DIfferentials definition in single variable calculus using limits
$begingroup$
I'm trying to merge the ideas of single variable calculus and the hand-waving done in newtonian mechanics when differentials are used as a measure of infinitesimal quantity change $dy$ instead of a derivative function$frac{dy}{dx}$, this quantities are then simplified and moved around as numbers.
After a while this quantities are integrated to solve some diferential equation, for example $dy$ is integrated and you get $y(x)$ as a result.
$int dy dx= y(x)$
I'm trying to formalize this concept a bit by using the definition of integral and derivative to try to get to the same results
Given the definition of a derivative
$$ frac{dy}{dx} = lim_{Delta xrightarrow0} left( frac{y(x+Delta x)-y(x)}{Delta x} right)$$
I Could define
$$frac{dy}{dx}dx = lim_{Delta xrightarrow0} left( frac{y(x+Delta x)-y(x)}{Delta x} Delta x right) $$
And then define what looks like the idea used in physics, the change in the function (as opposed to the rate of change)
$$dy= lim_{Delta xrightarrow0} left( (y(x+Delta x)-y(x)) right) $$
I know that the area under a curve (the reinmann sum) is calculated as
$$int_a^b y(x) dx= lim_{nrightarrow infty} sum_{i=1}^n yleft((ifrac{b-a}{n})+aright) left(frac{b-a}{n} right)$$
If you where to integrate $dy$ it would look like this
to accomodate for the definition of the integral I make $Delta x = lim_{nrightarrow infty}frac{b-a}{n}$
$$int_a^b dy dx= lim_{nrightarrow infty} sum_{i=1}^n left(y(x+frac{b-a}{n})-y(x)right) left(frac{b-a}{n} right)$$
now this sum looks like an area to me, but it's kind of a funny area. let me make an abuse of notation to try to clarify what I'm reading here
$$sum left(y(x+Delta x)-y(x)right) Delta x $$
$$sum left(Delta yright) Delta x $$
This area kind of represents the sum of an infinite bunch of rectangles that follow the function plot between $x=a$ and $x=b$ and have $Delta y$ height and $Delta x$ width.
That's a funny result, I expected the sum of the instantaneous changes (the antiderivative).
what went wrong?
did any of this make any sense?
calculus ordinary-differential-equations notation physics
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I'm trying to merge the ideas of single variable calculus and the hand-waving done in newtonian mechanics when differentials are used as a measure of infinitesimal quantity change $dy$ instead of a derivative function$frac{dy}{dx}$, this quantities are then simplified and moved around as numbers.
After a while this quantities are integrated to solve some diferential equation, for example $dy$ is integrated and you get $y(x)$ as a result.
$int dy dx= y(x)$
I'm trying to formalize this concept a bit by using the definition of integral and derivative to try to get to the same results
Given the definition of a derivative
$$ frac{dy}{dx} = lim_{Delta xrightarrow0} left( frac{y(x+Delta x)-y(x)}{Delta x} right)$$
I Could define
$$frac{dy}{dx}dx = lim_{Delta xrightarrow0} left( frac{y(x+Delta x)-y(x)}{Delta x} Delta x right) $$
And then define what looks like the idea used in physics, the change in the function (as opposed to the rate of change)
$$dy= lim_{Delta xrightarrow0} left( (y(x+Delta x)-y(x)) right) $$
I know that the area under a curve (the reinmann sum) is calculated as
$$int_a^b y(x) dx= lim_{nrightarrow infty} sum_{i=1}^n yleft((ifrac{b-a}{n})+aright) left(frac{b-a}{n} right)$$
If you where to integrate $dy$ it would look like this
to accomodate for the definition of the integral I make $Delta x = lim_{nrightarrow infty}frac{b-a}{n}$
$$int_a^b dy dx= lim_{nrightarrow infty} sum_{i=1}^n left(y(x+frac{b-a}{n})-y(x)right) left(frac{b-a}{n} right)$$
now this sum looks like an area to me, but it's kind of a funny area. let me make an abuse of notation to try to clarify what I'm reading here
$$sum left(y(x+Delta x)-y(x)right) Delta x $$
$$sum left(Delta yright) Delta x $$
This area kind of represents the sum of an infinite bunch of rectangles that follow the function plot between $x=a$ and $x=b$ and have $Delta y$ height and $Delta x$ width.
That's a funny result, I expected the sum of the instantaneous changes (the antiderivative).
what went wrong?
did any of this make any sense?
calculus ordinary-differential-equations notation physics
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
If $y$ Is continuous, then your definition of $dy$ just gives zero. Look instead at linear approximations to the change in $y$.
$endgroup$
– amd
Dec 19 '18 at 8:18
$begingroup$
Linear aproximation does a good job to explain the concept of $dy$ in the context of physics, but when I want to integrate it I dont seem to get back $y(t)$ (and that makes sense). So I cant find how to make use of linear aproximation to explain the concept of $frac{dy}{dx}dx = dy$ and then $int dydx = y(t)$
$endgroup$
– Joaquin Brandan
Dec 19 '18 at 14:24
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I'm trying to merge the ideas of single variable calculus and the hand-waving done in newtonian mechanics when differentials are used as a measure of infinitesimal quantity change $dy$ instead of a derivative function$frac{dy}{dx}$, this quantities are then simplified and moved around as numbers.
After a while this quantities are integrated to solve some diferential equation, for example $dy$ is integrated and you get $y(x)$ as a result.
$int dy dx= y(x)$
I'm trying to formalize this concept a bit by using the definition of integral and derivative to try to get to the same results
Given the definition of a derivative
$$ frac{dy}{dx} = lim_{Delta xrightarrow0} left( frac{y(x+Delta x)-y(x)}{Delta x} right)$$
I Could define
$$frac{dy}{dx}dx = lim_{Delta xrightarrow0} left( frac{y(x+Delta x)-y(x)}{Delta x} Delta x right) $$
And then define what looks like the idea used in physics, the change in the function (as opposed to the rate of change)
$$dy= lim_{Delta xrightarrow0} left( (y(x+Delta x)-y(x)) right) $$
I know that the area under a curve (the reinmann sum) is calculated as
$$int_a^b y(x) dx= lim_{nrightarrow infty} sum_{i=1}^n yleft((ifrac{b-a}{n})+aright) left(frac{b-a}{n} right)$$
If you where to integrate $dy$ it would look like this
to accomodate for the definition of the integral I make $Delta x = lim_{nrightarrow infty}frac{b-a}{n}$
$$int_a^b dy dx= lim_{nrightarrow infty} sum_{i=1}^n left(y(x+frac{b-a}{n})-y(x)right) left(frac{b-a}{n} right)$$
now this sum looks like an area to me, but it's kind of a funny area. let me make an abuse of notation to try to clarify what I'm reading here
$$sum left(y(x+Delta x)-y(x)right) Delta x $$
$$sum left(Delta yright) Delta x $$
This area kind of represents the sum of an infinite bunch of rectangles that follow the function plot between $x=a$ and $x=b$ and have $Delta y$ height and $Delta x$ width.
That's a funny result, I expected the sum of the instantaneous changes (the antiderivative).
what went wrong?
did any of this make any sense?
calculus ordinary-differential-equations notation physics
$endgroup$
I'm trying to merge the ideas of single variable calculus and the hand-waving done in newtonian mechanics when differentials are used as a measure of infinitesimal quantity change $dy$ instead of a derivative function$frac{dy}{dx}$, this quantities are then simplified and moved around as numbers.
After a while this quantities are integrated to solve some diferential equation, for example $dy$ is integrated and you get $y(x)$ as a result.
$int dy dx= y(x)$
I'm trying to formalize this concept a bit by using the definition of integral and derivative to try to get to the same results
Given the definition of a derivative
$$ frac{dy}{dx} = lim_{Delta xrightarrow0} left( frac{y(x+Delta x)-y(x)}{Delta x} right)$$
I Could define
$$frac{dy}{dx}dx = lim_{Delta xrightarrow0} left( frac{y(x+Delta x)-y(x)}{Delta x} Delta x right) $$
And then define what looks like the idea used in physics, the change in the function (as opposed to the rate of change)
$$dy= lim_{Delta xrightarrow0} left( (y(x+Delta x)-y(x)) right) $$
I know that the area under a curve (the reinmann sum) is calculated as
$$int_a^b y(x) dx= lim_{nrightarrow infty} sum_{i=1}^n yleft((ifrac{b-a}{n})+aright) left(frac{b-a}{n} right)$$
If you where to integrate $dy$ it would look like this
to accomodate for the definition of the integral I make $Delta x = lim_{nrightarrow infty}frac{b-a}{n}$
$$int_a^b dy dx= lim_{nrightarrow infty} sum_{i=1}^n left(y(x+frac{b-a}{n})-y(x)right) left(frac{b-a}{n} right)$$
now this sum looks like an area to me, but it's kind of a funny area. let me make an abuse of notation to try to clarify what I'm reading here
$$sum left(y(x+Delta x)-y(x)right) Delta x $$
$$sum left(Delta yright) Delta x $$
This area kind of represents the sum of an infinite bunch of rectangles that follow the function plot between $x=a$ and $x=b$ and have $Delta y$ height and $Delta x$ width.
That's a funny result, I expected the sum of the instantaneous changes (the antiderivative).
what went wrong?
did any of this make any sense?
calculus ordinary-differential-equations notation physics
calculus ordinary-differential-equations notation physics
asked Dec 19 '18 at 4:59
Joaquin BrandanJoaquin Brandan
290110
290110
1
$begingroup$
If $y$ Is continuous, then your definition of $dy$ just gives zero. Look instead at linear approximations to the change in $y$.
$endgroup$
– amd
Dec 19 '18 at 8:18
$begingroup$
Linear aproximation does a good job to explain the concept of $dy$ in the context of physics, but when I want to integrate it I dont seem to get back $y(t)$ (and that makes sense). So I cant find how to make use of linear aproximation to explain the concept of $frac{dy}{dx}dx = dy$ and then $int dydx = y(t)$
$endgroup$
– Joaquin Brandan
Dec 19 '18 at 14:24
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
If $y$ Is continuous, then your definition of $dy$ just gives zero. Look instead at linear approximations to the change in $y$.
$endgroup$
– amd
Dec 19 '18 at 8:18
$begingroup$
Linear aproximation does a good job to explain the concept of $dy$ in the context of physics, but when I want to integrate it I dont seem to get back $y(t)$ (and that makes sense). So I cant find how to make use of linear aproximation to explain the concept of $frac{dy}{dx}dx = dy$ and then $int dydx = y(t)$
$endgroup$
– Joaquin Brandan
Dec 19 '18 at 14:24
1
1
$begingroup$
If $y$ Is continuous, then your definition of $dy$ just gives zero. Look instead at linear approximations to the change in $y$.
$endgroup$
– amd
Dec 19 '18 at 8:18
$begingroup$
If $y$ Is continuous, then your definition of $dy$ just gives zero. Look instead at linear approximations to the change in $y$.
$endgroup$
– amd
Dec 19 '18 at 8:18
$begingroup$
Linear aproximation does a good job to explain the concept of $dy$ in the context of physics, but when I want to integrate it I dont seem to get back $y(t)$ (and that makes sense). So I cant find how to make use of linear aproximation to explain the concept of $frac{dy}{dx}dx = dy$ and then $int dydx = y(t)$
$endgroup$
– Joaquin Brandan
Dec 19 '18 at 14:24
$begingroup$
Linear aproximation does a good job to explain the concept of $dy$ in the context of physics, but when I want to integrate it I dont seem to get back $y(t)$ (and that makes sense). So I cant find how to make use of linear aproximation to explain the concept of $frac{dy}{dx}dx = dy$ and then $int dydx = y(t)$
$endgroup$
– Joaquin Brandan
Dec 19 '18 at 14:24
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3046019%2fdifferentials-definition-in-single-variable-calculus-using-limits%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3046019%2fdifferentials-definition-in-single-variable-calculus-using-limits%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
$begingroup$
If $y$ Is continuous, then your definition of $dy$ just gives zero. Look instead at linear approximations to the change in $y$.
$endgroup$
– amd
Dec 19 '18 at 8:18
$begingroup$
Linear aproximation does a good job to explain the concept of $dy$ in the context of physics, but when I want to integrate it I dont seem to get back $y(t)$ (and that makes sense). So I cant find how to make use of linear aproximation to explain the concept of $frac{dy}{dx}dx = dy$ and then $int dydx = y(t)$
$endgroup$
– Joaquin Brandan
Dec 19 '18 at 14:24