If the multiplication of a column independent matrix and its pseudo-inverse is positive definition?












0












$begingroup$


Let's consider a matrix J has the size of m by n (m>n) and all columns are linear independent. Therefore, $J^TJ$ is invertible. Then, the Moore–Penrose inverse of J is $J^+=(J^TJ)^{-1}J^T$. Obviously, there is $J^+J=I$.



My question is if $JJ^+$ is positive definition?



I test this in MATALB software and find this is true for several cases, but how to prove it rigorously?



Thank you!










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$

















    0












    $begingroup$


    Let's consider a matrix J has the size of m by n (m>n) and all columns are linear independent. Therefore, $J^TJ$ is invertible. Then, the Moore–Penrose inverse of J is $J^+=(J^TJ)^{-1}J^T$. Obviously, there is $J^+J=I$.



    My question is if $JJ^+$ is positive definition?



    I test this in MATALB software and find this is true for several cases, but how to prove it rigorously?



    Thank you!










    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$















      0












      0








      0





      $begingroup$


      Let's consider a matrix J has the size of m by n (m>n) and all columns are linear independent. Therefore, $J^TJ$ is invertible. Then, the Moore–Penrose inverse of J is $J^+=(J^TJ)^{-1}J^T$. Obviously, there is $J^+J=I$.



      My question is if $JJ^+$ is positive definition?



      I test this in MATALB software and find this is true for several cases, but how to prove it rigorously?



      Thank you!










      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      Let's consider a matrix J has the size of m by n (m>n) and all columns are linear independent. Therefore, $J^TJ$ is invertible. Then, the Moore–Penrose inverse of J is $J^+=(J^TJ)^{-1}J^T$. Obviously, there is $J^+J=I$.



      My question is if $JJ^+$ is positive definition?



      I test this in MATALB software and find this is true for several cases, but how to prove it rigorously?



      Thank you!







      linear-algebra






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Dec 9 '18 at 4:34







      David

















      asked Dec 9 '18 at 3:04









      DavidDavid

      32




      32






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          0












          $begingroup$

          Welcome to the Math SE.



          $JJ^+$ is not positive definite, but it is positive semi-definite, since it is not full rank. To see this first observe that if $P:=JJ^+$ then $P^2=P$, hence it is a projection matrix. A property of these matrices is that they have eigenvalues of either $1$ or $0$, which is easy to prove. Also, $P$ is symmetric, ie. $P=P^T$. These two facts are enough to conclude that $JJ^+$ is positive semi-definite.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            });
            });
            }, "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3031952%2fif-the-multiplication-of-a-column-independent-matrix-and-its-pseudo-inverse-is-p%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            0












            $begingroup$

            Welcome to the Math SE.



            $JJ^+$ is not positive definite, but it is positive semi-definite, since it is not full rank. To see this first observe that if $P:=JJ^+$ then $P^2=P$, hence it is a projection matrix. A property of these matrices is that they have eigenvalues of either $1$ or $0$, which is easy to prove. Also, $P$ is symmetric, ie. $P=P^T$. These two facts are enough to conclude that $JJ^+$ is positive semi-definite.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$


















              0












              $begingroup$

              Welcome to the Math SE.



              $JJ^+$ is not positive definite, but it is positive semi-definite, since it is not full rank. To see this first observe that if $P:=JJ^+$ then $P^2=P$, hence it is a projection matrix. A property of these matrices is that they have eigenvalues of either $1$ or $0$, which is easy to prove. Also, $P$ is symmetric, ie. $P=P^T$. These two facts are enough to conclude that $JJ^+$ is positive semi-definite.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$
















                0












                0








                0





                $begingroup$

                Welcome to the Math SE.



                $JJ^+$ is not positive definite, but it is positive semi-definite, since it is not full rank. To see this first observe that if $P:=JJ^+$ then $P^2=P$, hence it is a projection matrix. A property of these matrices is that they have eigenvalues of either $1$ or $0$, which is easy to prove. Also, $P$ is symmetric, ie. $P=P^T$. These two facts are enough to conclude that $JJ^+$ is positive semi-definite.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$



                Welcome to the Math SE.



                $JJ^+$ is not positive definite, but it is positive semi-definite, since it is not full rank. To see this first observe that if $P:=JJ^+$ then $P^2=P$, hence it is a projection matrix. A property of these matrices is that they have eigenvalues of either $1$ or $0$, which is easy to prove. Also, $P$ is symmetric, ie. $P=P^T$. These two facts are enough to conclude that $JJ^+$ is positive semi-definite.







                share|cite|improve this answer












                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer










                answered Dec 9 '18 at 21:28









                obareeyobareey

                2,99411028




                2,99411028






























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3031952%2fif-the-multiplication-of-a-column-independent-matrix-and-its-pseudo-inverse-is-p%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    Wiesbaden

                    Marschland

                    Dieringhausen