Proof of Logarithm map formulae from $SO(3)$ to $mathfrak {so}(3)$












2












$begingroup$


According to exponential map, there also exist a logarithm map
$$log:SO(3) to mathfrak {so}(3).$$
Suppose a vector $t inmathfrak {so}(3)$ and $t=|t|w$, according to exponential map
$$R = cos|t|I+(1-cos |t|)ww^T+sin |t|w^{land}.$$
So the inverse(i.e. from rotation matrix $R$ to vector $t$) is
$$|t|=cos^{-1}left(frac{operatorname{Tr}(R)-1}{2}right)tag 1$$
$$w = frac{1}{2sin(|t|)}
begin{bmatrix} r_{32}-r_{23} \ r_{13}-r_{31} \ r_{21}-r_{12}
end{bmatrix} tag 2$$
where $r_{ij}$ is elements of $R$. I can easily derive (1) while stuck in (2), can anyone help me out?






linear-algebra lie-groups lie-algebras rotations







share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    WP not enough?
    $endgroup$
    – Cosmas Zachos
    Dec 10 '18 at 23:14


















2












$begingroup$


According to exponential map, there also exist a logarithm map
$$log:SO(3) to mathfrak {so}(3).$$
Suppose a vector $t inmathfrak {so}(3)$ and $t=|t|w$, according to exponential map
$$R = cos|t|I+(1-cos |t|)ww^T+sin |t|w^{land}.$$
So the inverse(i.e. from rotation matrix $R$ to vector $t$) is
$$|t|=cos^{-1}left(frac{operatorname{Tr}(R)-1}{2}right)tag 1$$
$$w = frac{1}{2sin(|t|)}
begin{bmatrix} r_{32}-r_{23} \ r_{13}-r_{31} \ r_{21}-r_{12}
end{bmatrix} tag 2$$
where $r_{ij}$ is elements of $R$. I can easily derive (1) while stuck in (2), can anyone help me out?






linear-algebra lie-groups lie-algebras rotations







share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    WP not enough?
    $endgroup$
    – Cosmas Zachos
    Dec 10 '18 at 23:14
















2












2








2





$begingroup$


According to exponential map, there also exist a logarithm map
$$log:SO(3) to mathfrak {so}(3).$$
Suppose a vector $t inmathfrak {so}(3)$ and $t=|t|w$, according to exponential map
$$R = cos|t|I+(1-cos |t|)ww^T+sin |t|w^{land}.$$
So the inverse(i.e. from rotation matrix $R$ to vector $t$) is
$$|t|=cos^{-1}left(frac{operatorname{Tr}(R)-1}{2}right)tag 1$$
$$w = frac{1}{2sin(|t|)}
begin{bmatrix} r_{32}-r_{23} \ r_{13}-r_{31} \ r_{21}-r_{12}
end{bmatrix} tag 2$$
where $r_{ij}$ is elements of $R$. I can easily derive (1) while stuck in (2), can anyone help me out?






linear-algebra lie-groups lie-algebras rotations







share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




According to exponential map, there also exist a logarithm map
$$log:SO(3) to mathfrak {so}(3).$$
Suppose a vector $t inmathfrak {so}(3)$ and $t=|t|w$, according to exponential map
$$R = cos|t|I+(1-cos |t|)ww^T+sin |t|w^{land}.$$
So the inverse(i.e. from rotation matrix $R$ to vector $t$) is
$$|t|=cos^{-1}left(frac{operatorname{Tr}(R)-1}{2}right)tag 1$$
$$w = frac{1}{2sin(|t|)}
begin{bmatrix} r_{32}-r_{23} \ r_{13}-r_{31} \ r_{21}-r_{12}
end{bmatrix} tag 2$$
where $r_{ij}$ is elements of $R$. I can easily derive (1) while stuck in (2), can anyone help me out?






linear-algebra lie-groups lie-algebras rotations




linear-algebra lie-groups lie-algebras rotations






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Dec 15 '18 at 14:28









amWhy

1




1










asked Dec 9 '18 at 4:16









FinleyFinley

375213




375213












  • $begingroup$
    WP not enough?
    $endgroup$
    – Cosmas Zachos
    Dec 10 '18 at 23:14




















  • $begingroup$
    WP not enough?
    $endgroup$
    – Cosmas Zachos
    Dec 10 '18 at 23:14


















$begingroup$
WP not enough?
$endgroup$
– Cosmas Zachos
Dec 10 '18 at 23:14






$begingroup$
WP not enough?
$endgroup$
– Cosmas Zachos
Dec 10 '18 at 23:14












1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















1












$begingroup$

This is a standard formula accompanying the Rodrigues rotation formula, obvious if only you use the right notation! The important thing is is to streamline your orthogonal matrix R. Its logarithm is the antisymmetric matrix K, defined by the linear cross product at the end of your expansion of R,
$$
Kequiv
left[begin{array}{ccc}
0 & -t_3 & t_2 \
t_3 & 0 & -t_1 \
-t_2 & t_1 & 0
end{array}right] ~,
$$
so that $| t|^2= -frac{operatorname {Tr} (K^2)}{2}equiv | K|^2$; hence $K=|t| hat K$ with $| hat K|=1$ .



Now the crucial thing is to re-express the Rodrigues formula in this notation,
$$
R=(R^T)^{-1}= e^K= {mathbb 1} + sin |t| ~ hat K + (1-cos|t|) hat K ^2 .
$$
Note how different the coefficient of the identity looks, contrasted to your vector expression: it is not a mistake (read up on the point in WP.... well-wishers frequently "correct" it! Of course, this expression follows directly from the characteristic equation for K, not Rodrigues' original argument).



So, tracing this expression, and the fact that K is traceless since antisymmetric, your (1) follows.



Now antisymmetrize R,
$$
frac{R-R^T}{2}= sin|t| ~ hat K ,
$$
since the other two terms are symmetric matrices. Convert your "unit" antisymmetric matrix to your unit vector w and you have (2).






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3031999%2fproof-of-logarithm-map-formulae-from-so3-to-mathfrak-so3%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    1












    $begingroup$

    This is a standard formula accompanying the Rodrigues rotation formula, obvious if only you use the right notation! The important thing is is to streamline your orthogonal matrix R. Its logarithm is the antisymmetric matrix K, defined by the linear cross product at the end of your expansion of R,
    $$
    Kequiv
    left[begin{array}{ccc}
    0 & -t_3 & t_2 \
    t_3 & 0 & -t_1 \
    -t_2 & t_1 & 0
    end{array}right] ~,
    $$
    so that $| t|^2= -frac{operatorname {Tr} (K^2)}{2}equiv | K|^2$; hence $K=|t| hat K$ with $| hat K|=1$ .



    Now the crucial thing is to re-express the Rodrigues formula in this notation,
    $$
    R=(R^T)^{-1}= e^K= {mathbb 1} + sin |t| ~ hat K + (1-cos|t|) hat K ^2 .
    $$
    Note how different the coefficient of the identity looks, contrasted to your vector expression: it is not a mistake (read up on the point in WP.... well-wishers frequently "correct" it! Of course, this expression follows directly from the characteristic equation for K, not Rodrigues' original argument).



    So, tracing this expression, and the fact that K is traceless since antisymmetric, your (1) follows.



    Now antisymmetrize R,
    $$
    frac{R-R^T}{2}= sin|t| ~ hat K ,
    $$
    since the other two terms are symmetric matrices. Convert your "unit" antisymmetric matrix to your unit vector w and you have (2).






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$


















      1












      $begingroup$

      This is a standard formula accompanying the Rodrigues rotation formula, obvious if only you use the right notation! The important thing is is to streamline your orthogonal matrix R. Its logarithm is the antisymmetric matrix K, defined by the linear cross product at the end of your expansion of R,
      $$
      Kequiv
      left[begin{array}{ccc}
      0 & -t_3 & t_2 \
      t_3 & 0 & -t_1 \
      -t_2 & t_1 & 0
      end{array}right] ~,
      $$
      so that $| t|^2= -frac{operatorname {Tr} (K^2)}{2}equiv | K|^2$; hence $K=|t| hat K$ with $| hat K|=1$ .



      Now the crucial thing is to re-express the Rodrigues formula in this notation,
      $$
      R=(R^T)^{-1}= e^K= {mathbb 1} + sin |t| ~ hat K + (1-cos|t|) hat K ^2 .
      $$
      Note how different the coefficient of the identity looks, contrasted to your vector expression: it is not a mistake (read up on the point in WP.... well-wishers frequently "correct" it! Of course, this expression follows directly from the characteristic equation for K, not Rodrigues' original argument).



      So, tracing this expression, and the fact that K is traceless since antisymmetric, your (1) follows.



      Now antisymmetrize R,
      $$
      frac{R-R^T}{2}= sin|t| ~ hat K ,
      $$
      since the other two terms are symmetric matrices. Convert your "unit" antisymmetric matrix to your unit vector w and you have (2).






      share|cite|improve this answer











      $endgroup$
















        1












        1








        1





        $begingroup$

        This is a standard formula accompanying the Rodrigues rotation formula, obvious if only you use the right notation! The important thing is is to streamline your orthogonal matrix R. Its logarithm is the antisymmetric matrix K, defined by the linear cross product at the end of your expansion of R,
        $$
        Kequiv
        left[begin{array}{ccc}
        0 & -t_3 & t_2 \
        t_3 & 0 & -t_1 \
        -t_2 & t_1 & 0
        end{array}right] ~,
        $$
        so that $| t|^2= -frac{operatorname {Tr} (K^2)}{2}equiv | K|^2$; hence $K=|t| hat K$ with $| hat K|=1$ .



        Now the crucial thing is to re-express the Rodrigues formula in this notation,
        $$
        R=(R^T)^{-1}= e^K= {mathbb 1} + sin |t| ~ hat K + (1-cos|t|) hat K ^2 .
        $$
        Note how different the coefficient of the identity looks, contrasted to your vector expression: it is not a mistake (read up on the point in WP.... well-wishers frequently "correct" it! Of course, this expression follows directly from the characteristic equation for K, not Rodrigues' original argument).



        So, tracing this expression, and the fact that K is traceless since antisymmetric, your (1) follows.



        Now antisymmetrize R,
        $$
        frac{R-R^T}{2}= sin|t| ~ hat K ,
        $$
        since the other two terms are symmetric matrices. Convert your "unit" antisymmetric matrix to your unit vector w and you have (2).






        share|cite|improve this answer











        $endgroup$



        This is a standard formula accompanying the Rodrigues rotation formula, obvious if only you use the right notation! The important thing is is to streamline your orthogonal matrix R. Its logarithm is the antisymmetric matrix K, defined by the linear cross product at the end of your expansion of R,
        $$
        Kequiv
        left[begin{array}{ccc}
        0 & -t_3 & t_2 \
        t_3 & 0 & -t_1 \
        -t_2 & t_1 & 0
        end{array}right] ~,
        $$
        so that $| t|^2= -frac{operatorname {Tr} (K^2)}{2}equiv | K|^2$; hence $K=|t| hat K$ with $| hat K|=1$ .



        Now the crucial thing is to re-express the Rodrigues formula in this notation,
        $$
        R=(R^T)^{-1}= e^K= {mathbb 1} + sin |t| ~ hat K + (1-cos|t|) hat K ^2 .
        $$
        Note how different the coefficient of the identity looks, contrasted to your vector expression: it is not a mistake (read up on the point in WP.... well-wishers frequently "correct" it! Of course, this expression follows directly from the characteristic equation for K, not Rodrigues' original argument).



        So, tracing this expression, and the fact that K is traceless since antisymmetric, your (1) follows.



        Now antisymmetrize R,
        $$
        frac{R-R^T}{2}= sin|t| ~ hat K ,
        $$
        since the other two terms are symmetric matrices. Convert your "unit" antisymmetric matrix to your unit vector w and you have (2).







        share|cite|improve this answer














        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer








        edited Dec 11 '18 at 19:36

























        answered Dec 11 '18 at 0:50









        Cosmas ZachosCosmas Zachos

        1,582520




        1,582520






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid …



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3031999%2fproof-of-logarithm-map-formulae-from-so3-to-mathfrak-so3%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            -

            Popular posts from this blog

            Wiesbaden

            Image
            Wappen Deutschlandkarte 50.0825 8.24 117 Koordinaten: 50° 5′  N , 8° 14′  O Basisdaten Bundesland: Hessen Regierungsbezirk: Darmstadt Höhe: 117 m ü. NHN Fläche: 203,93 km 2 Einwohner: 278.654 (31. Dez. 2017) [1] Bevölkerungsdichte: 1366 Einwohner je km 2 Postleitzahlen: 65183–65207, 55246, 55252 Vorlage:Infobox Gemeinde in Deutschland/Wartung/PLZ enthält Text Vorwahlen: 0611, 06122, 06127, 06134 Kfz-Kennzeichen: WI Gemeindeschlüssel: 06 4 14 000 LOCODE: DE WIB NUTS: DE714 Stadtgliederung: 26 Ortsbezirke Adresse der Stadtverwaltung: Schlossplatz 6 65183 Wiesbaden Webpräsenz: www.wiesbaden.de Oberbürgermeister: Sven Gerich (SPD) Lage der Landeshauptstadt Wiesbaden in Hessen und im Regierungsbezirk Darmstadt Offizielles Logo der Landeshauptstadt Wiesbaden Flagge der Landeshauptstadt Wiesbaden Wiesbaden is
            Read more

            Marschland

            Image
            Kilometerweite Marsch in den Vier- und Marschlanden am Elbdeich Die Wedeler Marschlandschaft in Schleswig-Holstein Der Hadelner Kanal zur Entwässerung der Marsch Die tief gelegene Marsch und ein Entwässerungskanal Das Schöpfwerk Otterndorf im Land Hadeln zur Entwässerung der Medem verfügte damals bereits über die größte Kreiselpumpe Europas. Das Schöpfwerk in Neuhaus für die Aue und des Neuhaus-Bülkauer Kanals Als Marsch(land) (v. niederdt., altsächs. mersc ) – auch Masch , Mersch oder Schwemmland genannt – bezeichnet man eine nacheiszeitlich entstandene geomorphologische Landform im Gebiet der nordwestdeutschen Küsten und Flüsse sowie vergleichbare Landformen weltweit. Inhaltsverzeichnis 1 Landschaft 2 Entstehung 3 Marschböden 4 Nutzung 5 Marschgebiete in Deutschland 6 Siehe auch 7 Literatur 8 Weblinks 9 Einzelnachweise Landschaft | Marschen sind generell flache Landstriche ohne natürliche Erhebungen. Si
            Read more

            Dieringhausen

            Image
            Dieringhausen Stadt Gummersbach 50.982777777778 7.5316666666667 165 Koordinaten: 50° 58′ 58″  N , 7° 31′ 54″  O Höhe: 165  (160–245)  m Einwohner: 5055  (30. Jun. 2016) Postleitzahl: 51645 Vorwahl: 02261 Lage von Dieringhausen in Gummersbach Im Hohl ca. 1927–1930 Ansicht von Südwesten bei Bünghausen Dieringhausen (im örtlichen Dialekt Dierkesen ) ist ein Ortsteil von Gummersbach im Oberbergischen Kreis, Regierungsbezirk Köln, Nordrhein-Westfalen (Deutschland). Inhaltsverzeichnis 1 Geographie 2 Geschichte 3 Kultur 3.1 Sehenswürdigkeiten 3.2 Regelmäßige Veranstaltungen 4 Infrastruktur und Wirtschaft 4.1 Verkehr 4.1.1 Schienen- und Busverkehr 4.1.2 Straßen 4.2 Öffentliche Einrichtungen 4.2.1 Schulen und Bildungseinrichtungen 4.2.2 Kirchliche Einrichtungen 5 Persönlichkeiten 5.1 In Dieringhausen geboren 5.2 In Dieringhausen gelebt 6 Einzelnachweise 7
            Read more