How to quickly resolve a value from noise around a signal?












0












$begingroup$


Kalman filter seems to be slow in resolving a steady signal.



Is there a way to apply Ito calculus (stochastic calculus) to resolve the signal quicker?





The data takes a minute or longer to converge using a Kalman filter at 1hz sampling.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Do you have a picture or some characterization of your data?
    $endgroup$
    – Adrian Keister
    Dec 19 '18 at 22:25










  • $begingroup$
    added a description
    $endgroup$
    – jdl
    Dec 19 '18 at 22:28






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Where? I see no description. A graph would be an excellent thing to add. Also, any context about sampling rate, physical units, etc.
    $endgroup$
    – Adrian Keister
    Dec 19 '18 at 22:30
















0












$begingroup$


Kalman filter seems to be slow in resolving a steady signal.



Is there a way to apply Ito calculus (stochastic calculus) to resolve the signal quicker?





The data takes a minute or longer to converge using a Kalman filter at 1hz sampling.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Do you have a picture or some characterization of your data?
    $endgroup$
    – Adrian Keister
    Dec 19 '18 at 22:25










  • $begingroup$
    added a description
    $endgroup$
    – jdl
    Dec 19 '18 at 22:28






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Where? I see no description. A graph would be an excellent thing to add. Also, any context about sampling rate, physical units, etc.
    $endgroup$
    – Adrian Keister
    Dec 19 '18 at 22:30














0












0








0





$begingroup$


Kalman filter seems to be slow in resolving a steady signal.



Is there a way to apply Ito calculus (stochastic calculus) to resolve the signal quicker?





The data takes a minute or longer to converge using a Kalman filter at 1hz sampling.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




Kalman filter seems to be slow in resolving a steady signal.



Is there a way to apply Ito calculus (stochastic calculus) to resolve the signal quicker?





The data takes a minute or longer to converge using a Kalman filter at 1hz sampling.







stochastic-calculus data-analysis kalman-filter






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Dec 19 '18 at 23:04







jdl

















asked Dec 19 '18 at 22:21









jdljdl

1205




1205








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Do you have a picture or some characterization of your data?
    $endgroup$
    – Adrian Keister
    Dec 19 '18 at 22:25










  • $begingroup$
    added a description
    $endgroup$
    – jdl
    Dec 19 '18 at 22:28






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Where? I see no description. A graph would be an excellent thing to add. Also, any context about sampling rate, physical units, etc.
    $endgroup$
    – Adrian Keister
    Dec 19 '18 at 22:30














  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Do you have a picture or some characterization of your data?
    $endgroup$
    – Adrian Keister
    Dec 19 '18 at 22:25










  • $begingroup$
    added a description
    $endgroup$
    – jdl
    Dec 19 '18 at 22:28






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Where? I see no description. A graph would be an excellent thing to add. Also, any context about sampling rate, physical units, etc.
    $endgroup$
    – Adrian Keister
    Dec 19 '18 at 22:30








2




2




$begingroup$
Do you have a picture or some characterization of your data?
$endgroup$
– Adrian Keister
Dec 19 '18 at 22:25




$begingroup$
Do you have a picture or some characterization of your data?
$endgroup$
– Adrian Keister
Dec 19 '18 at 22:25












$begingroup$
added a description
$endgroup$
– jdl
Dec 19 '18 at 22:28




$begingroup$
added a description
$endgroup$
– jdl
Dec 19 '18 at 22:28




2




2




$begingroup$
Where? I see no description. A graph would be an excellent thing to add. Also, any context about sampling rate, physical units, etc.
$endgroup$
– Adrian Keister
Dec 19 '18 at 22:30




$begingroup$
Where? I see no description. A graph would be an excellent thing to add. Also, any context about sampling rate, physical units, etc.
$endgroup$
– Adrian Keister
Dec 19 '18 at 22:30










0






active

oldest

votes











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3046934%2fhow-to-quickly-resolve-a-value-from-noise-around-a-signal%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























0






active

oldest

votes








0






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes
















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3046934%2fhow-to-quickly-resolve-a-value-from-noise-around-a-signal%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Wiesbaden

Marschland

Dieringhausen