Proving $int_{-1}^1 frac{(f(x))^2}{sqrt{(1-x^2)}} dx gt 0$
I was supposed to show that $$langle f,g rangle = int_{-1}^1 frac{f(x)g(x)}{sqrt{(1-x^2)}} dx$$ is an inner product. The question basically said to prove symmetry, bilinearity, and that $langle f,f rangle gt 0$ where $f ne 0$.
Now, I have already shown symmetry and bilinearity. However, I am stuck with the last part. I would have to prove that $$int_{-1}^1 frac{(f(x))^2}{sqrt{(1-x^2)}} dx gt 0$$ but I have no clue how to do that. Could someone explain where should I start? Thanks.
calculus integration
add a comment |
I was supposed to show that $$langle f,g rangle = int_{-1}^1 frac{f(x)g(x)}{sqrt{(1-x^2)}} dx$$ is an inner product. The question basically said to prove symmetry, bilinearity, and that $langle f,f rangle gt 0$ where $f ne 0$.
Now, I have already shown symmetry and bilinearity. However, I am stuck with the last part. I would have to prove that $$int_{-1}^1 frac{(f(x))^2}{sqrt{(1-x^2)}} dx gt 0$$ but I have no clue how to do that. Could someone explain where should I start? Thanks.
calculus integration
Note that the integrand is positive. When it exists, the Riemann integral is positive definite.
– Dzoooks
Nov 30 at 4:43
add a comment |
I was supposed to show that $$langle f,g rangle = int_{-1}^1 frac{f(x)g(x)}{sqrt{(1-x^2)}} dx$$ is an inner product. The question basically said to prove symmetry, bilinearity, and that $langle f,f rangle gt 0$ where $f ne 0$.
Now, I have already shown symmetry and bilinearity. However, I am stuck with the last part. I would have to prove that $$int_{-1}^1 frac{(f(x))^2}{sqrt{(1-x^2)}} dx gt 0$$ but I have no clue how to do that. Could someone explain where should I start? Thanks.
calculus integration
I was supposed to show that $$langle f,g rangle = int_{-1}^1 frac{f(x)g(x)}{sqrt{(1-x^2)}} dx$$ is an inner product. The question basically said to prove symmetry, bilinearity, and that $langle f,f rangle gt 0$ where $f ne 0$.
Now, I have already shown symmetry and bilinearity. However, I am stuck with the last part. I would have to prove that $$int_{-1}^1 frac{(f(x))^2}{sqrt{(1-x^2)}} dx gt 0$$ but I have no clue how to do that. Could someone explain where should I start? Thanks.
calculus integration
calculus integration
edited Nov 30 at 6:24
user1551
71.2k566125
71.2k566125
asked Nov 30 at 4:39
dmsj djsl
35517
35517
Note that the integrand is positive. When it exists, the Riemann integral is positive definite.
– Dzoooks
Nov 30 at 4:43
add a comment |
Note that the integrand is positive. When it exists, the Riemann integral is positive definite.
– Dzoooks
Nov 30 at 4:43
Note that the integrand is positive. When it exists, the Riemann integral is positive definite.
– Dzoooks
Nov 30 at 4:43
Note that the integrand is positive. When it exists, the Riemann integral is positive definite.
– Dzoooks
Nov 30 at 4:43
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
You're overthinking! If we assume the integral exists, then $f^2(x)geq0$ and $sqrt{1-x^2}geq0$ for all $xin[-1,1]$. Since we assume that $f$ is not identically $0$, then this integral is of a positive function and the integral is positive.
add a comment |
Hint: The integral of a positive function is positive.
2
I am curious why there is a downvote?
– Tianlalu
Nov 30 at 4:57
add a comment |
Assume that $g(x) > 0$ almost everywhere and $E$ is a set of positive measure, that is, $m(E) > 0$. Suppose, by way of contradiction, that $int_E g(x) dx leq 0$. Let $E_n = {x in E: g(x) > 1/n }$. Then $E = cup_{k=1}^infty E_k$ and since $g(x) > 0$ almost everywhere, there exists an $n$ such that $m(E_n)>0$. Hence,
$int_E g(x) dx geq int_{E_n} g(x) dx > frac{1}{n} m(E_n) > 0 $ ,
a contradiction.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3019651%2fproving-int-11-fracfx2-sqrt1-x2-dx-gt-0%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
You're overthinking! If we assume the integral exists, then $f^2(x)geq0$ and $sqrt{1-x^2}geq0$ for all $xin[-1,1]$. Since we assume that $f$ is not identically $0$, then this integral is of a positive function and the integral is positive.
add a comment |
You're overthinking! If we assume the integral exists, then $f^2(x)geq0$ and $sqrt{1-x^2}geq0$ for all $xin[-1,1]$. Since we assume that $f$ is not identically $0$, then this integral is of a positive function and the integral is positive.
add a comment |
You're overthinking! If we assume the integral exists, then $f^2(x)geq0$ and $sqrt{1-x^2}geq0$ for all $xin[-1,1]$. Since we assume that $f$ is not identically $0$, then this integral is of a positive function and the integral is positive.
You're overthinking! If we assume the integral exists, then $f^2(x)geq0$ and $sqrt{1-x^2}geq0$ for all $xin[-1,1]$. Since we assume that $f$ is not identically $0$, then this integral is of a positive function and the integral is positive.
answered Dec 1 at 3:04
YiFan
2,3741421
2,3741421
add a comment |
add a comment |
Hint: The integral of a positive function is positive.
2
I am curious why there is a downvote?
– Tianlalu
Nov 30 at 4:57
add a comment |
Hint: The integral of a positive function is positive.
2
I am curious why there is a downvote?
– Tianlalu
Nov 30 at 4:57
add a comment |
Hint: The integral of a positive function is positive.
Hint: The integral of a positive function is positive.
answered Nov 30 at 4:41
Jimmy R.
33k42157
33k42157
2
I am curious why there is a downvote?
– Tianlalu
Nov 30 at 4:57
add a comment |
2
I am curious why there is a downvote?
– Tianlalu
Nov 30 at 4:57
2
2
I am curious why there is a downvote?
– Tianlalu
Nov 30 at 4:57
I am curious why there is a downvote?
– Tianlalu
Nov 30 at 4:57
add a comment |
Assume that $g(x) > 0$ almost everywhere and $E$ is a set of positive measure, that is, $m(E) > 0$. Suppose, by way of contradiction, that $int_E g(x) dx leq 0$. Let $E_n = {x in E: g(x) > 1/n }$. Then $E = cup_{k=1}^infty E_k$ and since $g(x) > 0$ almost everywhere, there exists an $n$ such that $m(E_n)>0$. Hence,
$int_E g(x) dx geq int_{E_n} g(x) dx > frac{1}{n} m(E_n) > 0 $ ,
a contradiction.
add a comment |
Assume that $g(x) > 0$ almost everywhere and $E$ is a set of positive measure, that is, $m(E) > 0$. Suppose, by way of contradiction, that $int_E g(x) dx leq 0$. Let $E_n = {x in E: g(x) > 1/n }$. Then $E = cup_{k=1}^infty E_k$ and since $g(x) > 0$ almost everywhere, there exists an $n$ such that $m(E_n)>0$. Hence,
$int_E g(x) dx geq int_{E_n} g(x) dx > frac{1}{n} m(E_n) > 0 $ ,
a contradiction.
add a comment |
Assume that $g(x) > 0$ almost everywhere and $E$ is a set of positive measure, that is, $m(E) > 0$. Suppose, by way of contradiction, that $int_E g(x) dx leq 0$. Let $E_n = {x in E: g(x) > 1/n }$. Then $E = cup_{k=1}^infty E_k$ and since $g(x) > 0$ almost everywhere, there exists an $n$ such that $m(E_n)>0$. Hence,
$int_E g(x) dx geq int_{E_n} g(x) dx > frac{1}{n} m(E_n) > 0 $ ,
a contradiction.
Assume that $g(x) > 0$ almost everywhere and $E$ is a set of positive measure, that is, $m(E) > 0$. Suppose, by way of contradiction, that $int_E g(x) dx leq 0$. Let $E_n = {x in E: g(x) > 1/n }$. Then $E = cup_{k=1}^infty E_k$ and since $g(x) > 0$ almost everywhere, there exists an $n$ such that $m(E_n)>0$. Hence,
$int_E g(x) dx geq int_{E_n} g(x) dx > frac{1}{n} m(E_n) > 0 $ ,
a contradiction.
edited Dec 2 at 22:52
answered Nov 30 at 4:53
Mustafa Said
2,9411913
2,9411913
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3019651%2fproving-int-11-fracfx2-sqrt1-x2-dx-gt-0%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Note that the integrand is positive. When it exists, the Riemann integral is positive definite.
– Dzoooks
Nov 30 at 4:43