About the Proof for “the Order of a Permutation $sigma$ is the $lcm$ of the Orders of its Disjoint...












1












$begingroup$


About the lemma below:




The order of a permutation $ sigma in S_n $ is the least common multiple of the orders of its disjoint cycles.




I didn't get the proof which consists of the following reasoning:




Let $ sigma = sigma_1 ... sigma_r $ with $ r le n $ and $ { sigma_i }_{1 le i le r} $ disjoint cycles in question. Since every $ sigma_i $ commute in this case, we have: $ sigma^m = sigma_{1}^{m} ... sigma_{r}^{m} $, for all $ m in mathbb{Z} $, and $ sigma^m = (1) $ iff $ sigma_{i}^{m} = (1) $ for all $ i $. Therefore, $ sigma^m = (1) $ iff $ | sigma_i |$ divides $m$ for all $i$ (for $sigma$ is cyclic). Since $ | sigma | $ is the least such $m$, the conclusion follows.




I have big trouble to understand why we needed to use this $m$-th power with, furthermore, considering the case about $sigma^m$ being the identity permutation.



Thank you,










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 4




    $begingroup$
    I'm not sure where your confusion lies. The $m$-th power is needed because one is seeking to find the order of $sigma$ in $S_n$.
    $endgroup$
    – user458276
    Dec 27 '18 at 19:32






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    What do you think that “order of $sigma$” means?
    $endgroup$
    – José Carlos Santos
    Dec 27 '18 at 19:43










  • $begingroup$
    I'm totally ok with your comments. I hadn't considered enough the question before posting it. But, I wonder if we wouldn't have here a slice of reasoning missing still? If not, I get it.
    $endgroup$
    – freehumorist
    Dec 27 '18 at 20:14


















1












$begingroup$


About the lemma below:




The order of a permutation $ sigma in S_n $ is the least common multiple of the orders of its disjoint cycles.




I didn't get the proof which consists of the following reasoning:




Let $ sigma = sigma_1 ... sigma_r $ with $ r le n $ and $ { sigma_i }_{1 le i le r} $ disjoint cycles in question. Since every $ sigma_i $ commute in this case, we have: $ sigma^m = sigma_{1}^{m} ... sigma_{r}^{m} $, for all $ m in mathbb{Z} $, and $ sigma^m = (1) $ iff $ sigma_{i}^{m} = (1) $ for all $ i $. Therefore, $ sigma^m = (1) $ iff $ | sigma_i |$ divides $m$ for all $i$ (for $sigma$ is cyclic). Since $ | sigma | $ is the least such $m$, the conclusion follows.




I have big trouble to understand why we needed to use this $m$-th power with, furthermore, considering the case about $sigma^m$ being the identity permutation.



Thank you,










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$








  • 4




    $begingroup$
    I'm not sure where your confusion lies. The $m$-th power is needed because one is seeking to find the order of $sigma$ in $S_n$.
    $endgroup$
    – user458276
    Dec 27 '18 at 19:32






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    What do you think that “order of $sigma$” means?
    $endgroup$
    – José Carlos Santos
    Dec 27 '18 at 19:43










  • $begingroup$
    I'm totally ok with your comments. I hadn't considered enough the question before posting it. But, I wonder if we wouldn't have here a slice of reasoning missing still? If not, I get it.
    $endgroup$
    – freehumorist
    Dec 27 '18 at 20:14
















1












1








1





$begingroup$


About the lemma below:




The order of a permutation $ sigma in S_n $ is the least common multiple of the orders of its disjoint cycles.




I didn't get the proof which consists of the following reasoning:




Let $ sigma = sigma_1 ... sigma_r $ with $ r le n $ and $ { sigma_i }_{1 le i le r} $ disjoint cycles in question. Since every $ sigma_i $ commute in this case, we have: $ sigma^m = sigma_{1}^{m} ... sigma_{r}^{m} $, for all $ m in mathbb{Z} $, and $ sigma^m = (1) $ iff $ sigma_{i}^{m} = (1) $ for all $ i $. Therefore, $ sigma^m = (1) $ iff $ | sigma_i |$ divides $m$ for all $i$ (for $sigma$ is cyclic). Since $ | sigma | $ is the least such $m$, the conclusion follows.




I have big trouble to understand why we needed to use this $m$-th power with, furthermore, considering the case about $sigma^m$ being the identity permutation.



Thank you,










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




About the lemma below:




The order of a permutation $ sigma in S_n $ is the least common multiple of the orders of its disjoint cycles.




I didn't get the proof which consists of the following reasoning:




Let $ sigma = sigma_1 ... sigma_r $ with $ r le n $ and $ { sigma_i }_{1 le i le r} $ disjoint cycles in question. Since every $ sigma_i $ commute in this case, we have: $ sigma^m = sigma_{1}^{m} ... sigma_{r}^{m} $, for all $ m in mathbb{Z} $, and $ sigma^m = (1) $ iff $ sigma_{i}^{m} = (1) $ for all $ i $. Therefore, $ sigma^m = (1) $ iff $ | sigma_i |$ divides $m$ for all $i$ (for $sigma$ is cyclic). Since $ | sigma | $ is the least such $m$, the conclusion follows.




I have big trouble to understand why we needed to use this $m$-th power with, furthermore, considering the case about $sigma^m$ being the identity permutation.



Thank you,







group-theory permutations proof-explanation symmetric-groups cyclic-groups






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Dec 27 '18 at 20:07









Shaun

9,444113684




9,444113684










asked Dec 27 '18 at 19:28









freehumoristfreehumorist

351214




351214








  • 4




    $begingroup$
    I'm not sure where your confusion lies. The $m$-th power is needed because one is seeking to find the order of $sigma$ in $S_n$.
    $endgroup$
    – user458276
    Dec 27 '18 at 19:32






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    What do you think that “order of $sigma$” means?
    $endgroup$
    – José Carlos Santos
    Dec 27 '18 at 19:43










  • $begingroup$
    I'm totally ok with your comments. I hadn't considered enough the question before posting it. But, I wonder if we wouldn't have here a slice of reasoning missing still? If not, I get it.
    $endgroup$
    – freehumorist
    Dec 27 '18 at 20:14
















  • 4




    $begingroup$
    I'm not sure where your confusion lies. The $m$-th power is needed because one is seeking to find the order of $sigma$ in $S_n$.
    $endgroup$
    – user458276
    Dec 27 '18 at 19:32






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    What do you think that “order of $sigma$” means?
    $endgroup$
    – José Carlos Santos
    Dec 27 '18 at 19:43










  • $begingroup$
    I'm totally ok with your comments. I hadn't considered enough the question before posting it. But, I wonder if we wouldn't have here a slice of reasoning missing still? If not, I get it.
    $endgroup$
    – freehumorist
    Dec 27 '18 at 20:14










4




4




$begingroup$
I'm not sure where your confusion lies. The $m$-th power is needed because one is seeking to find the order of $sigma$ in $S_n$.
$endgroup$
– user458276
Dec 27 '18 at 19:32




$begingroup$
I'm not sure where your confusion lies. The $m$-th power is needed because one is seeking to find the order of $sigma$ in $S_n$.
$endgroup$
– user458276
Dec 27 '18 at 19:32




2




2




$begingroup$
What do you think that “order of $sigma$” means?
$endgroup$
– José Carlos Santos
Dec 27 '18 at 19:43




$begingroup$
What do you think that “order of $sigma$” means?
$endgroup$
– José Carlos Santos
Dec 27 '18 at 19:43












$begingroup$
I'm totally ok with your comments. I hadn't considered enough the question before posting it. But, I wonder if we wouldn't have here a slice of reasoning missing still? If not, I get it.
$endgroup$
– freehumorist
Dec 27 '18 at 20:14






$begingroup$
I'm totally ok with your comments. I hadn't considered enough the question before posting it. But, I wonder if we wouldn't have here a slice of reasoning missing still? If not, I get it.
$endgroup$
– freehumorist
Dec 27 '18 at 20:14












1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















1












$begingroup$

As for all groups, the order of a permutation $sigmain S_n$ is, by definition, the least positive integer $m$ such that $sigma^n=operatorname{id}$.



In other words, it is the positive generator of the group homomorphism
begin{align}
(bf Z,+)&longrightarrow (S_n,circ)\
k &longmapsto sigma^k=underbrace{sigmacircsigmacircdotscircsigma}_{k :text{ factors}}end{align}






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3054287%2fabout-the-proof-for-the-order-of-a-permutation-sigma-is-the-lcm-of-the-ord%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    1












    $begingroup$

    As for all groups, the order of a permutation $sigmain S_n$ is, by definition, the least positive integer $m$ such that $sigma^n=operatorname{id}$.



    In other words, it is the positive generator of the group homomorphism
    begin{align}
    (bf Z,+)&longrightarrow (S_n,circ)\
    k &longmapsto sigma^k=underbrace{sigmacircsigmacircdotscircsigma}_{k :text{ factors}}end{align}






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$


















      1












      $begingroup$

      As for all groups, the order of a permutation $sigmain S_n$ is, by definition, the least positive integer $m$ such that $sigma^n=operatorname{id}$.



      In other words, it is the positive generator of the group homomorphism
      begin{align}
      (bf Z,+)&longrightarrow (S_n,circ)\
      k &longmapsto sigma^k=underbrace{sigmacircsigmacircdotscircsigma}_{k :text{ factors}}end{align}






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$
















        1












        1








        1





        $begingroup$

        As for all groups, the order of a permutation $sigmain S_n$ is, by definition, the least positive integer $m$ such that $sigma^n=operatorname{id}$.



        In other words, it is the positive generator of the group homomorphism
        begin{align}
        (bf Z,+)&longrightarrow (S_n,circ)\
        k &longmapsto sigma^k=underbrace{sigmacircsigmacircdotscircsigma}_{k :text{ factors}}end{align}






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        As for all groups, the order of a permutation $sigmain S_n$ is, by definition, the least positive integer $m$ such that $sigma^n=operatorname{id}$.



        In other words, it is the positive generator of the group homomorphism
        begin{align}
        (bf Z,+)&longrightarrow (S_n,circ)\
        k &longmapsto sigma^k=underbrace{sigmacircsigmacircdotscircsigma}_{k :text{ factors}}end{align}







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Dec 27 '18 at 20:17









        BernardBernard

        123k741116




        123k741116






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3054287%2fabout-the-proof-for-the-order-of-a-permutation-sigma-is-the-lcm-of-the-ord%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Wiesbaden

            Marschland

            Dieringhausen