Show that the function $f$ is a tempered distribution
$begingroup$
Let $f$ be a locally integrable function on $mathbb{R}^n$ such that $f$ is of polynomial growth at infinity. Prove that $f$ is a tempered distribution.
Here the distribution is defined as $f(phi)=int_{mathbb{R}^n}fphi.$
I think that I have no reason to be confused of this problem, but I am suddenly stuck.
The linearity is immediate, but I'm figuring out to prove the continuity.
The continuity is equivalent to proving that $int fphi_kto 0$ whenever $phi_kto 0$ in the Schwarz class $mathcal{S}(mathbb{R}^n)$, i.e. the sequence of functions $phi_k$ itself and all of the sequences of partial derivatives converge uniformly to zero.
Of course I can insert the limit into the integral by uniform convergence if the integral is done in a bounded set, but $mathbb{R}^n$ is unbounded, so I'm finding another way.
Another way I'm considering is to apply DCT, but how should I find an integrable majorant of ${f_n}$?
Thanks in advance!
functional-analysis distribution-theory schwartz-space
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $f$ be a locally integrable function on $mathbb{R}^n$ such that $f$ is of polynomial growth at infinity. Prove that $f$ is a tempered distribution.
Here the distribution is defined as $f(phi)=int_{mathbb{R}^n}fphi.$
I think that I have no reason to be confused of this problem, but I am suddenly stuck.
The linearity is immediate, but I'm figuring out to prove the continuity.
The continuity is equivalent to proving that $int fphi_kto 0$ whenever $phi_kto 0$ in the Schwarz class $mathcal{S}(mathbb{R}^n)$, i.e. the sequence of functions $phi_k$ itself and all of the sequences of partial derivatives converge uniformly to zero.
Of course I can insert the limit into the integral by uniform convergence if the integral is done in a bounded set, but $mathbb{R}^n$ is unbounded, so I'm finding another way.
Another way I'm considering is to apply DCT, but how should I find an integrable majorant of ${f_n}$?
Thanks in advance!
functional-analysis distribution-theory schwartz-space
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $f$ be a locally integrable function on $mathbb{R}^n$ such that $f$ is of polynomial growth at infinity. Prove that $f$ is a tempered distribution.
Here the distribution is defined as $f(phi)=int_{mathbb{R}^n}fphi.$
I think that I have no reason to be confused of this problem, but I am suddenly stuck.
The linearity is immediate, but I'm figuring out to prove the continuity.
The continuity is equivalent to proving that $int fphi_kto 0$ whenever $phi_kto 0$ in the Schwarz class $mathcal{S}(mathbb{R}^n)$, i.e. the sequence of functions $phi_k$ itself and all of the sequences of partial derivatives converge uniformly to zero.
Of course I can insert the limit into the integral by uniform convergence if the integral is done in a bounded set, but $mathbb{R}^n$ is unbounded, so I'm finding another way.
Another way I'm considering is to apply DCT, but how should I find an integrable majorant of ${f_n}$?
Thanks in advance!
functional-analysis distribution-theory schwartz-space
$endgroup$
Let $f$ be a locally integrable function on $mathbb{R}^n$ such that $f$ is of polynomial growth at infinity. Prove that $f$ is a tempered distribution.
Here the distribution is defined as $f(phi)=int_{mathbb{R}^n}fphi.$
I think that I have no reason to be confused of this problem, but I am suddenly stuck.
The linearity is immediate, but I'm figuring out to prove the continuity.
The continuity is equivalent to proving that $int fphi_kto 0$ whenever $phi_kto 0$ in the Schwarz class $mathcal{S}(mathbb{R}^n)$, i.e. the sequence of functions $phi_k$ itself and all of the sequences of partial derivatives converge uniformly to zero.
Of course I can insert the limit into the integral by uniform convergence if the integral is done in a bounded set, but $mathbb{R}^n$ is unbounded, so I'm finding another way.
Another way I'm considering is to apply DCT, but how should I find an integrable majorant of ${f_n}$?
Thanks in advance!
functional-analysis distribution-theory schwartz-space
functional-analysis distribution-theory schwartz-space
edited Dec 31 '18 at 21:14
Davide Giraudo
128k17154268
128k17154268
asked Dec 31 '18 at 12:45
bellcirclebellcircle
1,373411
1,373411
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Actually, convergence to zero in the Schwartz space refers to something stronger, namely, that for all $alpha, betainmathbb N^n$,
$$
lim_{kto +infty}sup_{xinmathbb R^n}leftlvert x^alpha left(D^{beta}phi_kright)(x)rightrvert=0.
$$
All we need is that for all $pinmathbb N$,
$$
lim_{kto +infty}sup_{xinmathbb R^n}leftlVert xrightrVert^p leftlvert phi_k (x)rightrvert=0.
$$
Indeed, from the polynomial growth assumption, we know that there exists $qin mathbb N $ and $cgt 0$ such that for all $xinmathbb R^n$, $leftlvert f(x)rightrvertleqslant cleft(1+leftlVert x rightrVert^qright)$. Therefore,
$$
leftlvert int_{mathbb R^n}
fphi_k rightrvertleqslant cint_{mathbb R^n} left(1+leftlVert x rightrVert^qright)leftlVert xrightrVert^{-p} leftlVert xrightrVert^p leftlvert phi_k (x)rightrvertmathrm dx.
$$
It thus suffices to choose $p$ such that the integral $int_{mathbb R^n} left(1+leftlVert x rightrVert^qright)leftlVert xrightrVert^{-p}mathrm dx$ is finite.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3057677%2fshow-that-the-function-f-is-a-tempered-distribution%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Actually, convergence to zero in the Schwartz space refers to something stronger, namely, that for all $alpha, betainmathbb N^n$,
$$
lim_{kto +infty}sup_{xinmathbb R^n}leftlvert x^alpha left(D^{beta}phi_kright)(x)rightrvert=0.
$$
All we need is that for all $pinmathbb N$,
$$
lim_{kto +infty}sup_{xinmathbb R^n}leftlVert xrightrVert^p leftlvert phi_k (x)rightrvert=0.
$$
Indeed, from the polynomial growth assumption, we know that there exists $qin mathbb N $ and $cgt 0$ such that for all $xinmathbb R^n$, $leftlvert f(x)rightrvertleqslant cleft(1+leftlVert x rightrVert^qright)$. Therefore,
$$
leftlvert int_{mathbb R^n}
fphi_k rightrvertleqslant cint_{mathbb R^n} left(1+leftlVert x rightrVert^qright)leftlVert xrightrVert^{-p} leftlVert xrightrVert^p leftlvert phi_k (x)rightrvertmathrm dx.
$$
It thus suffices to choose $p$ such that the integral $int_{mathbb R^n} left(1+leftlVert x rightrVert^qright)leftlVert xrightrVert^{-p}mathrm dx$ is finite.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Actually, convergence to zero in the Schwartz space refers to something stronger, namely, that for all $alpha, betainmathbb N^n$,
$$
lim_{kto +infty}sup_{xinmathbb R^n}leftlvert x^alpha left(D^{beta}phi_kright)(x)rightrvert=0.
$$
All we need is that for all $pinmathbb N$,
$$
lim_{kto +infty}sup_{xinmathbb R^n}leftlVert xrightrVert^p leftlvert phi_k (x)rightrvert=0.
$$
Indeed, from the polynomial growth assumption, we know that there exists $qin mathbb N $ and $cgt 0$ such that for all $xinmathbb R^n$, $leftlvert f(x)rightrvertleqslant cleft(1+leftlVert x rightrVert^qright)$. Therefore,
$$
leftlvert int_{mathbb R^n}
fphi_k rightrvertleqslant cint_{mathbb R^n} left(1+leftlVert x rightrVert^qright)leftlVert xrightrVert^{-p} leftlVert xrightrVert^p leftlvert phi_k (x)rightrvertmathrm dx.
$$
It thus suffices to choose $p$ such that the integral $int_{mathbb R^n} left(1+leftlVert x rightrVert^qright)leftlVert xrightrVert^{-p}mathrm dx$ is finite.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Actually, convergence to zero in the Schwartz space refers to something stronger, namely, that for all $alpha, betainmathbb N^n$,
$$
lim_{kto +infty}sup_{xinmathbb R^n}leftlvert x^alpha left(D^{beta}phi_kright)(x)rightrvert=0.
$$
All we need is that for all $pinmathbb N$,
$$
lim_{kto +infty}sup_{xinmathbb R^n}leftlVert xrightrVert^p leftlvert phi_k (x)rightrvert=0.
$$
Indeed, from the polynomial growth assumption, we know that there exists $qin mathbb N $ and $cgt 0$ such that for all $xinmathbb R^n$, $leftlvert f(x)rightrvertleqslant cleft(1+leftlVert x rightrVert^qright)$. Therefore,
$$
leftlvert int_{mathbb R^n}
fphi_k rightrvertleqslant cint_{mathbb R^n} left(1+leftlVert x rightrVert^qright)leftlVert xrightrVert^{-p} leftlVert xrightrVert^p leftlvert phi_k (x)rightrvertmathrm dx.
$$
It thus suffices to choose $p$ such that the integral $int_{mathbb R^n} left(1+leftlVert x rightrVert^qright)leftlVert xrightrVert^{-p}mathrm dx$ is finite.
$endgroup$
Actually, convergence to zero in the Schwartz space refers to something stronger, namely, that for all $alpha, betainmathbb N^n$,
$$
lim_{kto +infty}sup_{xinmathbb R^n}leftlvert x^alpha left(D^{beta}phi_kright)(x)rightrvert=0.
$$
All we need is that for all $pinmathbb N$,
$$
lim_{kto +infty}sup_{xinmathbb R^n}leftlVert xrightrVert^p leftlvert phi_k (x)rightrvert=0.
$$
Indeed, from the polynomial growth assumption, we know that there exists $qin mathbb N $ and $cgt 0$ such that for all $xinmathbb R^n$, $leftlvert f(x)rightrvertleqslant cleft(1+leftlVert x rightrVert^qright)$. Therefore,
$$
leftlvert int_{mathbb R^n}
fphi_k rightrvertleqslant cint_{mathbb R^n} left(1+leftlVert x rightrVert^qright)leftlVert xrightrVert^{-p} leftlVert xrightrVert^p leftlvert phi_k (x)rightrvertmathrm dx.
$$
It thus suffices to choose $p$ such that the integral $int_{mathbb R^n} left(1+leftlVert x rightrVert^qright)leftlVert xrightrVert^{-p}mathrm dx$ is finite.
answered Dec 31 '18 at 14:35
Davide GiraudoDavide Giraudo
128k17154268
128k17154268
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3057677%2fshow-that-the-function-f-is-a-tempered-distribution%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown