Number of Prime factors of a Number
$begingroup$
Find the number of prime factors of $(30)^7 times (22)^5 times (34)^{11}$
My Work
The prime factorisation of the above number is $2^{34} times 3^7 times 5^7 times 11^5 times 17^{11}$
Now the number of distinct prime factors of the number is 5.
But total prime factors are=$34+7+7+5+11$
Am I going correct way?
number-theory
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Find the number of prime factors of $(30)^7 times (22)^5 times (34)^{11}$
My Work
The prime factorisation of the above number is $2^{34} times 3^7 times 5^7 times 11^5 times 17^{11}$
Now the number of distinct prime factors of the number is 5.
But total prime factors are=$34+7+7+5+11$
Am I going correct way?
number-theory
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
If the prime factorization is indeed as it is given, then it suggests only that the question is poorly framed. (Unless the answer is indeed $5$ but I doubt you'd be here if that's the case.) Could you please quote, word for word, the exact question? Because something is not adding up right here.
$endgroup$
– Eevee Trainer
Dec 26 '18 at 10:08
1
$begingroup$
The reasonable interpretation of this question (if there is no further context) would be to count the distinct prime factors.
$endgroup$
– Peter
Dec 26 '18 at 10:24
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Find the number of prime factors of $(30)^7 times (22)^5 times (34)^{11}$
My Work
The prime factorisation of the above number is $2^{34} times 3^7 times 5^7 times 11^5 times 17^{11}$
Now the number of distinct prime factors of the number is 5.
But total prime factors are=$34+7+7+5+11$
Am I going correct way?
number-theory
$endgroup$
Find the number of prime factors of $(30)^7 times (22)^5 times (34)^{11}$
My Work
The prime factorisation of the above number is $2^{34} times 3^7 times 5^7 times 11^5 times 17^{11}$
Now the number of distinct prime factors of the number is 5.
But total prime factors are=$34+7+7+5+11$
Am I going correct way?
number-theory
number-theory
asked Dec 26 '18 at 10:07
user3767495user3767495
4078
4078
2
$begingroup$
If the prime factorization is indeed as it is given, then it suggests only that the question is poorly framed. (Unless the answer is indeed $5$ but I doubt you'd be here if that's the case.) Could you please quote, word for word, the exact question? Because something is not adding up right here.
$endgroup$
– Eevee Trainer
Dec 26 '18 at 10:08
1
$begingroup$
The reasonable interpretation of this question (if there is no further context) would be to count the distinct prime factors.
$endgroup$
– Peter
Dec 26 '18 at 10:24
add a comment |
2
$begingroup$
If the prime factorization is indeed as it is given, then it suggests only that the question is poorly framed. (Unless the answer is indeed $5$ but I doubt you'd be here if that's the case.) Could you please quote, word for word, the exact question? Because something is not adding up right here.
$endgroup$
– Eevee Trainer
Dec 26 '18 at 10:08
1
$begingroup$
The reasonable interpretation of this question (if there is no further context) would be to count the distinct prime factors.
$endgroup$
– Peter
Dec 26 '18 at 10:24
2
2
$begingroup$
If the prime factorization is indeed as it is given, then it suggests only that the question is poorly framed. (Unless the answer is indeed $5$ but I doubt you'd be here if that's the case.) Could you please quote, word for word, the exact question? Because something is not adding up right here.
$endgroup$
– Eevee Trainer
Dec 26 '18 at 10:08
$begingroup$
If the prime factorization is indeed as it is given, then it suggests only that the question is poorly framed. (Unless the answer is indeed $5$ but I doubt you'd be here if that's the case.) Could you please quote, word for word, the exact question? Because something is not adding up right here.
$endgroup$
– Eevee Trainer
Dec 26 '18 at 10:08
1
1
$begingroup$
The reasonable interpretation of this question (if there is no further context) would be to count the distinct prime factors.
$endgroup$
– Peter
Dec 26 '18 at 10:24
$begingroup$
The reasonable interpretation of this question (if there is no further context) would be to count the distinct prime factors.
$endgroup$
– Peter
Dec 26 '18 at 10:24
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3052803%2fnumber-of-prime-factors-of-a-number%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3052803%2fnumber-of-prime-factors-of-a-number%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
2
$begingroup$
If the prime factorization is indeed as it is given, then it suggests only that the question is poorly framed. (Unless the answer is indeed $5$ but I doubt you'd be here if that's the case.) Could you please quote, word for word, the exact question? Because something is not adding up right here.
$endgroup$
– Eevee Trainer
Dec 26 '18 at 10:08
1
$begingroup$
The reasonable interpretation of this question (if there is no further context) would be to count the distinct prime factors.
$endgroup$
– Peter
Dec 26 '18 at 10:24