Proper pushforward
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I am studying a some intersection theory. Now I am stuck on the proof of the Lemma 02R6 here. More precisely, I don't understand why the coeffiecient of $Z$ in $[f_astmathcal{F}]_k$ is equal to $text{length}_{R_{mathfrak p}}(M_{mathfrak p})$. Can you help me?
algebraic-geometry proof-explanation
asked Nov 21 at 16:46
Vincenzo Zaccaro
1,454719
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I am studying a some intersection theory. Now I am stuck on the proof of the Lemma 02R6 here. More precisely, I don't understand why the coeffiecient of $Z$ in $[f_astmathcal{F}]_k$ is equal to $text{length}_{R_{mathfrak p}}(M_{mathfrak p})$. Can you help me?
algebraic-geometry proof-explanation
asked Nov 21 at 16:46
Vincenzo Zaccaro
1,454719
1
This just follows from the definition of $[f_*mathcal{F}]$ - note here $mathfrak{p}$ is the generic point of $Z$.
– loch
Nov 21 at 19:19
I don't understand because it is not $deg(Z/f(Z))text{length}_{R_{mathfrak p}}(M_{mathfrak p})$. Can you expand your answer?
– Vincenzo Zaccaro
Nov 21 at 19:22
1
The degree of $f$ doesn't really matter here - it would show up if you were computing $f_*[mathcal{F}]_k$ ( and in particular you see this expression later), but here you're looking at $[f_*mathcal{F}]_k$! In other words what's happening is you have a coherent sheaf ($mathcal{G}:= f_*mathcal{F})$ on $Y$ and you're just trying to compute its corresponding cycle.
– loch
Nov 21 at 19:32
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I am studying a some intersection theory. Now I am stuck on the proof of the Lemma 02R6 here. More precisely, I don't understand why the coeffiecient of $Z$ in $[f_astmathcal{F}]_k$ is equal to $text{length}_{R_{mathfrak p}}(M_{mathfrak p})$. Can you help me?
algebraic-geometry proof-explanation
asked Nov 21 at 16:46
Vincenzo Zaccaro
1,454719
I am studying a some intersection theory. Now I am stuck on the proof of the Lemma 02R6 here. More precisely, I don't understand why the coeffiecient of $Z$ in $[f_astmathcal{F}]_k$ is equal to $text{length}_{R_{mathfrak p}}(M_{mathfrak p})$. Can you help me?
algebraic-geometry proof-explanation
algebraic-geometry proof-explanation
asked Nov 21 at 16:46
Vincenzo Zaccaro
1,454719
asked Nov 21 at 16:46
Vincenzo Zaccaro
1,454719
asked Nov 21 at 16:46
Vincenzo Zaccaro
1,454719
asked Nov 21 at 16:46
Vincenzo Zaccaro
1,454719
asked Nov 21 at 16:46
Vincenzo Zaccaro
1,454719
1,454719
1
This just follows from the definition of $[f_*mathcal{F}]$ - note here $mathfrak{p}$ is the generic point of $Z$.
– loch
Nov 21 at 19:19
I don't understand because it is not $deg(Z/f(Z))text{length}_{R_{mathfrak p}}(M_{mathfrak p})$. Can you expand your answer?
– Vincenzo Zaccaro
Nov 21 at 19:22
1
The degree of $f$ doesn't really matter here - it would show up if you were computing $f_*[mathcal{F}]_k$ ( and in particular you see this expression later), but here you're looking at $[f_*mathcal{F}]_k$! In other words what's happening is you have a coherent sheaf ($mathcal{G}:= f_*mathcal{F})$ on $Y$ and you're just trying to compute its corresponding cycle.
– loch
Nov 21 at 19:32
add a comment |
1
This just follows from the definition of $[f_*mathcal{F}]$ - note here $mathfrak{p}$ is the generic point of $Z$.
– loch
Nov 21 at 19:19
I don't understand because it is not $deg(Z/f(Z))text{length}_{R_{mathfrak p}}(M_{mathfrak p})$. Can you expand your answer?
– Vincenzo Zaccaro
Nov 21 at 19:22
1
The degree of $f$ doesn't really matter here - it would show up if you were computing $f_*[mathcal{F}]_k$ ( and in particular you see this expression later), but here you're looking at $[f_*mathcal{F}]_k$! In other words what's happening is you have a coherent sheaf ($mathcal{G}:= f_*mathcal{F})$ on $Y$ and you're just trying to compute its corresponding cycle.
– loch
Nov 21 at 19:32
1
1
This just follows from the definition of $[f_*mathcal{F}]$ - note here $mathfrak{p}$ is the generic point of $Z$.
– loch
Nov 21 at 19:19
This just follows from the definition of $[f_*mathcal{F}]$ - note here $mathfrak{p}$ is the generic point of $Z$.
– loch
Nov 21 at 19:19
I don't understand because it is not $deg(Z/f(Z))text{length}_{R_{mathfrak p}}(M_{mathfrak p})$. Can you expand your answer?
– Vincenzo Zaccaro
Nov 21 at 19:22
I don't understand because it is not $deg(Z/f(Z))text{length}_{R_{mathfrak p}}(M_{mathfrak p})$. Can you expand your answer?
– Vincenzo Zaccaro
Nov 21 at 19:22
1
1
The degree of $f$ doesn't really matter here - it would show up if you were computing $f_*[mathcal{F}]_k$ ( and in particular you see this expression later), but here you're looking at $[f_*mathcal{F}]_k$! In other words what's happening is you have a coherent sheaf ($mathcal{G}:= f_*mathcal{F})$ on $Y$ and you're just trying to compute its corresponding cycle.
– loch
Nov 21 at 19:32
The degree of $f$ doesn't really matter here - it would show up if you were computing $f_*[mathcal{F}]_k$ ( and in particular you see this expression later), but here you're looking at $[f_*mathcal{F}]_k$! In other words what's happening is you have a coherent sheaf ($mathcal{G}:= f_*mathcal{F})$ on $Y$ and you're just trying to compute its corresponding cycle.
– loch
Nov 21 at 19:32
add a comment |
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
draft saved
draft discarded
draft saved
draft discarded
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3007993%2fproper-pushforward%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
This just follows from the definition of $[f_*mathcal{F}]$ - note here $mathfrak{p}$ is the generic point of $Z$.
– loch
Nov 21 at 19:19
I don't understand because it is not $deg(Z/f(Z))text{length}_{R_{mathfrak p}}(M_{mathfrak p})$. Can you expand your answer?
– Vincenzo Zaccaro
Nov 21 at 19:22
1
The degree of $f$ doesn't really matter here - it would show up if you were computing $f_*[mathcal{F}]_k$ ( and in particular you see this expression later), but here you're looking at $[f_*mathcal{F}]_k$! In other words what's happening is you have a coherent sheaf ($mathcal{G}:= f_*mathcal{F})$ on $Y$ and you're just trying to compute its corresponding cycle.
– loch
Nov 21 at 19:32