementary-set-theory
add a comment |
I understand that if $x in A-B$ then $x in A$ because $x notin B$ but why doesn't the reverse hold true?
elementary-set-theory
2
Suppose $A = {2, 3}, B = {1, 2, 3}.$ Then there is no $x in A$ that is in $A-B$. Similarly, if $A = {1, 2, 3}, B= {1, 2},$ we can't conclude that just because $xin A$ that $x in A-B$,
– amWhy
Nov 28 at 23:55
1
Because $A - B subseteq A$ always, but we can't generally say that $A subseteq A - B$.
– JonathanZ
Nov 29 at 0:02
So if $A$={1,2,3} and $B$={1,2} then there would be $x in A$ that's in $A-B$ namely {3}?
– cap
Nov 29 at 0:11
add a comment |
I understand that if $x in A-B$ then $x in A$ because $x notin B$ but why doesn't the reverse hold true?
elementary-set-theory
I understand that if $x in A-B$ then $x in A$ because $x notin B$ but why doesn't the reverse hold true?
elementary-set-theory
elementary-set-theory
asked Nov 28 at 23:52
cap
103
103
2
Suppose $A = {2, 3}, B = {1, 2, 3}.$ Then there is no $x in A$ that is in $A-B$. Similarly, if $A = {1, 2, 3}, B= {1, 2},$ we can't conclude that just because $xin A$ that $x in A-B$,
– amWhy
Nov 28 at 23:55
1
Because $A - B subseteq A$ always, but we can't generally say that $A subseteq A - B$.
– JonathanZ
Nov 29 at 0:02
So if $A$={1,2,3} and $B$={1,2} then there would be $x in A$ that's in $A-B$ namely {3}?
– cap
Nov 29 at 0:11
add a comment |
2
Suppose $A = {2, 3}, B = {1, 2, 3}.$ Then there is no $x in A$ that is in $A-B$. Similarly, if $A = {1, 2, 3}, B= {1, 2},$ we can't conclude that just because $xin A$ that $x in A-B$,
– amWhy
Nov 28 at 23:55
1
Because $A - B subseteq A$ always, but we can't generally say that $A subseteq A - B$.
– JonathanZ
Nov 29 at 0:02
So if $A$={1,2,3} and $B$={1,2} then there would be $x in A$ that's in $A-B$ namely {3}?
– cap
Nov 29 at 0:11
2
2
Suppose $A = {2, 3}, B = {1, 2, 3}.$ Then there is no $x in A$ that is in $A-B$. Similarly, if $A = {1, 2, 3}, B= {1, 2},$ we can't conclude that just because $xin A$ that $x in A-B$,
– amWhy
Nov 28 at 23:55
Suppose $A = {2, 3}, B = {1, 2, 3}.$ Then there is no $x in A$ that is in $A-B$. Similarly, if $A = {1, 2, 3}, B= {1, 2},$ we can't conclude that just because $xin A$ that $x in A-B$,
– amWhy
Nov 28 at 23:55
1
1
Because $A - B subseteq A$ always, but we can't generally say that $A subseteq A - B$.
– JonathanZ
Nov 29 at 0:02
Because $A - B subseteq A$ always, but we can't generally say that $A subseteq A - B$.
– JonathanZ
Nov 29 at 0:02
So if $A$={1,2,3} and $B$={1,2} then there would be $x in A$ that's in $A-B$ namely {3}?
– cap
Nov 29 at 0:11
So if $A$={1,2,3} and $B$={1,2} then there would be $x in A$ that's in $A-B$ namely {3}?
– cap
Nov 29 at 0:11
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
Because $Asetminus B$ only includes elements in $A$ which are not also in $B$. Put differently, $A$ can be partitioned as
$$
A = (Asetminus B )cup (Acap B)
$$
and if $xin Acap B$, then $xin A$ but $xnotin Asetminus B$.
For instance, take $A=B={1}$ for a trivial counterexample. Then $Asetminus B = emptyset$: so $1in A$, but $1notin Asetminus B$.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3017931%2fif-x-in-a-why-does-it-not-follow-that-x-in-a-b%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Because $Asetminus B$ only includes elements in $A$ which are not also in $B$. Put differently, $A$ can be partitioned as
$$
A = (Asetminus B )cup (Acap B)
$$
and if $xin Acap B$, then $xin A$ but $xnotin Asetminus B$.
For instance, take $A=B={1}$ for a trivial counterexample. Then $Asetminus B = emptyset$: so $1in A$, but $1notin Asetminus B$.
add a comment |
Because $Asetminus B$ only includes elements in $A$ which are not also in $B$. Put differently, $A$ can be partitioned as
$$
A = (Asetminus B )cup (Acap B)
$$
and if $xin Acap B$, then $xin A$ but $xnotin Asetminus B$.
For instance, take $A=B={1}$ for a trivial counterexample. Then $Asetminus B = emptyset$: so $1in A$, but $1notin Asetminus B$.
add a comment |
Because $Asetminus B$ only includes elements in $A$ which are not also in $B$. Put differently, $A$ can be partitioned as
$$
A = (Asetminus B )cup (Acap B)
$$
and if $xin Acap B$, then $xin A$ but $xnotin Asetminus B$.
For instance, take $A=B={1}$ for a trivial counterexample. Then $Asetminus B = emptyset$: so $1in A$, but $1notin Asetminus B$.
Because $Asetminus B$ only includes elements in $A$ which are not also in $B$. Put differently, $A$ can be partitioned as
$$
A = (Asetminus B )cup (Acap B)
$$
and if $xin Acap B$, then $xin A$ but $xnotin Asetminus B$.
For instance, take $A=B={1}$ for a trivial counterexample. Then $Asetminus B = emptyset$: so $1in A$, but $1notin Asetminus B$.
answered Nov 28 at 23:56
Clement C.
49.4k33785
49.4k33785
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3017931%2fif-x-in-a-why-does-it-not-follow-that-x-in-a-b%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
2
Suppose $A = {2, 3}, B = {1, 2, 3}.$ Then there is no $x in A$ that is in $A-B$. Similarly, if $A = {1, 2, 3}, B= {1, 2},$ we can't conclude that just because $xin A$ that $x in A-B$,
– amWhy
Nov 28 at 23:55
1
Because $A - B subseteq A$ always, but we can't generally say that $A subseteq A - B$.
– JonathanZ
Nov 29 at 0:02
So if $A$={1,2,3} and $B$={1,2} then there would be $x in A$ that's in $A-B$ namely {3}?
– cap
Nov 29 at 0:11