Middle lines in octagon are congruent












3












$begingroup$



Let $A_1A_2dots A_8$ be a cyclic octagon. Suppose that $A_1A_6||A_2A_5, A_3A_8||A_4A_7$, and that $A_2A_5perp A_3A_8$. Prove that the length of the two midline segmets, one connecting the midpoints of sides $A_8A_1, A_4A_5$, and the other connecting sides $A_2A_3, A_6A_7$ are equal.




enter image description here



Here is an (ugly) solution with (position) vectors: Let $M_{ij}$ be the
midpoint of a chord $A_iA_j$. Let $vec{a}$ be a vector between midpoints of segments $A_2A_5$ and $A_1A_6$ so $$vec{a}=overrightarrow{M_{52}M_{16}} =M_{16}-M_{52} $$
and $vec{b}$ be a vector between midpoints of segments $A_4A_7$ and $A_3A_8$ so $$vec{b}=overrightarrow{M_{47}M_{38}} =M_{38}-M_{47} $$
Notice that $vec{a}bot vec{b}$ and $overrightarrow{A_7A_4} || overrightarrow{A_8A_3}||vec{a}$ and $overrightarrow{A_2A_5} ||overrightarrow{A_1A_6}||vec{b}$.
Then begin{eqnarray}
4overline{M_{18}M_{45}}^2 -4overline{{M_{23}M_{67}}}^2 &=& 4overrightarrow{M_{18}M_{45}}^2 -4overrightarrow{M_{23}M_{67}}^2 \
&=& (2overrightarrow{M_{18}M_{45}} -2overrightarrow{M_{23}M_{67}})(2overrightarrow{M_{18}M_{45}}+2overrightarrow{M_{23}M_{67}}) \
&=& (A_4+A_5 -A_1-A_8-A_6-A_7 +A_3+A_2)cdot \&&(A_4+A_5 -A_1-A_8+A_6+A_7 -A_3-A_2) \
&=&(overrightarrow{A_7A_4} +overrightarrow{A_8A_3}+2M_{52}-2M_{16}) cdot \&& (overrightarrow{A_2A_5} +overrightarrow{A_1A_6}+2M_{47}-2M_{38})\
&=& (mcdotvec{b} +kcdot vec{b}-2vec{b})cdot (lcdot vec{a} +ncdot vec{a}-2vec{a}) \
&=&0
end{eqnarray}
and we are done.



Can somebody find nicer solution, possibly with geometric transformations?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Is the blue dot O the center?
    $endgroup$
    – Muchang Bahng
    Dec 26 '18 at 11:56










  • $begingroup$
    Yes, and is unimportatnt in a solution i gave.
    $endgroup$
    – Maria Mazur
    Dec 26 '18 at 11:56












  • $begingroup$
    Although this is clearly not a duplicate (since it includes its own solution), a link to the original question seems desirable: math.stackexchange.com/questions/3052478/…
    $endgroup$
    – David K
    Dec 26 '18 at 15:08
















3












$begingroup$



Let $A_1A_2dots A_8$ be a cyclic octagon. Suppose that $A_1A_6||A_2A_5, A_3A_8||A_4A_7$, and that $A_2A_5perp A_3A_8$. Prove that the length of the two midline segmets, one connecting the midpoints of sides $A_8A_1, A_4A_5$, and the other connecting sides $A_2A_3, A_6A_7$ are equal.




enter image description here



Here is an (ugly) solution with (position) vectors: Let $M_{ij}$ be the
midpoint of a chord $A_iA_j$. Let $vec{a}$ be a vector between midpoints of segments $A_2A_5$ and $A_1A_6$ so $$vec{a}=overrightarrow{M_{52}M_{16}} =M_{16}-M_{52} $$
and $vec{b}$ be a vector between midpoints of segments $A_4A_7$ and $A_3A_8$ so $$vec{b}=overrightarrow{M_{47}M_{38}} =M_{38}-M_{47} $$
Notice that $vec{a}bot vec{b}$ and $overrightarrow{A_7A_4} || overrightarrow{A_8A_3}||vec{a}$ and $overrightarrow{A_2A_5} ||overrightarrow{A_1A_6}||vec{b}$.
Then begin{eqnarray}
4overline{M_{18}M_{45}}^2 -4overline{{M_{23}M_{67}}}^2 &=& 4overrightarrow{M_{18}M_{45}}^2 -4overrightarrow{M_{23}M_{67}}^2 \
&=& (2overrightarrow{M_{18}M_{45}} -2overrightarrow{M_{23}M_{67}})(2overrightarrow{M_{18}M_{45}}+2overrightarrow{M_{23}M_{67}}) \
&=& (A_4+A_5 -A_1-A_8-A_6-A_7 +A_3+A_2)cdot \&&(A_4+A_5 -A_1-A_8+A_6+A_7 -A_3-A_2) \
&=&(overrightarrow{A_7A_4} +overrightarrow{A_8A_3}+2M_{52}-2M_{16}) cdot \&& (overrightarrow{A_2A_5} +overrightarrow{A_1A_6}+2M_{47}-2M_{38})\
&=& (mcdotvec{b} +kcdot vec{b}-2vec{b})cdot (lcdot vec{a} +ncdot vec{a}-2vec{a}) \
&=&0
end{eqnarray}
and we are done.



Can somebody find nicer solution, possibly with geometric transformations?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Is the blue dot O the center?
    $endgroup$
    – Muchang Bahng
    Dec 26 '18 at 11:56










  • $begingroup$
    Yes, and is unimportatnt in a solution i gave.
    $endgroup$
    – Maria Mazur
    Dec 26 '18 at 11:56












  • $begingroup$
    Although this is clearly not a duplicate (since it includes its own solution), a link to the original question seems desirable: math.stackexchange.com/questions/3052478/…
    $endgroup$
    – David K
    Dec 26 '18 at 15:08














3












3








3


0



$begingroup$



Let $A_1A_2dots A_8$ be a cyclic octagon. Suppose that $A_1A_6||A_2A_5, A_3A_8||A_4A_7$, and that $A_2A_5perp A_3A_8$. Prove that the length of the two midline segmets, one connecting the midpoints of sides $A_8A_1, A_4A_5$, and the other connecting sides $A_2A_3, A_6A_7$ are equal.




enter image description here



Here is an (ugly) solution with (position) vectors: Let $M_{ij}$ be the
midpoint of a chord $A_iA_j$. Let $vec{a}$ be a vector between midpoints of segments $A_2A_5$ and $A_1A_6$ so $$vec{a}=overrightarrow{M_{52}M_{16}} =M_{16}-M_{52} $$
and $vec{b}$ be a vector between midpoints of segments $A_4A_7$ and $A_3A_8$ so $$vec{b}=overrightarrow{M_{47}M_{38}} =M_{38}-M_{47} $$
Notice that $vec{a}bot vec{b}$ and $overrightarrow{A_7A_4} || overrightarrow{A_8A_3}||vec{a}$ and $overrightarrow{A_2A_5} ||overrightarrow{A_1A_6}||vec{b}$.
Then begin{eqnarray}
4overline{M_{18}M_{45}}^2 -4overline{{M_{23}M_{67}}}^2 &=& 4overrightarrow{M_{18}M_{45}}^2 -4overrightarrow{M_{23}M_{67}}^2 \
&=& (2overrightarrow{M_{18}M_{45}} -2overrightarrow{M_{23}M_{67}})(2overrightarrow{M_{18}M_{45}}+2overrightarrow{M_{23}M_{67}}) \
&=& (A_4+A_5 -A_1-A_8-A_6-A_7 +A_3+A_2)cdot \&&(A_4+A_5 -A_1-A_8+A_6+A_7 -A_3-A_2) \
&=&(overrightarrow{A_7A_4} +overrightarrow{A_8A_3}+2M_{52}-2M_{16}) cdot \&& (overrightarrow{A_2A_5} +overrightarrow{A_1A_6}+2M_{47}-2M_{38})\
&=& (mcdotvec{b} +kcdot vec{b}-2vec{b})cdot (lcdot vec{a} +ncdot vec{a}-2vec{a}) \
&=&0
end{eqnarray}
and we are done.



Can somebody find nicer solution, possibly with geometric transformations?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$





Let $A_1A_2dots A_8$ be a cyclic octagon. Suppose that $A_1A_6||A_2A_5, A_3A_8||A_4A_7$, and that $A_2A_5perp A_3A_8$. Prove that the length of the two midline segmets, one connecting the midpoints of sides $A_8A_1, A_4A_5$, and the other connecting sides $A_2A_3, A_6A_7$ are equal.




enter image description here



Here is an (ugly) solution with (position) vectors: Let $M_{ij}$ be the
midpoint of a chord $A_iA_j$. Let $vec{a}$ be a vector between midpoints of segments $A_2A_5$ and $A_1A_6$ so $$vec{a}=overrightarrow{M_{52}M_{16}} =M_{16}-M_{52} $$
and $vec{b}$ be a vector between midpoints of segments $A_4A_7$ and $A_3A_8$ so $$vec{b}=overrightarrow{M_{47}M_{38}} =M_{38}-M_{47} $$
Notice that $vec{a}bot vec{b}$ and $overrightarrow{A_7A_4} || overrightarrow{A_8A_3}||vec{a}$ and $overrightarrow{A_2A_5} ||overrightarrow{A_1A_6}||vec{b}$.
Then begin{eqnarray}
4overline{M_{18}M_{45}}^2 -4overline{{M_{23}M_{67}}}^2 &=& 4overrightarrow{M_{18}M_{45}}^2 -4overrightarrow{M_{23}M_{67}}^2 \
&=& (2overrightarrow{M_{18}M_{45}} -2overrightarrow{M_{23}M_{67}})(2overrightarrow{M_{18}M_{45}}+2overrightarrow{M_{23}M_{67}}) \
&=& (A_4+A_5 -A_1-A_8-A_6-A_7 +A_3+A_2)cdot \&&(A_4+A_5 -A_1-A_8+A_6+A_7 -A_3-A_2) \
&=&(overrightarrow{A_7A_4} +overrightarrow{A_8A_3}+2M_{52}-2M_{16}) cdot \&& (overrightarrow{A_2A_5} +overrightarrow{A_1A_6}+2M_{47}-2M_{38})\
&=& (mcdotvec{b} +kcdot vec{b}-2vec{b})cdot (lcdot vec{a} +ncdot vec{a}-2vec{a}) \
&=&0
end{eqnarray}
and we are done.



Can somebody find nicer solution, possibly with geometric transformations?







geometry vectors euclidean-geometry geometric-transformation






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited yesterday







Maria Mazur

















asked Dec 26 '18 at 10:45









Maria MazurMaria Mazur

46.6k1260119




46.6k1260119












  • $begingroup$
    Is the blue dot O the center?
    $endgroup$
    – Muchang Bahng
    Dec 26 '18 at 11:56










  • $begingroup$
    Yes, and is unimportatnt in a solution i gave.
    $endgroup$
    – Maria Mazur
    Dec 26 '18 at 11:56












  • $begingroup$
    Although this is clearly not a duplicate (since it includes its own solution), a link to the original question seems desirable: math.stackexchange.com/questions/3052478/…
    $endgroup$
    – David K
    Dec 26 '18 at 15:08


















  • $begingroup$
    Is the blue dot O the center?
    $endgroup$
    – Muchang Bahng
    Dec 26 '18 at 11:56










  • $begingroup$
    Yes, and is unimportatnt in a solution i gave.
    $endgroup$
    – Maria Mazur
    Dec 26 '18 at 11:56












  • $begingroup$
    Although this is clearly not a duplicate (since it includes its own solution), a link to the original question seems desirable: math.stackexchange.com/questions/3052478/…
    $endgroup$
    – David K
    Dec 26 '18 at 15:08
















$begingroup$
Is the blue dot O the center?
$endgroup$
– Muchang Bahng
Dec 26 '18 at 11:56




$begingroup$
Is the blue dot O the center?
$endgroup$
– Muchang Bahng
Dec 26 '18 at 11:56












$begingroup$
Yes, and is unimportatnt in a solution i gave.
$endgroup$
– Maria Mazur
Dec 26 '18 at 11:56






$begingroup$
Yes, and is unimportatnt in a solution i gave.
$endgroup$
– Maria Mazur
Dec 26 '18 at 11:56














$begingroup$
Although this is clearly not a duplicate (since it includes its own solution), a link to the original question seems desirable: math.stackexchange.com/questions/3052478/…
$endgroup$
– David K
Dec 26 '18 at 15:08




$begingroup$
Although this is clearly not a duplicate (since it includes its own solution), a link to the original question seems desirable: math.stackexchange.com/questions/3052478/…
$endgroup$
– David K
Dec 26 '18 at 15:08










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















2












$begingroup$

enter image description hereIf this were graphed onto a coordinate plane temporarily, focus on the y-values of all points $A_1,A_2,...,A_8$.



We know that $A_1=A_6$ and $A_2=A_5$, while $A_3+A_8=A_4+A_7$ since they are parallel chords. So, $frac{A_1+A_2+A_3+A_8}{4}=frac{A_4+A_5+A_6+A_7}{4}$. This is important because if we rewrite it, it is $frac{frac{A_1+A_8}{2} +frac{A_2+A_3}{2}}{2}$=$frac{frac{A_7+A_6}{2} +frac{A_4+A_5}{2}}{2}$, translating into $frac{M_{18}+M_{23}}{2}=frac{M_{67}+M_{45}}{2}$.



So when we draw lines $M_{18}M_{23}$ and $M_{67}M_{45}$, their midpoints $M_{1823}$ and $M_{6745}$ have the same y-values. The two lines are also parallel, so the perpendicular bisectors of both $M_{18}M_{23}$ and $M_{67}M_{45}$ is the same line. For convenience, assume that this perpendicular bisector crosses over the black point in the diagram, call it K. By the properties of a perpendicular bisector on both $M_{18}M_{23}$ and $M_{67}M_{45}$, $KM_{67}=KM_{45}$ and $KM_{18}=KM_{23}$.



Also, angle $M_{18}KM_{67}$ is congruent to the angle $M_{23}KM_{45}$, meaning that $M_{18}KM_{67}+M_{67}KM_{45}$=$M_{23}KM_{45}+M_{67}KM_{45}$ so $M_{18}KM_{45}=M_{67}KM_{23}$.



Thus, by SAS, triangles $M_{18}KM_{45}$ and $M_{67}KM_{23}$ are congruent, meaning that $M_{67}M_{23}=M_{18}M_{45}$ and we're done.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Why is this true: angle $M_{18}KM_{67}$ is congruent to the angle $M_{23}KM_{45}$?
    $endgroup$
    – Maria Mazur
    Dec 26 '18 at 12:57










  • $begingroup$
    Sorry for the relatively messy diagram, but I added a picture showing why
    $endgroup$
    – Muchang Bahng
    Dec 26 '18 at 16:15










  • $begingroup$
    How do you know that that green line actualy separate 2A and 2B angles?
    $endgroup$
    – Maria Mazur
    Dec 26 '18 at 16:34










  • $begingroup$
    +1 for effort :)
    $endgroup$
    – Maria Mazur
    Dec 26 '18 at 16:45










  • $begingroup$
    Haha, yea sorry for not being so clear about it. Since we proved that the green line is a perpendicular bisector for both $M_{18}M_{23}$ and $M_{45}M_{67}$, we can draw the two pairs of congruent right triangles on the right and on the left. By SAS, the two right side triangles and two left side triangles are congruent, meaning that the corresponding angles of the triangles are congruent.
    $endgroup$
    – Muchang Bahng
    Dec 27 '18 at 1:49



















0












$begingroup$

Here is another solution motivated by Muchang Bahng writings:



Set a coordinate system so that perpendicular bisector for $A_4A_7$ (which is also for $A_3A_8$) be a x-axsis and a perpenduclar bisector for $A_1A_6$ (which is also for $A_2A_4$) be a y-axsis, in particular, let $$ M_{17}= (2b,0);;;; {rm and } ;;;;M_{38}= (-2a,0)$$ and
$$ M_{25}= (0,-2d);;;; {rm and } ;;;;M_{16}= (0,2c)$$



then $$ A_{1}= (-2k,2c);;;; {rm and } ;;;;A_{6}= (2k,2c)$$
$$ A_{2}= (-2l,-2d);;;; {rm and } ;;;;A_{5}= (2l,-2d)$$
$$ A_{3}= (-2a,-2m);;;; {rm and } ;;;;A_{8}= (-2a,2m)$$
$$ A_{4}= (2b,-2n);;;; {rm and } ;;;;A_{7}= (2b,2n)$$
thus $$ M_{18}= (-a-k,c+d);;;; {rm and } ;;;;M_{23}= (-l-a,-m-a)$$
$$ M_{45}= (l+b,-n-d);;;; {rm and } ;;;;M_{67}= (b+k,n+c)$$
So $$ overline{M_{18}M_{45}}^2 = (c+m+n+d)^2+(l+b+a+k)^2 = overline{M_{23}M_{67}}^2$$
and we are done.



Hmm, much easier then first solution and we never used that $A_i$ are actualy on a circle!






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3052828%2fmiddle-lines-in-octagon-are-congruent%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    2












    $begingroup$

    enter image description hereIf this were graphed onto a coordinate plane temporarily, focus on the y-values of all points $A_1,A_2,...,A_8$.



    We know that $A_1=A_6$ and $A_2=A_5$, while $A_3+A_8=A_4+A_7$ since they are parallel chords. So, $frac{A_1+A_2+A_3+A_8}{4}=frac{A_4+A_5+A_6+A_7}{4}$. This is important because if we rewrite it, it is $frac{frac{A_1+A_8}{2} +frac{A_2+A_3}{2}}{2}$=$frac{frac{A_7+A_6}{2} +frac{A_4+A_5}{2}}{2}$, translating into $frac{M_{18}+M_{23}}{2}=frac{M_{67}+M_{45}}{2}$.



    So when we draw lines $M_{18}M_{23}$ and $M_{67}M_{45}$, their midpoints $M_{1823}$ and $M_{6745}$ have the same y-values. The two lines are also parallel, so the perpendicular bisectors of both $M_{18}M_{23}$ and $M_{67}M_{45}$ is the same line. For convenience, assume that this perpendicular bisector crosses over the black point in the diagram, call it K. By the properties of a perpendicular bisector on both $M_{18}M_{23}$ and $M_{67}M_{45}$, $KM_{67}=KM_{45}$ and $KM_{18}=KM_{23}$.



    Also, angle $M_{18}KM_{67}$ is congruent to the angle $M_{23}KM_{45}$, meaning that $M_{18}KM_{67}+M_{67}KM_{45}$=$M_{23}KM_{45}+M_{67}KM_{45}$ so $M_{18}KM_{45}=M_{67}KM_{23}$.



    Thus, by SAS, triangles $M_{18}KM_{45}$ and $M_{67}KM_{23}$ are congruent, meaning that $M_{67}M_{23}=M_{18}M_{45}$ and we're done.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      Why is this true: angle $M_{18}KM_{67}$ is congruent to the angle $M_{23}KM_{45}$?
      $endgroup$
      – Maria Mazur
      Dec 26 '18 at 12:57










    • $begingroup$
      Sorry for the relatively messy diagram, but I added a picture showing why
      $endgroup$
      – Muchang Bahng
      Dec 26 '18 at 16:15










    • $begingroup$
      How do you know that that green line actualy separate 2A and 2B angles?
      $endgroup$
      – Maria Mazur
      Dec 26 '18 at 16:34










    • $begingroup$
      +1 for effort :)
      $endgroup$
      – Maria Mazur
      Dec 26 '18 at 16:45










    • $begingroup$
      Haha, yea sorry for not being so clear about it. Since we proved that the green line is a perpendicular bisector for both $M_{18}M_{23}$ and $M_{45}M_{67}$, we can draw the two pairs of congruent right triangles on the right and on the left. By SAS, the two right side triangles and two left side triangles are congruent, meaning that the corresponding angles of the triangles are congruent.
      $endgroup$
      – Muchang Bahng
      Dec 27 '18 at 1:49
















    2












    $begingroup$

    enter image description hereIf this were graphed onto a coordinate plane temporarily, focus on the y-values of all points $A_1,A_2,...,A_8$.



    We know that $A_1=A_6$ and $A_2=A_5$, while $A_3+A_8=A_4+A_7$ since they are parallel chords. So, $frac{A_1+A_2+A_3+A_8}{4}=frac{A_4+A_5+A_6+A_7}{4}$. This is important because if we rewrite it, it is $frac{frac{A_1+A_8}{2} +frac{A_2+A_3}{2}}{2}$=$frac{frac{A_7+A_6}{2} +frac{A_4+A_5}{2}}{2}$, translating into $frac{M_{18}+M_{23}}{2}=frac{M_{67}+M_{45}}{2}$.



    So when we draw lines $M_{18}M_{23}$ and $M_{67}M_{45}$, their midpoints $M_{1823}$ and $M_{6745}$ have the same y-values. The two lines are also parallel, so the perpendicular bisectors of both $M_{18}M_{23}$ and $M_{67}M_{45}$ is the same line. For convenience, assume that this perpendicular bisector crosses over the black point in the diagram, call it K. By the properties of a perpendicular bisector on both $M_{18}M_{23}$ and $M_{67}M_{45}$, $KM_{67}=KM_{45}$ and $KM_{18}=KM_{23}$.



    Also, angle $M_{18}KM_{67}$ is congruent to the angle $M_{23}KM_{45}$, meaning that $M_{18}KM_{67}+M_{67}KM_{45}$=$M_{23}KM_{45}+M_{67}KM_{45}$ so $M_{18}KM_{45}=M_{67}KM_{23}$.



    Thus, by SAS, triangles $M_{18}KM_{45}$ and $M_{67}KM_{23}$ are congruent, meaning that $M_{67}M_{23}=M_{18}M_{45}$ and we're done.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      Why is this true: angle $M_{18}KM_{67}$ is congruent to the angle $M_{23}KM_{45}$?
      $endgroup$
      – Maria Mazur
      Dec 26 '18 at 12:57










    • $begingroup$
      Sorry for the relatively messy diagram, but I added a picture showing why
      $endgroup$
      – Muchang Bahng
      Dec 26 '18 at 16:15










    • $begingroup$
      How do you know that that green line actualy separate 2A and 2B angles?
      $endgroup$
      – Maria Mazur
      Dec 26 '18 at 16:34










    • $begingroup$
      +1 for effort :)
      $endgroup$
      – Maria Mazur
      Dec 26 '18 at 16:45










    • $begingroup$
      Haha, yea sorry for not being so clear about it. Since we proved that the green line is a perpendicular bisector for both $M_{18}M_{23}$ and $M_{45}M_{67}$, we can draw the two pairs of congruent right triangles on the right and on the left. By SAS, the two right side triangles and two left side triangles are congruent, meaning that the corresponding angles of the triangles are congruent.
      $endgroup$
      – Muchang Bahng
      Dec 27 '18 at 1:49














    2












    2








    2





    $begingroup$

    enter image description hereIf this were graphed onto a coordinate plane temporarily, focus on the y-values of all points $A_1,A_2,...,A_8$.



    We know that $A_1=A_6$ and $A_2=A_5$, while $A_3+A_8=A_4+A_7$ since they are parallel chords. So, $frac{A_1+A_2+A_3+A_8}{4}=frac{A_4+A_5+A_6+A_7}{4}$. This is important because if we rewrite it, it is $frac{frac{A_1+A_8}{2} +frac{A_2+A_3}{2}}{2}$=$frac{frac{A_7+A_6}{2} +frac{A_4+A_5}{2}}{2}$, translating into $frac{M_{18}+M_{23}}{2}=frac{M_{67}+M_{45}}{2}$.



    So when we draw lines $M_{18}M_{23}$ and $M_{67}M_{45}$, their midpoints $M_{1823}$ and $M_{6745}$ have the same y-values. The two lines are also parallel, so the perpendicular bisectors of both $M_{18}M_{23}$ and $M_{67}M_{45}$ is the same line. For convenience, assume that this perpendicular bisector crosses over the black point in the diagram, call it K. By the properties of a perpendicular bisector on both $M_{18}M_{23}$ and $M_{67}M_{45}$, $KM_{67}=KM_{45}$ and $KM_{18}=KM_{23}$.



    Also, angle $M_{18}KM_{67}$ is congruent to the angle $M_{23}KM_{45}$, meaning that $M_{18}KM_{67}+M_{67}KM_{45}$=$M_{23}KM_{45}+M_{67}KM_{45}$ so $M_{18}KM_{45}=M_{67}KM_{23}$.



    Thus, by SAS, triangles $M_{18}KM_{45}$ and $M_{67}KM_{23}$ are congruent, meaning that $M_{67}M_{23}=M_{18}M_{45}$ and we're done.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$



    enter image description hereIf this were graphed onto a coordinate plane temporarily, focus on the y-values of all points $A_1,A_2,...,A_8$.



    We know that $A_1=A_6$ and $A_2=A_5$, while $A_3+A_8=A_4+A_7$ since they are parallel chords. So, $frac{A_1+A_2+A_3+A_8}{4}=frac{A_4+A_5+A_6+A_7}{4}$. This is important because if we rewrite it, it is $frac{frac{A_1+A_8}{2} +frac{A_2+A_3}{2}}{2}$=$frac{frac{A_7+A_6}{2} +frac{A_4+A_5}{2}}{2}$, translating into $frac{M_{18}+M_{23}}{2}=frac{M_{67}+M_{45}}{2}$.



    So when we draw lines $M_{18}M_{23}$ and $M_{67}M_{45}$, their midpoints $M_{1823}$ and $M_{6745}$ have the same y-values. The two lines are also parallel, so the perpendicular bisectors of both $M_{18}M_{23}$ and $M_{67}M_{45}$ is the same line. For convenience, assume that this perpendicular bisector crosses over the black point in the diagram, call it K. By the properties of a perpendicular bisector on both $M_{18}M_{23}$ and $M_{67}M_{45}$, $KM_{67}=KM_{45}$ and $KM_{18}=KM_{23}$.



    Also, angle $M_{18}KM_{67}$ is congruent to the angle $M_{23}KM_{45}$, meaning that $M_{18}KM_{67}+M_{67}KM_{45}$=$M_{23}KM_{45}+M_{67}KM_{45}$ so $M_{18}KM_{45}=M_{67}KM_{23}$.



    Thus, by SAS, triangles $M_{18}KM_{45}$ and $M_{67}KM_{23}$ are congruent, meaning that $M_{67}M_{23}=M_{18}M_{45}$ and we're done.







    share|cite|improve this answer














    share|cite|improve this answer



    share|cite|improve this answer








    edited Dec 26 '18 at 16:16

























    answered Dec 26 '18 at 12:40









    Muchang BahngMuchang Bahng

    763




    763












    • $begingroup$
      Why is this true: angle $M_{18}KM_{67}$ is congruent to the angle $M_{23}KM_{45}$?
      $endgroup$
      – Maria Mazur
      Dec 26 '18 at 12:57










    • $begingroup$
      Sorry for the relatively messy diagram, but I added a picture showing why
      $endgroup$
      – Muchang Bahng
      Dec 26 '18 at 16:15










    • $begingroup$
      How do you know that that green line actualy separate 2A and 2B angles?
      $endgroup$
      – Maria Mazur
      Dec 26 '18 at 16:34










    • $begingroup$
      +1 for effort :)
      $endgroup$
      – Maria Mazur
      Dec 26 '18 at 16:45










    • $begingroup$
      Haha, yea sorry for not being so clear about it. Since we proved that the green line is a perpendicular bisector for both $M_{18}M_{23}$ and $M_{45}M_{67}$, we can draw the two pairs of congruent right triangles on the right and on the left. By SAS, the two right side triangles and two left side triangles are congruent, meaning that the corresponding angles of the triangles are congruent.
      $endgroup$
      – Muchang Bahng
      Dec 27 '18 at 1:49


















    • $begingroup$
      Why is this true: angle $M_{18}KM_{67}$ is congruent to the angle $M_{23}KM_{45}$?
      $endgroup$
      – Maria Mazur
      Dec 26 '18 at 12:57










    • $begingroup$
      Sorry for the relatively messy diagram, but I added a picture showing why
      $endgroup$
      – Muchang Bahng
      Dec 26 '18 at 16:15










    • $begingroup$
      How do you know that that green line actualy separate 2A and 2B angles?
      $endgroup$
      – Maria Mazur
      Dec 26 '18 at 16:34










    • $begingroup$
      +1 for effort :)
      $endgroup$
      – Maria Mazur
      Dec 26 '18 at 16:45










    • $begingroup$
      Haha, yea sorry for not being so clear about it. Since we proved that the green line is a perpendicular bisector for both $M_{18}M_{23}$ and $M_{45}M_{67}$, we can draw the two pairs of congruent right triangles on the right and on the left. By SAS, the two right side triangles and two left side triangles are congruent, meaning that the corresponding angles of the triangles are congruent.
      $endgroup$
      – Muchang Bahng
      Dec 27 '18 at 1:49
















    $begingroup$
    Why is this true: angle $M_{18}KM_{67}$ is congruent to the angle $M_{23}KM_{45}$?
    $endgroup$
    – Maria Mazur
    Dec 26 '18 at 12:57




    $begingroup$
    Why is this true: angle $M_{18}KM_{67}$ is congruent to the angle $M_{23}KM_{45}$?
    $endgroup$
    – Maria Mazur
    Dec 26 '18 at 12:57












    $begingroup$
    Sorry for the relatively messy diagram, but I added a picture showing why
    $endgroup$
    – Muchang Bahng
    Dec 26 '18 at 16:15




    $begingroup$
    Sorry for the relatively messy diagram, but I added a picture showing why
    $endgroup$
    – Muchang Bahng
    Dec 26 '18 at 16:15












    $begingroup$
    How do you know that that green line actualy separate 2A and 2B angles?
    $endgroup$
    – Maria Mazur
    Dec 26 '18 at 16:34




    $begingroup$
    How do you know that that green line actualy separate 2A and 2B angles?
    $endgroup$
    – Maria Mazur
    Dec 26 '18 at 16:34












    $begingroup$
    +1 for effort :)
    $endgroup$
    – Maria Mazur
    Dec 26 '18 at 16:45




    $begingroup$
    +1 for effort :)
    $endgroup$
    – Maria Mazur
    Dec 26 '18 at 16:45












    $begingroup$
    Haha, yea sorry for not being so clear about it. Since we proved that the green line is a perpendicular bisector for both $M_{18}M_{23}$ and $M_{45}M_{67}$, we can draw the two pairs of congruent right triangles on the right and on the left. By SAS, the two right side triangles and two left side triangles are congruent, meaning that the corresponding angles of the triangles are congruent.
    $endgroup$
    – Muchang Bahng
    Dec 27 '18 at 1:49




    $begingroup$
    Haha, yea sorry for not being so clear about it. Since we proved that the green line is a perpendicular bisector for both $M_{18}M_{23}$ and $M_{45}M_{67}$, we can draw the two pairs of congruent right triangles on the right and on the left. By SAS, the two right side triangles and two left side triangles are congruent, meaning that the corresponding angles of the triangles are congruent.
    $endgroup$
    – Muchang Bahng
    Dec 27 '18 at 1:49











    0












    $begingroup$

    Here is another solution motivated by Muchang Bahng writings:



    Set a coordinate system so that perpendicular bisector for $A_4A_7$ (which is also for $A_3A_8$) be a x-axsis and a perpenduclar bisector for $A_1A_6$ (which is also for $A_2A_4$) be a y-axsis, in particular, let $$ M_{17}= (2b,0);;;; {rm and } ;;;;M_{38}= (-2a,0)$$ and
    $$ M_{25}= (0,-2d);;;; {rm and } ;;;;M_{16}= (0,2c)$$



    then $$ A_{1}= (-2k,2c);;;; {rm and } ;;;;A_{6}= (2k,2c)$$
    $$ A_{2}= (-2l,-2d);;;; {rm and } ;;;;A_{5}= (2l,-2d)$$
    $$ A_{3}= (-2a,-2m);;;; {rm and } ;;;;A_{8}= (-2a,2m)$$
    $$ A_{4}= (2b,-2n);;;; {rm and } ;;;;A_{7}= (2b,2n)$$
    thus $$ M_{18}= (-a-k,c+d);;;; {rm and } ;;;;M_{23}= (-l-a,-m-a)$$
    $$ M_{45}= (l+b,-n-d);;;; {rm and } ;;;;M_{67}= (b+k,n+c)$$
    So $$ overline{M_{18}M_{45}}^2 = (c+m+n+d)^2+(l+b+a+k)^2 = overline{M_{23}M_{67}}^2$$
    and we are done.



    Hmm, much easier then first solution and we never used that $A_i$ are actualy on a circle!






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$


















      0












      $begingroup$

      Here is another solution motivated by Muchang Bahng writings:



      Set a coordinate system so that perpendicular bisector for $A_4A_7$ (which is also for $A_3A_8$) be a x-axsis and a perpenduclar bisector for $A_1A_6$ (which is also for $A_2A_4$) be a y-axsis, in particular, let $$ M_{17}= (2b,0);;;; {rm and } ;;;;M_{38}= (-2a,0)$$ and
      $$ M_{25}= (0,-2d);;;; {rm and } ;;;;M_{16}= (0,2c)$$



      then $$ A_{1}= (-2k,2c);;;; {rm and } ;;;;A_{6}= (2k,2c)$$
      $$ A_{2}= (-2l,-2d);;;; {rm and } ;;;;A_{5}= (2l,-2d)$$
      $$ A_{3}= (-2a,-2m);;;; {rm and } ;;;;A_{8}= (-2a,2m)$$
      $$ A_{4}= (2b,-2n);;;; {rm and } ;;;;A_{7}= (2b,2n)$$
      thus $$ M_{18}= (-a-k,c+d);;;; {rm and } ;;;;M_{23}= (-l-a,-m-a)$$
      $$ M_{45}= (l+b,-n-d);;;; {rm and } ;;;;M_{67}= (b+k,n+c)$$
      So $$ overline{M_{18}M_{45}}^2 = (c+m+n+d)^2+(l+b+a+k)^2 = overline{M_{23}M_{67}}^2$$
      and we are done.



      Hmm, much easier then first solution and we never used that $A_i$ are actualy on a circle!






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$
















        0












        0








        0





        $begingroup$

        Here is another solution motivated by Muchang Bahng writings:



        Set a coordinate system so that perpendicular bisector for $A_4A_7$ (which is also for $A_3A_8$) be a x-axsis and a perpenduclar bisector for $A_1A_6$ (which is also for $A_2A_4$) be a y-axsis, in particular, let $$ M_{17}= (2b,0);;;; {rm and } ;;;;M_{38}= (-2a,0)$$ and
        $$ M_{25}= (0,-2d);;;; {rm and } ;;;;M_{16}= (0,2c)$$



        then $$ A_{1}= (-2k,2c);;;; {rm and } ;;;;A_{6}= (2k,2c)$$
        $$ A_{2}= (-2l,-2d);;;; {rm and } ;;;;A_{5}= (2l,-2d)$$
        $$ A_{3}= (-2a,-2m);;;; {rm and } ;;;;A_{8}= (-2a,2m)$$
        $$ A_{4}= (2b,-2n);;;; {rm and } ;;;;A_{7}= (2b,2n)$$
        thus $$ M_{18}= (-a-k,c+d);;;; {rm and } ;;;;M_{23}= (-l-a,-m-a)$$
        $$ M_{45}= (l+b,-n-d);;;; {rm and } ;;;;M_{67}= (b+k,n+c)$$
        So $$ overline{M_{18}M_{45}}^2 = (c+m+n+d)^2+(l+b+a+k)^2 = overline{M_{23}M_{67}}^2$$
        and we are done.



        Hmm, much easier then first solution and we never used that $A_i$ are actualy on a circle!






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        Here is another solution motivated by Muchang Bahng writings:



        Set a coordinate system so that perpendicular bisector for $A_4A_7$ (which is also for $A_3A_8$) be a x-axsis and a perpenduclar bisector for $A_1A_6$ (which is also for $A_2A_4$) be a y-axsis, in particular, let $$ M_{17}= (2b,0);;;; {rm and } ;;;;M_{38}= (-2a,0)$$ and
        $$ M_{25}= (0,-2d);;;; {rm and } ;;;;M_{16}= (0,2c)$$



        then $$ A_{1}= (-2k,2c);;;; {rm and } ;;;;A_{6}= (2k,2c)$$
        $$ A_{2}= (-2l,-2d);;;; {rm and } ;;;;A_{5}= (2l,-2d)$$
        $$ A_{3}= (-2a,-2m);;;; {rm and } ;;;;A_{8}= (-2a,2m)$$
        $$ A_{4}= (2b,-2n);;;; {rm and } ;;;;A_{7}= (2b,2n)$$
        thus $$ M_{18}= (-a-k,c+d);;;; {rm and } ;;;;M_{23}= (-l-a,-m-a)$$
        $$ M_{45}= (l+b,-n-d);;;; {rm and } ;;;;M_{67}= (b+k,n+c)$$
        So $$ overline{M_{18}M_{45}}^2 = (c+m+n+d)^2+(l+b+a+k)^2 = overline{M_{23}M_{67}}^2$$
        and we are done.



        Hmm, much easier then first solution and we never used that $A_i$ are actualy on a circle!







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Dec 26 '18 at 14:49









        Maria MazurMaria Mazur

        46.6k1260119




        46.6k1260119






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3052828%2fmiddle-lines-in-octagon-are-congruent%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Wiesbaden

            Marschland

            Dieringhausen