Approximating measurement data with $ae^{bx}+c$












0












$begingroup$


I have measurement data which looks like the sum of an exponential and a constant function. It is enough to see it as a continuous function, say $f(x)$.



I am looking for the $a$, $b$, $c$ values for which



$$intlimits_0^1big(ae^{bx}+c-f(x)big)^2dx$$



minimal.



I think the problem is well-known, although typically such functions are approximated with polynoms.



What I did:



First I've tried to find the local minimums, so I created an equation system using



$$frac{d}{d{a,b,c}}intlimits_0^1big(ae^{bx}+c-f(x)big)^2dx=0$$



The result was a practically not calculable equation system, after filling some sheet of paper with formulas. Using the Lambert W wouldn't be a problem for me, but the situation was too complex to apply even that.



However, such a well-known and probably useful problem probably has already some results.



Actually, even a local minimum would be already useful, I don't suspect multiple local minima in the $(a,b,c) in mathbb{R}^3$ space.



Or, maybe an entirely different direction should be used?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    are you sure to want a minimizing of the linear error, and not of a log error ?
    $endgroup$
    – G Cab
    Dec 19 '18 at 23:52










  • $begingroup$
    @GCab In the current case, yes. In a broader sense, the data looks like the sum of an exponential and a constant function, thus I think trying to minimize the logarithmic error wouldn't help too much.
    $endgroup$
    – peterh
    Dec 20 '18 at 9:42
















0












$begingroup$


I have measurement data which looks like the sum of an exponential and a constant function. It is enough to see it as a continuous function, say $f(x)$.



I am looking for the $a$, $b$, $c$ values for which



$$intlimits_0^1big(ae^{bx}+c-f(x)big)^2dx$$



minimal.



I think the problem is well-known, although typically such functions are approximated with polynoms.



What I did:



First I've tried to find the local minimums, so I created an equation system using



$$frac{d}{d{a,b,c}}intlimits_0^1big(ae^{bx}+c-f(x)big)^2dx=0$$



The result was a practically not calculable equation system, after filling some sheet of paper with formulas. Using the Lambert W wouldn't be a problem for me, but the situation was too complex to apply even that.



However, such a well-known and probably useful problem probably has already some results.



Actually, even a local minimum would be already useful, I don't suspect multiple local minima in the $(a,b,c) in mathbb{R}^3$ space.



Or, maybe an entirely different direction should be used?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    are you sure to want a minimizing of the linear error, and not of a log error ?
    $endgroup$
    – G Cab
    Dec 19 '18 at 23:52










  • $begingroup$
    @GCab In the current case, yes. In a broader sense, the data looks like the sum of an exponential and a constant function, thus I think trying to minimize the logarithmic error wouldn't help too much.
    $endgroup$
    – peterh
    Dec 20 '18 at 9:42














0












0








0


1



$begingroup$


I have measurement data which looks like the sum of an exponential and a constant function. It is enough to see it as a continuous function, say $f(x)$.



I am looking for the $a$, $b$, $c$ values for which



$$intlimits_0^1big(ae^{bx}+c-f(x)big)^2dx$$



minimal.



I think the problem is well-known, although typically such functions are approximated with polynoms.



What I did:



First I've tried to find the local minimums, so I created an equation system using



$$frac{d}{d{a,b,c}}intlimits_0^1big(ae^{bx}+c-f(x)big)^2dx=0$$



The result was a practically not calculable equation system, after filling some sheet of paper with formulas. Using the Lambert W wouldn't be a problem for me, but the situation was too complex to apply even that.



However, such a well-known and probably useful problem probably has already some results.



Actually, even a local minimum would be already useful, I don't suspect multiple local minima in the $(a,b,c) in mathbb{R}^3$ space.



Or, maybe an entirely different direction should be used?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




I have measurement data which looks like the sum of an exponential and a constant function. It is enough to see it as a continuous function, say $f(x)$.



I am looking for the $a$, $b$, $c$ values for which



$$intlimits_0^1big(ae^{bx}+c-f(x)big)^2dx$$



minimal.



I think the problem is well-known, although typically such functions are approximated with polynoms.



What I did:



First I've tried to find the local minimums, so I created an equation system using



$$frac{d}{d{a,b,c}}intlimits_0^1big(ae^{bx}+c-f(x)big)^2dx=0$$



The result was a practically not calculable equation system, after filling some sheet of paper with formulas. Using the Lambert W wouldn't be a problem for me, but the situation was too complex to apply even that.



However, such a well-known and probably useful problem probably has already some results.



Actually, even a local minimum would be already useful, I don't suspect multiple local minima in the $(a,b,c) in mathbb{R}^3$ space.



Or, maybe an entirely different direction should be used?







exponential-function approximation lambert-w






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Dec 19 '18 at 21:22









peterhpeterh

2,17351731




2,17351731








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    are you sure to want a minimizing of the linear error, and not of a log error ?
    $endgroup$
    – G Cab
    Dec 19 '18 at 23:52










  • $begingroup$
    @GCab In the current case, yes. In a broader sense, the data looks like the sum of an exponential and a constant function, thus I think trying to minimize the logarithmic error wouldn't help too much.
    $endgroup$
    – peterh
    Dec 20 '18 at 9:42














  • 1




    $begingroup$
    are you sure to want a minimizing of the linear error, and not of a log error ?
    $endgroup$
    – G Cab
    Dec 19 '18 at 23:52










  • $begingroup$
    @GCab In the current case, yes. In a broader sense, the data looks like the sum of an exponential and a constant function, thus I think trying to minimize the logarithmic error wouldn't help too much.
    $endgroup$
    – peterh
    Dec 20 '18 at 9:42








1




1




$begingroup$
are you sure to want a minimizing of the linear error, and not of a log error ?
$endgroup$
– G Cab
Dec 19 '18 at 23:52




$begingroup$
are you sure to want a minimizing of the linear error, and not of a log error ?
$endgroup$
– G Cab
Dec 19 '18 at 23:52












$begingroup$
@GCab In the current case, yes. In a broader sense, the data looks like the sum of an exponential and a constant function, thus I think trying to minimize the logarithmic error wouldn't help too much.
$endgroup$
– peterh
Dec 20 '18 at 9:42




$begingroup$
@GCab In the current case, yes. In a broader sense, the data looks like the sum of an exponential and a constant function, thus I think trying to minimize the logarithmic error wouldn't help too much.
$endgroup$
– peterh
Dec 20 '18 at 9:42










0






active

oldest

votes











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3046888%2fapproximating-measurement-data-with-aebxc%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























0






active

oldest

votes








0






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes
















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3046888%2fapproximating-measurement-data-with-aebxc%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Wiesbaden

Marschland

Dieringhausen