Factoring $3^6-3^3 +1$












1












$begingroup$


$3^6-3^3 +1$ factors?, 37 and 19, but how to do it using factoring, $3^3(3^3-1)+1$, can't somehow put the 1 inside










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$

















    1












    $begingroup$


    $3^6-3^3 +1$ factors?, 37 and 19, but how to do it using factoring, $3^3(3^3-1)+1$, can't somehow put the 1 inside










    share|cite|improve this question









    $endgroup$















      1












      1








      1


      1



      $begingroup$


      $3^6-3^3 +1$ factors?, 37 and 19, but how to do it using factoring, $3^3(3^3-1)+1$, can't somehow put the 1 inside










      share|cite|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      $3^6-3^3 +1$ factors?, 37 and 19, but how to do it using factoring, $3^3(3^3-1)+1$, can't somehow put the 1 inside







      factoring






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Dec 27 '18 at 14:30









      SuperMage1SuperMage1

      912211




      912211






















          4 Answers
          4






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          9












          $begingroup$

          Viewing this as a quadratic in $3^3$ leads you to try to factorise $x^2-x+1$ or $x^6-x^3+1$, neither of which splits into anything useful. However, you can pull out a factor of $9$ from $3^6$ and a factor of $3$ from $3^2$ to obtain
          $$3^6-3^3+1 = 9 cdot 3^4 - 3 cdot 3^2 + 1$$
          And the quartic $9x^4-3x^2+1$ does factorise into two quadratic factors:
          $$9x^4-3x^2+1 = (3x^2+3x+1)(3x^2-3x+1)$$
          Now set $x=3$ and voilà!






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            This is a special case of completing a square leads to a difference of squares - see my answer.
            $endgroup$
            – Bill Dubuque
            Dec 27 '18 at 16:43





















          2












          $begingroup$

          It's a special case of: completing the square leads to a difference of squares, i.e.



          $$begin{eqnarray}overbrace{3^{large 6}+1}^{rm incomplete}-,3^{large 3}&= &!!!! overbrace{(3^{large 3}+1)^{large 2}}^{rm!!! complete the square!!!}!!!!-color{#c00}{3,3^{large 3}} text{so, factoring this} ittext{ difference of squares}\[.3em]
          &!!!=&! (underbrace{3^{large 3}+1, -, color{#c00}{3^{large 2}}}_{Large 19}) (underbrace{3^{large 3}+1 +,color{#c00}{3^2}}_{Large 37})\
          end{eqnarray}$$



          Generally $ a^{large 6} + b, a^{large 3} + c^{large 2},$ factors if $ color{#c00}{ b= 2c!-!ad^{large 2}}$ for some $d,$ (above is $,a,b,c,d = 3,-1,1,1)$



          $$qquad begin{eqnarray}overbrace{a^{large 6}+c^{large 2}}^{rm incomplete}!+b,a^{large 3}&= &!!!! overbrace{(a^{large 3}+c)^{large 2}}^{rm!!! complete the square!!!}!!!!+color{#c00}{overbrace{(b-2c)}^{!!large -d^{Large 2}a},a^{large 3}} text{so, factoring this} ittext{ difference of squares}\[.3em]
          &!!!=&! ({a^{large 3}+c, -, color{#c00}{da^{large 2}}}) ({a^{large 3}+c +,color{#c00}{da^{large 2}}})\
          end{eqnarray}$$





          Remark $ $ Below is another well-known example



          $$begin{eqnarray} n^4+4k^4 &,=,& overbrace{(n^2!+2k^2)^2}^{rm!!! complete the square!!!}!!!-!(color{#c00}{2nk})^2 text{so, factoring this} ittext{ difference of squares}\
          &,=,& (n^2!+2k^2 -, color{#c00}{2nk}),(n^2!+2k^2+,color{#c00}{2nk})\
          &,=,&(underbrace{(n-k)^2}_{rm!!!!!!!!!!! complete the square!!!!!!!!} + ,k^2) underbrace{((n+k)^2}_{rm!!!!!!!!!!! complete the square!!!!!!!!!!!!!!} +,k^2)\ end{eqnarray}$$






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













          • $begingroup$
            @Downvoter If something is not clear then please feel welcome to ask questions and I will be happy to elaborate.
            $endgroup$
            – Bill Dubuque
            Dec 28 '18 at 17:53



















          1












          $begingroup$

          $x^2-x+1$ factorises as $(x-omega)(x+omega^2)$ where $omega^3=-1$.



          Here $x=27$ and working modulo $27$ the cubes are $1,8,0,10,17,0,19,26, 0, 1, 8 dots$ so $8^3equiv -1$, and we can take $omega = 8, omega^2=64equiv 10$ and obtain the factorisation $$(27-8)(27+10)=19times 37$$



          Since we have a cube root involved and the modulus is a power of $3$ there are some curiosities about the factorisation, but it checks out all the same.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$





















            0












            $begingroup$

            Numbers having the form $n^2-n+1$ can never have prime factors congruent to $2$ modulo $3$. Since $3$ is obviously out and any factorization must include a prime factor less than or equal to the square root if the number is composite, only factors $7,13,19$ need further investigation. The factorization $19×37$ is tgen fairly easy to find.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$













              Your Answer





              StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
              return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
              StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
              StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
              });
              });
              }, "mathjax-editing");

              StackExchange.ready(function() {
              var channelOptions = {
              tags: "".split(" "),
              id: "69"
              };
              initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

              StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
              // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
              if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
              StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
              createEditor();
              });
              }
              else {
              createEditor();
              }
              });

              function createEditor() {
              StackExchange.prepareEditor({
              heartbeatType: 'answer',
              autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
              convertImagesToLinks: true,
              noModals: true,
              showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
              reputationToPostImages: 10,
              bindNavPrevention: true,
              postfix: "",
              imageUploader: {
              brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
              contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
              allowUrls: true
              },
              noCode: true, onDemand: true,
              discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
              ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
              });


              }
              });














              draft saved

              draft discarded


















              StackExchange.ready(
              function () {
              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3053975%2ffactoring-36-33-1%23new-answer', 'question_page');
              }
              );

              Post as a guest















              Required, but never shown

























              4 Answers
              4






              active

              oldest

              votes








              4 Answers
              4






              active

              oldest

              votes









              active

              oldest

              votes






              active

              oldest

              votes









              9












              $begingroup$

              Viewing this as a quadratic in $3^3$ leads you to try to factorise $x^2-x+1$ or $x^6-x^3+1$, neither of which splits into anything useful. However, you can pull out a factor of $9$ from $3^6$ and a factor of $3$ from $3^2$ to obtain
              $$3^6-3^3+1 = 9 cdot 3^4 - 3 cdot 3^2 + 1$$
              And the quartic $9x^4-3x^2+1$ does factorise into two quadratic factors:
              $$9x^4-3x^2+1 = (3x^2+3x+1)(3x^2-3x+1)$$
              Now set $x=3$ and voilà!






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$













              • $begingroup$
                This is a special case of completing a square leads to a difference of squares - see my answer.
                $endgroup$
                – Bill Dubuque
                Dec 27 '18 at 16:43


















              9












              $begingroup$

              Viewing this as a quadratic in $3^3$ leads you to try to factorise $x^2-x+1$ or $x^6-x^3+1$, neither of which splits into anything useful. However, you can pull out a factor of $9$ from $3^6$ and a factor of $3$ from $3^2$ to obtain
              $$3^6-3^3+1 = 9 cdot 3^4 - 3 cdot 3^2 + 1$$
              And the quartic $9x^4-3x^2+1$ does factorise into two quadratic factors:
              $$9x^4-3x^2+1 = (3x^2+3x+1)(3x^2-3x+1)$$
              Now set $x=3$ and voilà!






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$













              • $begingroup$
                This is a special case of completing a square leads to a difference of squares - see my answer.
                $endgroup$
                – Bill Dubuque
                Dec 27 '18 at 16:43
















              9












              9








              9





              $begingroup$

              Viewing this as a quadratic in $3^3$ leads you to try to factorise $x^2-x+1$ or $x^6-x^3+1$, neither of which splits into anything useful. However, you can pull out a factor of $9$ from $3^6$ and a factor of $3$ from $3^2$ to obtain
              $$3^6-3^3+1 = 9 cdot 3^4 - 3 cdot 3^2 + 1$$
              And the quartic $9x^4-3x^2+1$ does factorise into two quadratic factors:
              $$9x^4-3x^2+1 = (3x^2+3x+1)(3x^2-3x+1)$$
              Now set $x=3$ and voilà!






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$



              Viewing this as a quadratic in $3^3$ leads you to try to factorise $x^2-x+1$ or $x^6-x^3+1$, neither of which splits into anything useful. However, you can pull out a factor of $9$ from $3^6$ and a factor of $3$ from $3^2$ to obtain
              $$3^6-3^3+1 = 9 cdot 3^4 - 3 cdot 3^2 + 1$$
              And the quartic $9x^4-3x^2+1$ does factorise into two quadratic factors:
              $$9x^4-3x^2+1 = (3x^2+3x+1)(3x^2-3x+1)$$
              Now set $x=3$ and voilà!







              share|cite|improve this answer












              share|cite|improve this answer



              share|cite|improve this answer










              answered Dec 27 '18 at 14:44









              Clive NewsteadClive Newstead

              51.9k474136




              51.9k474136












              • $begingroup$
                This is a special case of completing a square leads to a difference of squares - see my answer.
                $endgroup$
                – Bill Dubuque
                Dec 27 '18 at 16:43




















              • $begingroup$
                This is a special case of completing a square leads to a difference of squares - see my answer.
                $endgroup$
                – Bill Dubuque
                Dec 27 '18 at 16:43


















              $begingroup$
              This is a special case of completing a square leads to a difference of squares - see my answer.
              $endgroup$
              – Bill Dubuque
              Dec 27 '18 at 16:43






              $begingroup$
              This is a special case of completing a square leads to a difference of squares - see my answer.
              $endgroup$
              – Bill Dubuque
              Dec 27 '18 at 16:43













              2












              $begingroup$

              It's a special case of: completing the square leads to a difference of squares, i.e.



              $$begin{eqnarray}overbrace{3^{large 6}+1}^{rm incomplete}-,3^{large 3}&= &!!!! overbrace{(3^{large 3}+1)^{large 2}}^{rm!!! complete the square!!!}!!!!-color{#c00}{3,3^{large 3}} text{so, factoring this} ittext{ difference of squares}\[.3em]
              &!!!=&! (underbrace{3^{large 3}+1, -, color{#c00}{3^{large 2}}}_{Large 19}) (underbrace{3^{large 3}+1 +,color{#c00}{3^2}}_{Large 37})\
              end{eqnarray}$$



              Generally $ a^{large 6} + b, a^{large 3} + c^{large 2},$ factors if $ color{#c00}{ b= 2c!-!ad^{large 2}}$ for some $d,$ (above is $,a,b,c,d = 3,-1,1,1)$



              $$qquad begin{eqnarray}overbrace{a^{large 6}+c^{large 2}}^{rm incomplete}!+b,a^{large 3}&= &!!!! overbrace{(a^{large 3}+c)^{large 2}}^{rm!!! complete the square!!!}!!!!+color{#c00}{overbrace{(b-2c)}^{!!large -d^{Large 2}a},a^{large 3}} text{so, factoring this} ittext{ difference of squares}\[.3em]
              &!!!=&! ({a^{large 3}+c, -, color{#c00}{da^{large 2}}}) ({a^{large 3}+c +,color{#c00}{da^{large 2}}})\
              end{eqnarray}$$





              Remark $ $ Below is another well-known example



              $$begin{eqnarray} n^4+4k^4 &,=,& overbrace{(n^2!+2k^2)^2}^{rm!!! complete the square!!!}!!!-!(color{#c00}{2nk})^2 text{so, factoring this} ittext{ difference of squares}\
              &,=,& (n^2!+2k^2 -, color{#c00}{2nk}),(n^2!+2k^2+,color{#c00}{2nk})\
              &,=,&(underbrace{(n-k)^2}_{rm!!!!!!!!!!! complete the square!!!!!!!!} + ,k^2) underbrace{((n+k)^2}_{rm!!!!!!!!!!! complete the square!!!!!!!!!!!!!!} +,k^2)\ end{eqnarray}$$






              share|cite|improve this answer











              $endgroup$













              • $begingroup$
                @Downvoter If something is not clear then please feel welcome to ask questions and I will be happy to elaborate.
                $endgroup$
                – Bill Dubuque
                Dec 28 '18 at 17:53
















              2












              $begingroup$

              It's a special case of: completing the square leads to a difference of squares, i.e.



              $$begin{eqnarray}overbrace{3^{large 6}+1}^{rm incomplete}-,3^{large 3}&= &!!!! overbrace{(3^{large 3}+1)^{large 2}}^{rm!!! complete the square!!!}!!!!-color{#c00}{3,3^{large 3}} text{so, factoring this} ittext{ difference of squares}\[.3em]
              &!!!=&! (underbrace{3^{large 3}+1, -, color{#c00}{3^{large 2}}}_{Large 19}) (underbrace{3^{large 3}+1 +,color{#c00}{3^2}}_{Large 37})\
              end{eqnarray}$$



              Generally $ a^{large 6} + b, a^{large 3} + c^{large 2},$ factors if $ color{#c00}{ b= 2c!-!ad^{large 2}}$ for some $d,$ (above is $,a,b,c,d = 3,-1,1,1)$



              $$qquad begin{eqnarray}overbrace{a^{large 6}+c^{large 2}}^{rm incomplete}!+b,a^{large 3}&= &!!!! overbrace{(a^{large 3}+c)^{large 2}}^{rm!!! complete the square!!!}!!!!+color{#c00}{overbrace{(b-2c)}^{!!large -d^{Large 2}a},a^{large 3}} text{so, factoring this} ittext{ difference of squares}\[.3em]
              &!!!=&! ({a^{large 3}+c, -, color{#c00}{da^{large 2}}}) ({a^{large 3}+c +,color{#c00}{da^{large 2}}})\
              end{eqnarray}$$





              Remark $ $ Below is another well-known example



              $$begin{eqnarray} n^4+4k^4 &,=,& overbrace{(n^2!+2k^2)^2}^{rm!!! complete the square!!!}!!!-!(color{#c00}{2nk})^2 text{so, factoring this} ittext{ difference of squares}\
              &,=,& (n^2!+2k^2 -, color{#c00}{2nk}),(n^2!+2k^2+,color{#c00}{2nk})\
              &,=,&(underbrace{(n-k)^2}_{rm!!!!!!!!!!! complete the square!!!!!!!!} + ,k^2) underbrace{((n+k)^2}_{rm!!!!!!!!!!! complete the square!!!!!!!!!!!!!!} +,k^2)\ end{eqnarray}$$






              share|cite|improve this answer











              $endgroup$













              • $begingroup$
                @Downvoter If something is not clear then please feel welcome to ask questions and I will be happy to elaborate.
                $endgroup$
                – Bill Dubuque
                Dec 28 '18 at 17:53














              2












              2








              2





              $begingroup$

              It's a special case of: completing the square leads to a difference of squares, i.e.



              $$begin{eqnarray}overbrace{3^{large 6}+1}^{rm incomplete}-,3^{large 3}&= &!!!! overbrace{(3^{large 3}+1)^{large 2}}^{rm!!! complete the square!!!}!!!!-color{#c00}{3,3^{large 3}} text{so, factoring this} ittext{ difference of squares}\[.3em]
              &!!!=&! (underbrace{3^{large 3}+1, -, color{#c00}{3^{large 2}}}_{Large 19}) (underbrace{3^{large 3}+1 +,color{#c00}{3^2}}_{Large 37})\
              end{eqnarray}$$



              Generally $ a^{large 6} + b, a^{large 3} + c^{large 2},$ factors if $ color{#c00}{ b= 2c!-!ad^{large 2}}$ for some $d,$ (above is $,a,b,c,d = 3,-1,1,1)$



              $$qquad begin{eqnarray}overbrace{a^{large 6}+c^{large 2}}^{rm incomplete}!+b,a^{large 3}&= &!!!! overbrace{(a^{large 3}+c)^{large 2}}^{rm!!! complete the square!!!}!!!!+color{#c00}{overbrace{(b-2c)}^{!!large -d^{Large 2}a},a^{large 3}} text{so, factoring this} ittext{ difference of squares}\[.3em]
              &!!!=&! ({a^{large 3}+c, -, color{#c00}{da^{large 2}}}) ({a^{large 3}+c +,color{#c00}{da^{large 2}}})\
              end{eqnarray}$$





              Remark $ $ Below is another well-known example



              $$begin{eqnarray} n^4+4k^4 &,=,& overbrace{(n^2!+2k^2)^2}^{rm!!! complete the square!!!}!!!-!(color{#c00}{2nk})^2 text{so, factoring this} ittext{ difference of squares}\
              &,=,& (n^2!+2k^2 -, color{#c00}{2nk}),(n^2!+2k^2+,color{#c00}{2nk})\
              &,=,&(underbrace{(n-k)^2}_{rm!!!!!!!!!!! complete the square!!!!!!!!} + ,k^2) underbrace{((n+k)^2}_{rm!!!!!!!!!!! complete the square!!!!!!!!!!!!!!} +,k^2)\ end{eqnarray}$$






              share|cite|improve this answer











              $endgroup$



              It's a special case of: completing the square leads to a difference of squares, i.e.



              $$begin{eqnarray}overbrace{3^{large 6}+1}^{rm incomplete}-,3^{large 3}&= &!!!! overbrace{(3^{large 3}+1)^{large 2}}^{rm!!! complete the square!!!}!!!!-color{#c00}{3,3^{large 3}} text{so, factoring this} ittext{ difference of squares}\[.3em]
              &!!!=&! (underbrace{3^{large 3}+1, -, color{#c00}{3^{large 2}}}_{Large 19}) (underbrace{3^{large 3}+1 +,color{#c00}{3^2}}_{Large 37})\
              end{eqnarray}$$



              Generally $ a^{large 6} + b, a^{large 3} + c^{large 2},$ factors if $ color{#c00}{ b= 2c!-!ad^{large 2}}$ for some $d,$ (above is $,a,b,c,d = 3,-1,1,1)$



              $$qquad begin{eqnarray}overbrace{a^{large 6}+c^{large 2}}^{rm incomplete}!+b,a^{large 3}&= &!!!! overbrace{(a^{large 3}+c)^{large 2}}^{rm!!! complete the square!!!}!!!!+color{#c00}{overbrace{(b-2c)}^{!!large -d^{Large 2}a},a^{large 3}} text{so, factoring this} ittext{ difference of squares}\[.3em]
              &!!!=&! ({a^{large 3}+c, -, color{#c00}{da^{large 2}}}) ({a^{large 3}+c +,color{#c00}{da^{large 2}}})\
              end{eqnarray}$$





              Remark $ $ Below is another well-known example



              $$begin{eqnarray} n^4+4k^4 &,=,& overbrace{(n^2!+2k^2)^2}^{rm!!! complete the square!!!}!!!-!(color{#c00}{2nk})^2 text{so, factoring this} ittext{ difference of squares}\
              &,=,& (n^2!+2k^2 -, color{#c00}{2nk}),(n^2!+2k^2+,color{#c00}{2nk})\
              &,=,&(underbrace{(n-k)^2}_{rm!!!!!!!!!!! complete the square!!!!!!!!} + ,k^2) underbrace{((n+k)^2}_{rm!!!!!!!!!!! complete the square!!!!!!!!!!!!!!} +,k^2)\ end{eqnarray}$$







              share|cite|improve this answer














              share|cite|improve this answer



              share|cite|improve this answer








              edited Dec 28 '18 at 17:53

























              answered Dec 27 '18 at 16:41









              Bill DubuqueBill Dubuque

              212k29195653




              212k29195653












              • $begingroup$
                @Downvoter If something is not clear then please feel welcome to ask questions and I will be happy to elaborate.
                $endgroup$
                – Bill Dubuque
                Dec 28 '18 at 17:53


















              • $begingroup$
                @Downvoter If something is not clear then please feel welcome to ask questions and I will be happy to elaborate.
                $endgroup$
                – Bill Dubuque
                Dec 28 '18 at 17:53
















              $begingroup$
              @Downvoter If something is not clear then please feel welcome to ask questions and I will be happy to elaborate.
              $endgroup$
              – Bill Dubuque
              Dec 28 '18 at 17:53




              $begingroup$
              @Downvoter If something is not clear then please feel welcome to ask questions and I will be happy to elaborate.
              $endgroup$
              – Bill Dubuque
              Dec 28 '18 at 17:53











              1












              $begingroup$

              $x^2-x+1$ factorises as $(x-omega)(x+omega^2)$ where $omega^3=-1$.



              Here $x=27$ and working modulo $27$ the cubes are $1,8,0,10,17,0,19,26, 0, 1, 8 dots$ so $8^3equiv -1$, and we can take $omega = 8, omega^2=64equiv 10$ and obtain the factorisation $$(27-8)(27+10)=19times 37$$



              Since we have a cube root involved and the modulus is a power of $3$ there are some curiosities about the factorisation, but it checks out all the same.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$


















                1












                $begingroup$

                $x^2-x+1$ factorises as $(x-omega)(x+omega^2)$ where $omega^3=-1$.



                Here $x=27$ and working modulo $27$ the cubes are $1,8,0,10,17,0,19,26, 0, 1, 8 dots$ so $8^3equiv -1$, and we can take $omega = 8, omega^2=64equiv 10$ and obtain the factorisation $$(27-8)(27+10)=19times 37$$



                Since we have a cube root involved and the modulus is a power of $3$ there are some curiosities about the factorisation, but it checks out all the same.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$
















                  1












                  1








                  1





                  $begingroup$

                  $x^2-x+1$ factorises as $(x-omega)(x+omega^2)$ where $omega^3=-1$.



                  Here $x=27$ and working modulo $27$ the cubes are $1,8,0,10,17,0,19,26, 0, 1, 8 dots$ so $8^3equiv -1$, and we can take $omega = 8, omega^2=64equiv 10$ and obtain the factorisation $$(27-8)(27+10)=19times 37$$



                  Since we have a cube root involved and the modulus is a power of $3$ there are some curiosities about the factorisation, but it checks out all the same.






                  share|cite|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$



                  $x^2-x+1$ factorises as $(x-omega)(x+omega^2)$ where $omega^3=-1$.



                  Here $x=27$ and working modulo $27$ the cubes are $1,8,0,10,17,0,19,26, 0, 1, 8 dots$ so $8^3equiv -1$, and we can take $omega = 8, omega^2=64equiv 10$ and obtain the factorisation $$(27-8)(27+10)=19times 37$$



                  Since we have a cube root involved and the modulus is a power of $3$ there are some curiosities about the factorisation, but it checks out all the same.







                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer










                  answered Dec 27 '18 at 15:17









                  Mark BennetMark Bennet

                  81.6k984181




                  81.6k984181























                      0












                      $begingroup$

                      Numbers having the form $n^2-n+1$ can never have prime factors congruent to $2$ modulo $3$. Since $3$ is obviously out and any factorization must include a prime factor less than or equal to the square root if the number is composite, only factors $7,13,19$ need further investigation. The factorization $19×37$ is tgen fairly easy to find.






                      share|cite|improve this answer









                      $endgroup$


















                        0












                        $begingroup$

                        Numbers having the form $n^2-n+1$ can never have prime factors congruent to $2$ modulo $3$. Since $3$ is obviously out and any factorization must include a prime factor less than or equal to the square root if the number is composite, only factors $7,13,19$ need further investigation. The factorization $19×37$ is tgen fairly easy to find.






                        share|cite|improve this answer









                        $endgroup$
















                          0












                          0








                          0





                          $begingroup$

                          Numbers having the form $n^2-n+1$ can never have prime factors congruent to $2$ modulo $3$. Since $3$ is obviously out and any factorization must include a prime factor less than or equal to the square root if the number is composite, only factors $7,13,19$ need further investigation. The factorization $19×37$ is tgen fairly easy to find.






                          share|cite|improve this answer









                          $endgroup$



                          Numbers having the form $n^2-n+1$ can never have prime factors congruent to $2$ modulo $3$. Since $3$ is obviously out and any factorization must include a prime factor less than or equal to the square root if the number is composite, only factors $7,13,19$ need further investigation. The factorization $19×37$ is tgen fairly easy to find.







                          share|cite|improve this answer












                          share|cite|improve this answer



                          share|cite|improve this answer










                          answered Dec 27 '18 at 15:24









                          Oscar LanziOscar Lanzi

                          13.2k12136




                          13.2k12136






























                              draft saved

                              draft discarded




















































                              Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                              • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                              But avoid



                              • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                              • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                              Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                              To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                              draft saved


                              draft discarded














                              StackExchange.ready(
                              function () {
                              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3053975%2ffactoring-36-33-1%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                              }
                              );

                              Post as a guest















                              Required, but never shown





















































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown

































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown







                              Popular posts from this blog

                              Wiesbaden

                              Marschland

                              Dieringhausen