Can three vectors $ v_1,v_2,v_3 in mathbb R^2$ may be chosen from ${{ u_1,u_2,u_3,u_4}}$ such that $ u=...
Let $u_1,u_2,u_3,u_4$ be vectors in $mathbb{ R^2}$ and
$$ u= sum_{j=1}^{4} t_ju_j;text{ }t_j>0 text{ and } sum_{j=1}^{4} t_j=1$$
Then three vectors $ v_1,v_2,v_3 in mathbb{R}^2$ may be chosen from ${{ u_1,u_2,u_3,u_4}}$ such that
$$ u= sum_{j=1}^{3}s_jv_j ;text{ } s_jgeq 0 text{ and } sum_{j=1}^{3} s_j=1$$
Since $u_1,u_2,u_3,u_4$ are linearly dependent, i can replace $u_4$ (assuming $u_4$ is dependent one) by linear combination of $u_1,u_2,u_3$ so that $ u= sum_{j=1}^{3}s_jv_j$ but I can't claim $sum_{j=1}^{3} s_j=1$ .i'm stuck
Please give me a hint! (Using linear algebra )
I didn't studied topology yet, so it's hard for me to understand topological proof!
Thanks.
linear-algebra vector-spaces linear-transformations
add a comment |
Let $u_1,u_2,u_3,u_4$ be vectors in $mathbb{ R^2}$ and
$$ u= sum_{j=1}^{4} t_ju_j;text{ }t_j>0 text{ and } sum_{j=1}^{4} t_j=1$$
Then three vectors $ v_1,v_2,v_3 in mathbb{R}^2$ may be chosen from ${{ u_1,u_2,u_3,u_4}}$ such that
$$ u= sum_{j=1}^{3}s_jv_j ;text{ } s_jgeq 0 text{ and } sum_{j=1}^{3} s_j=1$$
Since $u_1,u_2,u_3,u_4$ are linearly dependent, i can replace $u_4$ (assuming $u_4$ is dependent one) by linear combination of $u_1,u_2,u_3$ so that $ u= sum_{j=1}^{3}s_jv_j$ but I can't claim $sum_{j=1}^{3} s_j=1$ .i'm stuck
Please give me a hint! (Using linear algebra )
I didn't studied topology yet, so it's hard for me to understand topological proof!
Thanks.
linear-algebra vector-spaces linear-transformations
Do you mean chosen from or constructed from? Maybe "chosen from the span of.."?
– Paul
Nov 30 at 12:47
@Paul chosen from given vectors. And not from span
– Cloud JR
Nov 30 at 12:52
Source : part A 6th question. univ.tifr.res.in/gs2019/Files/GS2012_QP_MTH.pdf
– Cloud JR
Nov 30 at 12:53
@CloudJR you can't do what you say you can. For example, if $;u_1=u_2=0;,;;u_3=(1,0);,;;u_4=(0,1);$ , there in $;u=u_4;$ you can't dispose of $;u_4;$...unless some other conditions are given.
– DonAntonio
Nov 30 at 13:04
@DonAntonio, well i actually assume u4 is dependent, let me edit it thanks
– Cloud JR
Nov 30 at 13:45
add a comment |
Let $u_1,u_2,u_3,u_4$ be vectors in $mathbb{ R^2}$ and
$$ u= sum_{j=1}^{4} t_ju_j;text{ }t_j>0 text{ and } sum_{j=1}^{4} t_j=1$$
Then three vectors $ v_1,v_2,v_3 in mathbb{R}^2$ may be chosen from ${{ u_1,u_2,u_3,u_4}}$ such that
$$ u= sum_{j=1}^{3}s_jv_j ;text{ } s_jgeq 0 text{ and } sum_{j=1}^{3} s_j=1$$
Since $u_1,u_2,u_3,u_4$ are linearly dependent, i can replace $u_4$ (assuming $u_4$ is dependent one) by linear combination of $u_1,u_2,u_3$ so that $ u= sum_{j=1}^{3}s_jv_j$ but I can't claim $sum_{j=1}^{3} s_j=1$ .i'm stuck
Please give me a hint! (Using linear algebra )
I didn't studied topology yet, so it's hard for me to understand topological proof!
Thanks.
linear-algebra vector-spaces linear-transformations
Let $u_1,u_2,u_3,u_4$ be vectors in $mathbb{ R^2}$ and
$$ u= sum_{j=1}^{4} t_ju_j;text{ }t_j>0 text{ and } sum_{j=1}^{4} t_j=1$$
Then three vectors $ v_1,v_2,v_3 in mathbb{R}^2$ may be chosen from ${{ u_1,u_2,u_3,u_4}}$ such that
$$ u= sum_{j=1}^{3}s_jv_j ;text{ } s_jgeq 0 text{ and } sum_{j=1}^{3} s_j=1$$
Since $u_1,u_2,u_3,u_4$ are linearly dependent, i can replace $u_4$ (assuming $u_4$ is dependent one) by linear combination of $u_1,u_2,u_3$ so that $ u= sum_{j=1}^{3}s_jv_j$ but I can't claim $sum_{j=1}^{3} s_j=1$ .i'm stuck
Please give me a hint! (Using linear algebra )
I didn't studied topology yet, so it's hard for me to understand topological proof!
Thanks.
linear-algebra vector-spaces linear-transformations
linear-algebra vector-spaces linear-transformations
edited Nov 30 at 13:52
asked Nov 30 at 12:44
Cloud JR
820417
820417
Do you mean chosen from or constructed from? Maybe "chosen from the span of.."?
– Paul
Nov 30 at 12:47
@Paul chosen from given vectors. And not from span
– Cloud JR
Nov 30 at 12:52
Source : part A 6th question. univ.tifr.res.in/gs2019/Files/GS2012_QP_MTH.pdf
– Cloud JR
Nov 30 at 12:53
@CloudJR you can't do what you say you can. For example, if $;u_1=u_2=0;,;;u_3=(1,0);,;;u_4=(0,1);$ , there in $;u=u_4;$ you can't dispose of $;u_4;$...unless some other conditions are given.
– DonAntonio
Nov 30 at 13:04
@DonAntonio, well i actually assume u4 is dependent, let me edit it thanks
– Cloud JR
Nov 30 at 13:45
add a comment |
Do you mean chosen from or constructed from? Maybe "chosen from the span of.."?
– Paul
Nov 30 at 12:47
@Paul chosen from given vectors. And not from span
– Cloud JR
Nov 30 at 12:52
Source : part A 6th question. univ.tifr.res.in/gs2019/Files/GS2012_QP_MTH.pdf
– Cloud JR
Nov 30 at 12:53
@CloudJR you can't do what you say you can. For example, if $;u_1=u_2=0;,;;u_3=(1,0);,;;u_4=(0,1);$ , there in $;u=u_4;$ you can't dispose of $;u_4;$...unless some other conditions are given.
– DonAntonio
Nov 30 at 13:04
@DonAntonio, well i actually assume u4 is dependent, let me edit it thanks
– Cloud JR
Nov 30 at 13:45
Do you mean chosen from or constructed from? Maybe "chosen from the span of.."?
– Paul
Nov 30 at 12:47
Do you mean chosen from or constructed from? Maybe "chosen from the span of.."?
– Paul
Nov 30 at 12:47
@Paul chosen from given vectors. And not from span
– Cloud JR
Nov 30 at 12:52
@Paul chosen from given vectors. And not from span
– Cloud JR
Nov 30 at 12:52
Source : part A 6th question. univ.tifr.res.in/gs2019/Files/GS2012_QP_MTH.pdf
– Cloud JR
Nov 30 at 12:53
Source : part A 6th question. univ.tifr.res.in/gs2019/Files/GS2012_QP_MTH.pdf
– Cloud JR
Nov 30 at 12:53
@CloudJR you can't do what you say you can. For example, if $;u_1=u_2=0;,;;u_3=(1,0);,;;u_4=(0,1);$ , there in $;u=u_4;$ you can't dispose of $;u_4;$...unless some other conditions are given.
– DonAntonio
Nov 30 at 13:04
@CloudJR you can't do what you say you can. For example, if $;u_1=u_2=0;,;;u_3=(1,0);,;;u_4=(0,1);$ , there in $;u=u_4;$ you can't dispose of $;u_4;$...unless some other conditions are given.
– DonAntonio
Nov 30 at 13:04
@DonAntonio, well i actually assume u4 is dependent, let me edit it thanks
– Cloud JR
Nov 30 at 13:45
@DonAntonio, well i actually assume u4 is dependent, let me edit it thanks
– Cloud JR
Nov 30 at 13:45
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
By its definition, $u$ lies in the convex hull of the $u_i$. It suffices to show that for any $u$ there are three $u_i$ whose convex hull contains $u$.
- If there are four points on the convex hull, without loss of generality take them to be $u_1u_2u_3u_4$ in that order. Then $u_1u_2u_3$ and $u_3u_4u_1$ partition the hull, so $u$ lies in at least one of them; the points of the enclosing triangle may be taken as the $v_i$.
- If there are only three points on the convex hull, a correct choice of $v_i$ is simply those three points.
- The two- and one-point cases are trivial.
I didn't studied convex hull before. Your proof looks geometrically intuitive, but it's hard for me to understand
– Cloud JR
Nov 30 at 13:50
@CloudJR Perhaps you studied "barycentric coordinates" and stuff, which is just next to convex hulls and etc. ?
– DonAntonio
Nov 30 at 13:52
But i will try to understand, and i will comment if i understood or having any problem. Please help ! Thanks
– Cloud JR
Nov 30 at 13:54
@DonAntonio nope. I'm not that good at geometry , i am just a second year undergraduate. I think it was a linear algebra problem, but when i tried no linear algebraic tools works... So i ask help here.I'm gonna check it out , in wiki or some books and let you know if i understood. Thanks
– Cloud JR
Nov 30 at 13:59
As far as I remember this is standard 2nd. undergraduate year stuff, and many times it is taught within linear algebra and not until topology...
– DonAntonio
Nov 30 at 14:08
|
show 3 more comments
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3020053%2fcan-three-vectors-v-1-v-2-v-3-in-mathbb-r2-may-be-chosen-from-u-1-u-2%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
By its definition, $u$ lies in the convex hull of the $u_i$. It suffices to show that for any $u$ there are three $u_i$ whose convex hull contains $u$.
- If there are four points on the convex hull, without loss of generality take them to be $u_1u_2u_3u_4$ in that order. Then $u_1u_2u_3$ and $u_3u_4u_1$ partition the hull, so $u$ lies in at least one of them; the points of the enclosing triangle may be taken as the $v_i$.
- If there are only three points on the convex hull, a correct choice of $v_i$ is simply those three points.
- The two- and one-point cases are trivial.
I didn't studied convex hull before. Your proof looks geometrically intuitive, but it's hard for me to understand
– Cloud JR
Nov 30 at 13:50
@CloudJR Perhaps you studied "barycentric coordinates" and stuff, which is just next to convex hulls and etc. ?
– DonAntonio
Nov 30 at 13:52
But i will try to understand, and i will comment if i understood or having any problem. Please help ! Thanks
– Cloud JR
Nov 30 at 13:54
@DonAntonio nope. I'm not that good at geometry , i am just a second year undergraduate. I think it was a linear algebra problem, but when i tried no linear algebraic tools works... So i ask help here.I'm gonna check it out , in wiki or some books and let you know if i understood. Thanks
– Cloud JR
Nov 30 at 13:59
As far as I remember this is standard 2nd. undergraduate year stuff, and many times it is taught within linear algebra and not until topology...
– DonAntonio
Nov 30 at 14:08
|
show 3 more comments
By its definition, $u$ lies in the convex hull of the $u_i$. It suffices to show that for any $u$ there are three $u_i$ whose convex hull contains $u$.
- If there are four points on the convex hull, without loss of generality take them to be $u_1u_2u_3u_4$ in that order. Then $u_1u_2u_3$ and $u_3u_4u_1$ partition the hull, so $u$ lies in at least one of them; the points of the enclosing triangle may be taken as the $v_i$.
- If there are only three points on the convex hull, a correct choice of $v_i$ is simply those three points.
- The two- and one-point cases are trivial.
I didn't studied convex hull before. Your proof looks geometrically intuitive, but it's hard for me to understand
– Cloud JR
Nov 30 at 13:50
@CloudJR Perhaps you studied "barycentric coordinates" and stuff, which is just next to convex hulls and etc. ?
– DonAntonio
Nov 30 at 13:52
But i will try to understand, and i will comment if i understood or having any problem. Please help ! Thanks
– Cloud JR
Nov 30 at 13:54
@DonAntonio nope. I'm not that good at geometry , i am just a second year undergraduate. I think it was a linear algebra problem, but when i tried no linear algebraic tools works... So i ask help here.I'm gonna check it out , in wiki or some books and let you know if i understood. Thanks
– Cloud JR
Nov 30 at 13:59
As far as I remember this is standard 2nd. undergraduate year stuff, and many times it is taught within linear algebra and not until topology...
– DonAntonio
Nov 30 at 14:08
|
show 3 more comments
By its definition, $u$ lies in the convex hull of the $u_i$. It suffices to show that for any $u$ there are three $u_i$ whose convex hull contains $u$.
- If there are four points on the convex hull, without loss of generality take them to be $u_1u_2u_3u_4$ in that order. Then $u_1u_2u_3$ and $u_3u_4u_1$ partition the hull, so $u$ lies in at least one of them; the points of the enclosing triangle may be taken as the $v_i$.
- If there are only three points on the convex hull, a correct choice of $v_i$ is simply those three points.
- The two- and one-point cases are trivial.
By its definition, $u$ lies in the convex hull of the $u_i$. It suffices to show that for any $u$ there are three $u_i$ whose convex hull contains $u$.
- If there are four points on the convex hull, without loss of generality take them to be $u_1u_2u_3u_4$ in that order. Then $u_1u_2u_3$ and $u_3u_4u_1$ partition the hull, so $u$ lies in at least one of them; the points of the enclosing triangle may be taken as the $v_i$.
- If there are only three points on the convex hull, a correct choice of $v_i$ is simply those three points.
- The two- and one-point cases are trivial.
answered Nov 30 at 13:19
Parcly Taxel
41.2k137199
41.2k137199
I didn't studied convex hull before. Your proof looks geometrically intuitive, but it's hard for me to understand
– Cloud JR
Nov 30 at 13:50
@CloudJR Perhaps you studied "barycentric coordinates" and stuff, which is just next to convex hulls and etc. ?
– DonAntonio
Nov 30 at 13:52
But i will try to understand, and i will comment if i understood or having any problem. Please help ! Thanks
– Cloud JR
Nov 30 at 13:54
@DonAntonio nope. I'm not that good at geometry , i am just a second year undergraduate. I think it was a linear algebra problem, but when i tried no linear algebraic tools works... So i ask help here.I'm gonna check it out , in wiki or some books and let you know if i understood. Thanks
– Cloud JR
Nov 30 at 13:59
As far as I remember this is standard 2nd. undergraduate year stuff, and many times it is taught within linear algebra and not until topology...
– DonAntonio
Nov 30 at 14:08
|
show 3 more comments
I didn't studied convex hull before. Your proof looks geometrically intuitive, but it's hard for me to understand
– Cloud JR
Nov 30 at 13:50
@CloudJR Perhaps you studied "barycentric coordinates" and stuff, which is just next to convex hulls and etc. ?
– DonAntonio
Nov 30 at 13:52
But i will try to understand, and i will comment if i understood or having any problem. Please help ! Thanks
– Cloud JR
Nov 30 at 13:54
@DonAntonio nope. I'm not that good at geometry , i am just a second year undergraduate. I think it was a linear algebra problem, but when i tried no linear algebraic tools works... So i ask help here.I'm gonna check it out , in wiki or some books and let you know if i understood. Thanks
– Cloud JR
Nov 30 at 13:59
As far as I remember this is standard 2nd. undergraduate year stuff, and many times it is taught within linear algebra and not until topology...
– DonAntonio
Nov 30 at 14:08
I didn't studied convex hull before. Your proof looks geometrically intuitive, but it's hard for me to understand
– Cloud JR
Nov 30 at 13:50
I didn't studied convex hull before. Your proof looks geometrically intuitive, but it's hard for me to understand
– Cloud JR
Nov 30 at 13:50
@CloudJR Perhaps you studied "barycentric coordinates" and stuff, which is just next to convex hulls and etc. ?
– DonAntonio
Nov 30 at 13:52
@CloudJR Perhaps you studied "barycentric coordinates" and stuff, which is just next to convex hulls and etc. ?
– DonAntonio
Nov 30 at 13:52
But i will try to understand, and i will comment if i understood or having any problem. Please help ! Thanks
– Cloud JR
Nov 30 at 13:54
But i will try to understand, and i will comment if i understood or having any problem. Please help ! Thanks
– Cloud JR
Nov 30 at 13:54
@DonAntonio nope. I'm not that good at geometry , i am just a second year undergraduate. I think it was a linear algebra problem, but when i tried no linear algebraic tools works... So i ask help here.I'm gonna check it out , in wiki or some books and let you know if i understood. Thanks
– Cloud JR
Nov 30 at 13:59
@DonAntonio nope. I'm not that good at geometry , i am just a second year undergraduate. I think it was a linear algebra problem, but when i tried no linear algebraic tools works... So i ask help here.I'm gonna check it out , in wiki or some books and let you know if i understood. Thanks
– Cloud JR
Nov 30 at 13:59
As far as I remember this is standard 2nd. undergraduate year stuff, and many times it is taught within linear algebra and not until topology...
– DonAntonio
Nov 30 at 14:08
As far as I remember this is standard 2nd. undergraduate year stuff, and many times it is taught within linear algebra and not until topology...
– DonAntonio
Nov 30 at 14:08
|
show 3 more comments
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3020053%2fcan-three-vectors-v-1-v-2-v-3-in-mathbb-r2-may-be-chosen-from-u-1-u-2%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Do you mean chosen from or constructed from? Maybe "chosen from the span of.."?
– Paul
Nov 30 at 12:47
@Paul chosen from given vectors. And not from span
– Cloud JR
Nov 30 at 12:52
Source : part A 6th question. univ.tifr.res.in/gs2019/Files/GS2012_QP_MTH.pdf
– Cloud JR
Nov 30 at 12:53
@CloudJR you can't do what you say you can. For example, if $;u_1=u_2=0;,;;u_3=(1,0);,;;u_4=(0,1);$ , there in $;u=u_4;$ you can't dispose of $;u_4;$...unless some other conditions are given.
– DonAntonio
Nov 30 at 13:04
@DonAntonio, well i actually assume u4 is dependent, let me edit it thanks
– Cloud JR
Nov 30 at 13:45