Measurable functions (Integral)
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
Let $sigma_x$ be a measure on $mathcal{P}(mathbb{R^n})$.
$sigma_x(F):=begin{cases}1,&text{if }x in Ftext{ }\0,&text{otherwise } end{cases}quad$
How to prove that all maps $g:mathbb{R} to mathbb{R}$ are integrable with respect to $sigma_x$?
I know that $int_mathbb{R}g=g(x)$.
I tried to use that:
$int_mathbb{R}|g| dsigma_x= |g(x)|<infty$ so all $g$ are integrable with respect to $sigma_x$
But I'm not sure if this works.
measure-theory proof-verification lebesgue-integral
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
Let $sigma_x$ be a measure on $mathcal{P}(mathbb{R^n})$.
$sigma_x(F):=begin{cases}1,&text{if }x in Ftext{ }\0,&text{otherwise } end{cases}quad$
How to prove that all maps $g:mathbb{R} to mathbb{R}$ are integrable with respect to $sigma_x$?
I know that $int_mathbb{R}g=g(x)$.
I tried to use that:
$int_mathbb{R}|g| dsigma_x= |g(x)|<infty$ so all $g$ are integrable with respect to $sigma_x$
But I'm not sure if this works.
measure-theory proof-verification lebesgue-integral
1
Your approach is correct.
– drhab
Nov 24 at 11:01
1
You may also want to state that all $mathbb{R}^n to mathbb{R}$ functions are measurable because all subsets of $mathbb{R}^n$ are $sigma_x$-measurable, so we don't need to worry about measurability of functions at all.
– Alex Vong
Nov 24 at 11:06
For a rigorous proof starting with definition of integral you have to first verify the equation $int g dsigma_x=g(x)$ for simple functions the take limits. Measurability is no issue because you are taking power set as the sigma algebra.
– Kavi Rama Murthy
Nov 24 at 11:53
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
Let $sigma_x$ be a measure on $mathcal{P}(mathbb{R^n})$.
$sigma_x(F):=begin{cases}1,&text{if }x in Ftext{ }\0,&text{otherwise } end{cases}quad$
How to prove that all maps $g:mathbb{R} to mathbb{R}$ are integrable with respect to $sigma_x$?
I know that $int_mathbb{R}g=g(x)$.
I tried to use that:
$int_mathbb{R}|g| dsigma_x= |g(x)|<infty$ so all $g$ are integrable with respect to $sigma_x$
But I'm not sure if this works.
measure-theory proof-verification lebesgue-integral
Let $sigma_x$ be a measure on $mathcal{P}(mathbb{R^n})$.
$sigma_x(F):=begin{cases}1,&text{if }x in Ftext{ }\0,&text{otherwise } end{cases}quad$
How to prove that all maps $g:mathbb{R} to mathbb{R}$ are integrable with respect to $sigma_x$?
I know that $int_mathbb{R}g=g(x)$.
I tried to use that:
$int_mathbb{R}|g| dsigma_x= |g(x)|<infty$ so all $g$ are integrable with respect to $sigma_x$
But I'm not sure if this works.
measure-theory proof-verification lebesgue-integral
measure-theory proof-verification lebesgue-integral
edited Nov 24 at 12:02
Scientifica
6,26141333
6,26141333
asked Nov 24 at 9:59
Nekarts
234
234
1
Your approach is correct.
– drhab
Nov 24 at 11:01
1
You may also want to state that all $mathbb{R}^n to mathbb{R}$ functions are measurable because all subsets of $mathbb{R}^n$ are $sigma_x$-measurable, so we don't need to worry about measurability of functions at all.
– Alex Vong
Nov 24 at 11:06
For a rigorous proof starting with definition of integral you have to first verify the equation $int g dsigma_x=g(x)$ for simple functions the take limits. Measurability is no issue because you are taking power set as the sigma algebra.
– Kavi Rama Murthy
Nov 24 at 11:53
add a comment |
1
Your approach is correct.
– drhab
Nov 24 at 11:01
1
You may also want to state that all $mathbb{R}^n to mathbb{R}$ functions are measurable because all subsets of $mathbb{R}^n$ are $sigma_x$-measurable, so we don't need to worry about measurability of functions at all.
– Alex Vong
Nov 24 at 11:06
For a rigorous proof starting with definition of integral you have to first verify the equation $int g dsigma_x=g(x)$ for simple functions the take limits. Measurability is no issue because you are taking power set as the sigma algebra.
– Kavi Rama Murthy
Nov 24 at 11:53
1
1
Your approach is correct.
– drhab
Nov 24 at 11:01
Your approach is correct.
– drhab
Nov 24 at 11:01
1
1
You may also want to state that all $mathbb{R}^n to mathbb{R}$ functions are measurable because all subsets of $mathbb{R}^n$ are $sigma_x$-measurable, so we don't need to worry about measurability of functions at all.
– Alex Vong
Nov 24 at 11:06
You may also want to state that all $mathbb{R}^n to mathbb{R}$ functions are measurable because all subsets of $mathbb{R}^n$ are $sigma_x$-measurable, so we don't need to worry about measurability of functions at all.
– Alex Vong
Nov 24 at 11:06
For a rigorous proof starting with definition of integral you have to first verify the equation $int g dsigma_x=g(x)$ for simple functions the take limits. Measurability is no issue because you are taking power set as the sigma algebra.
– Kavi Rama Murthy
Nov 24 at 11:53
For a rigorous proof starting with definition of integral you have to first verify the equation $int g dsigma_x=g(x)$ for simple functions the take limits. Measurability is no issue because you are taking power set as the sigma algebra.
– Kavi Rama Murthy
Nov 24 at 11:53
add a comment |
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3011376%2fmeasurable-functions-integral%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
Your approach is correct.
– drhab
Nov 24 at 11:01
1
You may also want to state that all $mathbb{R}^n to mathbb{R}$ functions are measurable because all subsets of $mathbb{R}^n$ are $sigma_x$-measurable, so we don't need to worry about measurability of functions at all.
– Alex Vong
Nov 24 at 11:06
For a rigorous proof starting with definition of integral you have to first verify the equation $int g dsigma_x=g(x)$ for simple functions the take limits. Measurability is no issue because you are taking power set as the sigma algebra.
– Kavi Rama Murthy
Nov 24 at 11:53