What is the functional consequence of equivalent norms?












0












$begingroup$


I'm trying to understand the concept of equivalent norms. I've already taken a look at a similar question about this, but do not fully understand.



Two norms are said to be equivalent if:



$ m||v||_b le ||v||_a le M ||v||_b $, for all $v in textbf{V}$ and $ m neq 0 $.



However, I don't think that this literally means that $||v||_1 = ||v||_2$. From reading other posts, my understanding of this is that this means that "two norms that are equivalent induce the same topology".



Can someone give me a higher-level understanding of what this means, suitable for a freshman linear algebra student? What implication does this have for, e.g. applied linear algebra?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    The norms are equivalent in the sense that sequences which converge in one norm converge in the other, or that a subspace with respect to one norm is a subspace with respect to the other.
    $endgroup$
    – Math1000
    Dec 19 '18 at 22:17










  • $begingroup$
    In finite dimensions all norms are equivalent in this sense. But from an applied point of view different norms are very different, e.g. the norm might encode which variables are more or less important. This concept is more useful when dealing with function spaces, since maybe it is easy to show that convergence happens w.r.t. one norm and then you want to show it happens w.r.t. to another (e.g. there are different ways to define Sobolev norms, and they are all equivalent ... But this is not freshman level.)
    $endgroup$
    – Lorenzo
    Dec 20 '18 at 1:16


















0












$begingroup$


I'm trying to understand the concept of equivalent norms. I've already taken a look at a similar question about this, but do not fully understand.



Two norms are said to be equivalent if:



$ m||v||_b le ||v||_a le M ||v||_b $, for all $v in textbf{V}$ and $ m neq 0 $.



However, I don't think that this literally means that $||v||_1 = ||v||_2$. From reading other posts, my understanding of this is that this means that "two norms that are equivalent induce the same topology".



Can someone give me a higher-level understanding of what this means, suitable for a freshman linear algebra student? What implication does this have for, e.g. applied linear algebra?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    The norms are equivalent in the sense that sequences which converge in one norm converge in the other, or that a subspace with respect to one norm is a subspace with respect to the other.
    $endgroup$
    – Math1000
    Dec 19 '18 at 22:17










  • $begingroup$
    In finite dimensions all norms are equivalent in this sense. But from an applied point of view different norms are very different, e.g. the norm might encode which variables are more or less important. This concept is more useful when dealing with function spaces, since maybe it is easy to show that convergence happens w.r.t. one norm and then you want to show it happens w.r.t. to another (e.g. there are different ways to define Sobolev norms, and they are all equivalent ... But this is not freshman level.)
    $endgroup$
    – Lorenzo
    Dec 20 '18 at 1:16
















0












0








0





$begingroup$


I'm trying to understand the concept of equivalent norms. I've already taken a look at a similar question about this, but do not fully understand.



Two norms are said to be equivalent if:



$ m||v||_b le ||v||_a le M ||v||_b $, for all $v in textbf{V}$ and $ m neq 0 $.



However, I don't think that this literally means that $||v||_1 = ||v||_2$. From reading other posts, my understanding of this is that this means that "two norms that are equivalent induce the same topology".



Can someone give me a higher-level understanding of what this means, suitable for a freshman linear algebra student? What implication does this have for, e.g. applied linear algebra?










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




I'm trying to understand the concept of equivalent norms. I've already taken a look at a similar question about this, but do not fully understand.



Two norms are said to be equivalent if:



$ m||v||_b le ||v||_a le M ||v||_b $, for all $v in textbf{V}$ and $ m neq 0 $.



However, I don't think that this literally means that $||v||_1 = ||v||_2$. From reading other posts, my understanding of this is that this means that "two norms that are equivalent induce the same topology".



Can someone give me a higher-level understanding of what this means, suitable for a freshman linear algebra student? What implication does this have for, e.g. applied linear algebra?







linear-algebra






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Dec 19 '18 at 21:46









GinaGina

183




183












  • $begingroup$
    The norms are equivalent in the sense that sequences which converge in one norm converge in the other, or that a subspace with respect to one norm is a subspace with respect to the other.
    $endgroup$
    – Math1000
    Dec 19 '18 at 22:17










  • $begingroup$
    In finite dimensions all norms are equivalent in this sense. But from an applied point of view different norms are very different, e.g. the norm might encode which variables are more or less important. This concept is more useful when dealing with function spaces, since maybe it is easy to show that convergence happens w.r.t. one norm and then you want to show it happens w.r.t. to another (e.g. there are different ways to define Sobolev norms, and they are all equivalent ... But this is not freshman level.)
    $endgroup$
    – Lorenzo
    Dec 20 '18 at 1:16




















  • $begingroup$
    The norms are equivalent in the sense that sequences which converge in one norm converge in the other, or that a subspace with respect to one norm is a subspace with respect to the other.
    $endgroup$
    – Math1000
    Dec 19 '18 at 22:17










  • $begingroup$
    In finite dimensions all norms are equivalent in this sense. But from an applied point of view different norms are very different, e.g. the norm might encode which variables are more or less important. This concept is more useful when dealing with function spaces, since maybe it is easy to show that convergence happens w.r.t. one norm and then you want to show it happens w.r.t. to another (e.g. there are different ways to define Sobolev norms, and they are all equivalent ... But this is not freshman level.)
    $endgroup$
    – Lorenzo
    Dec 20 '18 at 1:16


















$begingroup$
The norms are equivalent in the sense that sequences which converge in one norm converge in the other, or that a subspace with respect to one norm is a subspace with respect to the other.
$endgroup$
– Math1000
Dec 19 '18 at 22:17




$begingroup$
The norms are equivalent in the sense that sequences which converge in one norm converge in the other, or that a subspace with respect to one norm is a subspace with respect to the other.
$endgroup$
– Math1000
Dec 19 '18 at 22:17












$begingroup$
In finite dimensions all norms are equivalent in this sense. But from an applied point of view different norms are very different, e.g. the norm might encode which variables are more or less important. This concept is more useful when dealing with function spaces, since maybe it is easy to show that convergence happens w.r.t. one norm and then you want to show it happens w.r.t. to another (e.g. there are different ways to define Sobolev norms, and they are all equivalent ... But this is not freshman level.)
$endgroup$
– Lorenzo
Dec 20 '18 at 1:16






$begingroup$
In finite dimensions all norms are equivalent in this sense. But from an applied point of view different norms are very different, e.g. the norm might encode which variables are more or less important. This concept is more useful when dealing with function spaces, since maybe it is easy to show that convergence happens w.r.t. one norm and then you want to show it happens w.r.t. to another (e.g. there are different ways to define Sobolev norms, and they are all equivalent ... But this is not freshman level.)
$endgroup$
– Lorenzo
Dec 20 '18 at 1:16












0






active

oldest

votes











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3046902%2fwhat-is-the-functional-consequence-of-equivalent-norms%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























0






active

oldest

votes








0






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes
















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3046902%2fwhat-is-the-functional-consequence-of-equivalent-norms%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Wiesbaden

Marschland

Dieringhausen