What does $du^2$ notation mean in differential geometry?
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
I'm trying to read Lectures on quasiconformal mappings by Ahlfors, and I have trouble understanding some notation. I have a very basic understanding of differential geometry, so bear with me here.
On page 6 he takes a function $f(z) = u + iv$, $z = x + iy$, and writes
$du = u_x dx + u_y dy$
$dv = v_x dx + v_y dy$
and then says "in classical notation one writes"
$du^2 + dv^2 = (u_x^2 + v_x^2) dx^2 + (2u_x u_y + 2 v_x v_y) dx dy + (u_y^2 + v_y^2) dy^2$
I would like to thoroughly go through this as an exercise in differential geometry.
My understanding of the first equations is this: we have the tangent spaces at a specific point $z$ and $f(z)$, both of which are $mathbb{R}^2$. We have the differential forms $dx, dy$ on the tangent space of the domain of $f$, which act by projecting a vector onto first/second coordinate, and these linear transformations between $mathbb{R}^2$ and $mathbb{R}$ obviously also form a linear space. The function $f$ induces a linear transformation between these spaces, and it can be shown that it's given by these first two equations.
Now I'm a bit lost what he means here by $du^2$, because I don't think it's literally taking the square of $u$? And what object is $dx dy $, is that a wedge product? Basically the entire meaning of the last equation escapes me, thanks in advance.
complex-analysis differential-geometry
|
show 2 more comments
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
I'm trying to read Lectures on quasiconformal mappings by Ahlfors, and I have trouble understanding some notation. I have a very basic understanding of differential geometry, so bear with me here.
On page 6 he takes a function $f(z) = u + iv$, $z = x + iy$, and writes
$du = u_x dx + u_y dy$
$dv = v_x dx + v_y dy$
and then says "in classical notation one writes"
$du^2 + dv^2 = (u_x^2 + v_x^2) dx^2 + (2u_x u_y + 2 v_x v_y) dx dy + (u_y^2 + v_y^2) dy^2$
I would like to thoroughly go through this as an exercise in differential geometry.
My understanding of the first equations is this: we have the tangent spaces at a specific point $z$ and $f(z)$, both of which are $mathbb{R}^2$. We have the differential forms $dx, dy$ on the tangent space of the domain of $f$, which act by projecting a vector onto first/second coordinate, and these linear transformations between $mathbb{R}^2$ and $mathbb{R}$ obviously also form a linear space. The function $f$ induces a linear transformation between these spaces, and it can be shown that it's given by these first two equations.
Now I'm a bit lost what he means here by $du^2$, because I don't think it's literally taking the square of $u$? And what object is $dx dy $, is that a wedge product? Basically the entire meaning of the last equation escapes me, thanks in advance.
complex-analysis differential-geometry
2
Yes, it is literally taking the square, as the expansion shows. $dx,dy$ is the element of area in the $(x,y)$ coordinates.
– Yves Daoust
Nov 20 at 10:34
2
I could be the symmetrization of the tensor product from the two 1-forms, i.e. $mathrm d x mathrm d y (v,w) := mathrm{Sym} ( mathrm d x otimes mathrm d y ) (v,w) = frac{1}{2}left( mathrm d x(v) mathrm d y(w) + mathrm d y(v) mathrm dx(w)right)$? Then the equations reads as a equation for 2-froms. (I think something like this is defined in John M Lee's 'intro to smooth manifolds' book )
– Steffen Plunder
Nov 20 at 10:38
@YvesDaoust I'm confused, isn't the left hand side a one-form? And shouldn't the right hand side be one as well then?
– TheMountainThatCodes
Nov 20 at 10:41
1
No, the differentials are squared.
– Yves Daoust
Nov 20 at 10:45
1
Indeed. (And the differential $d(u^2)=2u,du$ is also not a one-form.)
– Yves Daoust
Nov 20 at 10:59
|
show 2 more comments
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
I'm trying to read Lectures on quasiconformal mappings by Ahlfors, and I have trouble understanding some notation. I have a very basic understanding of differential geometry, so bear with me here.
On page 6 he takes a function $f(z) = u + iv$, $z = x + iy$, and writes
$du = u_x dx + u_y dy$
$dv = v_x dx + v_y dy$
and then says "in classical notation one writes"
$du^2 + dv^2 = (u_x^2 + v_x^2) dx^2 + (2u_x u_y + 2 v_x v_y) dx dy + (u_y^2 + v_y^2) dy^2$
I would like to thoroughly go through this as an exercise in differential geometry.
My understanding of the first equations is this: we have the tangent spaces at a specific point $z$ and $f(z)$, both of which are $mathbb{R}^2$. We have the differential forms $dx, dy$ on the tangent space of the domain of $f$, which act by projecting a vector onto first/second coordinate, and these linear transformations between $mathbb{R}^2$ and $mathbb{R}$ obviously also form a linear space. The function $f$ induces a linear transformation between these spaces, and it can be shown that it's given by these first two equations.
Now I'm a bit lost what he means here by $du^2$, because I don't think it's literally taking the square of $u$? And what object is $dx dy $, is that a wedge product? Basically the entire meaning of the last equation escapes me, thanks in advance.
complex-analysis differential-geometry
I'm trying to read Lectures on quasiconformal mappings by Ahlfors, and I have trouble understanding some notation. I have a very basic understanding of differential geometry, so bear with me here.
On page 6 he takes a function $f(z) = u + iv$, $z = x + iy$, and writes
$du = u_x dx + u_y dy$
$dv = v_x dx + v_y dy$
and then says "in classical notation one writes"
$du^2 + dv^2 = (u_x^2 + v_x^2) dx^2 + (2u_x u_y + 2 v_x v_y) dx dy + (u_y^2 + v_y^2) dy^2$
I would like to thoroughly go through this as an exercise in differential geometry.
My understanding of the first equations is this: we have the tangent spaces at a specific point $z$ and $f(z)$, both of which are $mathbb{R}^2$. We have the differential forms $dx, dy$ on the tangent space of the domain of $f$, which act by projecting a vector onto first/second coordinate, and these linear transformations between $mathbb{R}^2$ and $mathbb{R}$ obviously also form a linear space. The function $f$ induces a linear transformation between these spaces, and it can be shown that it's given by these first two equations.
Now I'm a bit lost what he means here by $du^2$, because I don't think it's literally taking the square of $u$? And what object is $dx dy $, is that a wedge product? Basically the entire meaning of the last equation escapes me, thanks in advance.
complex-analysis differential-geometry
complex-analysis differential-geometry
asked Nov 20 at 10:30
TheMountainThatCodes
1486
1486
2
Yes, it is literally taking the square, as the expansion shows. $dx,dy$ is the element of area in the $(x,y)$ coordinates.
– Yves Daoust
Nov 20 at 10:34
2
I could be the symmetrization of the tensor product from the two 1-forms, i.e. $mathrm d x mathrm d y (v,w) := mathrm{Sym} ( mathrm d x otimes mathrm d y ) (v,w) = frac{1}{2}left( mathrm d x(v) mathrm d y(w) + mathrm d y(v) mathrm dx(w)right)$? Then the equations reads as a equation for 2-froms. (I think something like this is defined in John M Lee's 'intro to smooth manifolds' book )
– Steffen Plunder
Nov 20 at 10:38
@YvesDaoust I'm confused, isn't the left hand side a one-form? And shouldn't the right hand side be one as well then?
– TheMountainThatCodes
Nov 20 at 10:41
1
No, the differentials are squared.
– Yves Daoust
Nov 20 at 10:45
1
Indeed. (And the differential $d(u^2)=2u,du$ is also not a one-form.)
– Yves Daoust
Nov 20 at 10:59
|
show 2 more comments
2
Yes, it is literally taking the square, as the expansion shows. $dx,dy$ is the element of area in the $(x,y)$ coordinates.
– Yves Daoust
Nov 20 at 10:34
2
I could be the symmetrization of the tensor product from the two 1-forms, i.e. $mathrm d x mathrm d y (v,w) := mathrm{Sym} ( mathrm d x otimes mathrm d y ) (v,w) = frac{1}{2}left( mathrm d x(v) mathrm d y(w) + mathrm d y(v) mathrm dx(w)right)$? Then the equations reads as a equation for 2-froms. (I think something like this is defined in John M Lee's 'intro to smooth manifolds' book )
– Steffen Plunder
Nov 20 at 10:38
@YvesDaoust I'm confused, isn't the left hand side a one-form? And shouldn't the right hand side be one as well then?
– TheMountainThatCodes
Nov 20 at 10:41
1
No, the differentials are squared.
– Yves Daoust
Nov 20 at 10:45
1
Indeed. (And the differential $d(u^2)=2u,du$ is also not a one-form.)
– Yves Daoust
Nov 20 at 10:59
2
2
Yes, it is literally taking the square, as the expansion shows. $dx,dy$ is the element of area in the $(x,y)$ coordinates.
– Yves Daoust
Nov 20 at 10:34
Yes, it is literally taking the square, as the expansion shows. $dx,dy$ is the element of area in the $(x,y)$ coordinates.
– Yves Daoust
Nov 20 at 10:34
2
2
I could be the symmetrization of the tensor product from the two 1-forms, i.e. $mathrm d x mathrm d y (v,w) := mathrm{Sym} ( mathrm d x otimes mathrm d y ) (v,w) = frac{1}{2}left( mathrm d x(v) mathrm d y(w) + mathrm d y(v) mathrm dx(w)right)$? Then the equations reads as a equation for 2-froms. (I think something like this is defined in John M Lee's 'intro to smooth manifolds' book )
– Steffen Plunder
Nov 20 at 10:38
I could be the symmetrization of the tensor product from the two 1-forms, i.e. $mathrm d x mathrm d y (v,w) := mathrm{Sym} ( mathrm d x otimes mathrm d y ) (v,w) = frac{1}{2}left( mathrm d x(v) mathrm d y(w) + mathrm d y(v) mathrm dx(w)right)$? Then the equations reads as a equation for 2-froms. (I think something like this is defined in John M Lee's 'intro to smooth manifolds' book )
– Steffen Plunder
Nov 20 at 10:38
@YvesDaoust I'm confused, isn't the left hand side a one-form? And shouldn't the right hand side be one as well then?
– TheMountainThatCodes
Nov 20 at 10:41
@YvesDaoust I'm confused, isn't the left hand side a one-form? And shouldn't the right hand side be one as well then?
– TheMountainThatCodes
Nov 20 at 10:41
1
1
No, the differentials are squared.
– Yves Daoust
Nov 20 at 10:45
No, the differentials are squared.
– Yves Daoust
Nov 20 at 10:45
1
1
Indeed. (And the differential $d(u^2)=2u,du$ is also not a one-form.)
– Yves Daoust
Nov 20 at 10:59
Indeed. (And the differential $d(u^2)=2u,du$ is also not a one-form.)
– Yves Daoust
Nov 20 at 10:59
|
show 2 more comments
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3006163%2fwhat-does-du2-notation-mean-in-differential-geometry%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
2
Yes, it is literally taking the square, as the expansion shows. $dx,dy$ is the element of area in the $(x,y)$ coordinates.
– Yves Daoust
Nov 20 at 10:34
2
I could be the symmetrization of the tensor product from the two 1-forms, i.e. $mathrm d x mathrm d y (v,w) := mathrm{Sym} ( mathrm d x otimes mathrm d y ) (v,w) = frac{1}{2}left( mathrm d x(v) mathrm d y(w) + mathrm d y(v) mathrm dx(w)right)$? Then the equations reads as a equation for 2-froms. (I think something like this is defined in John M Lee's 'intro to smooth manifolds' book )
– Steffen Plunder
Nov 20 at 10:38
@YvesDaoust I'm confused, isn't the left hand side a one-form? And shouldn't the right hand side be one as well then?
– TheMountainThatCodes
Nov 20 at 10:41
1
No, the differentials are squared.
– Yves Daoust
Nov 20 at 10:45
1
Indeed. (And the differential $d(u^2)=2u,du$ is also not a one-form.)
– Yves Daoust
Nov 20 at 10:59