Constant trajectory in Hamiltonian system












0












$begingroup$



Let the (non-canonical) Hamiltonian system be given in the form
$$dot{x}=J(x)DH(x)$$
where $H(x)$ is the Hamiltonian function, $J(x)$ is the skew-symmetric symplectic matrix, and $DH$ denotes the vector of partial derivatives of $H$ (the gradient of $H$). Let $J(x)$ have a nonempty null space, and let a function $C(x)$ satisfy $J(x)DC(x) = 0$ for all $x$. Show that value of $C(x)$ is constant on any trajectory of the system regardless of the choice of $H$.




Here is my proposed solution. I use the fact that $J(x)$ is the skew-symmetric in the fourth equality $big(J(x)^{-1} = J(x)^T = -J(x)big)$. The fact that $J(x)DC(x) = 0$ is used in the fifth equality.



begin{equation}
begin{split}
Cdot{(x)} & = nabla{C}boldsymbol{cdot}{x} \
& = nabla{C}boldsymbol{cdot}J(x)DH(x) \
& = Big((J(x))^T(nabla{C})^TBig)^Tboldsymbol{cdot}DH(x) \
& = Big(-J(x)DC(x)Big)^Tboldsymbol{cdot}DH(x) \
& = 0boldsymbol{cdot}DH(x) \
& = 0
end{split}
end{equation}



Therefore, as $Cdot{(x)}=0$, this implies that $C(x)$ is constant along any trajectory.



I'm having trouble justifying the first equality and fourth equality. Is this the right approach to this problem? Is there an alternative approach that would lead to the right answer?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$

















    0












    $begingroup$



    Let the (non-canonical) Hamiltonian system be given in the form
    $$dot{x}=J(x)DH(x)$$
    where $H(x)$ is the Hamiltonian function, $J(x)$ is the skew-symmetric symplectic matrix, and $DH$ denotes the vector of partial derivatives of $H$ (the gradient of $H$). Let $J(x)$ have a nonempty null space, and let a function $C(x)$ satisfy $J(x)DC(x) = 0$ for all $x$. Show that value of $C(x)$ is constant on any trajectory of the system regardless of the choice of $H$.




    Here is my proposed solution. I use the fact that $J(x)$ is the skew-symmetric in the fourth equality $big(J(x)^{-1} = J(x)^T = -J(x)big)$. The fact that $J(x)DC(x) = 0$ is used in the fifth equality.



    begin{equation}
    begin{split}
    Cdot{(x)} & = nabla{C}boldsymbol{cdot}{x} \
    & = nabla{C}boldsymbol{cdot}J(x)DH(x) \
    & = Big((J(x))^T(nabla{C})^TBig)^Tboldsymbol{cdot}DH(x) \
    & = Big(-J(x)DC(x)Big)^Tboldsymbol{cdot}DH(x) \
    & = 0boldsymbol{cdot}DH(x) \
    & = 0
    end{split}
    end{equation}



    Therefore, as $Cdot{(x)}=0$, this implies that $C(x)$ is constant along any trajectory.



    I'm having trouble justifying the first equality and fourth equality. Is this the right approach to this problem? Is there an alternative approach that would lead to the right answer?










    share|cite|improve this question









    $endgroup$















      0












      0








      0





      $begingroup$



      Let the (non-canonical) Hamiltonian system be given in the form
      $$dot{x}=J(x)DH(x)$$
      where $H(x)$ is the Hamiltonian function, $J(x)$ is the skew-symmetric symplectic matrix, and $DH$ denotes the vector of partial derivatives of $H$ (the gradient of $H$). Let $J(x)$ have a nonempty null space, and let a function $C(x)$ satisfy $J(x)DC(x) = 0$ for all $x$. Show that value of $C(x)$ is constant on any trajectory of the system regardless of the choice of $H$.




      Here is my proposed solution. I use the fact that $J(x)$ is the skew-symmetric in the fourth equality $big(J(x)^{-1} = J(x)^T = -J(x)big)$. The fact that $J(x)DC(x) = 0$ is used in the fifth equality.



      begin{equation}
      begin{split}
      Cdot{(x)} & = nabla{C}boldsymbol{cdot}{x} \
      & = nabla{C}boldsymbol{cdot}J(x)DH(x) \
      & = Big((J(x))^T(nabla{C})^TBig)^Tboldsymbol{cdot}DH(x) \
      & = Big(-J(x)DC(x)Big)^Tboldsymbol{cdot}DH(x) \
      & = 0boldsymbol{cdot}DH(x) \
      & = 0
      end{split}
      end{equation}



      Therefore, as $Cdot{(x)}=0$, this implies that $C(x)$ is constant along any trajectory.



      I'm having trouble justifying the first equality and fourth equality. Is this the right approach to this problem? Is there an alternative approach that would lead to the right answer?










      share|cite|improve this question









      $endgroup$





      Let the (non-canonical) Hamiltonian system be given in the form
      $$dot{x}=J(x)DH(x)$$
      where $H(x)$ is the Hamiltonian function, $J(x)$ is the skew-symmetric symplectic matrix, and $DH$ denotes the vector of partial derivatives of $H$ (the gradient of $H$). Let $J(x)$ have a nonempty null space, and let a function $C(x)$ satisfy $J(x)DC(x) = 0$ for all $x$. Show that value of $C(x)$ is constant on any trajectory of the system regardless of the choice of $H$.




      Here is my proposed solution. I use the fact that $J(x)$ is the skew-symmetric in the fourth equality $big(J(x)^{-1} = J(x)^T = -J(x)big)$. The fact that $J(x)DC(x) = 0$ is used in the fifth equality.



      begin{equation}
      begin{split}
      Cdot{(x)} & = nabla{C}boldsymbol{cdot}{x} \
      & = nabla{C}boldsymbol{cdot}J(x)DH(x) \
      & = Big((J(x))^T(nabla{C})^TBig)^Tboldsymbol{cdot}DH(x) \
      & = Big(-J(x)DC(x)Big)^Tboldsymbol{cdot}DH(x) \
      & = 0boldsymbol{cdot}DH(x) \
      & = 0
      end{split}
      end{equation}



      Therefore, as $Cdot{(x)}=0$, this implies that $C(x)$ is constant along any trajectory.



      I'm having trouble justifying the first equality and fourth equality. Is this the right approach to this problem? Is there an alternative approach that would lead to the right answer?







      proof-verification hamilton-equations






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Dec 19 '18 at 16:01









      Axion004Axion004

      374313




      374313






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          1












          $begingroup$

          I think you are thinking on the right line. I have the following solution.



          Write, along the solution trajectories of the system



          $begin{align*}
          frac{d}{dt} H(x(t)) &= frac{partial H}{partial x} dot{x} \
          &= (DH(x))^T J(x) DH(x)\
          &= DH(x)^T (-J(x))^T DH(x)\
          text{Adding the two equations,}\
          2 frac{d}{dt} H(x(t)) &= 0\
          Rightarrow frac{d}{dt} H(x(t)) &= 0
          end{align*}$



          Hence, you can write $H(x(t)) = c$, for a constant $c$. So, $H(x)$ is constant along the trajectory of the system.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            });
            });
            }, "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3046545%2fconstant-trajectory-in-hamiltonian-system%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            1












            $begingroup$

            I think you are thinking on the right line. I have the following solution.



            Write, along the solution trajectories of the system



            $begin{align*}
            frac{d}{dt} H(x(t)) &= frac{partial H}{partial x} dot{x} \
            &= (DH(x))^T J(x) DH(x)\
            &= DH(x)^T (-J(x))^T DH(x)\
            text{Adding the two equations,}\
            2 frac{d}{dt} H(x(t)) &= 0\
            Rightarrow frac{d}{dt} H(x(t)) &= 0
            end{align*}$



            Hence, you can write $H(x(t)) = c$, for a constant $c$. So, $H(x)$ is constant along the trajectory of the system.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$


















              1












              $begingroup$

              I think you are thinking on the right line. I have the following solution.



              Write, along the solution trajectories of the system



              $begin{align*}
              frac{d}{dt} H(x(t)) &= frac{partial H}{partial x} dot{x} \
              &= (DH(x))^T J(x) DH(x)\
              &= DH(x)^T (-J(x))^T DH(x)\
              text{Adding the two equations,}\
              2 frac{d}{dt} H(x(t)) &= 0\
              Rightarrow frac{d}{dt} H(x(t)) &= 0
              end{align*}$



              Hence, you can write $H(x(t)) = c$, for a constant $c$. So, $H(x)$ is constant along the trajectory of the system.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$
















                1












                1








                1





                $begingroup$

                I think you are thinking on the right line. I have the following solution.



                Write, along the solution trajectories of the system



                $begin{align*}
                frac{d}{dt} H(x(t)) &= frac{partial H}{partial x} dot{x} \
                &= (DH(x))^T J(x) DH(x)\
                &= DH(x)^T (-J(x))^T DH(x)\
                text{Adding the two equations,}\
                2 frac{d}{dt} H(x(t)) &= 0\
                Rightarrow frac{d}{dt} H(x(t)) &= 0
                end{align*}$



                Hence, you can write $H(x(t)) = c$, for a constant $c$. So, $H(x)$ is constant along the trajectory of the system.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$



                I think you are thinking on the right line. I have the following solution.



                Write, along the solution trajectories of the system



                $begin{align*}
                frac{d}{dt} H(x(t)) &= frac{partial H}{partial x} dot{x} \
                &= (DH(x))^T J(x) DH(x)\
                &= DH(x)^T (-J(x))^T DH(x)\
                text{Adding the two equations,}\
                2 frac{d}{dt} H(x(t)) &= 0\
                Rightarrow frac{d}{dt} H(x(t)) &= 0
                end{align*}$



                Hence, you can write $H(x(t)) = c$, for a constant $c$. So, $H(x)$ is constant along the trajectory of the system.







                share|cite|improve this answer












                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer










                answered Feb 14 at 4:07









                wootmanwootman

                246




                246






























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3046545%2fconstant-trajectory-in-hamiltonian-system%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Wiesbaden

                    Marschland

                    Dieringhausen