Proving the Identity Theorem for polynomials [duplicate]












-1












$begingroup$



This question already has an answer here:




  • Show that if $ R $ is an integral domain then a polynomial in $ R[X] $ of degree $ d $ can have at most $ d $ roots

    2 answers




Bob tells me that the Identity Theorem is the three following statements




  1. If a polynomial has infinitely many roots, then it is equal to $0$.


  2. If two polynomials satisfy $P(x)=Q(x)$ for infinitely many $x$, then the two polynomials are equal.


  3. If two polynomials of at most degree $n$ satisfy $P(x)=Q(x)$ for $n+1$ values of $x$, then the two polynomials are equal.



I do not know how to prove these; I think the Factor, Remainder, and Division Theorems will be useful.



I tried using Fundamental Theorem of Algebra, but it did not get me anywhere.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$



marked as duplicate by Bill Dubuque number-theory
Users with the  number-theory badge can single-handedly close number-theory questions as duplicates and reopen them as needed.

StackExchange.ready(function() {
if (StackExchange.options.isMobile) return;

$('.dupe-hammer-message-hover:not(.hover-bound)').each(function() {
var $hover = $(this).addClass('hover-bound'),
$msg = $hover.siblings('.dupe-hammer-message');

$hover.hover(
function() {
$hover.showInfoMessage('', {
messageElement: $msg.clone().show(),
transient: false,
position: { my: 'bottom left', at: 'top center', offsetTop: -7 },
dismissable: false,
relativeToBody: true
});
},
function() {
StackExchange.helpers.removeMessages();
}
);
});
});
Dec 27 '18 at 15:31


This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.














  • 4




    $begingroup$
    Who is Bob and why his statements should be of interest?
    $endgroup$
    – user
    Dec 27 '18 at 13:10










  • $begingroup$
    Use number $3$ to prove the second one... Then use the second one to prove the first. Then all that remains is proving the third one. Alternatively, prove these in the reverse order
    $endgroup$
    – abiessu
    Dec 27 '18 at 13:13








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    what have you tried with the Fundamental Theorem of Algebra? What does it tell you about a non-constant polynomial?
    $endgroup$
    – Jonas Lenz
    Dec 27 '18 at 13:14










  • $begingroup$
    @user Probably, "Bob" refers to mathdoctorbob.org
    $endgroup$
    – lisyarus
    Dec 27 '18 at 13:16






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Note that it matters that the polynomials have coefficients over a field (or a domain). So real or rational or integer coefficients will do. But without this condition we have modulo $8$ the polynomial $x^2-1$ has four roots $1,3,5,7$ and factorisations $(x-1)(x-7)equiv (x-3)(x-5) equiv x^2-1$, so factorisation is not unique.
    $endgroup$
    – Mark Bennet
    Dec 27 '18 at 13:24
















-1












$begingroup$



This question already has an answer here:




  • Show that if $ R $ is an integral domain then a polynomial in $ R[X] $ of degree $ d $ can have at most $ d $ roots

    2 answers




Bob tells me that the Identity Theorem is the three following statements




  1. If a polynomial has infinitely many roots, then it is equal to $0$.


  2. If two polynomials satisfy $P(x)=Q(x)$ for infinitely many $x$, then the two polynomials are equal.


  3. If two polynomials of at most degree $n$ satisfy $P(x)=Q(x)$ for $n+1$ values of $x$, then the two polynomials are equal.



I do not know how to prove these; I think the Factor, Remainder, and Division Theorems will be useful.



I tried using Fundamental Theorem of Algebra, but it did not get me anywhere.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$



marked as duplicate by Bill Dubuque number-theory
Users with the  number-theory badge can single-handedly close number-theory questions as duplicates and reopen them as needed.

StackExchange.ready(function() {
if (StackExchange.options.isMobile) return;

$('.dupe-hammer-message-hover:not(.hover-bound)').each(function() {
var $hover = $(this).addClass('hover-bound'),
$msg = $hover.siblings('.dupe-hammer-message');

$hover.hover(
function() {
$hover.showInfoMessage('', {
messageElement: $msg.clone().show(),
transient: false,
position: { my: 'bottom left', at: 'top center', offsetTop: -7 },
dismissable: false,
relativeToBody: true
});
},
function() {
StackExchange.helpers.removeMessages();
}
);
});
});
Dec 27 '18 at 15:31


This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.














  • 4




    $begingroup$
    Who is Bob and why his statements should be of interest?
    $endgroup$
    – user
    Dec 27 '18 at 13:10










  • $begingroup$
    Use number $3$ to prove the second one... Then use the second one to prove the first. Then all that remains is proving the third one. Alternatively, prove these in the reverse order
    $endgroup$
    – abiessu
    Dec 27 '18 at 13:13








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    what have you tried with the Fundamental Theorem of Algebra? What does it tell you about a non-constant polynomial?
    $endgroup$
    – Jonas Lenz
    Dec 27 '18 at 13:14










  • $begingroup$
    @user Probably, "Bob" refers to mathdoctorbob.org
    $endgroup$
    – lisyarus
    Dec 27 '18 at 13:16






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Note that it matters that the polynomials have coefficients over a field (or a domain). So real or rational or integer coefficients will do. But without this condition we have modulo $8$ the polynomial $x^2-1$ has four roots $1,3,5,7$ and factorisations $(x-1)(x-7)equiv (x-3)(x-5) equiv x^2-1$, so factorisation is not unique.
    $endgroup$
    – Mark Bennet
    Dec 27 '18 at 13:24














-1












-1








-1





$begingroup$



This question already has an answer here:




  • Show that if $ R $ is an integral domain then a polynomial in $ R[X] $ of degree $ d $ can have at most $ d $ roots

    2 answers




Bob tells me that the Identity Theorem is the three following statements




  1. If a polynomial has infinitely many roots, then it is equal to $0$.


  2. If two polynomials satisfy $P(x)=Q(x)$ for infinitely many $x$, then the two polynomials are equal.


  3. If two polynomials of at most degree $n$ satisfy $P(x)=Q(x)$ for $n+1$ values of $x$, then the two polynomials are equal.



I do not know how to prove these; I think the Factor, Remainder, and Division Theorems will be useful.



I tried using Fundamental Theorem of Algebra, but it did not get me anywhere.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$





This question already has an answer here:




  • Show that if $ R $ is an integral domain then a polynomial in $ R[X] $ of degree $ d $ can have at most $ d $ roots

    2 answers




Bob tells me that the Identity Theorem is the three following statements




  1. If a polynomial has infinitely many roots, then it is equal to $0$.


  2. If two polynomials satisfy $P(x)=Q(x)$ for infinitely many $x$, then the two polynomials are equal.


  3. If two polynomials of at most degree $n$ satisfy $P(x)=Q(x)$ for $n+1$ values of $x$, then the two polynomials are equal.



I do not know how to prove these; I think the Factor, Remainder, and Division Theorems will be useful.



I tried using Fundamental Theorem of Algebra, but it did not get me anywhere.





This question already has an answer here:




  • Show that if $ R $ is an integral domain then a polynomial in $ R[X] $ of degree $ d $ can have at most $ d $ roots

    2 answers








number-theory polynomials roots






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Dec 27 '18 at 13:12









Blue

49.1k870156




49.1k870156










asked Dec 27 '18 at 13:03









user627514user627514

393




393




marked as duplicate by Bill Dubuque number-theory
Users with the  number-theory badge can single-handedly close number-theory questions as duplicates and reopen them as needed.

StackExchange.ready(function() {
if (StackExchange.options.isMobile) return;

$('.dupe-hammer-message-hover:not(.hover-bound)').each(function() {
var $hover = $(this).addClass('hover-bound'),
$msg = $hover.siblings('.dupe-hammer-message');

$hover.hover(
function() {
$hover.showInfoMessage('', {
messageElement: $msg.clone().show(),
transient: false,
position: { my: 'bottom left', at: 'top center', offsetTop: -7 },
dismissable: false,
relativeToBody: true
});
},
function() {
StackExchange.helpers.removeMessages();
}
);
});
});
Dec 27 '18 at 15:31


This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.









marked as duplicate by Bill Dubuque number-theory
Users with the  number-theory badge can single-handedly close number-theory questions as duplicates and reopen them as needed.

StackExchange.ready(function() {
if (StackExchange.options.isMobile) return;

$('.dupe-hammer-message-hover:not(.hover-bound)').each(function() {
var $hover = $(this).addClass('hover-bound'),
$msg = $hover.siblings('.dupe-hammer-message');

$hover.hover(
function() {
$hover.showInfoMessage('', {
messageElement: $msg.clone().show(),
transient: false,
position: { my: 'bottom left', at: 'top center', offsetTop: -7 },
dismissable: false,
relativeToBody: true
});
},
function() {
StackExchange.helpers.removeMessages();
}
);
});
});
Dec 27 '18 at 15:31


This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.










  • 4




    $begingroup$
    Who is Bob and why his statements should be of interest?
    $endgroup$
    – user
    Dec 27 '18 at 13:10










  • $begingroup$
    Use number $3$ to prove the second one... Then use the second one to prove the first. Then all that remains is proving the third one. Alternatively, prove these in the reverse order
    $endgroup$
    – abiessu
    Dec 27 '18 at 13:13








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    what have you tried with the Fundamental Theorem of Algebra? What does it tell you about a non-constant polynomial?
    $endgroup$
    – Jonas Lenz
    Dec 27 '18 at 13:14










  • $begingroup$
    @user Probably, "Bob" refers to mathdoctorbob.org
    $endgroup$
    – lisyarus
    Dec 27 '18 at 13:16






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Note that it matters that the polynomials have coefficients over a field (or a domain). So real or rational or integer coefficients will do. But without this condition we have modulo $8$ the polynomial $x^2-1$ has four roots $1,3,5,7$ and factorisations $(x-1)(x-7)equiv (x-3)(x-5) equiv x^2-1$, so factorisation is not unique.
    $endgroup$
    – Mark Bennet
    Dec 27 '18 at 13:24














  • 4




    $begingroup$
    Who is Bob and why his statements should be of interest?
    $endgroup$
    – user
    Dec 27 '18 at 13:10










  • $begingroup$
    Use number $3$ to prove the second one... Then use the second one to prove the first. Then all that remains is proving the third one. Alternatively, prove these in the reverse order
    $endgroup$
    – abiessu
    Dec 27 '18 at 13:13








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    what have you tried with the Fundamental Theorem of Algebra? What does it tell you about a non-constant polynomial?
    $endgroup$
    – Jonas Lenz
    Dec 27 '18 at 13:14










  • $begingroup$
    @user Probably, "Bob" refers to mathdoctorbob.org
    $endgroup$
    – lisyarus
    Dec 27 '18 at 13:16






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Note that it matters that the polynomials have coefficients over a field (or a domain). So real or rational or integer coefficients will do. But without this condition we have modulo $8$ the polynomial $x^2-1$ has four roots $1,3,5,7$ and factorisations $(x-1)(x-7)equiv (x-3)(x-5) equiv x^2-1$, so factorisation is not unique.
    $endgroup$
    – Mark Bennet
    Dec 27 '18 at 13:24








4




4




$begingroup$
Who is Bob and why his statements should be of interest?
$endgroup$
– user
Dec 27 '18 at 13:10




$begingroup$
Who is Bob and why his statements should be of interest?
$endgroup$
– user
Dec 27 '18 at 13:10












$begingroup$
Use number $3$ to prove the second one... Then use the second one to prove the first. Then all that remains is proving the third one. Alternatively, prove these in the reverse order
$endgroup$
– abiessu
Dec 27 '18 at 13:13






$begingroup$
Use number $3$ to prove the second one... Then use the second one to prove the first. Then all that remains is proving the third one. Alternatively, prove these in the reverse order
$endgroup$
– abiessu
Dec 27 '18 at 13:13






1




1




$begingroup$
what have you tried with the Fundamental Theorem of Algebra? What does it tell you about a non-constant polynomial?
$endgroup$
– Jonas Lenz
Dec 27 '18 at 13:14




$begingroup$
what have you tried with the Fundamental Theorem of Algebra? What does it tell you about a non-constant polynomial?
$endgroup$
– Jonas Lenz
Dec 27 '18 at 13:14












$begingroup$
@user Probably, "Bob" refers to mathdoctorbob.org
$endgroup$
– lisyarus
Dec 27 '18 at 13:16




$begingroup$
@user Probably, "Bob" refers to mathdoctorbob.org
$endgroup$
– lisyarus
Dec 27 '18 at 13:16




1




1




$begingroup$
Note that it matters that the polynomials have coefficients over a field (or a domain). So real or rational or integer coefficients will do. But without this condition we have modulo $8$ the polynomial $x^2-1$ has four roots $1,3,5,7$ and factorisations $(x-1)(x-7)equiv (x-3)(x-5) equiv x^2-1$, so factorisation is not unique.
$endgroup$
– Mark Bennet
Dec 27 '18 at 13:24




$begingroup$
Note that it matters that the polynomials have coefficients over a field (or a domain). So real or rational or integer coefficients will do. But without this condition we have modulo $8$ the polynomial $x^2-1$ has four roots $1,3,5,7$ and factorisations $(x-1)(x-7)equiv (x-3)(x-5) equiv x^2-1$, so factorisation is not unique.
$endgroup$
– Mark Bennet
Dec 27 '18 at 13:24










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















0












$begingroup$

For polynomials with coefficients in $mathbb C$, the three facts are easy consequences of the fundamental theorem of algebra, which says that a nonzero polynomial has $n$ ( not necessarily distinct) roots, where $n$ is the degree.



For example, $n+1$ would be too many roots, leaving the zero polynomial as the only way out.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$




















    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    0












    $begingroup$

    For polynomials with coefficients in $mathbb C$, the three facts are easy consequences of the fundamental theorem of algebra, which says that a nonzero polynomial has $n$ ( not necessarily distinct) roots, where $n$ is the degree.



    For example, $n+1$ would be too many roots, leaving the zero polynomial as the only way out.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$


















      0












      $begingroup$

      For polynomials with coefficients in $mathbb C$, the three facts are easy consequences of the fundamental theorem of algebra, which says that a nonzero polynomial has $n$ ( not necessarily distinct) roots, where $n$ is the degree.



      For example, $n+1$ would be too many roots, leaving the zero polynomial as the only way out.






      share|cite|improve this answer











      $endgroup$
















        0












        0








        0





        $begingroup$

        For polynomials with coefficients in $mathbb C$, the three facts are easy consequences of the fundamental theorem of algebra, which says that a nonzero polynomial has $n$ ( not necessarily distinct) roots, where $n$ is the degree.



        For example, $n+1$ would be too many roots, leaving the zero polynomial as the only way out.






        share|cite|improve this answer











        $endgroup$



        For polynomials with coefficients in $mathbb C$, the three facts are easy consequences of the fundamental theorem of algebra, which says that a nonzero polynomial has $n$ ( not necessarily distinct) roots, where $n$ is the degree.



        For example, $n+1$ would be too many roots, leaving the zero polynomial as the only way out.







        share|cite|improve this answer














        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer








        edited Dec 27 '18 at 15:18









        Bill Dubuque

        212k29195653




        212k29195653










        answered Dec 27 '18 at 14:50









        Chris CusterChris Custer

        14.2k3827




        14.2k3827















            Popular posts from this blog

            Wiesbaden

            Marschland

            Dieringhausen