When GBM model saved and loaded doesn't give same predicted values when model loaded again and again












0














I trained a GBM model (classification) and saved it using:



saveRDS(gbmfit, file='E:/..../gbm_nb.rds')


when I am using above model for scoring data, I load it using:



gbmfit <- readRDS('E:/..../gbm_nb.rds')


and predict:



nb_lapse$PRED <- predict(gbmfit, nb_lapse, type='response', n.trees=2000)


This PRED values should be same each time I run it against same scoring data. But some of these values come different. I have printed these by two runs of above code and the differences are around 3% of records. The difference I have printed as such:
enter image description here



Where ID is the unique number. PRD_ORIG is coming in the first run and PRED_NEW is coming in the second run. In second run I am loading model again. If I am not loading model, instead score data again on already loaded model then I don't see any difference in PRED values.



Have you seen this kind of behavior? I was expecting that this should give same PRED values, for same scoring data, each time I will load model and score it.



Thanks.










share|improve this question



























    0














    I trained a GBM model (classification) and saved it using:



    saveRDS(gbmfit, file='E:/..../gbm_nb.rds')


    when I am using above model for scoring data, I load it using:



    gbmfit <- readRDS('E:/..../gbm_nb.rds')


    and predict:



    nb_lapse$PRED <- predict(gbmfit, nb_lapse, type='response', n.trees=2000)


    This PRED values should be same each time I run it against same scoring data. But some of these values come different. I have printed these by two runs of above code and the differences are around 3% of records. The difference I have printed as such:
    enter image description here



    Where ID is the unique number. PRD_ORIG is coming in the first run and PRED_NEW is coming in the second run. In second run I am loading model again. If I am not loading model, instead score data again on already loaded model then I don't see any difference in PRED values.



    Have you seen this kind of behavior? I was expecting that this should give same PRED values, for same scoring data, each time I will load model and score it.



    Thanks.










    share|improve this question

























      0












      0








      0


      1





      I trained a GBM model (classification) and saved it using:



      saveRDS(gbmfit, file='E:/..../gbm_nb.rds')


      when I am using above model for scoring data, I load it using:



      gbmfit <- readRDS('E:/..../gbm_nb.rds')


      and predict:



      nb_lapse$PRED <- predict(gbmfit, nb_lapse, type='response', n.trees=2000)


      This PRED values should be same each time I run it against same scoring data. But some of these values come different. I have printed these by two runs of above code and the differences are around 3% of records. The difference I have printed as such:
      enter image description here



      Where ID is the unique number. PRD_ORIG is coming in the first run and PRED_NEW is coming in the second run. In second run I am loading model again. If I am not loading model, instead score data again on already loaded model then I don't see any difference in PRED values.



      Have you seen this kind of behavior? I was expecting that this should give same PRED values, for same scoring data, each time I will load model and score it.



      Thanks.










      share|improve this question













      I trained a GBM model (classification) and saved it using:



      saveRDS(gbmfit, file='E:/..../gbm_nb.rds')


      when I am using above model for scoring data, I load it using:



      gbmfit <- readRDS('E:/..../gbm_nb.rds')


      and predict:



      nb_lapse$PRED <- predict(gbmfit, nb_lapse, type='response', n.trees=2000)


      This PRED values should be same each time I run it against same scoring data. But some of these values come different. I have printed these by two runs of above code and the differences are around 3% of records. The difference I have printed as such:
      enter image description here



      Where ID is the unique number. PRD_ORIG is coming in the first run and PRED_NEW is coming in the second run. In second run I am loading model again. If I am not loading model, instead score data again on already loaded model then I don't see any difference in PRED values.



      Have you seen this kind of behavior? I was expecting that this should give same PRED values, for same scoring data, each time I will load model and score it.



      Thanks.







      r gbm






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked Nov 20 at 17:22









      Sanoj

      4042515




      4042515
























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          0














          I found the answer. I have one categorical variable, say A, with many categories. In the train data, I have capped those categories based on another variable, say B, in the data frame. In scoring data frame that variable B is not present. Therefore, despite my scoring data goes through capping code, actual capping of categories doesn't happen. R doesn't throw any error if code is not executed. Therefore in scoring data I end up having more categories in categorical variable A than in train data on which model was trained. This was creating problem and I was getting different predicted values for those data points where categories were different, or not present, than in train data. Once I capped scoring data categorical variable as in train data my predicted values are coming same every time.






          share|improve this answer





















            Your Answer






            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
            StackExchange.snippets.init();
            });
            });
            }, "code-snippets");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "1"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53398305%2fwhen-gbm-model-saved-and-loaded-doesnt-give-same-predicted-values-when-model-lo%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            0














            I found the answer. I have one categorical variable, say A, with many categories. In the train data, I have capped those categories based on another variable, say B, in the data frame. In scoring data frame that variable B is not present. Therefore, despite my scoring data goes through capping code, actual capping of categories doesn't happen. R doesn't throw any error if code is not executed. Therefore in scoring data I end up having more categories in categorical variable A than in train data on which model was trained. This was creating problem and I was getting different predicted values for those data points where categories were different, or not present, than in train data. Once I capped scoring data categorical variable as in train data my predicted values are coming same every time.






            share|improve this answer


























              0














              I found the answer. I have one categorical variable, say A, with many categories. In the train data, I have capped those categories based on another variable, say B, in the data frame. In scoring data frame that variable B is not present. Therefore, despite my scoring data goes through capping code, actual capping of categories doesn't happen. R doesn't throw any error if code is not executed. Therefore in scoring data I end up having more categories in categorical variable A than in train data on which model was trained. This was creating problem and I was getting different predicted values for those data points where categories were different, or not present, than in train data. Once I capped scoring data categorical variable as in train data my predicted values are coming same every time.






              share|improve this answer
























                0












                0








                0






                I found the answer. I have one categorical variable, say A, with many categories. In the train data, I have capped those categories based on another variable, say B, in the data frame. In scoring data frame that variable B is not present. Therefore, despite my scoring data goes through capping code, actual capping of categories doesn't happen. R doesn't throw any error if code is not executed. Therefore in scoring data I end up having more categories in categorical variable A than in train data on which model was trained. This was creating problem and I was getting different predicted values for those data points where categories were different, or not present, than in train data. Once I capped scoring data categorical variable as in train data my predicted values are coming same every time.






                share|improve this answer












                I found the answer. I have one categorical variable, say A, with many categories. In the train data, I have capped those categories based on another variable, say B, in the data frame. In scoring data frame that variable B is not present. Therefore, despite my scoring data goes through capping code, actual capping of categories doesn't happen. R doesn't throw any error if code is not executed. Therefore in scoring data I end up having more categories in categorical variable A than in train data on which model was trained. This was creating problem and I was getting different predicted values for those data points where categories were different, or not present, than in train data. Once I capped scoring data categorical variable as in train data my predicted values are coming same every time.







                share|improve this answer












                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer










                answered Nov 20 at 21:22









                Sanoj

                4042515




                4042515






























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





                    Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


                    Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53398305%2fwhen-gbm-model-saved-and-loaded-doesnt-give-same-predicted-values-when-model-lo%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Wiesbaden

                    Marschland

                    Dieringhausen