About the Proof for “the Order of a Permutation $sigma$ is the $lcm$ of the Orders of its Disjoint...
$begingroup$
About the lemma below:
The order of a permutation $ sigma in S_n $ is the least common multiple of the orders of its disjoint cycles.
I didn't get the proof which consists of the following reasoning:
Let $ sigma = sigma_1 ... sigma_r $ with $ r le n $ and $ { sigma_i }_{1 le i le r} $ disjoint cycles in question. Since every $ sigma_i $ commute in this case, we have: $ sigma^m = sigma_{1}^{m} ... sigma_{r}^{m} $, for all $ m in mathbb{Z} $, and $ sigma^m = (1) $ iff $ sigma_{i}^{m} = (1) $ for all $ i $. Therefore, $ sigma^m = (1) $ iff $ | sigma_i |$ divides $m$ for all $i$ (for $sigma$ is cyclic). Since $ | sigma | $ is the least such $m$, the conclusion follows.
I have big trouble to understand why we needed to use this $m$-th power with, furthermore, considering the case about $sigma^m$ being the identity permutation.
Thank you,
group-theory permutations proof-explanation symmetric-groups cyclic-groups
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
About the lemma below:
The order of a permutation $ sigma in S_n $ is the least common multiple of the orders of its disjoint cycles.
I didn't get the proof which consists of the following reasoning:
Let $ sigma = sigma_1 ... sigma_r $ with $ r le n $ and $ { sigma_i }_{1 le i le r} $ disjoint cycles in question. Since every $ sigma_i $ commute in this case, we have: $ sigma^m = sigma_{1}^{m} ... sigma_{r}^{m} $, for all $ m in mathbb{Z} $, and $ sigma^m = (1) $ iff $ sigma_{i}^{m} = (1) $ for all $ i $. Therefore, $ sigma^m = (1) $ iff $ | sigma_i |$ divides $m$ for all $i$ (for $sigma$ is cyclic). Since $ | sigma | $ is the least such $m$, the conclusion follows.
I have big trouble to understand why we needed to use this $m$-th power with, furthermore, considering the case about $sigma^m$ being the identity permutation.
Thank you,
group-theory permutations proof-explanation symmetric-groups cyclic-groups
$endgroup$
4
$begingroup$
I'm not sure where your confusion lies. The $m$-th power is needed because one is seeking to find the order of $sigma$ in $S_n$.
$endgroup$
– user458276
Dec 27 '18 at 19:32
2
$begingroup$
What do you think that “order of $sigma$” means?
$endgroup$
– José Carlos Santos
Dec 27 '18 at 19:43
$begingroup$
I'm totally ok with your comments. I hadn't considered enough the question before posting it. But, I wonder if we wouldn't have here a slice of reasoning missing still? If not, I get it.
$endgroup$
– freehumorist
Dec 27 '18 at 20:14
add a comment |
$begingroup$
About the lemma below:
The order of a permutation $ sigma in S_n $ is the least common multiple of the orders of its disjoint cycles.
I didn't get the proof which consists of the following reasoning:
Let $ sigma = sigma_1 ... sigma_r $ with $ r le n $ and $ { sigma_i }_{1 le i le r} $ disjoint cycles in question. Since every $ sigma_i $ commute in this case, we have: $ sigma^m = sigma_{1}^{m} ... sigma_{r}^{m} $, for all $ m in mathbb{Z} $, and $ sigma^m = (1) $ iff $ sigma_{i}^{m} = (1) $ for all $ i $. Therefore, $ sigma^m = (1) $ iff $ | sigma_i |$ divides $m$ for all $i$ (for $sigma$ is cyclic). Since $ | sigma | $ is the least such $m$, the conclusion follows.
I have big trouble to understand why we needed to use this $m$-th power with, furthermore, considering the case about $sigma^m$ being the identity permutation.
Thank you,
group-theory permutations proof-explanation symmetric-groups cyclic-groups
$endgroup$
About the lemma below:
The order of a permutation $ sigma in S_n $ is the least common multiple of the orders of its disjoint cycles.
I didn't get the proof which consists of the following reasoning:
Let $ sigma = sigma_1 ... sigma_r $ with $ r le n $ and $ { sigma_i }_{1 le i le r} $ disjoint cycles in question. Since every $ sigma_i $ commute in this case, we have: $ sigma^m = sigma_{1}^{m} ... sigma_{r}^{m} $, for all $ m in mathbb{Z} $, and $ sigma^m = (1) $ iff $ sigma_{i}^{m} = (1) $ for all $ i $. Therefore, $ sigma^m = (1) $ iff $ | sigma_i |$ divides $m$ for all $i$ (for $sigma$ is cyclic). Since $ | sigma | $ is the least such $m$, the conclusion follows.
I have big trouble to understand why we needed to use this $m$-th power with, furthermore, considering the case about $sigma^m$ being the identity permutation.
Thank you,
group-theory permutations proof-explanation symmetric-groups cyclic-groups
group-theory permutations proof-explanation symmetric-groups cyclic-groups
edited Dec 27 '18 at 20:07
Shaun
9,444113684
9,444113684
asked Dec 27 '18 at 19:28
freehumoristfreehumorist
351214
351214
4
$begingroup$
I'm not sure where your confusion lies. The $m$-th power is needed because one is seeking to find the order of $sigma$ in $S_n$.
$endgroup$
– user458276
Dec 27 '18 at 19:32
2
$begingroup$
What do you think that “order of $sigma$” means?
$endgroup$
– José Carlos Santos
Dec 27 '18 at 19:43
$begingroup$
I'm totally ok with your comments. I hadn't considered enough the question before posting it. But, I wonder if we wouldn't have here a slice of reasoning missing still? If not, I get it.
$endgroup$
– freehumorist
Dec 27 '18 at 20:14
add a comment |
4
$begingroup$
I'm not sure where your confusion lies. The $m$-th power is needed because one is seeking to find the order of $sigma$ in $S_n$.
$endgroup$
– user458276
Dec 27 '18 at 19:32
2
$begingroup$
What do you think that “order of $sigma$” means?
$endgroup$
– José Carlos Santos
Dec 27 '18 at 19:43
$begingroup$
I'm totally ok with your comments. I hadn't considered enough the question before posting it. But, I wonder if we wouldn't have here a slice of reasoning missing still? If not, I get it.
$endgroup$
– freehumorist
Dec 27 '18 at 20:14
4
4
$begingroup$
I'm not sure where your confusion lies. The $m$-th power is needed because one is seeking to find the order of $sigma$ in $S_n$.
$endgroup$
– user458276
Dec 27 '18 at 19:32
$begingroup$
I'm not sure where your confusion lies. The $m$-th power is needed because one is seeking to find the order of $sigma$ in $S_n$.
$endgroup$
– user458276
Dec 27 '18 at 19:32
2
2
$begingroup$
What do you think that “order of $sigma$” means?
$endgroup$
– José Carlos Santos
Dec 27 '18 at 19:43
$begingroup$
What do you think that “order of $sigma$” means?
$endgroup$
– José Carlos Santos
Dec 27 '18 at 19:43
$begingroup$
I'm totally ok with your comments. I hadn't considered enough the question before posting it. But, I wonder if we wouldn't have here a slice of reasoning missing still? If not, I get it.
$endgroup$
– freehumorist
Dec 27 '18 at 20:14
$begingroup$
I'm totally ok with your comments. I hadn't considered enough the question before posting it. But, I wonder if we wouldn't have here a slice of reasoning missing still? If not, I get it.
$endgroup$
– freehumorist
Dec 27 '18 at 20:14
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
As for all groups, the order of a permutation $sigmain S_n$ is, by definition, the least positive integer $m$ such that $sigma^n=operatorname{id}$.
In other words, it is the positive generator of the group homomorphism
begin{align}
(bf Z,+)&longrightarrow (S_n,circ)\
k &longmapsto sigma^k=underbrace{sigmacircsigmacircdotscircsigma}_{k :text{ factors}}end{align}
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3054287%2fabout-the-proof-for-the-order-of-a-permutation-sigma-is-the-lcm-of-the-ord%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
As for all groups, the order of a permutation $sigmain S_n$ is, by definition, the least positive integer $m$ such that $sigma^n=operatorname{id}$.
In other words, it is the positive generator of the group homomorphism
begin{align}
(bf Z,+)&longrightarrow (S_n,circ)\
k &longmapsto sigma^k=underbrace{sigmacircsigmacircdotscircsigma}_{k :text{ factors}}end{align}
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
As for all groups, the order of a permutation $sigmain S_n$ is, by definition, the least positive integer $m$ such that $sigma^n=operatorname{id}$.
In other words, it is the positive generator of the group homomorphism
begin{align}
(bf Z,+)&longrightarrow (S_n,circ)\
k &longmapsto sigma^k=underbrace{sigmacircsigmacircdotscircsigma}_{k :text{ factors}}end{align}
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
As for all groups, the order of a permutation $sigmain S_n$ is, by definition, the least positive integer $m$ such that $sigma^n=operatorname{id}$.
In other words, it is the positive generator of the group homomorphism
begin{align}
(bf Z,+)&longrightarrow (S_n,circ)\
k &longmapsto sigma^k=underbrace{sigmacircsigmacircdotscircsigma}_{k :text{ factors}}end{align}
$endgroup$
As for all groups, the order of a permutation $sigmain S_n$ is, by definition, the least positive integer $m$ such that $sigma^n=operatorname{id}$.
In other words, it is the positive generator of the group homomorphism
begin{align}
(bf Z,+)&longrightarrow (S_n,circ)\
k &longmapsto sigma^k=underbrace{sigmacircsigmacircdotscircsigma}_{k :text{ factors}}end{align}
answered Dec 27 '18 at 20:17
BernardBernard
123k741116
123k741116
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3054287%2fabout-the-proof-for-the-order-of-a-permutation-sigma-is-the-lcm-of-the-ord%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
4
$begingroup$
I'm not sure where your confusion lies. The $m$-th power is needed because one is seeking to find the order of $sigma$ in $S_n$.
$endgroup$
– user458276
Dec 27 '18 at 19:32
2
$begingroup$
What do you think that “order of $sigma$” means?
$endgroup$
– José Carlos Santos
Dec 27 '18 at 19:43
$begingroup$
I'm totally ok with your comments. I hadn't considered enough the question before posting it. But, I wonder if we wouldn't have here a slice of reasoning missing still? If not, I get it.
$endgroup$
– freehumorist
Dec 27 '18 at 20:14