What is the probability of 3 heart and 2 distinct pairs in a hand of five cards?
$begingroup$
Given that the hand is drawn from a standard deck of 52 cards, what is the probability that it contains three hearts and two distinct pairs?
I know that there are ${52 choose 5}$ distinct hands of five, and that each pair will contain exactly one heart, with the third heart not being in a pair.
So far, my work is that there are:
${13 choose 3}$ ways to draw three hearts
${3 choose 2}$ ways to select which of the two hearts are part of the two pairs
${3choose2}$ ways to select the suit of the other card for each pair
And so the probability would be $frac{{13 choose 3}{3 choose 2}^3}{{52 choose 5}}$, about 0.003
I can't help but feel like I am leaving something out, though. Have I forgotten to include anything in the numerator?
probability poker
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Given that the hand is drawn from a standard deck of 52 cards, what is the probability that it contains three hearts and two distinct pairs?
I know that there are ${52 choose 5}$ distinct hands of five, and that each pair will contain exactly one heart, with the third heart not being in a pair.
So far, my work is that there are:
${13 choose 3}$ ways to draw three hearts
${3 choose 2}$ ways to select which of the two hearts are part of the two pairs
${3choose2}$ ways to select the suit of the other card for each pair
And so the probability would be $frac{{13 choose 3}{3 choose 2}^3}{{52 choose 5}}$, about 0.003
I can't help but feel like I am leaving something out, though. Have I forgotten to include anything in the numerator?
probability poker
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Does a "distinct pair" rule out three of a kind (full house-one pair and then three of another)?
$endgroup$
– fleablood
Dec 6 '18 at 19:00
$begingroup$
"${3 choose 2}$ ways to select the suit of the other card for each pair" That's not correct. You have ${3choose 1}$ way to choose one of the suits and ${3choose 1}$ way to chose the other.
$endgroup$
– fleablood
Dec 6 '18 at 19:15
$begingroup$
Hmm.... no I'm mistaken. Brain fart. YOu DID square it. Sorry.
$endgroup$
– fleablood
Dec 6 '18 at 19:25
$begingroup$
Well, it should be ${3choose 1}$ and not ${3 choose 2}$ for the other suit of each pair but as ${3choose 1} = {3choose 2}$ .....
$endgroup$
– fleablood
Dec 6 '18 at 19:27
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Given that the hand is drawn from a standard deck of 52 cards, what is the probability that it contains three hearts and two distinct pairs?
I know that there are ${52 choose 5}$ distinct hands of five, and that each pair will contain exactly one heart, with the third heart not being in a pair.
So far, my work is that there are:
${13 choose 3}$ ways to draw three hearts
${3 choose 2}$ ways to select which of the two hearts are part of the two pairs
${3choose2}$ ways to select the suit of the other card for each pair
And so the probability would be $frac{{13 choose 3}{3 choose 2}^3}{{52 choose 5}}$, about 0.003
I can't help but feel like I am leaving something out, though. Have I forgotten to include anything in the numerator?
probability poker
$endgroup$
Given that the hand is drawn from a standard deck of 52 cards, what is the probability that it contains three hearts and two distinct pairs?
I know that there are ${52 choose 5}$ distinct hands of five, and that each pair will contain exactly one heart, with the third heart not being in a pair.
So far, my work is that there are:
${13 choose 3}$ ways to draw three hearts
${3 choose 2}$ ways to select which of the two hearts are part of the two pairs
${3choose2}$ ways to select the suit of the other card for each pair
And so the probability would be $frac{{13 choose 3}{3 choose 2}^3}{{52 choose 5}}$, about 0.003
I can't help but feel like I am leaving something out, though. Have I forgotten to include anything in the numerator?
probability poker
probability poker
asked Dec 6 '18 at 18:53
sk13sk13
176
176
$begingroup$
Does a "distinct pair" rule out three of a kind (full house-one pair and then three of another)?
$endgroup$
– fleablood
Dec 6 '18 at 19:00
$begingroup$
"${3 choose 2}$ ways to select the suit of the other card for each pair" That's not correct. You have ${3choose 1}$ way to choose one of the suits and ${3choose 1}$ way to chose the other.
$endgroup$
– fleablood
Dec 6 '18 at 19:15
$begingroup$
Hmm.... no I'm mistaken. Brain fart. YOu DID square it. Sorry.
$endgroup$
– fleablood
Dec 6 '18 at 19:25
$begingroup$
Well, it should be ${3choose 1}$ and not ${3 choose 2}$ for the other suit of each pair but as ${3choose 1} = {3choose 2}$ .....
$endgroup$
– fleablood
Dec 6 '18 at 19:27
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Does a "distinct pair" rule out three of a kind (full house-one pair and then three of another)?
$endgroup$
– fleablood
Dec 6 '18 at 19:00
$begingroup$
"${3 choose 2}$ ways to select the suit of the other card for each pair" That's not correct. You have ${3choose 1}$ way to choose one of the suits and ${3choose 1}$ way to chose the other.
$endgroup$
– fleablood
Dec 6 '18 at 19:15
$begingroup$
Hmm.... no I'm mistaken. Brain fart. YOu DID square it. Sorry.
$endgroup$
– fleablood
Dec 6 '18 at 19:25
$begingroup$
Well, it should be ${3choose 1}$ and not ${3 choose 2}$ for the other suit of each pair but as ${3choose 1} = {3choose 2}$ .....
$endgroup$
– fleablood
Dec 6 '18 at 19:27
$begingroup$
Does a "distinct pair" rule out three of a kind (full house-one pair and then three of another)?
$endgroup$
– fleablood
Dec 6 '18 at 19:00
$begingroup$
Does a "distinct pair" rule out three of a kind (full house-one pair and then three of another)?
$endgroup$
– fleablood
Dec 6 '18 at 19:00
$begingroup$
"${3 choose 2}$ ways to select the suit of the other card for each pair" That's not correct. You have ${3choose 1}$ way to choose one of the suits and ${3choose 1}$ way to chose the other.
$endgroup$
– fleablood
Dec 6 '18 at 19:15
$begingroup$
"${3 choose 2}$ ways to select the suit of the other card for each pair" That's not correct. You have ${3choose 1}$ way to choose one of the suits and ${3choose 1}$ way to chose the other.
$endgroup$
– fleablood
Dec 6 '18 at 19:15
$begingroup$
Hmm.... no I'm mistaken. Brain fart. YOu DID square it. Sorry.
$endgroup$
– fleablood
Dec 6 '18 at 19:25
$begingroup$
Hmm.... no I'm mistaken. Brain fart. YOu DID square it. Sorry.
$endgroup$
– fleablood
Dec 6 '18 at 19:25
$begingroup$
Well, it should be ${3choose 1}$ and not ${3 choose 2}$ for the other suit of each pair but as ${3choose 1} = {3choose 2}$ .....
$endgroup$
– fleablood
Dec 6 '18 at 19:27
$begingroup$
Well, it should be ${3choose 1}$ and not ${3 choose 2}$ for the other suit of each pair but as ${3choose 1} = {3choose 2}$ .....
$endgroup$
– fleablood
Dec 6 '18 at 19:27
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
This becomes easy once you realize that a pair can't be both hearts. So at most each pair accounts for one heart and the fifth card must be the third. SO the only way you can have two pairs and three hearts is to have a pair with one of the cards a heart, another pair and one of the cards a heart, and the fifth card a heart.
There are there are ${13 choose 2}$ possible options the pairs can be. there are $11$ options the fifth card can be. For each pair there are $3$ options the second card in the pair can be.
So there are ${13choose 2}cdot 3cdot 3cdot 11=$
$frac {13cdot 12}2cdot 99 = 13cdot 6cdot 99 = 7722$ ways to do this.
So probality is $frac {frac {13!}{11!2!}9*11}{frac {52!}{47!5!}} =frac {7722}{2598960} approx 0.003$
Which is the same answer as yours as I did $ {13choose 2}cdot{{13-2} choose 1}=frac {13!}{11!2!}frac {11!}{10!1!}$ whereas you did ${13choose 3}{3choose 1}=frac {13!}{10!3!}frac {3!}{2!1!}$ which are clearly the same value. (there's probably a combinatorial argument why).
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3028893%2fwhat-is-the-probability-of-3-heart-and-2-distinct-pairs-in-a-hand-of-five-cards%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
This becomes easy once you realize that a pair can't be both hearts. So at most each pair accounts for one heart and the fifth card must be the third. SO the only way you can have two pairs and three hearts is to have a pair with one of the cards a heart, another pair and one of the cards a heart, and the fifth card a heart.
There are there are ${13 choose 2}$ possible options the pairs can be. there are $11$ options the fifth card can be. For each pair there are $3$ options the second card in the pair can be.
So there are ${13choose 2}cdot 3cdot 3cdot 11=$
$frac {13cdot 12}2cdot 99 = 13cdot 6cdot 99 = 7722$ ways to do this.
So probality is $frac {frac {13!}{11!2!}9*11}{frac {52!}{47!5!}} =frac {7722}{2598960} approx 0.003$
Which is the same answer as yours as I did $ {13choose 2}cdot{{13-2} choose 1}=frac {13!}{11!2!}frac {11!}{10!1!}$ whereas you did ${13choose 3}{3choose 1}=frac {13!}{10!3!}frac {3!}{2!1!}$ which are clearly the same value. (there's probably a combinatorial argument why).
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This becomes easy once you realize that a pair can't be both hearts. So at most each pair accounts for one heart and the fifth card must be the third. SO the only way you can have two pairs and three hearts is to have a pair with one of the cards a heart, another pair and one of the cards a heart, and the fifth card a heart.
There are there are ${13 choose 2}$ possible options the pairs can be. there are $11$ options the fifth card can be. For each pair there are $3$ options the second card in the pair can be.
So there are ${13choose 2}cdot 3cdot 3cdot 11=$
$frac {13cdot 12}2cdot 99 = 13cdot 6cdot 99 = 7722$ ways to do this.
So probality is $frac {frac {13!}{11!2!}9*11}{frac {52!}{47!5!}} =frac {7722}{2598960} approx 0.003$
Which is the same answer as yours as I did $ {13choose 2}cdot{{13-2} choose 1}=frac {13!}{11!2!}frac {11!}{10!1!}$ whereas you did ${13choose 3}{3choose 1}=frac {13!}{10!3!}frac {3!}{2!1!}$ which are clearly the same value. (there's probably a combinatorial argument why).
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This becomes easy once you realize that a pair can't be both hearts. So at most each pair accounts for one heart and the fifth card must be the third. SO the only way you can have two pairs and three hearts is to have a pair with one of the cards a heart, another pair and one of the cards a heart, and the fifth card a heart.
There are there are ${13 choose 2}$ possible options the pairs can be. there are $11$ options the fifth card can be. For each pair there are $3$ options the second card in the pair can be.
So there are ${13choose 2}cdot 3cdot 3cdot 11=$
$frac {13cdot 12}2cdot 99 = 13cdot 6cdot 99 = 7722$ ways to do this.
So probality is $frac {frac {13!}{11!2!}9*11}{frac {52!}{47!5!}} =frac {7722}{2598960} approx 0.003$
Which is the same answer as yours as I did $ {13choose 2}cdot{{13-2} choose 1}=frac {13!}{11!2!}frac {11!}{10!1!}$ whereas you did ${13choose 3}{3choose 1}=frac {13!}{10!3!}frac {3!}{2!1!}$ which are clearly the same value. (there's probably a combinatorial argument why).
$endgroup$
This becomes easy once you realize that a pair can't be both hearts. So at most each pair accounts for one heart and the fifth card must be the third. SO the only way you can have two pairs and three hearts is to have a pair with one of the cards a heart, another pair and one of the cards a heart, and the fifth card a heart.
There are there are ${13 choose 2}$ possible options the pairs can be. there are $11$ options the fifth card can be. For each pair there are $3$ options the second card in the pair can be.
So there are ${13choose 2}cdot 3cdot 3cdot 11=$
$frac {13cdot 12}2cdot 99 = 13cdot 6cdot 99 = 7722$ ways to do this.
So probality is $frac {frac {13!}{11!2!}9*11}{frac {52!}{47!5!}} =frac {7722}{2598960} approx 0.003$
Which is the same answer as yours as I did $ {13choose 2}cdot{{13-2} choose 1}=frac {13!}{11!2!}frac {11!}{10!1!}$ whereas you did ${13choose 3}{3choose 1}=frac {13!}{10!3!}frac {3!}{2!1!}$ which are clearly the same value. (there's probably a combinatorial argument why).
edited Dec 6 '18 at 19:33
answered Dec 6 '18 at 19:08
fleabloodfleablood
69k22685
69k22685
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3028893%2fwhat-is-the-probability-of-3-heart-and-2-distinct-pairs-in-a-hand-of-five-cards%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
Does a "distinct pair" rule out three of a kind (full house-one pair and then three of another)?
$endgroup$
– fleablood
Dec 6 '18 at 19:00
$begingroup$
"${3 choose 2}$ ways to select the suit of the other card for each pair" That's not correct. You have ${3choose 1}$ way to choose one of the suits and ${3choose 1}$ way to chose the other.
$endgroup$
– fleablood
Dec 6 '18 at 19:15
$begingroup$
Hmm.... no I'm mistaken. Brain fart. YOu DID square it. Sorry.
$endgroup$
– fleablood
Dec 6 '18 at 19:25
$begingroup$
Well, it should be ${3choose 1}$ and not ${3 choose 2}$ for the other suit of each pair but as ${3choose 1} = {3choose 2}$ .....
$endgroup$
– fleablood
Dec 6 '18 at 19:27