How do I create a sum row and sum column in pandas?
up vote
8
down vote
favorite
I'm going through the Khan Academy course on Statistics as a bit of a refresher from my college days, and as a way to get me up to speed on pandas & other scientific Python.
I've got a table that looks like this from Khan Academy:
| Undergraduate | Graduate | Total
-------------+---------------+----------+------
Straight A's | 240 | 60 | 300
-------------+---------------+----------+------
Not | 3,760 | 440 | 4,200
-------------+---------------+----------+------
Total | 4,000 | 500 | 4,500
I would like to recreate this table using pandas. Of course I could create a DataFrame using something like
"Graduate": {...},
"Undergraduate": {...},
"Total": {...},
But that seems like a naive approach that would both fall over quickly and just not really be extensible.
I've got the non-totals part of the table like this:
df = pd.DataFrame(
{
"Undergraduate": {"Straight A's": 240, "Not": 3_760},
"Graduate": {"Straight A's": 60, "Not": 440},
}
)
df
I've been looking and found a couple of promising things, like:
df['Total'] = df.sum(axis=1)
But I didn't find anything terribly elegant.
I did find the crosstab
function that looks like it should do what I want, but it seems like in order to do that I'd have to create a dataframe consisting of 1/0 for all of these values, which seems silly because I've already got an aggregate.
I have found some approaches that seem to manually build a new totals row, but it seems like there should be a better way, something like:
totals(df, rows=True, columns=True)
or something.
Does this exist in pandas, or do I have to just cobble together my own approach?
python pandas
add a comment |
up vote
8
down vote
favorite
I'm going through the Khan Academy course on Statistics as a bit of a refresher from my college days, and as a way to get me up to speed on pandas & other scientific Python.
I've got a table that looks like this from Khan Academy:
| Undergraduate | Graduate | Total
-------------+---------------+----------+------
Straight A's | 240 | 60 | 300
-------------+---------------+----------+------
Not | 3,760 | 440 | 4,200
-------------+---------------+----------+------
Total | 4,000 | 500 | 4,500
I would like to recreate this table using pandas. Of course I could create a DataFrame using something like
"Graduate": {...},
"Undergraduate": {...},
"Total": {...},
But that seems like a naive approach that would both fall over quickly and just not really be extensible.
I've got the non-totals part of the table like this:
df = pd.DataFrame(
{
"Undergraduate": {"Straight A's": 240, "Not": 3_760},
"Graduate": {"Straight A's": 60, "Not": 440},
}
)
df
I've been looking and found a couple of promising things, like:
df['Total'] = df.sum(axis=1)
But I didn't find anything terribly elegant.
I did find the crosstab
function that looks like it should do what I want, but it seems like in order to do that I'd have to create a dataframe consisting of 1/0 for all of these values, which seems silly because I've already got an aggregate.
I have found some approaches that seem to manually build a new totals row, but it seems like there should be a better way, something like:
totals(df, rows=True, columns=True)
or something.
Does this exist in pandas, or do I have to just cobble together my own approach?
python pandas
add a comment |
up vote
8
down vote
favorite
up vote
8
down vote
favorite
I'm going through the Khan Academy course on Statistics as a bit of a refresher from my college days, and as a way to get me up to speed on pandas & other scientific Python.
I've got a table that looks like this from Khan Academy:
| Undergraduate | Graduate | Total
-------------+---------------+----------+------
Straight A's | 240 | 60 | 300
-------------+---------------+----------+------
Not | 3,760 | 440 | 4,200
-------------+---------------+----------+------
Total | 4,000 | 500 | 4,500
I would like to recreate this table using pandas. Of course I could create a DataFrame using something like
"Graduate": {...},
"Undergraduate": {...},
"Total": {...},
But that seems like a naive approach that would both fall over quickly and just not really be extensible.
I've got the non-totals part of the table like this:
df = pd.DataFrame(
{
"Undergraduate": {"Straight A's": 240, "Not": 3_760},
"Graduate": {"Straight A's": 60, "Not": 440},
}
)
df
I've been looking and found a couple of promising things, like:
df['Total'] = df.sum(axis=1)
But I didn't find anything terribly elegant.
I did find the crosstab
function that looks like it should do what I want, but it seems like in order to do that I'd have to create a dataframe consisting of 1/0 for all of these values, which seems silly because I've already got an aggregate.
I have found some approaches that seem to manually build a new totals row, but it seems like there should be a better way, something like:
totals(df, rows=True, columns=True)
or something.
Does this exist in pandas, or do I have to just cobble together my own approach?
python pandas
I'm going through the Khan Academy course on Statistics as a bit of a refresher from my college days, and as a way to get me up to speed on pandas & other scientific Python.
I've got a table that looks like this from Khan Academy:
| Undergraduate | Graduate | Total
-------------+---------------+----------+------
Straight A's | 240 | 60 | 300
-------------+---------------+----------+------
Not | 3,760 | 440 | 4,200
-------------+---------------+----------+------
Total | 4,000 | 500 | 4,500
I would like to recreate this table using pandas. Of course I could create a DataFrame using something like
"Graduate": {...},
"Undergraduate": {...},
"Total": {...},
But that seems like a naive approach that would both fall over quickly and just not really be extensible.
I've got the non-totals part of the table like this:
df = pd.DataFrame(
{
"Undergraduate": {"Straight A's": 240, "Not": 3_760},
"Graduate": {"Straight A's": 60, "Not": 440},
}
)
df
I've been looking and found a couple of promising things, like:
df['Total'] = df.sum(axis=1)
But I didn't find anything terribly elegant.
I did find the crosstab
function that looks like it should do what I want, but it seems like in order to do that I'd have to create a dataframe consisting of 1/0 for all of these values, which seems silly because I've already got an aggregate.
I have found some approaches that seem to manually build a new totals row, but it seems like there should be a better way, something like:
totals(df, rows=True, columns=True)
or something.
Does this exist in pandas, or do I have to just cobble together my own approach?
python pandas
python pandas
asked Nov 21 at 15:07
Wayne Werner
26.4k13109191
26.4k13109191
add a comment |
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
up vote
9
down vote
Or in two steps, using the .sum()
function as you suggested (which might be a bit more readable as well):
import pandas as pd
df = pd.DataFrame( {"Undergraduate": {"Straight A's": 240, "Not": 3_760},"Graduate": {"Straight A's": 60, "Not": 440},})
df.loc['Total',:]= df.sum(axis=0)
df.loc[:,'Total'] = df.sum(axis=1)
Output:
Graduate Undergraduate Total
Not 440 3760 4200
Straight A's 60 240 300
Total 500 4000 4500
Huh... this is giving me some weird output though - 3760+440 isn't 8400, but that's what it's showing??
– Wayne Werner
Nov 21 at 15:20
That's weird, I get 4200 as it is supposed to? Maybe a typo?
– Archie
Nov 21 at 15:22
5
@WayneWerner that is because this is an in place operation. It seems you've run it twice
– piRSquared
Nov 21 at 15:23
Ah, I must have accidentally hit ctrl+enter in my notebook. This time I made a copy to operate on :)
– Wayne Werner
Nov 21 at 15:27
add a comment |
up vote
7
down vote
append
and assign
The point of this answer is to provide an in line and not an in place solution.
append
I use append
to stack a Series
or DataFrame
vertically. It also creates a copy
so that I can continue to chain.
assign
I use assign
to add a column. However, the DataFrame
I'm working on is in the in between nether space. So I use a lambda
in the assign
argument which tells Pandas
to apply it to the calling DataFrame
.
df.append(df.sum().rename('Total')).assign(Total=lambda d: d.sum(1))
Graduate Undergraduate Total
Not 440 3760 4200
Straight A's 60 240 300
Total 500 4000 4500
Fun alternative
Uses drop
with errors='ignore'
to get rid of potentially pre-existing Total
rows and columns.
Also, still in line.
def tc(d):
return d.assign(Total=d.drop('Total', errors='ignore', axis=1).sum(1))
df.pipe(tc).T.pipe(tc).T
Graduate Undergraduate Total
Not 440 3760 4200
Straight A's 60 240 300
Total 500 4000 4500
add a comment |
up vote
4
down vote
From the original data using crosstab
, if just base on your input, you just need melt
before crosstab
s=df.reset_index().melt('index')
pd.crosstab(index=s['index'],columns=s.variable,values=s.value,aggfunc='sum',margins=True)
Out[33]:
variable Graduate Undergraduate All
index
Not 440 3760 4200
Straight A's 60 240 300
All 500 4000 4500
Toy data
df=pd.DataFrame({'c1':[1,2,2,3,4],'c2':[2,2,3,3,3],'c3':[1,2,3,4,5]})
# before `agg`, I think your input is the result after `groupby`
df
Out[37]:
c1 c2 c3
0 1 2 1
1 2 2 2
2 2 3 3
3 3 3 4
4 4 3 5
pd.crosstab(df.c1,df.c2,df.c3,aggfunc='sum',margins
=True)
Out[38]:
c2 2 3 All
c1
1 1.0 NaN 1
2 2.0 3.0 5
3 NaN 4.0 4
4 NaN 5.0 5
All 3.0 12.0 15
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
9
down vote
Or in two steps, using the .sum()
function as you suggested (which might be a bit more readable as well):
import pandas as pd
df = pd.DataFrame( {"Undergraduate": {"Straight A's": 240, "Not": 3_760},"Graduate": {"Straight A's": 60, "Not": 440},})
df.loc['Total',:]= df.sum(axis=0)
df.loc[:,'Total'] = df.sum(axis=1)
Output:
Graduate Undergraduate Total
Not 440 3760 4200
Straight A's 60 240 300
Total 500 4000 4500
Huh... this is giving me some weird output though - 3760+440 isn't 8400, but that's what it's showing??
– Wayne Werner
Nov 21 at 15:20
That's weird, I get 4200 as it is supposed to? Maybe a typo?
– Archie
Nov 21 at 15:22
5
@WayneWerner that is because this is an in place operation. It seems you've run it twice
– piRSquared
Nov 21 at 15:23
Ah, I must have accidentally hit ctrl+enter in my notebook. This time I made a copy to operate on :)
– Wayne Werner
Nov 21 at 15:27
add a comment |
up vote
9
down vote
Or in two steps, using the .sum()
function as you suggested (which might be a bit more readable as well):
import pandas as pd
df = pd.DataFrame( {"Undergraduate": {"Straight A's": 240, "Not": 3_760},"Graduate": {"Straight A's": 60, "Not": 440},})
df.loc['Total',:]= df.sum(axis=0)
df.loc[:,'Total'] = df.sum(axis=1)
Output:
Graduate Undergraduate Total
Not 440 3760 4200
Straight A's 60 240 300
Total 500 4000 4500
Huh... this is giving me some weird output though - 3760+440 isn't 8400, but that's what it's showing??
– Wayne Werner
Nov 21 at 15:20
That's weird, I get 4200 as it is supposed to? Maybe a typo?
– Archie
Nov 21 at 15:22
5
@WayneWerner that is because this is an in place operation. It seems you've run it twice
– piRSquared
Nov 21 at 15:23
Ah, I must have accidentally hit ctrl+enter in my notebook. This time I made a copy to operate on :)
– Wayne Werner
Nov 21 at 15:27
add a comment |
up vote
9
down vote
up vote
9
down vote
Or in two steps, using the .sum()
function as you suggested (which might be a bit more readable as well):
import pandas as pd
df = pd.DataFrame( {"Undergraduate": {"Straight A's": 240, "Not": 3_760},"Graduate": {"Straight A's": 60, "Not": 440},})
df.loc['Total',:]= df.sum(axis=0)
df.loc[:,'Total'] = df.sum(axis=1)
Output:
Graduate Undergraduate Total
Not 440 3760 4200
Straight A's 60 240 300
Total 500 4000 4500
Or in two steps, using the .sum()
function as you suggested (which might be a bit more readable as well):
import pandas as pd
df = pd.DataFrame( {"Undergraduate": {"Straight A's": 240, "Not": 3_760},"Graduate": {"Straight A's": 60, "Not": 440},})
df.loc['Total',:]= df.sum(axis=0)
df.loc[:,'Total'] = df.sum(axis=1)
Output:
Graduate Undergraduate Total
Not 440 3760 4200
Straight A's 60 240 300
Total 500 4000 4500
edited Nov 21 at 15:25
answered Nov 21 at 15:12
Archie
526721
526721
Huh... this is giving me some weird output though - 3760+440 isn't 8400, but that's what it's showing??
– Wayne Werner
Nov 21 at 15:20
That's weird, I get 4200 as it is supposed to? Maybe a typo?
– Archie
Nov 21 at 15:22
5
@WayneWerner that is because this is an in place operation. It seems you've run it twice
– piRSquared
Nov 21 at 15:23
Ah, I must have accidentally hit ctrl+enter in my notebook. This time I made a copy to operate on :)
– Wayne Werner
Nov 21 at 15:27
add a comment |
Huh... this is giving me some weird output though - 3760+440 isn't 8400, but that's what it's showing??
– Wayne Werner
Nov 21 at 15:20
That's weird, I get 4200 as it is supposed to? Maybe a typo?
– Archie
Nov 21 at 15:22
5
@WayneWerner that is because this is an in place operation. It seems you've run it twice
– piRSquared
Nov 21 at 15:23
Ah, I must have accidentally hit ctrl+enter in my notebook. This time I made a copy to operate on :)
– Wayne Werner
Nov 21 at 15:27
Huh... this is giving me some weird output though - 3760+440 isn't 8400, but that's what it's showing??
– Wayne Werner
Nov 21 at 15:20
Huh... this is giving me some weird output though - 3760+440 isn't 8400, but that's what it's showing??
– Wayne Werner
Nov 21 at 15:20
That's weird, I get 4200 as it is supposed to? Maybe a typo?
– Archie
Nov 21 at 15:22
That's weird, I get 4200 as it is supposed to? Maybe a typo?
– Archie
Nov 21 at 15:22
5
5
@WayneWerner that is because this is an in place operation. It seems you've run it twice
– piRSquared
Nov 21 at 15:23
@WayneWerner that is because this is an in place operation. It seems you've run it twice
– piRSquared
Nov 21 at 15:23
Ah, I must have accidentally hit ctrl+enter in my notebook. This time I made a copy to operate on :)
– Wayne Werner
Nov 21 at 15:27
Ah, I must have accidentally hit ctrl+enter in my notebook. This time I made a copy to operate on :)
– Wayne Werner
Nov 21 at 15:27
add a comment |
up vote
7
down vote
append
and assign
The point of this answer is to provide an in line and not an in place solution.
append
I use append
to stack a Series
or DataFrame
vertically. It also creates a copy
so that I can continue to chain.
assign
I use assign
to add a column. However, the DataFrame
I'm working on is in the in between nether space. So I use a lambda
in the assign
argument which tells Pandas
to apply it to the calling DataFrame
.
df.append(df.sum().rename('Total')).assign(Total=lambda d: d.sum(1))
Graduate Undergraduate Total
Not 440 3760 4200
Straight A's 60 240 300
Total 500 4000 4500
Fun alternative
Uses drop
with errors='ignore'
to get rid of potentially pre-existing Total
rows and columns.
Also, still in line.
def tc(d):
return d.assign(Total=d.drop('Total', errors='ignore', axis=1).sum(1))
df.pipe(tc).T.pipe(tc).T
Graduate Undergraduate Total
Not 440 3760 4200
Straight A's 60 240 300
Total 500 4000 4500
add a comment |
up vote
7
down vote
append
and assign
The point of this answer is to provide an in line and not an in place solution.
append
I use append
to stack a Series
or DataFrame
vertically. It also creates a copy
so that I can continue to chain.
assign
I use assign
to add a column. However, the DataFrame
I'm working on is in the in between nether space. So I use a lambda
in the assign
argument which tells Pandas
to apply it to the calling DataFrame
.
df.append(df.sum().rename('Total')).assign(Total=lambda d: d.sum(1))
Graduate Undergraduate Total
Not 440 3760 4200
Straight A's 60 240 300
Total 500 4000 4500
Fun alternative
Uses drop
with errors='ignore'
to get rid of potentially pre-existing Total
rows and columns.
Also, still in line.
def tc(d):
return d.assign(Total=d.drop('Total', errors='ignore', axis=1).sum(1))
df.pipe(tc).T.pipe(tc).T
Graduate Undergraduate Total
Not 440 3760 4200
Straight A's 60 240 300
Total 500 4000 4500
add a comment |
up vote
7
down vote
up vote
7
down vote
append
and assign
The point of this answer is to provide an in line and not an in place solution.
append
I use append
to stack a Series
or DataFrame
vertically. It also creates a copy
so that I can continue to chain.
assign
I use assign
to add a column. However, the DataFrame
I'm working on is in the in between nether space. So I use a lambda
in the assign
argument which tells Pandas
to apply it to the calling DataFrame
.
df.append(df.sum().rename('Total')).assign(Total=lambda d: d.sum(1))
Graduate Undergraduate Total
Not 440 3760 4200
Straight A's 60 240 300
Total 500 4000 4500
Fun alternative
Uses drop
with errors='ignore'
to get rid of potentially pre-existing Total
rows and columns.
Also, still in line.
def tc(d):
return d.assign(Total=d.drop('Total', errors='ignore', axis=1).sum(1))
df.pipe(tc).T.pipe(tc).T
Graduate Undergraduate Total
Not 440 3760 4200
Straight A's 60 240 300
Total 500 4000 4500
append
and assign
The point of this answer is to provide an in line and not an in place solution.
append
I use append
to stack a Series
or DataFrame
vertically. It also creates a copy
so that I can continue to chain.
assign
I use assign
to add a column. However, the DataFrame
I'm working on is in the in between nether space. So I use a lambda
in the assign
argument which tells Pandas
to apply it to the calling DataFrame
.
df.append(df.sum().rename('Total')).assign(Total=lambda d: d.sum(1))
Graduate Undergraduate Total
Not 440 3760 4200
Straight A's 60 240 300
Total 500 4000 4500
Fun alternative
Uses drop
with errors='ignore'
to get rid of potentially pre-existing Total
rows and columns.
Also, still in line.
def tc(d):
return d.assign(Total=d.drop('Total', errors='ignore', axis=1).sum(1))
df.pipe(tc).T.pipe(tc).T
Graduate Undergraduate Total
Not 440 3760 4200
Straight A's 60 240 300
Total 500 4000 4500
edited Nov 21 at 15:27
answered Nov 21 at 15:09
piRSquared
150k21135277
150k21135277
add a comment |
add a comment |
up vote
4
down vote
From the original data using crosstab
, if just base on your input, you just need melt
before crosstab
s=df.reset_index().melt('index')
pd.crosstab(index=s['index'],columns=s.variable,values=s.value,aggfunc='sum',margins=True)
Out[33]:
variable Graduate Undergraduate All
index
Not 440 3760 4200
Straight A's 60 240 300
All 500 4000 4500
Toy data
df=pd.DataFrame({'c1':[1,2,2,3,4],'c2':[2,2,3,3,3],'c3':[1,2,3,4,5]})
# before `agg`, I think your input is the result after `groupby`
df
Out[37]:
c1 c2 c3
0 1 2 1
1 2 2 2
2 2 3 3
3 3 3 4
4 4 3 5
pd.crosstab(df.c1,df.c2,df.c3,aggfunc='sum',margins
=True)
Out[38]:
c2 2 3 All
c1
1 1.0 NaN 1
2 2.0 3.0 5
3 NaN 4.0 4
4 NaN 5.0 5
All 3.0 12.0 15
add a comment |
up vote
4
down vote
From the original data using crosstab
, if just base on your input, you just need melt
before crosstab
s=df.reset_index().melt('index')
pd.crosstab(index=s['index'],columns=s.variable,values=s.value,aggfunc='sum',margins=True)
Out[33]:
variable Graduate Undergraduate All
index
Not 440 3760 4200
Straight A's 60 240 300
All 500 4000 4500
Toy data
df=pd.DataFrame({'c1':[1,2,2,3,4],'c2':[2,2,3,3,3],'c3':[1,2,3,4,5]})
# before `agg`, I think your input is the result after `groupby`
df
Out[37]:
c1 c2 c3
0 1 2 1
1 2 2 2
2 2 3 3
3 3 3 4
4 4 3 5
pd.crosstab(df.c1,df.c2,df.c3,aggfunc='sum',margins
=True)
Out[38]:
c2 2 3 All
c1
1 1.0 NaN 1
2 2.0 3.0 5
3 NaN 4.0 4
4 NaN 5.0 5
All 3.0 12.0 15
add a comment |
up vote
4
down vote
up vote
4
down vote
From the original data using crosstab
, if just base on your input, you just need melt
before crosstab
s=df.reset_index().melt('index')
pd.crosstab(index=s['index'],columns=s.variable,values=s.value,aggfunc='sum',margins=True)
Out[33]:
variable Graduate Undergraduate All
index
Not 440 3760 4200
Straight A's 60 240 300
All 500 4000 4500
Toy data
df=pd.DataFrame({'c1':[1,2,2,3,4],'c2':[2,2,3,3,3],'c3':[1,2,3,4,5]})
# before `agg`, I think your input is the result after `groupby`
df
Out[37]:
c1 c2 c3
0 1 2 1
1 2 2 2
2 2 3 3
3 3 3 4
4 4 3 5
pd.crosstab(df.c1,df.c2,df.c3,aggfunc='sum',margins
=True)
Out[38]:
c2 2 3 All
c1
1 1.0 NaN 1
2 2.0 3.0 5
3 NaN 4.0 4
4 NaN 5.0 5
All 3.0 12.0 15
From the original data using crosstab
, if just base on your input, you just need melt
before crosstab
s=df.reset_index().melt('index')
pd.crosstab(index=s['index'],columns=s.variable,values=s.value,aggfunc='sum',margins=True)
Out[33]:
variable Graduate Undergraduate All
index
Not 440 3760 4200
Straight A's 60 240 300
All 500 4000 4500
Toy data
df=pd.DataFrame({'c1':[1,2,2,3,4],'c2':[2,2,3,3,3],'c3':[1,2,3,4,5]})
# before `agg`, I think your input is the result after `groupby`
df
Out[37]:
c1 c2 c3
0 1 2 1
1 2 2 2
2 2 3 3
3 3 3 4
4 4 3 5
pd.crosstab(df.c1,df.c2,df.c3,aggfunc='sum',margins
=True)
Out[38]:
c2 2 3 All
c1
1 1.0 NaN 1
2 2.0 3.0 5
3 NaN 4.0 4
4 NaN 5.0 5
All 3.0 12.0 15
edited Nov 21 at 15:21
answered Nov 21 at 15:16
W-B
94.2k72857
94.2k72857
add a comment |
add a comment |
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53414960%2fhow-do-i-create-a-sum-row-and-sum-column-in-pandas%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown