Solving $sin^2 x +1=2x$











up vote
5
down vote

favorite
2












How do I solve this equation?



$$sin^2 x +1=2x$$



I have no idea how to attack the problem.



Thanks!










share|cite|improve this question
























  • Since $x$ is both inside and outside of the sine, this is a transcendental equation. You'll only get approximate answers, say, using numerical methods.
    – Blue
    Nov 21 at 17:01






  • 1




    Use numerical methods or wolframalpha.com
    – Vasya
    Nov 21 at 17:01








  • 1




    This equation does not have a nice algebraic solution. You can use numerical methods to find an approximation. If you draw a graph of $sin^x +1 -2x$ you can see about where it crosses the $x$ axis.
    – Ethan Bolker
    Nov 21 at 17:02










  • @Blue Well, sometimes these equations do have nice solutions e.g. $sin x=x$. It doesn't seem to be the case here
    – A.Γ.
    Nov 21 at 17:04










  • @AweKumarJha did you mean Aryabhata?
    – Raptor
    Nov 21 at 17:05















up vote
5
down vote

favorite
2












How do I solve this equation?



$$sin^2 x +1=2x$$



I have no idea how to attack the problem.



Thanks!










share|cite|improve this question
























  • Since $x$ is both inside and outside of the sine, this is a transcendental equation. You'll only get approximate answers, say, using numerical methods.
    – Blue
    Nov 21 at 17:01






  • 1




    Use numerical methods or wolframalpha.com
    – Vasya
    Nov 21 at 17:01








  • 1




    This equation does not have a nice algebraic solution. You can use numerical methods to find an approximation. If you draw a graph of $sin^x +1 -2x$ you can see about where it crosses the $x$ axis.
    – Ethan Bolker
    Nov 21 at 17:02










  • @Blue Well, sometimes these equations do have nice solutions e.g. $sin x=x$. It doesn't seem to be the case here
    – A.Γ.
    Nov 21 at 17:04










  • @AweKumarJha did you mean Aryabhata?
    – Raptor
    Nov 21 at 17:05













up vote
5
down vote

favorite
2









up vote
5
down vote

favorite
2






2





How do I solve this equation?



$$sin^2 x +1=2x$$



I have no idea how to attack the problem.



Thanks!










share|cite|improve this question















How do I solve this equation?



$$sin^2 x +1=2x$$



I have no idea how to attack the problem.



Thanks!







calculus trigonometry






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Nov 21 at 16:59









Blue

46.8k870147




46.8k870147










asked Nov 21 at 16:51









L. G.

341




341












  • Since $x$ is both inside and outside of the sine, this is a transcendental equation. You'll only get approximate answers, say, using numerical methods.
    – Blue
    Nov 21 at 17:01






  • 1




    Use numerical methods or wolframalpha.com
    – Vasya
    Nov 21 at 17:01








  • 1




    This equation does not have a nice algebraic solution. You can use numerical methods to find an approximation. If you draw a graph of $sin^x +1 -2x$ you can see about where it crosses the $x$ axis.
    – Ethan Bolker
    Nov 21 at 17:02










  • @Blue Well, sometimes these equations do have nice solutions e.g. $sin x=x$. It doesn't seem to be the case here
    – A.Γ.
    Nov 21 at 17:04










  • @AweKumarJha did you mean Aryabhata?
    – Raptor
    Nov 21 at 17:05


















  • Since $x$ is both inside and outside of the sine, this is a transcendental equation. You'll only get approximate answers, say, using numerical methods.
    – Blue
    Nov 21 at 17:01






  • 1




    Use numerical methods or wolframalpha.com
    – Vasya
    Nov 21 at 17:01








  • 1




    This equation does not have a nice algebraic solution. You can use numerical methods to find an approximation. If you draw a graph of $sin^x +1 -2x$ you can see about where it crosses the $x$ axis.
    – Ethan Bolker
    Nov 21 at 17:02










  • @Blue Well, sometimes these equations do have nice solutions e.g. $sin x=x$. It doesn't seem to be the case here
    – A.Γ.
    Nov 21 at 17:04










  • @AweKumarJha did you mean Aryabhata?
    – Raptor
    Nov 21 at 17:05
















Since $x$ is both inside and outside of the sine, this is a transcendental equation. You'll only get approximate answers, say, using numerical methods.
– Blue
Nov 21 at 17:01




Since $x$ is both inside and outside of the sine, this is a transcendental equation. You'll only get approximate answers, say, using numerical methods.
– Blue
Nov 21 at 17:01




1




1




Use numerical methods or wolframalpha.com
– Vasya
Nov 21 at 17:01






Use numerical methods or wolframalpha.com
– Vasya
Nov 21 at 17:01






1




1




This equation does not have a nice algebraic solution. You can use numerical methods to find an approximation. If you draw a graph of $sin^x +1 -2x$ you can see about where it crosses the $x$ axis.
– Ethan Bolker
Nov 21 at 17:02




This equation does not have a nice algebraic solution. You can use numerical methods to find an approximation. If you draw a graph of $sin^x +1 -2x$ you can see about where it crosses the $x$ axis.
– Ethan Bolker
Nov 21 at 17:02












@Blue Well, sometimes these equations do have nice solutions e.g. $sin x=x$. It doesn't seem to be the case here
– A.Γ.
Nov 21 at 17:04




@Blue Well, sometimes these equations do have nice solutions e.g. $sin x=x$. It doesn't seem to be the case here
– A.Γ.
Nov 21 at 17:04












@AweKumarJha did you mean Aryabhata?
– Raptor
Nov 21 at 17:05




@AweKumarJha did you mean Aryabhata?
– Raptor
Nov 21 at 17:05










4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
5
down vote













$$1le 1+sin^2(x)le 2implies frac 12le xle 1.$$
the function
$$f:xmapsto sin^2(x)+1-2x$$
is continuous at $[frac 12,1],$



$$f(frac 12)>0; ; f(1)<0,$$
and



$$f'(x)=sin(2x)-2<0.$$



By IVT,
there is a unique solution $alpha$ in $]frac 12,1[$.



$$alpha=lim_{nto+infty}u_n$$



with
$$u_0=1$$
and
$$u_{n+1}=u_n-frac{f(u_n)}{f'(u_n)}$$



This numerical method is known as Newton-Raphson.






share|cite|improve this answer






























    up vote
    2
    down vote













    Once it is proved that $f(x)=sin^2(x)-2x+1$ has a unique real zero in the interval $[0,pi/4]$, its numerical determination is simple since $f(x)$ is a positive and convex function on $(0,pi/4)$ (due to $f''(x)>0$), hence by applying Newton's method with starting point $x=0$ we get



    $$ rho approx 0.714836$$
    in just four steps.






    share|cite|improve this answer




























      up vote
      1
      down vote













      Just for the fun of the approximation.



      Using the double angle formula Rewrite the equation as $$cos(2x)+4x=3$$ Now, let $t=2x$ to make the equation
      $$cos(t)+2t=3$$
      Now, using the approximation
      $$cos(t) simeqfrac{pi ^2-4t^2}{pi ^2+t^2}qquad (-frac pi 2 leq tleqfrac pi 2)$$ we get the cubic equation
      $$2 t^3-7 t^2+2 pi ^2 t-2 pi ^2=0$$ which has only one real root. Using the hyperbolic solution for one real root, the result is really ugly but it evaluates as $tapprox 1.428167$ that is to say $xapprox 0.714083$ while the "exact" solution is $xapprox 0.714836$.



      We can even do better building the $[2,2]$ Padé approximant around $x=frac pi 4$
      $$cos(2x)+4x-3=frac{(pi -3)+2 left(x-frac{pi }{4}right)+left(2-frac{2 pi }{3}right)
      left(x-frac{pi }{4}right)^2 } {1-frac{2}{3} left(x-frac{pi }{4}right)^2 }$$
      Solving the quadratic
      $$x=frac pi 4+frac{6-sqrt{252-144 pi +24 pi ^2}}{4 pi -12}approx 0.714837$$



      To even avoid solving the quadratic equation, building instead the $[1,3]$ Padé approximant around $x=frac pi 4$ would lead to
      $$x=frac pi 4 -frac{(pi -3) left(15-6 pi +pi ^2right)}{4 left(12-6 pi +pi ^2right)}approx 0.714837$$






      share|cite|improve this answer






























        up vote
        0
        down vote













        There is no solution in terms of elementary functions - you can solve it only by a numerical algorithm. There is Newton's method - the 'goto' method; but possibly there is an algorithm particular to this one that converges particularly fast. Numerical algorithms is a very highly developed area of mathematics, and for various problems numerical algorithms exist that converge truly astoundingly fast! The one I mentioned - Newtons - converges very fast at nearly every application of it ... and for the vast majority of problems you can do at least that well.






        share|cite|improve this answer





















          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














           

          draft saved


          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3008005%2fsolving-sin2-x-1-2x%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          4 Answers
          4






          active

          oldest

          votes








          4 Answers
          4






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes








          up vote
          5
          down vote













          $$1le 1+sin^2(x)le 2implies frac 12le xle 1.$$
          the function
          $$f:xmapsto sin^2(x)+1-2x$$
          is continuous at $[frac 12,1],$



          $$f(frac 12)>0; ; f(1)<0,$$
          and



          $$f'(x)=sin(2x)-2<0.$$



          By IVT,
          there is a unique solution $alpha$ in $]frac 12,1[$.



          $$alpha=lim_{nto+infty}u_n$$



          with
          $$u_0=1$$
          and
          $$u_{n+1}=u_n-frac{f(u_n)}{f'(u_n)}$$



          This numerical method is known as Newton-Raphson.






          share|cite|improve this answer



























            up vote
            5
            down vote













            $$1le 1+sin^2(x)le 2implies frac 12le xle 1.$$
            the function
            $$f:xmapsto sin^2(x)+1-2x$$
            is continuous at $[frac 12,1],$



            $$f(frac 12)>0; ; f(1)<0,$$
            and



            $$f'(x)=sin(2x)-2<0.$$



            By IVT,
            there is a unique solution $alpha$ in $]frac 12,1[$.



            $$alpha=lim_{nto+infty}u_n$$



            with
            $$u_0=1$$
            and
            $$u_{n+1}=u_n-frac{f(u_n)}{f'(u_n)}$$



            This numerical method is known as Newton-Raphson.






            share|cite|improve this answer

























              up vote
              5
              down vote










              up vote
              5
              down vote









              $$1le 1+sin^2(x)le 2implies frac 12le xle 1.$$
              the function
              $$f:xmapsto sin^2(x)+1-2x$$
              is continuous at $[frac 12,1],$



              $$f(frac 12)>0; ; f(1)<0,$$
              and



              $$f'(x)=sin(2x)-2<0.$$



              By IVT,
              there is a unique solution $alpha$ in $]frac 12,1[$.



              $$alpha=lim_{nto+infty}u_n$$



              with
              $$u_0=1$$
              and
              $$u_{n+1}=u_n-frac{f(u_n)}{f'(u_n)}$$



              This numerical method is known as Newton-Raphson.






              share|cite|improve this answer














              $$1le 1+sin^2(x)le 2implies frac 12le xle 1.$$
              the function
              $$f:xmapsto sin^2(x)+1-2x$$
              is continuous at $[frac 12,1],$



              $$f(frac 12)>0; ; f(1)<0,$$
              and



              $$f'(x)=sin(2x)-2<0.$$



              By IVT,
              there is a unique solution $alpha$ in $]frac 12,1[$.



              $$alpha=lim_{nto+infty}u_n$$



              with
              $$u_0=1$$
              and
              $$u_{n+1}=u_n-frac{f(u_n)}{f'(u_n)}$$



              This numerical method is known as Newton-Raphson.







              share|cite|improve this answer














              share|cite|improve this answer



              share|cite|improve this answer








              edited Nov 21 at 17:19

























              answered Nov 21 at 17:13









              hamam_Abdallah

              36.8k21533




              36.8k21533






















                  up vote
                  2
                  down vote













                  Once it is proved that $f(x)=sin^2(x)-2x+1$ has a unique real zero in the interval $[0,pi/4]$, its numerical determination is simple since $f(x)$ is a positive and convex function on $(0,pi/4)$ (due to $f''(x)>0$), hence by applying Newton's method with starting point $x=0$ we get



                  $$ rho approx 0.714836$$
                  in just four steps.






                  share|cite|improve this answer

























                    up vote
                    2
                    down vote













                    Once it is proved that $f(x)=sin^2(x)-2x+1$ has a unique real zero in the interval $[0,pi/4]$, its numerical determination is simple since $f(x)$ is a positive and convex function on $(0,pi/4)$ (due to $f''(x)>0$), hence by applying Newton's method with starting point $x=0$ we get



                    $$ rho approx 0.714836$$
                    in just four steps.






                    share|cite|improve this answer























                      up vote
                      2
                      down vote










                      up vote
                      2
                      down vote









                      Once it is proved that $f(x)=sin^2(x)-2x+1$ has a unique real zero in the interval $[0,pi/4]$, its numerical determination is simple since $f(x)$ is a positive and convex function on $(0,pi/4)$ (due to $f''(x)>0$), hence by applying Newton's method with starting point $x=0$ we get



                      $$ rho approx 0.714836$$
                      in just four steps.






                      share|cite|improve this answer












                      Once it is proved that $f(x)=sin^2(x)-2x+1$ has a unique real zero in the interval $[0,pi/4]$, its numerical determination is simple since $f(x)$ is a positive and convex function on $(0,pi/4)$ (due to $f''(x)>0$), hence by applying Newton's method with starting point $x=0$ we get



                      $$ rho approx 0.714836$$
                      in just four steps.







                      share|cite|improve this answer












                      share|cite|improve this answer



                      share|cite|improve this answer










                      answered Nov 21 at 17:09









                      Jack D'Aurizio

                      283k33275653




                      283k33275653






















                          up vote
                          1
                          down vote













                          Just for the fun of the approximation.



                          Using the double angle formula Rewrite the equation as $$cos(2x)+4x=3$$ Now, let $t=2x$ to make the equation
                          $$cos(t)+2t=3$$
                          Now, using the approximation
                          $$cos(t) simeqfrac{pi ^2-4t^2}{pi ^2+t^2}qquad (-frac pi 2 leq tleqfrac pi 2)$$ we get the cubic equation
                          $$2 t^3-7 t^2+2 pi ^2 t-2 pi ^2=0$$ which has only one real root. Using the hyperbolic solution for one real root, the result is really ugly but it evaluates as $tapprox 1.428167$ that is to say $xapprox 0.714083$ while the "exact" solution is $xapprox 0.714836$.



                          We can even do better building the $[2,2]$ Padé approximant around $x=frac pi 4$
                          $$cos(2x)+4x-3=frac{(pi -3)+2 left(x-frac{pi }{4}right)+left(2-frac{2 pi }{3}right)
                          left(x-frac{pi }{4}right)^2 } {1-frac{2}{3} left(x-frac{pi }{4}right)^2 }$$
                          Solving the quadratic
                          $$x=frac pi 4+frac{6-sqrt{252-144 pi +24 pi ^2}}{4 pi -12}approx 0.714837$$



                          To even avoid solving the quadratic equation, building instead the $[1,3]$ Padé approximant around $x=frac pi 4$ would lead to
                          $$x=frac pi 4 -frac{(pi -3) left(15-6 pi +pi ^2right)}{4 left(12-6 pi +pi ^2right)}approx 0.714837$$






                          share|cite|improve this answer



























                            up vote
                            1
                            down vote













                            Just for the fun of the approximation.



                            Using the double angle formula Rewrite the equation as $$cos(2x)+4x=3$$ Now, let $t=2x$ to make the equation
                            $$cos(t)+2t=3$$
                            Now, using the approximation
                            $$cos(t) simeqfrac{pi ^2-4t^2}{pi ^2+t^2}qquad (-frac pi 2 leq tleqfrac pi 2)$$ we get the cubic equation
                            $$2 t^3-7 t^2+2 pi ^2 t-2 pi ^2=0$$ which has only one real root. Using the hyperbolic solution for one real root, the result is really ugly but it evaluates as $tapprox 1.428167$ that is to say $xapprox 0.714083$ while the "exact" solution is $xapprox 0.714836$.



                            We can even do better building the $[2,2]$ Padé approximant around $x=frac pi 4$
                            $$cos(2x)+4x-3=frac{(pi -3)+2 left(x-frac{pi }{4}right)+left(2-frac{2 pi }{3}right)
                            left(x-frac{pi }{4}right)^2 } {1-frac{2}{3} left(x-frac{pi }{4}right)^2 }$$
                            Solving the quadratic
                            $$x=frac pi 4+frac{6-sqrt{252-144 pi +24 pi ^2}}{4 pi -12}approx 0.714837$$



                            To even avoid solving the quadratic equation, building instead the $[1,3]$ Padé approximant around $x=frac pi 4$ would lead to
                            $$x=frac pi 4 -frac{(pi -3) left(15-6 pi +pi ^2right)}{4 left(12-6 pi +pi ^2right)}approx 0.714837$$






                            share|cite|improve this answer

























                              up vote
                              1
                              down vote










                              up vote
                              1
                              down vote









                              Just for the fun of the approximation.



                              Using the double angle formula Rewrite the equation as $$cos(2x)+4x=3$$ Now, let $t=2x$ to make the equation
                              $$cos(t)+2t=3$$
                              Now, using the approximation
                              $$cos(t) simeqfrac{pi ^2-4t^2}{pi ^2+t^2}qquad (-frac pi 2 leq tleqfrac pi 2)$$ we get the cubic equation
                              $$2 t^3-7 t^2+2 pi ^2 t-2 pi ^2=0$$ which has only one real root. Using the hyperbolic solution for one real root, the result is really ugly but it evaluates as $tapprox 1.428167$ that is to say $xapprox 0.714083$ while the "exact" solution is $xapprox 0.714836$.



                              We can even do better building the $[2,2]$ Padé approximant around $x=frac pi 4$
                              $$cos(2x)+4x-3=frac{(pi -3)+2 left(x-frac{pi }{4}right)+left(2-frac{2 pi }{3}right)
                              left(x-frac{pi }{4}right)^2 } {1-frac{2}{3} left(x-frac{pi }{4}right)^2 }$$
                              Solving the quadratic
                              $$x=frac pi 4+frac{6-sqrt{252-144 pi +24 pi ^2}}{4 pi -12}approx 0.714837$$



                              To even avoid solving the quadratic equation, building instead the $[1,3]$ Padé approximant around $x=frac pi 4$ would lead to
                              $$x=frac pi 4 -frac{(pi -3) left(15-6 pi +pi ^2right)}{4 left(12-6 pi +pi ^2right)}approx 0.714837$$






                              share|cite|improve this answer














                              Just for the fun of the approximation.



                              Using the double angle formula Rewrite the equation as $$cos(2x)+4x=3$$ Now, let $t=2x$ to make the equation
                              $$cos(t)+2t=3$$
                              Now, using the approximation
                              $$cos(t) simeqfrac{pi ^2-4t^2}{pi ^2+t^2}qquad (-frac pi 2 leq tleqfrac pi 2)$$ we get the cubic equation
                              $$2 t^3-7 t^2+2 pi ^2 t-2 pi ^2=0$$ which has only one real root. Using the hyperbolic solution for one real root, the result is really ugly but it evaluates as $tapprox 1.428167$ that is to say $xapprox 0.714083$ while the "exact" solution is $xapprox 0.714836$.



                              We can even do better building the $[2,2]$ Padé approximant around $x=frac pi 4$
                              $$cos(2x)+4x-3=frac{(pi -3)+2 left(x-frac{pi }{4}right)+left(2-frac{2 pi }{3}right)
                              left(x-frac{pi }{4}right)^2 } {1-frac{2}{3} left(x-frac{pi }{4}right)^2 }$$
                              Solving the quadratic
                              $$x=frac pi 4+frac{6-sqrt{252-144 pi +24 pi ^2}}{4 pi -12}approx 0.714837$$



                              To even avoid solving the quadratic equation, building instead the $[1,3]$ Padé approximant around $x=frac pi 4$ would lead to
                              $$x=frac pi 4 -frac{(pi -3) left(15-6 pi +pi ^2right)}{4 left(12-6 pi +pi ^2right)}approx 0.714837$$







                              share|cite|improve this answer














                              share|cite|improve this answer



                              share|cite|improve this answer








                              edited Nov 23 at 4:24

























                              answered Nov 22 at 18:12









                              Claude Leibovici

                              116k1156131




                              116k1156131






















                                  up vote
                                  0
                                  down vote













                                  There is no solution in terms of elementary functions - you can solve it only by a numerical algorithm. There is Newton's method - the 'goto' method; but possibly there is an algorithm particular to this one that converges particularly fast. Numerical algorithms is a very highly developed area of mathematics, and for various problems numerical algorithms exist that converge truly astoundingly fast! The one I mentioned - Newtons - converges very fast at nearly every application of it ... and for the vast majority of problems you can do at least that well.






                                  share|cite|improve this answer

























                                    up vote
                                    0
                                    down vote













                                    There is no solution in terms of elementary functions - you can solve it only by a numerical algorithm. There is Newton's method - the 'goto' method; but possibly there is an algorithm particular to this one that converges particularly fast. Numerical algorithms is a very highly developed area of mathematics, and for various problems numerical algorithms exist that converge truly astoundingly fast! The one I mentioned - Newtons - converges very fast at nearly every application of it ... and for the vast majority of problems you can do at least that well.






                                    share|cite|improve this answer























                                      up vote
                                      0
                                      down vote










                                      up vote
                                      0
                                      down vote









                                      There is no solution in terms of elementary functions - you can solve it only by a numerical algorithm. There is Newton's method - the 'goto' method; but possibly there is an algorithm particular to this one that converges particularly fast. Numerical algorithms is a very highly developed area of mathematics, and for various problems numerical algorithms exist that converge truly astoundingly fast! The one I mentioned - Newtons - converges very fast at nearly every application of it ... and for the vast majority of problems you can do at least that well.






                                      share|cite|improve this answer












                                      There is no solution in terms of elementary functions - you can solve it only by a numerical algorithm. There is Newton's method - the 'goto' method; but possibly there is an algorithm particular to this one that converges particularly fast. Numerical algorithms is a very highly developed area of mathematics, and for various problems numerical algorithms exist that converge truly astoundingly fast! The one I mentioned - Newtons - converges very fast at nearly every application of it ... and for the vast majority of problems you can do at least that well.







                                      share|cite|improve this answer












                                      share|cite|improve this answer



                                      share|cite|improve this answer










                                      answered Nov 21 at 17:24









                                      AmbretteOrrisey

                                      3548




                                      3548






























                                           

                                          draft saved


                                          draft discarded



















































                                           


                                          draft saved


                                          draft discarded














                                          StackExchange.ready(
                                          function () {
                                          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3008005%2fsolving-sin2-x-1-2x%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                                          }
                                          );

                                          Post as a guest















                                          Required, but never shown





















































                                          Required, but never shown














                                          Required, but never shown












                                          Required, but never shown







                                          Required, but never shown

































                                          Required, but never shown














                                          Required, but never shown












                                          Required, but never shown







                                          Required, but never shown







                                          Popular posts from this blog

                                          Wiesbaden

                                          Marschland

                                          Dieringhausen