Using `gsub` inside (double quoted) heredoc does not work
It appears that using gsub
inside a (double quoted) heredoc does not evaluate the result of gsub
, as follows:
class Test
def self.define_phone
class_eval <<-EOS
def _phone=(val)
puts val
puts val.gsub(/D/,'')
end
EOS
end
end
Test.define_phone
test = Test.new
test._phone = '123-456-7890'
# >> 123-456-7890
# >> 123-456-7890
The second puts
should have printed 1234567890
, just as it would in this case:
'123-456-7890'.gsub(/D/,'')
# => "1234567890"
What is going on inside the heredoc?
ruby literals heredoc
add a comment |
It appears that using gsub
inside a (double quoted) heredoc does not evaluate the result of gsub
, as follows:
class Test
def self.define_phone
class_eval <<-EOS
def _phone=(val)
puts val
puts val.gsub(/D/,'')
end
EOS
end
end
Test.define_phone
test = Test.new
test._phone = '123-456-7890'
# >> 123-456-7890
# >> 123-456-7890
The second puts
should have printed 1234567890
, just as it would in this case:
'123-456-7890'.gsub(/D/,'')
# => "1234567890"
What is going on inside the heredoc?
ruby literals heredoc
Note that you can accomplish this without class eval (and thus no worrying about string escaping). Just replace theclass_eval
anddef _phone
withdefine_method :_phone do |val|
– Max
Nov 26 '18 at 14:46
add a comment |
It appears that using gsub
inside a (double quoted) heredoc does not evaluate the result of gsub
, as follows:
class Test
def self.define_phone
class_eval <<-EOS
def _phone=(val)
puts val
puts val.gsub(/D/,'')
end
EOS
end
end
Test.define_phone
test = Test.new
test._phone = '123-456-7890'
# >> 123-456-7890
# >> 123-456-7890
The second puts
should have printed 1234567890
, just as it would in this case:
'123-456-7890'.gsub(/D/,'')
# => "1234567890"
What is going on inside the heredoc?
ruby literals heredoc
It appears that using gsub
inside a (double quoted) heredoc does not evaluate the result of gsub
, as follows:
class Test
def self.define_phone
class_eval <<-EOS
def _phone=(val)
puts val
puts val.gsub(/D/,'')
end
EOS
end
end
Test.define_phone
test = Test.new
test._phone = '123-456-7890'
# >> 123-456-7890
# >> 123-456-7890
The second puts
should have printed 1234567890
, just as it would in this case:
'123-456-7890'.gsub(/D/,'')
# => "1234567890"
What is going on inside the heredoc?
ruby literals heredoc
ruby literals heredoc
edited Nov 26 '18 at 5:05
sawa
133k29206308
133k29206308
asked Nov 26 '18 at 3:18
DonatoDonato
2,13931435
2,13931435
Note that you can accomplish this without class eval (and thus no worrying about string escaping). Just replace theclass_eval
anddef _phone
withdefine_method :_phone do |val|
– Max
Nov 26 '18 at 14:46
add a comment |
Note that you can accomplish this without class eval (and thus no worrying about string escaping). Just replace theclass_eval
anddef _phone
withdefine_method :_phone do |val|
– Max
Nov 26 '18 at 14:46
Note that you can accomplish this without class eval (and thus no worrying about string escaping). Just replace the
class_eval
and def _phone
with define_method :_phone do |val|
– Max
Nov 26 '18 at 14:46
Note that you can accomplish this without class eval (and thus no worrying about string escaping). Just replace the
class_eval
and def _phone
with define_method :_phone do |val|
– Max
Nov 26 '18 at 14:46
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
The problem is with the D
in the regex. It will be evaluated when the heredoc is evaluated as a string, which results in D
:
"D" # => "D"
eval("/D/") #=> /D/
On the other hand, D
inside a single quote will not be evaluated as D
:
'D' # => "\D"
eval('/D/') # => /D/
So wrap the heredoc terminator EOS
in a single quote to achieve what you want:
class Test
def self.define_phone
class_eval <<-'EOS'
def _phone=(val)
puts val
puts val.gsub(/D/,'')
end
EOS
end
end
Test.define_phone
test = Test.new
test._phone = '123-456-7890'
# >> 123-456-7890
# >> 1234567890
Reference
If you run the above code without the wrapped EOS
, gsub
will try to replace "D" (literally) in the val
. See this:
test._phone = '123-D456-D7890DD'
# >> 123-D456-D7890DD
# >> 123-456-7890
3
Or, another way is to replaceD
with\D
.
– sawa
Nov 26 '18 at 4:54
Official reference: Literals - Here Documents
– Stefan
Nov 26 '18 at 9:12
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
StackExchange.snippets.init();
});
});
}, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53474368%2fusing-gsub-inside-double-quoted-heredoc-does-not-work%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
The problem is with the D
in the regex. It will be evaluated when the heredoc is evaluated as a string, which results in D
:
"D" # => "D"
eval("/D/") #=> /D/
On the other hand, D
inside a single quote will not be evaluated as D
:
'D' # => "\D"
eval('/D/') # => /D/
So wrap the heredoc terminator EOS
in a single quote to achieve what you want:
class Test
def self.define_phone
class_eval <<-'EOS'
def _phone=(val)
puts val
puts val.gsub(/D/,'')
end
EOS
end
end
Test.define_phone
test = Test.new
test._phone = '123-456-7890'
# >> 123-456-7890
# >> 1234567890
Reference
If you run the above code without the wrapped EOS
, gsub
will try to replace "D" (literally) in the val
. See this:
test._phone = '123-D456-D7890DD'
# >> 123-D456-D7890DD
# >> 123-456-7890
3
Or, another way is to replaceD
with\D
.
– sawa
Nov 26 '18 at 4:54
Official reference: Literals - Here Documents
– Stefan
Nov 26 '18 at 9:12
add a comment |
The problem is with the D
in the regex. It will be evaluated when the heredoc is evaluated as a string, which results in D
:
"D" # => "D"
eval("/D/") #=> /D/
On the other hand, D
inside a single quote will not be evaluated as D
:
'D' # => "\D"
eval('/D/') # => /D/
So wrap the heredoc terminator EOS
in a single quote to achieve what you want:
class Test
def self.define_phone
class_eval <<-'EOS'
def _phone=(val)
puts val
puts val.gsub(/D/,'')
end
EOS
end
end
Test.define_phone
test = Test.new
test._phone = '123-456-7890'
# >> 123-456-7890
# >> 1234567890
Reference
If you run the above code without the wrapped EOS
, gsub
will try to replace "D" (literally) in the val
. See this:
test._phone = '123-D456-D7890DD'
# >> 123-D456-D7890DD
# >> 123-456-7890
3
Or, another way is to replaceD
with\D
.
– sawa
Nov 26 '18 at 4:54
Official reference: Literals - Here Documents
– Stefan
Nov 26 '18 at 9:12
add a comment |
The problem is with the D
in the regex. It will be evaluated when the heredoc is evaluated as a string, which results in D
:
"D" # => "D"
eval("/D/") #=> /D/
On the other hand, D
inside a single quote will not be evaluated as D
:
'D' # => "\D"
eval('/D/') # => /D/
So wrap the heredoc terminator EOS
in a single quote to achieve what you want:
class Test
def self.define_phone
class_eval <<-'EOS'
def _phone=(val)
puts val
puts val.gsub(/D/,'')
end
EOS
end
end
Test.define_phone
test = Test.new
test._phone = '123-456-7890'
# >> 123-456-7890
# >> 1234567890
Reference
If you run the above code without the wrapped EOS
, gsub
will try to replace "D" (literally) in the val
. See this:
test._phone = '123-D456-D7890DD'
# >> 123-D456-D7890DD
# >> 123-456-7890
The problem is with the D
in the regex. It will be evaluated when the heredoc is evaluated as a string, which results in D
:
"D" # => "D"
eval("/D/") #=> /D/
On the other hand, D
inside a single quote will not be evaluated as D
:
'D' # => "\D"
eval('/D/') # => /D/
So wrap the heredoc terminator EOS
in a single quote to achieve what you want:
class Test
def self.define_phone
class_eval <<-'EOS'
def _phone=(val)
puts val
puts val.gsub(/D/,'')
end
EOS
end
end
Test.define_phone
test = Test.new
test._phone = '123-456-7890'
# >> 123-456-7890
# >> 1234567890
Reference
If you run the above code without the wrapped EOS
, gsub
will try to replace "D" (literally) in the val
. See this:
test._phone = '123-D456-D7890DD'
# >> 123-D456-D7890DD
# >> 123-456-7890
edited Nov 26 '18 at 5:03
sawa
133k29206308
133k29206308
answered Nov 26 '18 at 4:51
Lenin Raj RajasekaranLenin Raj Rajasekaran
16.1k1173115
16.1k1173115
3
Or, another way is to replaceD
with\D
.
– sawa
Nov 26 '18 at 4:54
Official reference: Literals - Here Documents
– Stefan
Nov 26 '18 at 9:12
add a comment |
3
Or, another way is to replaceD
with\D
.
– sawa
Nov 26 '18 at 4:54
Official reference: Literals - Here Documents
– Stefan
Nov 26 '18 at 9:12
3
3
Or, another way is to replace
D
with \D
.– sawa
Nov 26 '18 at 4:54
Or, another way is to replace
D
with \D
.– sawa
Nov 26 '18 at 4:54
Official reference: Literals - Here Documents
– Stefan
Nov 26 '18 at 9:12
Official reference: Literals - Here Documents
– Stefan
Nov 26 '18 at 9:12
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53474368%2fusing-gsub-inside-double-quoted-heredoc-does-not-work%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Note that you can accomplish this without class eval (and thus no worrying about string escaping). Just replace the
class_eval
anddef _phone
withdefine_method :_phone do |val|
– Max
Nov 26 '18 at 14:46