Proving rank of $(I_n-{1over n}A_n)$ is $n-1$ where $A_n$ is $ntimes n$ with all entries $1$











up vote
1
down vote

favorite












We were asked to find a symmetric idempotent matrix $H$ with rank $n-1$ such that if $X$ is a column vector with $n$ observations, then ${1over n}X^THX$ is the variance of observations in $X$.



I found the matrix (for $n$ obs) to be $H_n=I_n-{1over n}A_n$ where $I_n$ is identity matrix of dimension $ntimes n$, $A_n$ is again $ntimes n$ with all observations being $1$ and $H_n$ is the required matrix.



It was easy to show this is symmetric and idempotent but I'm facing difficulty with showing its rank is $n-1$.
However, it is easy to see $R_1+R_2+dots+R_n=0$ where $R_i$ is the $i^{th}$ row. So its rank is strictly less than $n$.

I also noticed $R_1+R_2+dots+R_n-R_ine0$ for any $i$.

How should I proceed?










share|cite|improve this question
























  • How many zero eigenvalues does this matrix have? If the matrix is symmetric it should be diagonalizable.
    – Ramiro Scorolli
    Nov 20 at 10:22










  • Sorry, haven't studied eigenvectors yet. Is there an approach without them?
    – Anvit
    Nov 20 at 10:25






  • 2




    It is known (if you don't know this, then it is a very good exercise) that, for an idempotent $n$-by-$n$ matrix $E$ over a field $mathbb{K}$, $ker(E)oplustext{im}(E)=mathbb{K}^n$. (That means $ker(E)+text{im}(E)=mathbb{K}^n$ and $ker(E)captext{im}(E)={0}$.) So, if you find out that $ker(E)$ is $r$-dimensional, then $text{im}(E)$ is $(n-r)$-dimensional, whence $E$ is of rank $n-r$. The same situation applies here. Prove that $ker(H)$ has dimension $1$.
    – Batominovski
    Nov 20 at 10:53












  • @Batominovski $ker(H)={(x,x,dots)|xinmathbb K}$ I think this proves it. Thanks
    – Anvit
    2 days ago















up vote
1
down vote

favorite












We were asked to find a symmetric idempotent matrix $H$ with rank $n-1$ such that if $X$ is a column vector with $n$ observations, then ${1over n}X^THX$ is the variance of observations in $X$.



I found the matrix (for $n$ obs) to be $H_n=I_n-{1over n}A_n$ where $I_n$ is identity matrix of dimension $ntimes n$, $A_n$ is again $ntimes n$ with all observations being $1$ and $H_n$ is the required matrix.



It was easy to show this is symmetric and idempotent but I'm facing difficulty with showing its rank is $n-1$.
However, it is easy to see $R_1+R_2+dots+R_n=0$ where $R_i$ is the $i^{th}$ row. So its rank is strictly less than $n$.

I also noticed $R_1+R_2+dots+R_n-R_ine0$ for any $i$.

How should I proceed?










share|cite|improve this question
























  • How many zero eigenvalues does this matrix have? If the matrix is symmetric it should be diagonalizable.
    – Ramiro Scorolli
    Nov 20 at 10:22










  • Sorry, haven't studied eigenvectors yet. Is there an approach without them?
    – Anvit
    Nov 20 at 10:25






  • 2




    It is known (if you don't know this, then it is a very good exercise) that, for an idempotent $n$-by-$n$ matrix $E$ over a field $mathbb{K}$, $ker(E)oplustext{im}(E)=mathbb{K}^n$. (That means $ker(E)+text{im}(E)=mathbb{K}^n$ and $ker(E)captext{im}(E)={0}$.) So, if you find out that $ker(E)$ is $r$-dimensional, then $text{im}(E)$ is $(n-r)$-dimensional, whence $E$ is of rank $n-r$. The same situation applies here. Prove that $ker(H)$ has dimension $1$.
    – Batominovski
    Nov 20 at 10:53












  • @Batominovski $ker(H)={(x,x,dots)|xinmathbb K}$ I think this proves it. Thanks
    – Anvit
    2 days ago













up vote
1
down vote

favorite









up vote
1
down vote

favorite











We were asked to find a symmetric idempotent matrix $H$ with rank $n-1$ such that if $X$ is a column vector with $n$ observations, then ${1over n}X^THX$ is the variance of observations in $X$.



I found the matrix (for $n$ obs) to be $H_n=I_n-{1over n}A_n$ where $I_n$ is identity matrix of dimension $ntimes n$, $A_n$ is again $ntimes n$ with all observations being $1$ and $H_n$ is the required matrix.



It was easy to show this is symmetric and idempotent but I'm facing difficulty with showing its rank is $n-1$.
However, it is easy to see $R_1+R_2+dots+R_n=0$ where $R_i$ is the $i^{th}$ row. So its rank is strictly less than $n$.

I also noticed $R_1+R_2+dots+R_n-R_ine0$ for any $i$.

How should I proceed?










share|cite|improve this question















We were asked to find a symmetric idempotent matrix $H$ with rank $n-1$ such that if $X$ is a column vector with $n$ observations, then ${1over n}X^THX$ is the variance of observations in $X$.



I found the matrix (for $n$ obs) to be $H_n=I_n-{1over n}A_n$ where $I_n$ is identity matrix of dimension $ntimes n$, $A_n$ is again $ntimes n$ with all observations being $1$ and $H_n$ is the required matrix.



It was easy to show this is symmetric and idempotent but I'm facing difficulty with showing its rank is $n-1$.
However, it is easy to see $R_1+R_2+dots+R_n=0$ where $R_i$ is the $i^{th}$ row. So its rank is strictly less than $n$.

I also noticed $R_1+R_2+dots+R_n-R_ine0$ for any $i$.

How should I proceed?







linear-algebra matrices matrix-rank






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited 2 days ago









StubbornAtom

4,86911137




4,86911137










asked Nov 20 at 10:05









Anvit

1,510419




1,510419












  • How many zero eigenvalues does this matrix have? If the matrix is symmetric it should be diagonalizable.
    – Ramiro Scorolli
    Nov 20 at 10:22










  • Sorry, haven't studied eigenvectors yet. Is there an approach without them?
    – Anvit
    Nov 20 at 10:25






  • 2




    It is known (if you don't know this, then it is a very good exercise) that, for an idempotent $n$-by-$n$ matrix $E$ over a field $mathbb{K}$, $ker(E)oplustext{im}(E)=mathbb{K}^n$. (That means $ker(E)+text{im}(E)=mathbb{K}^n$ and $ker(E)captext{im}(E)={0}$.) So, if you find out that $ker(E)$ is $r$-dimensional, then $text{im}(E)$ is $(n-r)$-dimensional, whence $E$ is of rank $n-r$. The same situation applies here. Prove that $ker(H)$ has dimension $1$.
    – Batominovski
    Nov 20 at 10:53












  • @Batominovski $ker(H)={(x,x,dots)|xinmathbb K}$ I think this proves it. Thanks
    – Anvit
    2 days ago


















  • How many zero eigenvalues does this matrix have? If the matrix is symmetric it should be diagonalizable.
    – Ramiro Scorolli
    Nov 20 at 10:22










  • Sorry, haven't studied eigenvectors yet. Is there an approach without them?
    – Anvit
    Nov 20 at 10:25






  • 2




    It is known (if you don't know this, then it is a very good exercise) that, for an idempotent $n$-by-$n$ matrix $E$ over a field $mathbb{K}$, $ker(E)oplustext{im}(E)=mathbb{K}^n$. (That means $ker(E)+text{im}(E)=mathbb{K}^n$ and $ker(E)captext{im}(E)={0}$.) So, if you find out that $ker(E)$ is $r$-dimensional, then $text{im}(E)$ is $(n-r)$-dimensional, whence $E$ is of rank $n-r$. The same situation applies here. Prove that $ker(H)$ has dimension $1$.
    – Batominovski
    Nov 20 at 10:53












  • @Batominovski $ker(H)={(x,x,dots)|xinmathbb K}$ I think this proves it. Thanks
    – Anvit
    2 days ago
















How many zero eigenvalues does this matrix have? If the matrix is symmetric it should be diagonalizable.
– Ramiro Scorolli
Nov 20 at 10:22




How many zero eigenvalues does this matrix have? If the matrix is symmetric it should be diagonalizable.
– Ramiro Scorolli
Nov 20 at 10:22












Sorry, haven't studied eigenvectors yet. Is there an approach without them?
– Anvit
Nov 20 at 10:25




Sorry, haven't studied eigenvectors yet. Is there an approach without them?
– Anvit
Nov 20 at 10:25




2




2




It is known (if you don't know this, then it is a very good exercise) that, for an idempotent $n$-by-$n$ matrix $E$ over a field $mathbb{K}$, $ker(E)oplustext{im}(E)=mathbb{K}^n$. (That means $ker(E)+text{im}(E)=mathbb{K}^n$ and $ker(E)captext{im}(E)={0}$.) So, if you find out that $ker(E)$ is $r$-dimensional, then $text{im}(E)$ is $(n-r)$-dimensional, whence $E$ is of rank $n-r$. The same situation applies here. Prove that $ker(H)$ has dimension $1$.
– Batominovski
Nov 20 at 10:53






It is known (if you don't know this, then it is a very good exercise) that, for an idempotent $n$-by-$n$ matrix $E$ over a field $mathbb{K}$, $ker(E)oplustext{im}(E)=mathbb{K}^n$. (That means $ker(E)+text{im}(E)=mathbb{K}^n$ and $ker(E)captext{im}(E)={0}$.) So, if you find out that $ker(E)$ is $r$-dimensional, then $text{im}(E)$ is $(n-r)$-dimensional, whence $E$ is of rank $n-r$. The same situation applies here. Prove that $ker(H)$ has dimension $1$.
– Batominovski
Nov 20 at 10:53














@Batominovski $ker(H)={(x,x,dots)|xinmathbb K}$ I think this proves it. Thanks
– Anvit
2 days ago




@Batominovski $ker(H)={(x,x,dots)|xinmathbb K}$ I think this proves it. Thanks
– Anvit
2 days ago










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
3
down vote



accepted










Denoting the column vector of all $1$s by $mathbf1$, we have$$H=I_n-frac{1}{n}mathbf{11}^top$$



Indeed as you say, $H$ is an idempotent matrix. Then we know that $$mathrm{rank}(H)=mathrm{trace}(H)=mathrm{trace}(I_n)-mathrm{trace}left(frac{1}{n}mathbf{11}^topright)=n-1$$





We can also use some trivial rank inequalities although this is quite unnecessary to prove the result:



We know that for any two matrices $A$ and $B$ having the same order, $$mathrm{rank}(A-B+B)le mathrm{rank}(A-B)+mathrm{rank}(B)$$



Or, $$mathrm{rank}(A-B)ge |mathrm{rank}(A)-mathrm{rank}(B)|$$



Noting that $mathbf{11}^top$ is a rank $1$ matrix, applying this inequality on $H$ we get,



$$mathrm{rank}(H)ge n-1$$



Now we can show that $mathrm{rank}(H)$ is never $n$ (the only other possibility) from the fact that $$det(H)=1-frac{1}{n}mathbf1^topmathbf1=1-1=0$$



So it must be that $$mathrm{rank}(H)=n-1$$






share|cite|improve this answer





















  • Both of them are really nice and elegent solutions. Thank you!
    – Anvit
    2 days ago


















up vote
1
down vote













To prove the rank of $H$ is $n-1$, we may look at the linear system $HX = 0$ and prove the dimensions of the space of solutions is $1$. The system $HX = 0$ may be written as



begin{align*}
(S)left{begin{matrix}
x_1 &+& x_2 &+& ldots &x_n &=& n x_1 \
x_1 &+& x_2 &+& ldots &x_n &=& n x_2 \
vdots && &&&vdots && vdots \
x_1 &+& x_2 &+& ldots &x_n &=& n x_n \
end{matrix}right.
end{align*}

now substract the first line to all the other lines :
begin{align*}
(S) &Longleftrightarrow &
left{begin{matrix}
x_1 &+& x_2 &+& ldots &x_n &=& n x_1 \
&&&&& 0 &=& n (x_2-x_1) \
&&&&&vdots&& vdots \
&&&&& 0 &=& n (x_n-x_1) \
end{matrix}right.\
\
& Longleftrightarrow &
left{begin{matrix}
x_1 &+& x_2 &+& ldots &x_n &=& n x_1 \
&&x_2&&& &=& x_1 \
&&&ddots&&&& vdots \
&&&&& x_n &=& x_1 \
end{matrix}right.
end{align*}

Next we subtract all lines $2, ldots, n$ to line $1$ to get
begin{align*}
(S) &Longleftrightarrow &
left{begin{matrix}
x_2&& &=& x_1 \
&ddots &&& vdots \
&&x_n &=& x_1 \
end{matrix}right.
end{align*}

whose solutions are the $1$-dimensional space generated by $begin{pmatrix}1 \ 1 \ vdots \ 1end{pmatrix}$.






share|cite|improve this answer






























    up vote
    0
    down vote













    Let $e_k = (1, omega^k, omega^{2k}, ldots, omega^{(n-1)k})$ where $omega=e^{2pi i/n}$. You have shown that $e_0$ is in the null-space of $H$. For $0<k<n$, $e_k$ is an eigenvector of $H$ of eigenvalue $1$. As the $(e_k)$ are independent (why?), this shows that the rank is $n-1$.






    share|cite|improve this answer





















    • Sorry, I should've mentioned. This is in a Statistics course and I haven't studied eigenvectors
      – Anvit
      Nov 20 at 10:15












    • Go and study them then.
      – Richard Martin
      Nov 20 at 10:18










    • Please tell me if me reasoning is correct. ${e_1,e_2,dots,e_n}$ for a basis for vector space $V=mathbb C^n$ and $H$ is linear transformation $Vto V$. By rank-nullity theorem, rank = $n$-dim(kernel) = $n-1$. If it is correct I just need to show that $e_k$ are independant
      – Anvit
      Nov 20 at 10:47










    • You can pick a basis orthogonal to $e_0$, but you need to show that the kernel has dimension no higher than 1. This is what I did above.
      – Richard Martin
      Nov 20 at 10:52











    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














     

    draft saved


    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3006137%2fproving-rank-of-i-n-1-over-na-n-is-n-1-where-a-n-is-n-times-n-with-a%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes








    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    3
    down vote



    accepted










    Denoting the column vector of all $1$s by $mathbf1$, we have$$H=I_n-frac{1}{n}mathbf{11}^top$$



    Indeed as you say, $H$ is an idempotent matrix. Then we know that $$mathrm{rank}(H)=mathrm{trace}(H)=mathrm{trace}(I_n)-mathrm{trace}left(frac{1}{n}mathbf{11}^topright)=n-1$$





    We can also use some trivial rank inequalities although this is quite unnecessary to prove the result:



    We know that for any two matrices $A$ and $B$ having the same order, $$mathrm{rank}(A-B+B)le mathrm{rank}(A-B)+mathrm{rank}(B)$$



    Or, $$mathrm{rank}(A-B)ge |mathrm{rank}(A)-mathrm{rank}(B)|$$



    Noting that $mathbf{11}^top$ is a rank $1$ matrix, applying this inequality on $H$ we get,



    $$mathrm{rank}(H)ge n-1$$



    Now we can show that $mathrm{rank}(H)$ is never $n$ (the only other possibility) from the fact that $$det(H)=1-frac{1}{n}mathbf1^topmathbf1=1-1=0$$



    So it must be that $$mathrm{rank}(H)=n-1$$






    share|cite|improve this answer





















    • Both of them are really nice and elegent solutions. Thank you!
      – Anvit
      2 days ago















    up vote
    3
    down vote



    accepted










    Denoting the column vector of all $1$s by $mathbf1$, we have$$H=I_n-frac{1}{n}mathbf{11}^top$$



    Indeed as you say, $H$ is an idempotent matrix. Then we know that $$mathrm{rank}(H)=mathrm{trace}(H)=mathrm{trace}(I_n)-mathrm{trace}left(frac{1}{n}mathbf{11}^topright)=n-1$$





    We can also use some trivial rank inequalities although this is quite unnecessary to prove the result:



    We know that for any two matrices $A$ and $B$ having the same order, $$mathrm{rank}(A-B+B)le mathrm{rank}(A-B)+mathrm{rank}(B)$$



    Or, $$mathrm{rank}(A-B)ge |mathrm{rank}(A)-mathrm{rank}(B)|$$



    Noting that $mathbf{11}^top$ is a rank $1$ matrix, applying this inequality on $H$ we get,



    $$mathrm{rank}(H)ge n-1$$



    Now we can show that $mathrm{rank}(H)$ is never $n$ (the only other possibility) from the fact that $$det(H)=1-frac{1}{n}mathbf1^topmathbf1=1-1=0$$



    So it must be that $$mathrm{rank}(H)=n-1$$






    share|cite|improve this answer





















    • Both of them are really nice and elegent solutions. Thank you!
      – Anvit
      2 days ago













    up vote
    3
    down vote



    accepted







    up vote
    3
    down vote



    accepted






    Denoting the column vector of all $1$s by $mathbf1$, we have$$H=I_n-frac{1}{n}mathbf{11}^top$$



    Indeed as you say, $H$ is an idempotent matrix. Then we know that $$mathrm{rank}(H)=mathrm{trace}(H)=mathrm{trace}(I_n)-mathrm{trace}left(frac{1}{n}mathbf{11}^topright)=n-1$$





    We can also use some trivial rank inequalities although this is quite unnecessary to prove the result:



    We know that for any two matrices $A$ and $B$ having the same order, $$mathrm{rank}(A-B+B)le mathrm{rank}(A-B)+mathrm{rank}(B)$$



    Or, $$mathrm{rank}(A-B)ge |mathrm{rank}(A)-mathrm{rank}(B)|$$



    Noting that $mathbf{11}^top$ is a rank $1$ matrix, applying this inequality on $H$ we get,



    $$mathrm{rank}(H)ge n-1$$



    Now we can show that $mathrm{rank}(H)$ is never $n$ (the only other possibility) from the fact that $$det(H)=1-frac{1}{n}mathbf1^topmathbf1=1-1=0$$



    So it must be that $$mathrm{rank}(H)=n-1$$






    share|cite|improve this answer












    Denoting the column vector of all $1$s by $mathbf1$, we have$$H=I_n-frac{1}{n}mathbf{11}^top$$



    Indeed as you say, $H$ is an idempotent matrix. Then we know that $$mathrm{rank}(H)=mathrm{trace}(H)=mathrm{trace}(I_n)-mathrm{trace}left(frac{1}{n}mathbf{11}^topright)=n-1$$





    We can also use some trivial rank inequalities although this is quite unnecessary to prove the result:



    We know that for any two matrices $A$ and $B$ having the same order, $$mathrm{rank}(A-B+B)le mathrm{rank}(A-B)+mathrm{rank}(B)$$



    Or, $$mathrm{rank}(A-B)ge |mathrm{rank}(A)-mathrm{rank}(B)|$$



    Noting that $mathbf{11}^top$ is a rank $1$ matrix, applying this inequality on $H$ we get,



    $$mathrm{rank}(H)ge n-1$$



    Now we can show that $mathrm{rank}(H)$ is never $n$ (the only other possibility) from the fact that $$det(H)=1-frac{1}{n}mathbf1^topmathbf1=1-1=0$$



    So it must be that $$mathrm{rank}(H)=n-1$$







    share|cite|improve this answer












    share|cite|improve this answer



    share|cite|improve this answer










    answered Nov 20 at 11:40









    StubbornAtom

    4,86911137




    4,86911137












    • Both of them are really nice and elegent solutions. Thank you!
      – Anvit
      2 days ago


















    • Both of them are really nice and elegent solutions. Thank you!
      – Anvit
      2 days ago
















    Both of them are really nice and elegent solutions. Thank you!
    – Anvit
    2 days ago




    Both of them are really nice and elegent solutions. Thank you!
    – Anvit
    2 days ago










    up vote
    1
    down vote













    To prove the rank of $H$ is $n-1$, we may look at the linear system $HX = 0$ and prove the dimensions of the space of solutions is $1$. The system $HX = 0$ may be written as



    begin{align*}
    (S)left{begin{matrix}
    x_1 &+& x_2 &+& ldots &x_n &=& n x_1 \
    x_1 &+& x_2 &+& ldots &x_n &=& n x_2 \
    vdots && &&&vdots && vdots \
    x_1 &+& x_2 &+& ldots &x_n &=& n x_n \
    end{matrix}right.
    end{align*}

    now substract the first line to all the other lines :
    begin{align*}
    (S) &Longleftrightarrow &
    left{begin{matrix}
    x_1 &+& x_2 &+& ldots &x_n &=& n x_1 \
    &&&&& 0 &=& n (x_2-x_1) \
    &&&&&vdots&& vdots \
    &&&&& 0 &=& n (x_n-x_1) \
    end{matrix}right.\
    \
    & Longleftrightarrow &
    left{begin{matrix}
    x_1 &+& x_2 &+& ldots &x_n &=& n x_1 \
    &&x_2&&& &=& x_1 \
    &&&ddots&&&& vdots \
    &&&&& x_n &=& x_1 \
    end{matrix}right.
    end{align*}

    Next we subtract all lines $2, ldots, n$ to line $1$ to get
    begin{align*}
    (S) &Longleftrightarrow &
    left{begin{matrix}
    x_2&& &=& x_1 \
    &ddots &&& vdots \
    &&x_n &=& x_1 \
    end{matrix}right.
    end{align*}

    whose solutions are the $1$-dimensional space generated by $begin{pmatrix}1 \ 1 \ vdots \ 1end{pmatrix}$.






    share|cite|improve this answer



























      up vote
      1
      down vote













      To prove the rank of $H$ is $n-1$, we may look at the linear system $HX = 0$ and prove the dimensions of the space of solutions is $1$. The system $HX = 0$ may be written as



      begin{align*}
      (S)left{begin{matrix}
      x_1 &+& x_2 &+& ldots &x_n &=& n x_1 \
      x_1 &+& x_2 &+& ldots &x_n &=& n x_2 \
      vdots && &&&vdots && vdots \
      x_1 &+& x_2 &+& ldots &x_n &=& n x_n \
      end{matrix}right.
      end{align*}

      now substract the first line to all the other lines :
      begin{align*}
      (S) &Longleftrightarrow &
      left{begin{matrix}
      x_1 &+& x_2 &+& ldots &x_n &=& n x_1 \
      &&&&& 0 &=& n (x_2-x_1) \
      &&&&&vdots&& vdots \
      &&&&& 0 &=& n (x_n-x_1) \
      end{matrix}right.\
      \
      & Longleftrightarrow &
      left{begin{matrix}
      x_1 &+& x_2 &+& ldots &x_n &=& n x_1 \
      &&x_2&&& &=& x_1 \
      &&&ddots&&&& vdots \
      &&&&& x_n &=& x_1 \
      end{matrix}right.
      end{align*}

      Next we subtract all lines $2, ldots, n$ to line $1$ to get
      begin{align*}
      (S) &Longleftrightarrow &
      left{begin{matrix}
      x_2&& &=& x_1 \
      &ddots &&& vdots \
      &&x_n &=& x_1 \
      end{matrix}right.
      end{align*}

      whose solutions are the $1$-dimensional space generated by $begin{pmatrix}1 \ 1 \ vdots \ 1end{pmatrix}$.






      share|cite|improve this answer

























        up vote
        1
        down vote










        up vote
        1
        down vote









        To prove the rank of $H$ is $n-1$, we may look at the linear system $HX = 0$ and prove the dimensions of the space of solutions is $1$. The system $HX = 0$ may be written as



        begin{align*}
        (S)left{begin{matrix}
        x_1 &+& x_2 &+& ldots &x_n &=& n x_1 \
        x_1 &+& x_2 &+& ldots &x_n &=& n x_2 \
        vdots && &&&vdots && vdots \
        x_1 &+& x_2 &+& ldots &x_n &=& n x_n \
        end{matrix}right.
        end{align*}

        now substract the first line to all the other lines :
        begin{align*}
        (S) &Longleftrightarrow &
        left{begin{matrix}
        x_1 &+& x_2 &+& ldots &x_n &=& n x_1 \
        &&&&& 0 &=& n (x_2-x_1) \
        &&&&&vdots&& vdots \
        &&&&& 0 &=& n (x_n-x_1) \
        end{matrix}right.\
        \
        & Longleftrightarrow &
        left{begin{matrix}
        x_1 &+& x_2 &+& ldots &x_n &=& n x_1 \
        &&x_2&&& &=& x_1 \
        &&&ddots&&&& vdots \
        &&&&& x_n &=& x_1 \
        end{matrix}right.
        end{align*}

        Next we subtract all lines $2, ldots, n$ to line $1$ to get
        begin{align*}
        (S) &Longleftrightarrow &
        left{begin{matrix}
        x_2&& &=& x_1 \
        &ddots &&& vdots \
        &&x_n &=& x_1 \
        end{matrix}right.
        end{align*}

        whose solutions are the $1$-dimensional space generated by $begin{pmatrix}1 \ 1 \ vdots \ 1end{pmatrix}$.






        share|cite|improve this answer














        To prove the rank of $H$ is $n-1$, we may look at the linear system $HX = 0$ and prove the dimensions of the space of solutions is $1$. The system $HX = 0$ may be written as



        begin{align*}
        (S)left{begin{matrix}
        x_1 &+& x_2 &+& ldots &x_n &=& n x_1 \
        x_1 &+& x_2 &+& ldots &x_n &=& n x_2 \
        vdots && &&&vdots && vdots \
        x_1 &+& x_2 &+& ldots &x_n &=& n x_n \
        end{matrix}right.
        end{align*}

        now substract the first line to all the other lines :
        begin{align*}
        (S) &Longleftrightarrow &
        left{begin{matrix}
        x_1 &+& x_2 &+& ldots &x_n &=& n x_1 \
        &&&&& 0 &=& n (x_2-x_1) \
        &&&&&vdots&& vdots \
        &&&&& 0 &=& n (x_n-x_1) \
        end{matrix}right.\
        \
        & Longleftrightarrow &
        left{begin{matrix}
        x_1 &+& x_2 &+& ldots &x_n &=& n x_1 \
        &&x_2&&& &=& x_1 \
        &&&ddots&&&& vdots \
        &&&&& x_n &=& x_1 \
        end{matrix}right.
        end{align*}

        Next we subtract all lines $2, ldots, n$ to line $1$ to get
        begin{align*}
        (S) &Longleftrightarrow &
        left{begin{matrix}
        x_2&& &=& x_1 \
        &ddots &&& vdots \
        &&x_n &=& x_1 \
        end{matrix}right.
        end{align*}

        whose solutions are the $1$-dimensional space generated by $begin{pmatrix}1 \ 1 \ vdots \ 1end{pmatrix}$.







        share|cite|improve this answer














        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer








        edited Nov 20 at 12:10

























        answered Nov 20 at 12:04









        Joel Cohen

        7,16912037




        7,16912037






















            up vote
            0
            down vote













            Let $e_k = (1, omega^k, omega^{2k}, ldots, omega^{(n-1)k})$ where $omega=e^{2pi i/n}$. You have shown that $e_0$ is in the null-space of $H$. For $0<k<n$, $e_k$ is an eigenvector of $H$ of eigenvalue $1$. As the $(e_k)$ are independent (why?), this shows that the rank is $n-1$.






            share|cite|improve this answer





















            • Sorry, I should've mentioned. This is in a Statistics course and I haven't studied eigenvectors
              – Anvit
              Nov 20 at 10:15












            • Go and study them then.
              – Richard Martin
              Nov 20 at 10:18










            • Please tell me if me reasoning is correct. ${e_1,e_2,dots,e_n}$ for a basis for vector space $V=mathbb C^n$ and $H$ is linear transformation $Vto V$. By rank-nullity theorem, rank = $n$-dim(kernel) = $n-1$. If it is correct I just need to show that $e_k$ are independant
              – Anvit
              Nov 20 at 10:47










            • You can pick a basis orthogonal to $e_0$, but you need to show that the kernel has dimension no higher than 1. This is what I did above.
              – Richard Martin
              Nov 20 at 10:52















            up vote
            0
            down vote













            Let $e_k = (1, omega^k, omega^{2k}, ldots, omega^{(n-1)k})$ where $omega=e^{2pi i/n}$. You have shown that $e_0$ is in the null-space of $H$. For $0<k<n$, $e_k$ is an eigenvector of $H$ of eigenvalue $1$. As the $(e_k)$ are independent (why?), this shows that the rank is $n-1$.






            share|cite|improve this answer





















            • Sorry, I should've mentioned. This is in a Statistics course and I haven't studied eigenvectors
              – Anvit
              Nov 20 at 10:15












            • Go and study them then.
              – Richard Martin
              Nov 20 at 10:18










            • Please tell me if me reasoning is correct. ${e_1,e_2,dots,e_n}$ for a basis for vector space $V=mathbb C^n$ and $H$ is linear transformation $Vto V$. By rank-nullity theorem, rank = $n$-dim(kernel) = $n-1$. If it is correct I just need to show that $e_k$ are independant
              – Anvit
              Nov 20 at 10:47










            • You can pick a basis orthogonal to $e_0$, but you need to show that the kernel has dimension no higher than 1. This is what I did above.
              – Richard Martin
              Nov 20 at 10:52













            up vote
            0
            down vote










            up vote
            0
            down vote









            Let $e_k = (1, omega^k, omega^{2k}, ldots, omega^{(n-1)k})$ where $omega=e^{2pi i/n}$. You have shown that $e_0$ is in the null-space of $H$. For $0<k<n$, $e_k$ is an eigenvector of $H$ of eigenvalue $1$. As the $(e_k)$ are independent (why?), this shows that the rank is $n-1$.






            share|cite|improve this answer












            Let $e_k = (1, omega^k, omega^{2k}, ldots, omega^{(n-1)k})$ where $omega=e^{2pi i/n}$. You have shown that $e_0$ is in the null-space of $H$. For $0<k<n$, $e_k$ is an eigenvector of $H$ of eigenvalue $1$. As the $(e_k)$ are independent (why?), this shows that the rank is $n-1$.







            share|cite|improve this answer












            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer










            answered Nov 20 at 10:14









            Richard Martin

            1,4618




            1,4618












            • Sorry, I should've mentioned. This is in a Statistics course and I haven't studied eigenvectors
              – Anvit
              Nov 20 at 10:15












            • Go and study them then.
              – Richard Martin
              Nov 20 at 10:18










            • Please tell me if me reasoning is correct. ${e_1,e_2,dots,e_n}$ for a basis for vector space $V=mathbb C^n$ and $H$ is linear transformation $Vto V$. By rank-nullity theorem, rank = $n$-dim(kernel) = $n-1$. If it is correct I just need to show that $e_k$ are independant
              – Anvit
              Nov 20 at 10:47










            • You can pick a basis orthogonal to $e_0$, but you need to show that the kernel has dimension no higher than 1. This is what I did above.
              – Richard Martin
              Nov 20 at 10:52


















            • Sorry, I should've mentioned. This is in a Statistics course and I haven't studied eigenvectors
              – Anvit
              Nov 20 at 10:15












            • Go and study them then.
              – Richard Martin
              Nov 20 at 10:18










            • Please tell me if me reasoning is correct. ${e_1,e_2,dots,e_n}$ for a basis for vector space $V=mathbb C^n$ and $H$ is linear transformation $Vto V$. By rank-nullity theorem, rank = $n$-dim(kernel) = $n-1$. If it is correct I just need to show that $e_k$ are independant
              – Anvit
              Nov 20 at 10:47










            • You can pick a basis orthogonal to $e_0$, but you need to show that the kernel has dimension no higher than 1. This is what I did above.
              – Richard Martin
              Nov 20 at 10:52
















            Sorry, I should've mentioned. This is in a Statistics course and I haven't studied eigenvectors
            – Anvit
            Nov 20 at 10:15






            Sorry, I should've mentioned. This is in a Statistics course and I haven't studied eigenvectors
            – Anvit
            Nov 20 at 10:15














            Go and study them then.
            – Richard Martin
            Nov 20 at 10:18




            Go and study them then.
            – Richard Martin
            Nov 20 at 10:18












            Please tell me if me reasoning is correct. ${e_1,e_2,dots,e_n}$ for a basis for vector space $V=mathbb C^n$ and $H$ is linear transformation $Vto V$. By rank-nullity theorem, rank = $n$-dim(kernel) = $n-1$. If it is correct I just need to show that $e_k$ are independant
            – Anvit
            Nov 20 at 10:47




            Please tell me if me reasoning is correct. ${e_1,e_2,dots,e_n}$ for a basis for vector space $V=mathbb C^n$ and $H$ is linear transformation $Vto V$. By rank-nullity theorem, rank = $n$-dim(kernel) = $n-1$. If it is correct I just need to show that $e_k$ are independant
            – Anvit
            Nov 20 at 10:47












            You can pick a basis orthogonal to $e_0$, but you need to show that the kernel has dimension no higher than 1. This is what I did above.
            – Richard Martin
            Nov 20 at 10:52




            You can pick a basis orthogonal to $e_0$, but you need to show that the kernel has dimension no higher than 1. This is what I did above.
            – Richard Martin
            Nov 20 at 10:52


















             

            draft saved


            draft discarded



















































             


            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3006137%2fproving-rank-of-i-n-1-over-na-n-is-n-1-where-a-n-is-n-times-n-with-a%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Wiesbaden

            Marschland

            Dieringhausen