Is there an irreducible projective hypersurface such that its complement has zero Euler characteristic?
$begingroup$
We know that, if $f=X_0X_1...X_n in mathbb{C}[X_0,...,X_n]$ and $Z(f)subset mathbb{CP}^n$, then the Euler characteristic of its complement is zero, i.e.
$$
chi(mathbb{CP}^nsetminus Z(f))=0.
$$
But $f$ is not irreducible.
Let $Zsubset mathbb{CP}^n$ be a smooth, irreducible hypersurface. Then, we know that
$$
chi(Z)=frac{1}{d}((1-d)^{n+1}-1)+n+1,
$$
where $d$ degree of $Z$.
In particular, if $g=X_0^2+...+X_3^2 in mathbb{C}[X_0,...,X_3]$, we have
$$
chi(Z(g))=frac{1}{2}((1-2)^4-1)+4=4,
$$
then $chi(mathbb{CP}^3setminus Z(g))=0$, since $chi(mathbb{CP}^3)=4$.
So I ask: is there an irreducible homogeneous polynomial $h in mathbb{C}[X_0,...,X_n]$ such that deg$h>2$ and $chi(mathbb{CP}^nsetminus Z(h))=0$?
Remark: this is not possible if $Z(h)$ is smooth (with deg$h>2$).
algebraic-geometry algebraic-topology complex-geometry
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
We know that, if $f=X_0X_1...X_n in mathbb{C}[X_0,...,X_n]$ and $Z(f)subset mathbb{CP}^n$, then the Euler characteristic of its complement is zero, i.e.
$$
chi(mathbb{CP}^nsetminus Z(f))=0.
$$
But $f$ is not irreducible.
Let $Zsubset mathbb{CP}^n$ be a smooth, irreducible hypersurface. Then, we know that
$$
chi(Z)=frac{1}{d}((1-d)^{n+1}-1)+n+1,
$$
where $d$ degree of $Z$.
In particular, if $g=X_0^2+...+X_3^2 in mathbb{C}[X_0,...,X_3]$, we have
$$
chi(Z(g))=frac{1}{2}((1-2)^4-1)+4=4,
$$
then $chi(mathbb{CP}^3setminus Z(g))=0$, since $chi(mathbb{CP}^3)=4$.
So I ask: is there an irreducible homogeneous polynomial $h in mathbb{C}[X_0,...,X_n]$ such that deg$h>2$ and $chi(mathbb{CP}^nsetminus Z(h))=0$?
Remark: this is not possible if $Z(h)$ is smooth (with deg$h>2$).
algebraic-geometry algebraic-topology complex-geometry
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
As a note it is not generally true for CW complexes that $chi(X setminus Y) + chi(Y)=chi(X)$. It's true here by a trick of dimension.
$endgroup$
– user98602
Dec 29 '15 at 19:32
$begingroup$
Have you tried to calculate the top Chern class of the tangent buundle of a smooth hypersurface?
$endgroup$
– Alan Muniz
Jan 21 '16 at 0:43
$begingroup$
@AlanMuniz, sorry, but how I will use top Chern class? I'm asking this, because $Z(h)$ is not smooth, since I know that there is no such $h$ if $Z(h)$ is smooth.
$endgroup$
– user73454
May 9 '18 at 14:42
add a comment |
$begingroup$
We know that, if $f=X_0X_1...X_n in mathbb{C}[X_0,...,X_n]$ and $Z(f)subset mathbb{CP}^n$, then the Euler characteristic of its complement is zero, i.e.
$$
chi(mathbb{CP}^nsetminus Z(f))=0.
$$
But $f$ is not irreducible.
Let $Zsubset mathbb{CP}^n$ be a smooth, irreducible hypersurface. Then, we know that
$$
chi(Z)=frac{1}{d}((1-d)^{n+1}-1)+n+1,
$$
where $d$ degree of $Z$.
In particular, if $g=X_0^2+...+X_3^2 in mathbb{C}[X_0,...,X_3]$, we have
$$
chi(Z(g))=frac{1}{2}((1-2)^4-1)+4=4,
$$
then $chi(mathbb{CP}^3setminus Z(g))=0$, since $chi(mathbb{CP}^3)=4$.
So I ask: is there an irreducible homogeneous polynomial $h in mathbb{C}[X_0,...,X_n]$ such that deg$h>2$ and $chi(mathbb{CP}^nsetminus Z(h))=0$?
Remark: this is not possible if $Z(h)$ is smooth (with deg$h>2$).
algebraic-geometry algebraic-topology complex-geometry
$endgroup$
We know that, if $f=X_0X_1...X_n in mathbb{C}[X_0,...,X_n]$ and $Z(f)subset mathbb{CP}^n$, then the Euler characteristic of its complement is zero, i.e.
$$
chi(mathbb{CP}^nsetminus Z(f))=0.
$$
But $f$ is not irreducible.
Let $Zsubset mathbb{CP}^n$ be a smooth, irreducible hypersurface. Then, we know that
$$
chi(Z)=frac{1}{d}((1-d)^{n+1}-1)+n+1,
$$
where $d$ degree of $Z$.
In particular, if $g=X_0^2+...+X_3^2 in mathbb{C}[X_0,...,X_3]$, we have
$$
chi(Z(g))=frac{1}{2}((1-2)^4-1)+4=4,
$$
then $chi(mathbb{CP}^3setminus Z(g))=0$, since $chi(mathbb{CP}^3)=4$.
So I ask: is there an irreducible homogeneous polynomial $h in mathbb{C}[X_0,...,X_n]$ such that deg$h>2$ and $chi(mathbb{CP}^nsetminus Z(h))=0$?
Remark: this is not possible if $Z(h)$ is smooth (with deg$h>2$).
algebraic-geometry algebraic-topology complex-geometry
algebraic-geometry algebraic-topology complex-geometry
edited Jan 4 '16 at 2:49
user73454
asked Dec 29 '15 at 17:05
user73454user73454
501314
501314
2
$begingroup$
As a note it is not generally true for CW complexes that $chi(X setminus Y) + chi(Y)=chi(X)$. It's true here by a trick of dimension.
$endgroup$
– user98602
Dec 29 '15 at 19:32
$begingroup$
Have you tried to calculate the top Chern class of the tangent buundle of a smooth hypersurface?
$endgroup$
– Alan Muniz
Jan 21 '16 at 0:43
$begingroup$
@AlanMuniz, sorry, but how I will use top Chern class? I'm asking this, because $Z(h)$ is not smooth, since I know that there is no such $h$ if $Z(h)$ is smooth.
$endgroup$
– user73454
May 9 '18 at 14:42
add a comment |
2
$begingroup$
As a note it is not generally true for CW complexes that $chi(X setminus Y) + chi(Y)=chi(X)$. It's true here by a trick of dimension.
$endgroup$
– user98602
Dec 29 '15 at 19:32
$begingroup$
Have you tried to calculate the top Chern class of the tangent buundle of a smooth hypersurface?
$endgroup$
– Alan Muniz
Jan 21 '16 at 0:43
$begingroup$
@AlanMuniz, sorry, but how I will use top Chern class? I'm asking this, because $Z(h)$ is not smooth, since I know that there is no such $h$ if $Z(h)$ is smooth.
$endgroup$
– user73454
May 9 '18 at 14:42
2
2
$begingroup$
As a note it is not generally true for CW complexes that $chi(X setminus Y) + chi(Y)=chi(X)$. It's true here by a trick of dimension.
$endgroup$
– user98602
Dec 29 '15 at 19:32
$begingroup$
As a note it is not generally true for CW complexes that $chi(X setminus Y) + chi(Y)=chi(X)$. It's true here by a trick of dimension.
$endgroup$
– user98602
Dec 29 '15 at 19:32
$begingroup$
Have you tried to calculate the top Chern class of the tangent buundle of a smooth hypersurface?
$endgroup$
– Alan Muniz
Jan 21 '16 at 0:43
$begingroup$
Have you tried to calculate the top Chern class of the tangent buundle of a smooth hypersurface?
$endgroup$
– Alan Muniz
Jan 21 '16 at 0:43
$begingroup$
@AlanMuniz, sorry, but how I will use top Chern class? I'm asking this, because $Z(h)$ is not smooth, since I know that there is no such $h$ if $Z(h)$ is smooth.
$endgroup$
– user73454
May 9 '18 at 14:42
$begingroup$
@AlanMuniz, sorry, but how I will use top Chern class? I'm asking this, because $Z(h)$ is not smooth, since I know that there is no such $h$ if $Z(h)$ is smooth.
$endgroup$
– user73454
May 9 '18 at 14:42
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Let $S = { x_1^j x_2^{d-j} = x_3^k x_4^{d-k} }$ in $mathbb{P}^3$, with $0 < j,k < d$ and $GCD(j,k,d)=1$. I claim that $S$ is irreducible and $chi(S)=4$ and hence $chi(mathbb{P}^3 setminus S)=0$.
Let $T ={ x_1 x_2 x_3 x_4 neq 0 } subset mathbb{P}^3$, this is isomorphic to $(mathbb{C}^{ast})^3$. Since $GCD(j,k,d)=GCD(j,k,d-j,d-k)=1$, the locus in $T$ where $x_1^j x_2^{d-j} x_3^{-k} x_4^{-(d-k)}=1$ is isomorphic to $(mathbb{C}^{ast})^2$, with Euler characteristic $0$. So $chi(S cap T) =0$ and thus $chi(S) = chi(S setminus T)$.
But (using the assumptions $0 < j,k < d$) the complement $S setminus T$ is just four $mathbb{P}^1$'s: ${x_1=x_3=0}$, ${x_1=x_4=0}$, ${x_2=x_3=0}$ and ${x_2=x_4=0}$, and this has Euler characteristic $4$. Also, $T cap S$ is obviously irreducible and is dense in $S$, so $S$ is irreducible.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1592924%2fis-there-an-irreducible-projective-hypersurface-such-that-its-complement-has-zer%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Let $S = { x_1^j x_2^{d-j} = x_3^k x_4^{d-k} }$ in $mathbb{P}^3$, with $0 < j,k < d$ and $GCD(j,k,d)=1$. I claim that $S$ is irreducible and $chi(S)=4$ and hence $chi(mathbb{P}^3 setminus S)=0$.
Let $T ={ x_1 x_2 x_3 x_4 neq 0 } subset mathbb{P}^3$, this is isomorphic to $(mathbb{C}^{ast})^3$. Since $GCD(j,k,d)=GCD(j,k,d-j,d-k)=1$, the locus in $T$ where $x_1^j x_2^{d-j} x_3^{-k} x_4^{-(d-k)}=1$ is isomorphic to $(mathbb{C}^{ast})^2$, with Euler characteristic $0$. So $chi(S cap T) =0$ and thus $chi(S) = chi(S setminus T)$.
But (using the assumptions $0 < j,k < d$) the complement $S setminus T$ is just four $mathbb{P}^1$'s: ${x_1=x_3=0}$, ${x_1=x_4=0}$, ${x_2=x_3=0}$ and ${x_2=x_4=0}$, and this has Euler characteristic $4$. Also, $T cap S$ is obviously irreducible and is dense in $S$, so $S$ is irreducible.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $S = { x_1^j x_2^{d-j} = x_3^k x_4^{d-k} }$ in $mathbb{P}^3$, with $0 < j,k < d$ and $GCD(j,k,d)=1$. I claim that $S$ is irreducible and $chi(S)=4$ and hence $chi(mathbb{P}^3 setminus S)=0$.
Let $T ={ x_1 x_2 x_3 x_4 neq 0 } subset mathbb{P}^3$, this is isomorphic to $(mathbb{C}^{ast})^3$. Since $GCD(j,k,d)=GCD(j,k,d-j,d-k)=1$, the locus in $T$ where $x_1^j x_2^{d-j} x_3^{-k} x_4^{-(d-k)}=1$ is isomorphic to $(mathbb{C}^{ast})^2$, with Euler characteristic $0$. So $chi(S cap T) =0$ and thus $chi(S) = chi(S setminus T)$.
But (using the assumptions $0 < j,k < d$) the complement $S setminus T$ is just four $mathbb{P}^1$'s: ${x_1=x_3=0}$, ${x_1=x_4=0}$, ${x_2=x_3=0}$ and ${x_2=x_4=0}$, and this has Euler characteristic $4$. Also, $T cap S$ is obviously irreducible and is dense in $S$, so $S$ is irreducible.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $S = { x_1^j x_2^{d-j} = x_3^k x_4^{d-k} }$ in $mathbb{P}^3$, with $0 < j,k < d$ and $GCD(j,k,d)=1$. I claim that $S$ is irreducible and $chi(S)=4$ and hence $chi(mathbb{P}^3 setminus S)=0$.
Let $T ={ x_1 x_2 x_3 x_4 neq 0 } subset mathbb{P}^3$, this is isomorphic to $(mathbb{C}^{ast})^3$. Since $GCD(j,k,d)=GCD(j,k,d-j,d-k)=1$, the locus in $T$ where $x_1^j x_2^{d-j} x_3^{-k} x_4^{-(d-k)}=1$ is isomorphic to $(mathbb{C}^{ast})^2$, with Euler characteristic $0$. So $chi(S cap T) =0$ and thus $chi(S) = chi(S setminus T)$.
But (using the assumptions $0 < j,k < d$) the complement $S setminus T$ is just four $mathbb{P}^1$'s: ${x_1=x_3=0}$, ${x_1=x_4=0}$, ${x_2=x_3=0}$ and ${x_2=x_4=0}$, and this has Euler characteristic $4$. Also, $T cap S$ is obviously irreducible and is dense in $S$, so $S$ is irreducible.
$endgroup$
Let $S = { x_1^j x_2^{d-j} = x_3^k x_4^{d-k} }$ in $mathbb{P}^3$, with $0 < j,k < d$ and $GCD(j,k,d)=1$. I claim that $S$ is irreducible and $chi(S)=4$ and hence $chi(mathbb{P}^3 setminus S)=0$.
Let $T ={ x_1 x_2 x_3 x_4 neq 0 } subset mathbb{P}^3$, this is isomorphic to $(mathbb{C}^{ast})^3$. Since $GCD(j,k,d)=GCD(j,k,d-j,d-k)=1$, the locus in $T$ where $x_1^j x_2^{d-j} x_3^{-k} x_4^{-(d-k)}=1$ is isomorphic to $(mathbb{C}^{ast})^2$, with Euler characteristic $0$. So $chi(S cap T) =0$ and thus $chi(S) = chi(S setminus T)$.
But (using the assumptions $0 < j,k < d$) the complement $S setminus T$ is just four $mathbb{P}^1$'s: ${x_1=x_3=0}$, ${x_1=x_4=0}$, ${x_2=x_3=0}$ and ${x_2=x_4=0}$, and this has Euler characteristic $4$. Also, $T cap S$ is obviously irreducible and is dense in $S$, so $S$ is irreducible.
edited Jan 9 at 15:58
answered Jan 7 at 19:22
David E SpeyerDavid E Speyer
46.3k4127211
46.3k4127211
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1592924%2fis-there-an-irreducible-projective-hypersurface-such-that-its-complement-has-zer%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
2
$begingroup$
As a note it is not generally true for CW complexes that $chi(X setminus Y) + chi(Y)=chi(X)$. It's true here by a trick of dimension.
$endgroup$
– user98602
Dec 29 '15 at 19:32
$begingroup$
Have you tried to calculate the top Chern class of the tangent buundle of a smooth hypersurface?
$endgroup$
– Alan Muniz
Jan 21 '16 at 0:43
$begingroup$
@AlanMuniz, sorry, but how I will use top Chern class? I'm asking this, because $Z(h)$ is not smooth, since I know that there is no such $h$ if $Z(h)$ is smooth.
$endgroup$
– user73454
May 9 '18 at 14:42