Sandwich natural transformation between two functors
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
In the Kleisli adjunction we have:
$Gvarepsilon F = mu$ where $varepsilon$ is a natural transformation called the counit.
How exactly is $Gvarepsilon F$ defined? I understand $Gvarepsilon$ and $varepsilon F$ but not the sandwiched form.
Followup question: Counit of the Kleisli adjunction
category-theory adjoint-functors functors natural-transformations
asked Nov 24 at 9:14
Roland
19311
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
In the Kleisli adjunction we have:
$Gvarepsilon F = mu$ where $varepsilon$ is a natural transformation called the counit.
How exactly is $Gvarepsilon F$ defined? I understand $Gvarepsilon$ and $varepsilon F$ but not the sandwiched form.
Followup question: Counit of the Kleisli adjunction
category-theory adjoint-functors functors natural-transformations
asked Nov 24 at 9:14
Roland
19311
2
If I call $varepsilon F$ $alpha$ and ask what is $Galpha$, do you understand it then? It's compositional. There is, of course, a coherence constraint you could verify. Namely that $Galpha = beta F$ where $beta = Gvarepsilon$. Incidentally, I personally prefer representing right whiskering by subscripting, i.e. $Gvarepsilon_F$.
– Derek Elkins
Nov 24 at 9:20
@DerekElkins I posted a followup math.stackexchange.com/questions/3011366/…
– Roland
Nov 24 at 9:50
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
In the Kleisli adjunction we have:
$Gvarepsilon F = mu$ where $varepsilon$ is a natural transformation called the counit.
How exactly is $Gvarepsilon F$ defined? I understand $Gvarepsilon$ and $varepsilon F$ but not the sandwiched form.
Followup question: Counit of the Kleisli adjunction
category-theory adjoint-functors functors natural-transformations
asked Nov 24 at 9:14
Roland
19311
In the Kleisli adjunction we have:
$Gvarepsilon F = mu$ where $varepsilon$ is a natural transformation called the counit.
How exactly is $Gvarepsilon F$ defined? I understand $Gvarepsilon$ and $varepsilon F$ but not the sandwiched form.
Followup question: Counit of the Kleisli adjunction
category-theory adjoint-functors functors natural-transformations
category-theory adjoint-functors functors natural-transformations
asked Nov 24 at 9:14
Roland
19311
asked Nov 24 at 9:14
Roland
19311
edited Nov 24 at 9:52
asked Nov 24 at 9:14
Roland
19311
asked Nov 24 at 9:14
Roland
19311
asked Nov 24 at 9:14
Roland
19311
19311
2
If I call $varepsilon F$ $alpha$ and ask what is $Galpha$, do you understand it then? It's compositional. There is, of course, a coherence constraint you could verify. Namely that $Galpha = beta F$ where $beta = Gvarepsilon$. Incidentally, I personally prefer representing right whiskering by subscripting, i.e. $Gvarepsilon_F$.
– Derek Elkins
Nov 24 at 9:20
@DerekElkins I posted a followup math.stackexchange.com/questions/3011366/…
– Roland
Nov 24 at 9:50
add a comment |
2
If I call $varepsilon F$ $alpha$ and ask what is $Galpha$, do you understand it then? It's compositional. There is, of course, a coherence constraint you could verify. Namely that $Galpha = beta F$ where $beta = Gvarepsilon$. Incidentally, I personally prefer representing right whiskering by subscripting, i.e. $Gvarepsilon_F$.
– Derek Elkins
Nov 24 at 9:20
@DerekElkins I posted a followup math.stackexchange.com/questions/3011366/…
– Roland
Nov 24 at 9:50
2
2
If I call $varepsilon F$ $alpha$ and ask what is $Galpha$, do you understand it then? It's compositional. There is, of course, a coherence constraint you could verify. Namely that $Galpha = beta F$ where $beta = Gvarepsilon$. Incidentally, I personally prefer representing right whiskering by subscripting, i.e. $Gvarepsilon_F$.
– Derek Elkins
Nov 24 at 9:20
If I call $varepsilon F$ $alpha$ and ask what is $Galpha$, do you understand it then? It's compositional. There is, of course, a coherence constraint you could verify. Namely that $Galpha = beta F$ where $beta = Gvarepsilon$. Incidentally, I personally prefer representing right whiskering by subscripting, i.e. $Gvarepsilon_F$.
– Derek Elkins
Nov 24 at 9:20
@DerekElkins I posted a followup math.stackexchange.com/questions/3011366/…
– Roland
Nov 24 at 9:50
@DerekElkins I posted a followup math.stackexchange.com/questions/3011366/…
– Roland
Nov 24 at 9:50
add a comment |
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3011347%2fsandwich-natural-transformation-between-two-functors%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
2
If I call $varepsilon F$ $alpha$ and ask what is $Galpha$, do you understand it then? It's compositional. There is, of course, a coherence constraint you could verify. Namely that $Galpha = beta F$ where $beta = Gvarepsilon$. Incidentally, I personally prefer representing right whiskering by subscripting, i.e. $Gvarepsilon_F$.
– Derek Elkins
Nov 24 at 9:20
@DerekElkins I posted a followup math.stackexchange.com/questions/3011366/…
– Roland
Nov 24 at 9:50